Core outcome set for children with neurological impairment and tube feeding

Push-PEG or Pull-PEG: Does the Technique Matter? A Prospective Study Comparing Outcomes After Gastrostomy Placement

BACKGROUND

Push-PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) with T-fastener fixation (PEG-T) allows one-step insertion of a balloon tube or button, and avoids contamination of the stoma by oral bacteria. However, PEG-T is a technically more demanding procedure with a significant learning curve. The aim of the present study was to compare outcomes after PEG-T and pull-PEG in a setting where both procedures were well established.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study is a prospective cohort study including all patients between 0 and 18 year undergoing PEG-T and pull-PEG between 2017 and 2020 at a combined local and tertiary referral center. Complications and parent reported outcomes were recorded during hospital stay, after 14 days and 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

82 (93%) of eligible PEG-T and 37 (86%) pull-PEG patients were included. The groups were not significantly different with regard to age or weight. Malignant disorders and heart conditions were more frequent in the pull-PEG group, whilst neurodevelopmental disorders were more frequent in the PEG-T group (p < 0.001). 54% in both groups had a complication within 2 weeks. Late complications (between 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively) occurred in 63% PEG-T vs 62% pull-PEG patients (p = 0.896). More parents in the pull-PEG group (49%) reported that the gastrostomy tube restricted their child's activity, compared to PEG-T (24%) (p = 0.01). At 3 months follow-up, more pull-PEG patients (43%) reported discomfort from the gastrostomy compared to PEG-T (21%) (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Overall complication rates were approximately similar, but pull-PEG was associated with more discomfort and restriction of activity.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Treatment study level II.

Hospital-to-home transitions for children with medical complexity: part 2-a core outcome set

Appropriate outcome measures as part of high-quality intervention trials are critical to advancing hospital-to-home transitions for Children with Medical Complexity (CMC). Our aim was to conduct a Delphi study and focus groups to identify a Core Outcome Set (COS) that healthcare professionals and parents consider essential outcomes for future intervention research. The development process consisted of two phases: (1) a three-round Delphi study in which different professionals rated outcomes, previously described in a systematic review, for inclusion in the COS and (2) focus groups with parents of CMC to validate the results of the Delphi study. Forty-five professionals participated in the Delphi study. The response rates were 55%, 57%, and 58% in the three rounds, respectively. In addition to the 24 outcomes from the literature, the participants suggested 12 additional outcomes. The Delphi rounds resulted in the following core outcomes: (1) disease management, (2) child's quality of life, and (3) impact on the life of families. Two focus groups with seven parents highlighted another core outcome: (4) self-efficacy of parents.   Conclusion: An evidence-informed COS has been developed based on consensus among healthcare professionals and parents. These core outcomes could facilitate standard reporting in future CMC hospital to home transition research. This study facilitated the next step of COS development: selecting the appropriate measurement instruments for every outcome. What is Known: • Hospital-to-home transition for Children with Medical Complexity is a challenging process. • The use of core outcome sets could improve the quality and consistency of research reporting, ultimately leading to better outcomes for children and families. What is New: • The Core Outcome Set for transitional care for Children with Medical Complexity includes four outcomes: disease management, children's quality of life, impact on the life of families, and self-efficacy of parents.

Blended diet for enteral tube feeding in young people: A systematic review of the benefits and complications

BACKGROUND

Interest and use of blended diets (BD) for young people who are tube fed has significantly increased in the last decade, driven primarily by the desires of motivated caregivers. This review identified, appraised and synthesised the available evidence on the benefits and complications of BD versus commercial feeds.

METHODS

A systematic review following PRISMA guidance and registered with PROSPERO was conducted across PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus and Cochrane up to August 2022.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

English language studies including (1) children, (2) original research (interventional and observational) and (3) examination of BD outcomes. Exclusion criteria were (1) unoriginal research or case reports, (2) focus on feeding management, preparations or attitudes and (3) comparing commercial blends only. Data were synthesised using an established narrative synthesis approach using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and six database results were identified and 61 were sought for retrieval. A full-text article review revealed seven eligible studies, involving 267 participants (age range 9 months to 26 years). Studies reported differences in gastrointestinal symptoms (n = 222), medication use (n = 119), growth (n = 189) and complications or adverse events (n = 91). The results indicate positive outcomes, particularly in gastrointestinal symptom control, with few reports of mild adverse events in the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a paucity of data in this area and much heterogeneity in the included studies, but the available literature points towards positive outcomes. This is an important and highly relevant topic, and more primary research, ideally using standardised reporting, is required to answer the key questions.

