Effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for the prevention and treatment of foot ulcers in people with diabetes: a systematic review

The quest for wellness: How to optimise self-care strategies for diabetic foot management?

Diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) is common and highly recurrent, negatively impacting the individuals' quality of life. The 2023 guidelines of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot emphasise that adherence to foot self-care recommendations is one of the most important factors in DFU prevention. These guidelines also briefly mention that depression and other psychosocial problems can hamper treatment and ulcer healing. Moreover, a new clinical question was added on psychological interventions for ulcer prevention, although the evidence regarding the role of psychological and social factors is still limited. To help the field progress, this narrative overview discusses how a stronger focus on psychological factors by both researchers and clinicians could improve the care for people at high DFU risk. The review starts with a testimony of a person living with DFU, explaining that for him, the absence of shared decision-making has been a key barrier to successful foot self-care implementation. Intervention studies that address patient-reported barriers are still scarce, and are therefore urgently needed. Furthermore, the key elements of psychological interventions found to be successful in managing diabetes are yet to be implemented in DFU risk management. Importantly, research evidence indicates that commonly advocated foot self-care recommendations may be insufficient in preventing DFU recurrence, whereas digital technology appears to effectively reduce recurrent DFU. More research is therefore needed to identify determinants of patient acceptance of digital technology.

Psychosocial Care for People With Diabetic Neuropathy: Time for Action

Psychological factors and psychosocial care for individuals with diabetic neuropathy (DN), a common and burdensome complication of diabetes, are important but overlooked areas. In this article we focus on common clinical manifestations of DN, unremitting neuropathic pain, postural instability, and foot complications, and their psychosocial impact, including depression, anxiety, poor sleep quality, and specific problems such as fear of falling and fear of amputation. We also summarize the evidence regarding the negative impact of psychological factors such as depression on DN, self-care tasks, and future health outcomes. The clinical problem of underdetection and undertreatment of psychological problems is described, together with the value of using brief assessments of these in clinical care. We conclude by discussing trial evidence regarding the effectiveness of current pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches and also future directions for developing and testing new psychological treatments for DN and its clinical manifestations.

The effectiveness of foot care educational interventions for people living with diabetes mellitus: An umbrella review

BACKGROUND

Diabetes Mellitus is a public health problem becoming more prevalent. Diabetic foot is a debilitating condition caused by diabetes mellitus. Diabetic foot, which includes foot ulceration, infection, and destruction of tissues may necessitate amputation.

AIM

The aim of this review is to derive evidence from existing systematic reviews and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of foot care educational interventions, directly aimed at people living with diabetes.

METHODS

A systematic search was implemented using biomedical citation databases including Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO. Major repositories of systematic reviews such as the JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the PROSPERO register were also searched. The search also included a grey literature search and manual searches of reference lists contained within review studies and other relevant published reviews. The umbrella review searched for articles published from January 2016 to 2021 to ensure sources were current and reflected the most recent interventions.

RESULTS

This umbrella review is the first to collect and summarise the evidence from existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses of foot care educational interventions directly aimed at people living with diabetes. It reports findings from nine systematic reviews on the evaluation of foot care educational interventions. The number of studies included in each review ranged from 6 to 81. A total of 314 primary studies were included. After examining the overlap between studies reported in multiple reviews, 82 were included in the final review. Without providing effective and consistent preventive and prophylactic foot care, creating, and testing interventions, integrating the concept into practice will remain challenging.

CONCLUSION

Currently, most educational foot care intervention programmes concentrate on a single intervention. However, there is insufficient evidence that a single educational intervention effectively reduces the occurrence of ulcers and amputations or improves patients' knowledge and behaviour. Two studies used complex interventions, and they reduced the incidence amputation and foot ulceration incidence for people living with diabetes.

Relax to Heal? Perspectives of Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Health Professionals on Relaxation Sessions for Wound Healing

OBJECTIVE

To explore patients' and healthcare professionals' (HPs') perspectives on the suitability/acceptability of a relaxation intervention, its effects on patients' well-being and diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) healing, and its incorporation into the multidisciplinary management of patients with diabetic foot.

