1
|
Karnon J, Partington A, Gray J, Pincombe A, Schultz T. Local Level Economic Evaluation: What is it? What is its Value? Is it Sustainable? APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2024; 22:273-281. [PMID: 37980329 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00847-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
In Australia, local health services with allocated budgets manage public hospital services for defined geographical areas. The authors were embedded in a local health service for around 2 years and undertook a range of local level economic evaluations for which three decision contexts were defined: intervention development, post-implementation and prioritisation. Despite difficulties in estimating opportunity costs and in the relevance of portfolio-based prioritisation approaches, economic evaluation added value to local decision-making. Development-focused (ex ante) economic evaluations used expert elicitation and calibration methods to synthesise published evidence with local health systems data to evaluate interventions to prevent hospital acquired complications. The use of economic evaluation facilitated the implementation of interventions with additional resource requirements. Decision analytic models were used alongside the implementation of larger scale, more complex service interventions to estimate counterfactual patient pathways, costs and outcomes, providing a transparent alternative to the statistical analyses of intervention effects, which were subject to high risk of bias. Economic evaluations of more established services had less impact due to data limitations and lesser executive interest. Prioritisation-focused economic evaluations compared costs, outcomes and processes of care for defined patient populations across alternative local health services to identify, understand and quantify the effects of unwarranted variation to inform priority areas for improvement within individual local health services. The sustained use of local level economic evaluation could be supported by embedding health economists in local continuous improvement units, perhaps with an initial focus on supporting the development and evaluation of prioritised new service interventions. Shared resources and critical mass are important, which could be facilitated through groups of embedded economists with joint appointments between different local health services and the same academic institution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Karnon
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
| | - Andrew Partington
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Jodi Gray
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Aubyn Pincombe
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Timothy Schultz
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gray J, Thynne TR, Eaton V, Larcombe R, Tantiongco M, Karnon J. Using Expert Elicitation to Adjust Published Intervention Effects to Reflect the Local Context. MDM Policy Pract 2024; 9:23814683231226335. [PMID: 38283395 PMCID: PMC10812103 DOI: 10.1177/23814683231226335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Background. Local health services make limited use of economic evaluation to inform decisions to fund new health service interventions. One barrier is the relevance of published intervention effects to the local setting, given these effects can strongly reflect the original evaluation context. Expert elicitation methods provide a structured approach to explicitly and transparently adjust published effect estimates, which can then be used in local-level economic evaluations to increase their local relevance. Expert elicitation was used to adjust published effect estimates for 2 interventions targeting the prevention of inpatient hypoglycemia. Methods. Elicitation was undertaken with 6 clinical experts. They were systematically presented with information regarding potential differences in patient characteristics and quality of care between the published study and local contexts, and regarding the design and application of the published study. The experts then assessed the intervention effects and provided estimates of the most realistic, most pessimistic, and most optimistic intervention effect sizes in the local context. Results. The experts estimated both interventions would be less effective in the local setting compared with the published effect estimates. For one intervention, the experts expected the lower complexity of admitted patients in the local setting would reduce the intervention's effectiveness. For the other intervention, the reduced effect was largely driven by differences in the scope of implementation (hospital-wide in the local setting compared with targeted implementation in the evaluation). Conclusions. The pragmatic elicitation methods reported in this article provide a feasible and acceptable approach to assess and adjust published intervention effects to better reflect expected effects in the local context. Further development and application of these methods is proposed to facilitate the use of local-level economic evaluation. Highlights Local health services make limited use of economic evaluation to inform their decisions on the funding of new health service interventions. One barrier to use is the relevance of published intervention evaluations to the local setting.Expert elicitation methods provide a structured way to consider differences between the evaluation and local settings and to explicitly and transparently adjust published effect estimates for use in local economic evaluations.The pragmatic elicitation methods reported in this article offer a feasible and acceptable approach to adjusting published intervention effects to better reflect the effects expected in the local context. This increases the relevance of economic evaluations for local decision makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jodi Gray
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute (FHMRI), College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Tilenka R. Thynne
- Flinders Medical Centre, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network (SALHN), Bedford Park, SA, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Vaughn Eaton