Capturing Meaningful Outcomes in -Pediatric Neurology: Further Reflections on Principles, Challenges, and Opportunities

Patient and public involvement in health care is considered indispensable in the way we conduct daily pediatric neurology practice, and in the development and utilization of health outcome measurements. This essay examines what meaningful quality evaluations and measurements are, describes the development of approaches to measuring health and outcomes, explores the potential applications of patient-reported outcome measures in pediatric neurology, and identifies opportunities and challenges in using patient-reported outcome measurements in our daily clinical practice. Recent developments have transformed our attitude on how to help children with neurological and developmental conditions and their families: specifically, (1) the recognition of the fundamental rights of children with disabilities; (2) the application of the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health by the World Health Organization that views health from the perspective of both biopsychosocial strengths and functional abilities; (3) the application of qualitative research methodologies to children with neurological conditions and their caregivers to elucidate what they consider essential for their own good health and well-being; and (4) the development of core outcome measurements sets for children and adults with various neurological and developmental conditions. In summary, supporting patients in their role as full partners in clinical care and research enables them to contribute their experiential knowledge and helps ensure that results are relevant and address patient needs, preferences, and priorities. Recognizing the importance of involving young people in their health management decisions has become central in contemporary medicine and needs to be part of the curriculum of all health care professionals.

Identifying common health indicators from paediatric core outcome sets: a systematic review with narrative synthesis using the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Health and Disability

BACKGROUND

Indicators of child health have the potential to inform societal conversations, decision-making and prioritisation. Paediatric core outcome sets are an increasingly common way of identifying a minimum set of outcomes for trials within clinical groups. Exploring commonality across existing sets may give insight into universally important and inclusive child health indicators.

METHODS

A search of the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trial register from 2008 to 2022 was carried out. Eligible articles were those reporting on core outcome sets focused on children and young people aged 0-18 years old. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) was used as a framework to categorise extracted outcomes. Information about the involvement of children, young people and their families in the development of sets was also extracted.

RESULTS

206 articles were identified, of which 36 were included. 441 unique outcomes were extracted, mapping to 22 outcome clusters present across multiple sets. Medical diagnostic outcomes were the biggest cluster, followed by pain, communication and social interaction, mobility, self-care and school. Children and young people's views were under-represented across core outcome sets, with only 36% of reviewed studies including them at any stage of development.

CONCLUSIONS

Existing paediatric core outcome sets show overlap in key outcomes, suggesting the potential for generic child health measurement frameworks. It is unclear whether existing sets best reflect health dimensions important to children and young people, and there is a need for better child and young person involvement in health indicator development to address this.

From Philanthropy to Clinical Care through Research: Impact of the Norman Saunders Complex Care Initiative

Norman Saunders was a respected academic community paediatrician who was passionate about the care of children with medical complexity. Following his untimely death at age 60, patients, friends, and colleagues raised funds to create the Norman Saunders Complex Care Initiative (NSCCI). Dr. Saunders’s vision was a comprehensive, coordinated, and integrated clinical program for children with medical complexity that was informed by research evidence. The objective of this review was to evaluate the impact of targeted philanthropic funding on research, clinical care, and policy. Since 2006, NSCCI funds have been used to support interdisciplinary and innovative research. Funded projects have reflected a breadth of research questions (clinical care, training, health system delivery, social determinants), disciplines, and methods, and the research results have informed and helped build an internationally renowned clinical program in complex care. Philanthropic funding was the foundation for the NSCCI, which over the last 15 years has built research and clinical capacity, catalysed clinical and research networks, helped train paediatric residents, influenced policy, and improved the health and well-being of children with medical complexity and their families across Canada, and beyond.

Patient perspectives in pediatric neurology: a critical shift in the paradigm of outcome measurement

This review explores children's self-reported outcome measurements in pediatric neurology. We examine the following questions: (1) What is meant by patient-reported health, functioning, and quality of life outcomes? (2) How can patients express whether the interventions they receive do more good than harm? (3) Why and how should pediatric neurology patients help determine the outcomes of interest? (4) What tools and recommendations are available to evaluate the outcomes of interest? Applying patients' perspectives across the processes of evaluation of medical interventions has become an important expectation. These developments, consistent with current healthcare goals, coincide with the evolution of pediatric neurology into a sophisticated diagnostic-interventional field that aims to prolong survival, decrease impairments and symptoms, and improve patients' well-being - the recognized essential endpoints of interest in all medicine.

Outcomes for gastrostomy-fed children and their parents: qualitative findings from the 'Your Tube' study

AIM

To identify child and parent outcomes relevant to having a gastrostomy, and to specify outcomes believed to be particularly salient to type of diet (formula vs blended food).

METHOD

Twenty parents, two children (both 12y), and 41 professionals (dietitians [n=10]; nurses [n=12]; paediatricians [n=12]; speech and language therapists [n=7)]) were recruited. Parents and children were interviewed; professionals participated in focus groups. Children (2-18y) represented included those on formula (n=11), blended-food (n=7), and mixed (n=2) diets. All had been tube-fed for at least 6 months. Neurological, genetic, and metabolic conditions were represented.

RESULTS

Participants identified a range of children's outcomes relevant to a gastrostomy, including physical health, gastrointestinal symptoms, sleep, and time spent feeding. The children described experiences of exclusion caused by being tube-fed. Time, sleep, and emotional health were regarded as most salient to understanding parents' gastrostomy outcomes. Participants believed type of diet would most likely effect gastrointestinal symptoms, time spent feeding, sleep, and physical health.