METHODS

This qualitative study was nested within a three-arm pilot randomized controlled trial. Patients with a chronic DFU received four relaxation sessions. Investigators then interviewed patients, physicians, and nurses involved with diabetic foot consultations. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic content analysis.

RESULTS

Five themes emerged from patient's interviews about the suitability/acceptability of the relaxation intervention: perceptions regarding the psychological intervention, distress, the relaxation technique, changes in the patient's life, and changes in DFU/contribution to healing. Three themes emerged from interviews with HPs: perceptions regarding relaxation, changes in the patient, and changes in DFU/healing. Regarding the feasibility of the relaxation intervention, three themes emerged for both patients and HPs: suggested modifications, stressors/difficulties, and impact of COVID-19 pandemic. The utility theme emerged only in HP interviews, with subthemes of patients' distress, psychological interventions, relaxation intervention, and integration of the psychologist in the team.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide evidence for the suitability/acceptability, feasibility, and utility of a relaxation intervention in diabetic foot consultations.

A Comprehensive Therapeutic Patient Education May Improve Wound Healing and Reduce Ulcer Recurrence and Mortality in Persons With Type 2 Diabetes

OBJECTIVES

The impact of a comprehensive therapeutic patient education (TPE) on the prognosis of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) has not yet been evaluated in the literature. The purpose of this study was to determine whether TPE is a predictor of outcome in type 2 diabetes patients with DFU.

METHODS

We evaluated 583 consecutive individuals with a recent and single DFU. They were treated and followed for 42.8±23.3 months. Patients were divided into 2 groups. The TPE group included subjects who had been receiving regular sessions of a comprehensive TPE, including a specific foot care education (FCE), for at least 12 months before DFU occurred (n=129). The non-TPE group comprised the remaining subjects (n=454). All 583 patients received intensive FCE during the treatment period.

RESULTS

We identified a significantly higher percentage of healed DFUs (96.0% vs 74.9%; p<0.0001) and a lower percentage of major amputations (0.8% vs 4.4%; p=0.0511), minor amputations (1.6% vs 12.3%; p=0.0003), DFU persistence (1.6% vs 8.4%; p=0.0069) and deaths (1.6% vs 21.4%; p<0.0001) in the TPE group than in the non-TPE group. Among 464 patients with healed ulcers, the proportion of subjects with re-ulceration was greater in the non-TPE group than in the TPE group (48.8% vs 6.5%; p<0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that TPE can predict healing (odds ratio [OR], 4.202; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.604 to 11.004; p=0.0035) and may significantly reduce DFU recurrence (OR, 0.093; 95% CI, 0.043 to 0.201; p<0.0001) and mortality (OR, 0.096; 95% CI, 0.022 to 0.410; p=0.0016).

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive TPE may have a positive impact on wound healing, ulcer recurrence and mortality in people with DFU.

Remotely Delivered Monitoring and Management of Diabetes-Related Foot Disease: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

BACKGROUND

Diabetes-related foot disease (DFD) management requires input from multiple healthcare professionals, and has worse outcomes for people living in remote localities by comparison to urban areas. Remotely delivered healthcare may reduce this disparity. This overview summarizes current evidence on the effectiveness, stakeholder perceptions, and cost-effectiveness of remotely delivered healthcare for DFD.

METHODS

A search of 5 databases was conducted to identify systematic reviews published between January 2000 and June 2020. Eligible reviews were those evaluating remotely delivered monitoring or management of patients at risk of or with active DFD, or clinicians managing these patients. Risk of bias was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 tool.