- SA Pharmacy Southern Adelaide Local Health Network (SALHN), Department of Health and Wellbeing, SA Health, Government of South Australia, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Rebecca Larcombe
- SA Pharmacy Southern Adelaide Local Health Network (SALHN), Department of Health and Wellbeing, SA Health, Government of South Australia, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Mahsa Tantiongco
- SA Pharmacy Southern Adelaide Local Health Network (SALHN), Department of Health and Wellbeing, SA Health, Government of South Australia, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Jonathan Karnon
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute (FHMRI), College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gray J, Thynne TR, Eaton V, Reade B, Larcombe R, Baldacchino L, Gehlert J, Hakendorf P, Karnon J. A framework for local-level economic evaluation to inform implementation decisions: health service interventions to prevent hospital-acquired hypoglycemia. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2023; 39:e74. [PMID: 38116650 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462323002775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Published evidence on health service interventions should inform decision-making in local health services, but primary effectiveness studies and cost-effectiveness analyses are unlikely to reflect contexts other than those in which the evaluations were undertaken. A ten-step framework was developed and applied to use published evidence as the basis for local-level economic evaluations that estimate the expected costs and effects of new service intervention options in specific local contexts. METHODS Working with a multidisciplinary group of local clinicians, the framework was applied to evaluate intervention options for preventing hospital-acquired hypoglycemia. The framework included: clinical audit and analyses of local health systems data to understand the local context and estimate baseline event rates; pragmatic literature review to identify evidence on relevant intervention options; expert elicitation to adjust published intervention effect estimates to reflect the local context; and modeling to synthesize and calibrate data derived from the disparate data sources. RESULTS From forty-seven studies identified in the literature review, the working group selected three interventions for evaluation. The local-level economic evaluation generated estimates of intervention costs and a range of cost, capacity and patient outcome-related consequences, which informed working group recommendations to implement two of the interventions. CONCLUSIONS The applied framework for modeled local-level economic evaluation was valued by local stakeholders, in particular the structured, formal approach to identifying and interpreting published evidence alongside local data. Key methodological issues included the handling of alternative reported outcomes and the elicitation of the expected intervention effects in the local context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jodi Gray
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute (FHMRI), College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Tilenka R Thynne
- Flinders Medical Centre, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network (SALHN), Bedford Park, SA, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Vaughn Eaton
- SA Pharmacy Southern Adelaide Local Health Network (SALHN), Department of Health and Wellbeing, SA Health, Government of South Australia, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Brianna Reade
- Flinders Medical Centre, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network (SALHN), Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Rebecca Larcombe
- SA Pharmacy Southern Adelaide Local Health Network (SALHN), Department of Health and Wellbeing, SA Health, Government of South Australia, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Linda Baldacchino
- Flinders Medical Centre, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network (SALHN), Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Jessica Gehlert
- Flinders Medical Centre, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network (SALHN), Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Paul Hakendorf
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute (FHMRI), College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
- Flinders Medical Centre, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network (SALHN), Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Jonathan Karnon
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute (FHMRI), College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Roseleur J, Edney LC, Jung J, Karnon J. Prevalence of unmet supportive care needs reported by individuals ever diagnosed with cancer in Australia: a systematic review to support service prioritisation. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:676. [PMID: 37934313 PMCID: PMC10630245 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08146-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Improved health outcomes for individuals ever diagnosed with cancer require comprehensive, coordinated care that addresses their supportive care needs. Implementing interventions to address these is confounded by a lack of evidence on population needs and a large pool of potential interventions. This systematic review estimates the point prevalence of different supportive care needs stratified by the tool used to measure needs and cancer type in Australia. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus from 2010 to April 2023 to identify relevant studies published on the prevalence of supportive care needs in Australia. RESULTS We identified 35 studies that met the inclusion criteria. The highest prevalent unmet need across all cancers was 'fear of cancer spreading' (20.7%) from the Supportive Care Needs Survey Short-Form 34 (SCNS-SF34), ranging from 9.4% for individuals ever diagnosed with haematological cancer to 36.3% for individuals ever diagnosed with gynaecological cancer, and 'concerns about cancer coming back' (17.9%) from the Cancer Survivors' Unmet Needs (CaSUN), ranging from 9.7% for individuals ever diagnosed with prostate cancer to 37.8% for individuals ever diagnosed with breast cancer. Two studies assessed needs in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations, reporting the highest needs for financial worries (21.1%). CONCLUSIONS Point prevalence estimates presented here, combined with estimates of the costs and effects of potential interventions, can be used within economic evaluations to inform evidence-based local service provision to address the supportive care needs of individuals ever diagnosed with cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Local health services can use local evidence to prioritise the implementation of interventions targeted at unmet needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jackie Roseleur