INTERPRETATION

Findings indicate a number of refinements to, and allow further specification of, the current 'initial' core outcome set for tube-fed children. Findings also have implications for choice of outcomes measures. Further qualitative research with children and young people is needed. What this paper adds Sleep is a key outcome for children and parents. Gastrointestinal symptoms and physical health were regarded as outcomes most likely to be affected by type of diet. Well-being and participation were identified as key distal outcomes. Gastrostomies are complex interventions. Further specification of the core outcome set is possible.

Core Outcome Sets for Medium-Chain Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency and Phenylketonuria

BACKGROUND

Evidence to guide treatment of pediatric medium-chain acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency and phenylketonuria (PKU) is fragmented because of large variability in outcome selection and measurement. Our goal was to develop core outcome sets (COSs) for these diseases to facilitate meaningful future evidence generation and enhance the capacity to compare and synthesize findings across studies.

METHODS

Parents and/or caregivers, health professionals, and health policy advisors completed a Delphi survey and participated in a consensus workshop to select core outcomes from candidate lists of outcomes for MCAD deficiency and PKU. Delphi participants rated the importance of outcomes on a nine-point scale (1-3: not important, 4-6: important but not critical, 7-9: critical). Candidate outcomes were progressively narrowed down over 3 survey rounds. At the workshop, participants evaluated the remaining candidate outcomes using an adapted nominal technique, open discussion, and voting. After the workshop, we finalized the COSs and recommended measurement instruments for each outcome.

RESULTS

There were 85, 61, and 53 participants across 3 Delphi rounds, respectively. The candidate core outcome lists were narrowed down to 20 outcomes per disease to be discussed at the consensus workshop. Voting by 18 workshop participants led to COSs composed of 8 and 9 outcomes for MCAD deficiency and PKU, respectively, with measurement recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

These are the first known pediatric COSs for MCAD deficiency and PKU. Adoption in future studies will help to ensure best use of limited research resources to ultimately improve care for children with these rare diseases.

Parenting children who are enterally fed: How families go from surviving to thriving

BACKGROUND

Complex feeding difficulties requiring enteral (tube) feeding affect everyone around the child. Parents experience additional stress and are at risk of social isolation. This study investigated the strategies families develop and use to adjust and adapt to enteral feeding so they were not just surviving but thriving as a family.

METHODS

Twenty parents whose children had been or continued to be enterally fed were interviewed, four of them twice as their experience of enteral feeding progressed. Learning theory was used to conceptualize findings in terms of changing use of tools that mediated parents' response to feeding-related challenges.

RESULTS

Parents encountered dilemmas relating to enteral feeding: maintaining participation in everyday activities, managing responses to the use of tubes for feeding, and doing what feels right for their child. They used four kinds of mediating tools to overcome these: memory aids and readiness tools, metaphors and narratives, repurposed everyday objects and personalized routines and materialities.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel account of tool used to resolve dilemmas provides an empirically and theoretically grounded basis for supporting parents to thrive despite the challenges of enteral feeding. Specifically, it can guide information given to help parents anticipate and cope with dilemmas arising from enteral feeding.

A systematic review of outcomes reported inpediatric perioperative research: A report from the Pediatric Perioperative Outcomes Group

The Pediatric Perioperative Outcomes Group (PPOG) is an international collaborative of clinical investigators and clinicians within the subspecialty of pediatric anesthesiology and perioperative care which aims to use COMET (Core Outcomes Measures in Effectiveness Trials) methodology to develop core outcome setsfor infants, children and young people that are tailored to the priorities of the pediatric surgical population.Focusing on four age-dependent patient subpopulations determined a priori for core outcome set development: i) neonates and former preterm infants (up to 60 weeks postmenstrual age); ii) infants (>60 weeks postmenstrual age - <1 year); iii) toddlers and school age children (>1-<13 years); and iv) adolescents (>13-<18 years), we conducted a systematic review of outcomes reported in perioperative studies that include participants within age-dependent pediatric subpopulations. Our review of pediatric perioperative controlled trials published from 2008 to 2018 identified 724 articles reporting 3192 outcome measures. The proportion of published trials and the most frequently reported outcomes varied across pre-determined age groups. Outcomes related to patient comfort, particularly pain and analgesic requirement, were the most frequent domain for infants, children and adolescents. Clinical indicators, particularly cardiorespiratory or medication-related adverse events, were the most common outcomes for neonates and infants < 60 weeks and were the second most frequent domain at all other ages. Neonates and infants <60 weeks of age were significantly under-represented in perioperative trials. Patient-centered outcomes, heath care utilization, and bleeding/transfusion related outcomes were less often reported. In most studies, outcomes were measured in the immediate perioperative period, with the duration often restricted to the post-anesthesia care unit or the first 24 postoperative hours. The outcomes identified with this systematic review will be combined with patient centered outcomes identified through a subsequent stakeholder engagement study to arrive at a core outcome set for each age-specific group.