RESULTS

Eight reviews were eligible for inclusion, including 88 primary studies and 8509 participants, of which 36 studies involving 4357 participants evaluated remotely delivered monitoring or management of DFD. Only one review had a low risk of bias, with most reviews demonstrating limited search strategies and poor reporting of participants. Evidence on effectiveness was mixed, with meta-analyses demonstrating long-term ulcer healing and mortality were not significantly different between telehealth and standard care groups, although the lower-limb amputation rate was significantly decreased in one meta-analysis. Perceptions of telehealth by patients and clinicians were generally positive, whilst acknowledging limitations relating to access and use. Cost-effectiveness data were limited, with poor reporting preventing clear conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Remotely delivered healthcare of DFD is well received by patients and clinicians, but its effectiveness is unclear. High quality trials are needed to evaluate the risks and benefits of remotely delivered DFD management.

Reliability of the evidence to guide decision-making in foot ulcer prevention in diabetes: an overview of systematic reviews

Background

Reliable evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to prevent diabetes-related foot ulceration is essential to inform clinical practice. Well-conducted systematic reviews that synthesise evidence from all relevant trials offer the most robust evidence for decision-making. We conducted an overview to assess the comprehensiveness and utility of the available secondary evidence as a reliable source of robust estimates of effect with the aim of informing a cost-effective care pathway using an economic model. Here we report the details of the overview. [PROSPERO Database (CRD42016052324)].

Methods

Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Epistomonikos, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE), and the Health Technology Assessment Journals Library were searched to 17th May 2021, without restrictions, for systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of preventive interventions in people with diabetes. The primary outcomes of interest were new primary or recurrent foot ulcers. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the included reviews.

Findings

The overview identified 30 systematic reviews of patient education, footwear and off-loading, complex and other interventions. Many are poorly reported and have fundamental methodological shortcomings associated with increased risk of bias. Most concerns relate to vague inclusion criteria (60%), weak search or selection strategies (70%) and quality appraisal methods (53%) and inexpert conduct and interpretation of quantitative and narrative evidence syntheses (57%). The 30 reviews have collectively assessed 26 largely poor-quality RCTs with substantial overlap.

Interpretation

The majority of these systematic reviews of the effectiveness of interventions to prevent diabetic foot ulceration are at high risk of bias and fail to provide reliable evidence for decision-making. Adherence to the core principles of conducting and reporting systematic reviews is needed to improve the reliability of the evidence generated to inform clinical practice.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01738-y.

A psycho-educational intervention for the prevention of foot lesions in people with diabetes: Report of a clinical audit

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Motivational approaches may help target the psychological aspects of self-care, improving adherence to good practices in individuals with diabetes. The present study was designed to test the feasibility and effectiveness of a psychoeducational program for diabetic foot prevention or disease progression.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eighty-one subjects with or at high risk of foot ulcer development entered a program consisting of six 120-min group sessions, conducted by a podiatrist and an expert in psycho-education. Occurrence/recurrence of lesions in a 3-year follow-up was compared with 172 cases with similar risk score (IWGDF score 2019), receiving education at any 6-month podiatric visit (standard-of-care). Motivation to self-care and competence were assessed by specific questionnaires. The experimental program increased adherence to follow-up. The prevalence of foot lesions was higher at baseline and was remarkably reduced at any time-point in patients attending the psychoeducational program, whereas it remained relatively stable in standard care (around 10% of cases). The cumulative incidence was lower in the psychoeducational program (13.2, 95% CI 9.2-18.0 per 100 patient-year vs. 26.1; 95% CI 22.1-30.2); time to new lesions was increased (P = 0.022). Cox proportional hazard analysis confirmed an overall reduction of lesions in the psychoeducational program (HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.18-0.66; P < 0.001), after adjustment for confounders. The program was associated with significant changes in competence and motivation to self-care.

CONCLUSION

A psychoeducational approach is both feasible and effective to support patients with diabetes at high risk of first or recurrent foot lesions, increasing their adherence to self-care practices.

