Adverse outcomes after major surgery in children with intellectual disability

In-hospital outcomes in people with autism and epilepsy - A population-based study

Autism is a common comorbid diagnosis in those with epilepsy. Understanding the health needs and outcomes in patients with this dual diagnosis is important for optimizing healthcare outcomes. We compared hospital-level variables amongst patients with co-occurring autism and epilepsy, to those with epilepsy alone. Non-elective hospital admissions amongst patients with epilepsy alone and co-occurring autism and epilepsy were identified in the 2003-14 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) using previously validated ICD-9-CM case definitions. One patient with co-occurring epilepsy and autism was matched to three epilepsy patients for age and sex. Multinomial logistic regressions were performed to examine outcomes of interest. Compared to those with epilepsy alone (n = 27,762), patients with autism and epilepsy (n = 9254) had a higher odds of transfer to another facility (OR = 1.09, p = 0.048), in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.36, p = 0.011), longer mean length of stay (5.63 days vs. 5.12 days, p < 0.0001), and septicemia (4.21 % vs. 3.08 %, p < 0.0001). Distributions of demographics, insurance type, socioeconomic status, and comorbidities significantly differed between both groups. Our findings demonstrate that patients with comorbid autism and epilepsy are a unique population with health outcomes significantly differing from those with epilepsy alone. Given the effect that dual diagnosis has on hospital trajectory, focused treatment plans must be adopted to optimize care and hospital outcomes in these patients.

Association of Intellectual Disability with Delayed Presentation and Worse Outcomes in Emergency General Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between intellectual disability and both severity of disease and clinical outcomes among patients presenting with common emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions.

BACKGROUND

Accurate and timely diagnosis of EGS conditions is crucial for optimal management and patient outcomes. Individuals with intellectual disabilities may be at increased risk of delayed presentation and worse outcomes for EGS; however, little is known about surgical outcomes in this population.

METHODS

Using the 2012-2017 Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of adult patients admitted for 9 common EGS conditions. We performed multivariable logistic and linear regression to examine the association between intellectual disability and the following outcomes: EGS disease severity at presentation, any surgery, complications, mortality, length of stay, discharge disposition, and inpatient costs. Analyses were adjusted for patient demographics and facility traits.

RESULTS

Of 1,317,572 adult EGS admissions, 5,062 (0.38%) patients had a concurrent ICD-9/-10 code consistent with intellectual disability. EGS patients with intellectual disabilities had 31% higher odds of more severe disease at presentation compared with neurotypical patients (aOR 1.31; 95% CI 1.17-1.48). Intellectual disability was also associated with a higher rate of complications and mortality, longer lengths of stay, lower rate of discharge to home, and higher inpatient costs.

CONCLUSION

EGS patients with intellectual disabilities are at increased risk of more severe presentation and worse outcomes. The underlying causes of delayed presentation and worse outcomes must be better characterized to address the disparities in surgical care for this often under-recognized but highly vulnerable population.

Exploring patient safety outcomes for people with learning disabilities in acute hospital settings: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

To produce a narrative synthesis of published academic and grey literature focusing on patient safety outcomes for people with learning disabilities in an acute hospital setting.

DESIGN

Scoping review with narrative synthesis.

METHODS

The review followed the six stages of the Arksey and O'Malley framework. We searched four research databases from January 2000 to March 2021, in addition to handsearching and backwards searching using terms relating to our eligibility criteria-patient safety and adverse events, learning disability and hospital setting. Following stakeholder input, we searched grey literature databases and specific websites of known organisations until March 2020. Potentially relevant articles and grey literature materials were screened against the eligibility criteria. Findings were extracted and collated in data charting forms.

RESULTS

45 academic articles and 33 grey literature materials were included, and we organised the findings around six concepts: (1) adverse events, patient safety and quality of care; (2) maternal and infant outcomes; (3) postoperative outcomes; (4) role of family and carers; (5) understanding needs in hospital and (6) supporting initiatives, recommendations and good practice examples. The findings suggest inequalities and inequities for a range of specific patient safety outcomes including adverse events, quality of care, maternal and infant outcomes and postoperative outcomes, in addition to potential protective factors, such as the roles of family and carers and the extent to which health professionals are able to understand the needs of people with learning disabilities.

CONCLUSION

People with learning disabilities appear to experience poorer patient safety outcomes in hospital. The involvement of family and carers, and understanding and effectively meeting the needs of people with learning disabilities may play a protective role. Promising interventions and examples of good practice exist, however many of these have not been implemented consistently and warrant further robust evaluation.