Intervención educativa de autocuidado en la prevención del pie diabético

Objetivo: evaluar los cambios de una intervención educativa en la prevención del pie diabético en el nivel de autocuidado de personas con diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Materiales y métodos: estudio cuantitativo, tipo antes y después, con una muestra de 79 participantes. La medición pretest incluyó la caracterización sociodemográfica y clínica de los participantes, así como su clasificación en categoría de riesgo y nivel de autocuidado. Se implementó una intervención educativa, tras lo cual se llevó a cabo la medición postest del nivel de autocuidado. Resultados: la mediana de edad de los participantes fue de 62 años y el 62 % (n = 49) de estos corresponden a personas de sexo femenino. Los participantes presentaban antecedentes como hormigueo (n = 58; 73,4 %), claudicación (n = 14; 17,7 %), falta de educación previa (n = 25; 31,6 %) y uso de calzado/medias inadecuadas (n = 21; 26,6 %). La mitad de ellos se ubicaron en categorías altas de riesgo de pie diabético. Se identificaron cambios significativos en el nivel de autocuidado en la prevención del pie diabético posterior a la intervención educativa (p = 0,0000). Conclusiones: la intervención educativa implementada mostró mejoras en el nivel de autocuidado en la prevención del pie diabético. Esta intervención abordó dimensiones emocionales, sociales, automanejo de la diabetes y cuidado pedio. Se recomienda su aplicación en poblaciones similares.

Effectiveness of at-home skin temperature monitoring in reducing the incidence of foot ulcer recurrence in people with diabetes: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (DIATEMP)

INTRODUCTION

The skin of people with diabetic foot disease is thought to heat up from ambulatory activity before it breaks down into ulceration. This allows for early recognition of imminent ulcers. We assessed whether at-home monitoring of plantar foot skin temperature can help prevent ulcer recurrence in diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this parallel-group outcome-assessor-blinded multicenter randomized controlled trial (7 hospitals, 4 podiatry practices), we randomly assigned people with diabetes, neuropathy, foot ulcer history (<4 years, n=295), or Charcot's neuro-arthropathy (n=9) to usual care (ie, podiatric treatment, education, and therapeutic footwear) or usual care plus measuring skin temperatures at 6-8 plantar sites per foot each day (enhanced therapy). If ∆T>2.2°C between corresponding sites on the left and right foot for two consecutive days, participants were instructed to reduce ambulatory activity until this hotspot disappeared and contact their podiatrist. Primary outcome was ulcer recurrence in 18 months on the plantar foot, interdigital, or medial/lateral/anterior forefoot surfaces; secondary outcome was ulcer recurrence at any foot site.

RESULTS

On the basis of intention-to-treat, 44 of 151 (29.1%) participants in enhanced therapy and 57 of 153 (37.3%) in usual care had ulcer recurrence at a primary outcome site (RR: 0.782 (95%CI 0.566 to 1.080), p=0.133). Of the 83 participants in enhanced therapy who measured a hotspot, the 24 subsequently reducing their ambulatory activity had significantly fewer ulcer recurrences (n=3) than those in usual care (RR: 0.336 (95% CI 0.114 to 0.986), p=0.017). Enhanced therapy was effective over usual care for ulcer recurrence at any foot site (RR: 0.760 (95% CI 0.579 to 0.997), p=0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

At-home foot temperature monitoring does not significantly reduce incidence of diabetic foot ulcer recurrence at or adjacent to measurement sites over usual care, unless participants reduce ambulatory activity when hotspots are found, or when aiming to prevent ulcers at any foot site.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NTR5403.

Effects of Custom-Made Insole Materials on Frictional Stress and Contact Pressure in Diabetic Foot with Neuropathy: Results from a Finite Element Analysis

Offloading plantar pressure in a diabetic foot with neuropathy is challenging in conventional clinical practice. Custom-made insole (CMI) materials play an important role in plantar pressure reduction, but the assessment is costly and time-consuming. Finite element analysis (FEA) can provide an efficient evaluation of different insoles on the plantar pressure distribution. This study investigated the effect of CMI materials and their combinations on plantar pressure reduction for the diabetic foot with neuropathy using FEA. The study was conducted by constructing a three-dimensional foot model along with CMI to study the peak contact pressure between the foot and CMI. The softer material (E = 5 MPa) resulted in a better reduction of peak contact pressure compared with the stiffer material (E = 11 MPa). The plantar pressure was well redistributed with softer material compared with the stiffer material and its combination. In addition, the single softer material resulted in reduced frictional stress under the first metatarsal head compared with the stiffer material and the combination of materials. The softer material and its combination have a beneficial effect on plantar pressure reduction and redistribution for a diabetic foot with neuropathy. This study provided an effective approach for CMI material selection using FEA.

Psychological interventions for treating foot ulcers, and preventing their recurrence, in people with diabetes

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) can be defined as a full-thickness wound below the ankle and is a major complication of diabetes mellitus. Despite best practice, many wounds fail to heal, and when they do, the risk of recurrence of DFU remains high. Beliefs about personal control, or influence, on ulceration are associated with better engagement with self-care in DFU. Psychological interventions aim to reduce levels of psychological distress and empower people to engage in self-care, and there is some evidence to suggest that they can impact positively on the rate of wound healing.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of psychological interventions on healing and recurrence of DFU.

SEARCH METHODS

In September 2019, we searched the Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Ovid MEDLINE (including In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations), Ovid Embase, Ovid PsycINFO and EBSCO CINAHL Plus. We also searched clinical trials registries for ongoing and unpublished studies, and reviewed reference lists of relevant included studies as well as reviews, meta-analyses and health technology reports to identify additional studies. There were no restrictions with respect to language, date of publication or study setting.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that evaluated psychological interventions compared with standard care, education or another psychological intervention. Our primary outcomes were the proportion of wounds completely healed; time to complete wound healing; time to recurrence and number of recurrences.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four review authors independently screened titles and abstracts of the studies identified by the search strategy for eligibility. Three authors independently screened all potentially relevant studies using the inclusion criteria and carried out data extraction, assessment of risk of bias and GRADE assessment of the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified seven trials that met the inclusion criteria with a total of 290 participants: six RCTs and one quasi-RCT. The studies were conducted in Australia, the USA, the UK, Indonesia, Norway and South Africa. Three trials used a counselling-style intervention and one assessed an intervention designed to enhance an understanding of well-being. One RCT used a biofeedback relaxation training intervention and one used a psychosocial intervention based on cognitive behavioural therapy. A quasi-RCT assessed motivation and tailored the intervention accordingly. Due to the heterogeneity of the trials identified, pooling of data was judged inappropriate, and we therefore present a narrative synthesis. Comparisons were (1) psychological intervention compared with standard care and (2) psychological intervention compared with another psychological intervention. We are uncertain whether there is a difference between psychological intervention and standard care for people with diabetic foot ulceration in the proportion of wounds completely healed (two trials, data not pooled, first trial RR 6.25, 95% CI 0.35 to 112.5; 16 participants, second trial RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.39; 60 participants), in foot ulcer recurrence after one year (two trials, data not pooled, first trial RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.41; 41 participants, second trial RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.05 to 7.90; 13 participants) or in health-related quality of life (one trial, MD 5.52, 95% CI -5.80 to 16.84; 56 participants). This is based on very low-certainty evidence which we downgraded for very serious study limitations, risk of bias and imprecision. We are uncertain whether there is a difference in the proportion of wounds completely healed in people with diabetic foot ulceration depending on whether they receive a psychological intervention compared with another psychological intervention (one trial, RR 2.33, 95% CI 0.92 to 5.93; 16 participants). This is based on very low-certainty evidence from one study which we downgraded for very serious study limitations, risk of bias and imprecision. Time to complete wound healing was reported in two studies but not in a way that was suitable for inclusion in this review. One trial reported self-efficacy and two trials reported quality of life, but only one reported quality of life in a manner that enabled us to extract data for this review. No studies explored the other primary outcome (time to recurrence) or secondary outcomes (amputations (major or distal) or cost).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We are unable to determine whether psychological interventions are of any benefit to people with an active diabetic foot ulcer or a history of diabetic foot ulcers to achieve complete wound healing or prevent recurrence. This is because there are few trials of psychological interventions in this area. Of the trials we included, few measured all of our outcomes of interest and, where they did so, we judged the evidence, using GRADE criteria, to be of very low certainty.