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
| | - Laura Catherine Edney
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Jayda Jung
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Jonathan Karnon
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gray J, Rachakonda A, Karnon J. Pragmatic review of interventions to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) in adult inpatients. J Hosp Infect 2023; 136:55-74. [PMID: 37015257 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most common hospital-acquired complications. Insertion of a urinary catheter and the duration of catheterization are the main risk factors, with catheter-associated UTIs (CAUTIs) accounting for 70-80% of hospital-acquired UTIs. Guidance is available regarding the prevention of hospital-acquired CAUTIs; however, how best to operationalize this guidance remains a challenge. AIM To map and summarize the peer-reviewed literature on model-of-care interventions for the prevention of CAUTIs in adult inpatients. METHODS PubMed, CINAHL and SCOPUS were searched for articles that reported UTI, CAUTI or urinary catheter outcomes. Articles were screened systematically, data were extracted systematically, and interventions were classified by intervention type. FINDINGS This review included 70 articles. Interventions were classified as single component (N=19) or multi-component (N=51). Single component interventions included: daily rounds or activities (N=4), protocols and procedure changes (N=6), reminders and order sets (N=5), audit and feedback interventions (N=3), and education with simulation (N=1). Overall, daily catheter reviews and protocol and procedure changes demonstrated the most consistent effects on catheter and CAUTI outcomes. The components of multi-component interventions were categorized to map common elements and identify novel ideas. CONCLUSION A range of potential intervention options with evidence of a positive effect on catheter and CAUTI outcomes was identified. This is intended to provide a 'menu' of intervention options for local decision makers, enabling them to identify interventions that are relevant and feasible in their local setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Gray
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
| | - A Rachakonda
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - J Karnon
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
McCall AL, Lieb DC, Gianchandani R, MacMaster H, Maynard GA, Murad MH, Seaquist E, Wolfsdorf JI, Wright RF, Wiercioch W. Management of Individuals With Diabetes at High Risk for Hypoglycemia: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2023; 108:529-562. [PMID: 36477488 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgac596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Hypoglycemia in people with diabetes is common, especially in those taking medications such as insulin and sulfonylureas (SU) that place them at higher risk. Hypoglycemia is associated with distress in those with diabetes and their families, medication nonadherence, and disruption of life and work, and it leads to costly emergency department visits and hospitalizations, morbidity, and mortality. OBJECTIVE To review and update the diabetes-specific parts of the 2009 Evaluation and Management of Adult Hypoglycemic Disorders: Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline and to address developing issues surrounding hypoglycemia in both adults and children living with diabetes. The overriding objectives are to reduce and prevent hypoglycemia. METHODS A multidisciplinary panel of clinician experts, together with a patient representative, and methodologists with expertise in evidence synthesis and guideline development, identified and prioritized 10 clinical questions related to hypoglycemia in people living with diabetes. Systematic reviews were conducted to address all the questions. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence and make recommendations. RESULTS The panel agreed on 10 questions specific to hypoglycemia risk and prevention in people with diabetes for which 10 recommendations were made. The guideline includes conditional recommendations for use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and algorithm-driven insulin pumps in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D), use of CGM for outpatients with type 2 diabetes at high risk for hypoglycemia, use of long-acting and rapid-acting insulin analogs, and initiation of and continuation of CGM for select inpatient populations at high risk for hypoglycemia. Strong recommendations were made for structured diabetes education programs for those at high risk for hypoglycemia, use of glucagon preparations that do not require reconstitution vs those that do for managing severe outpatient hypoglycemia for adults and children, use of real-time CGM for individuals with T1D receiving multiple daily injections, and the use of inpatient glycemic management programs leveraging electronic health record data to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia. CONCLUSION The recommendations are based on the consideration of critical outcomes as well as implementation factors such as feasibility and values and preferences of people with diabetes. These recommendations can be used to inform clinical practice and health care system improvement for this important complication for people living with diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony L McCall
- University of Virginia Medical School, Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Charlottesville, VA 22901, USA
| | - David C Lieb
- Eastern Virginia Medical School, Division of Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, Department of Medicine, Norfolk, VA 23510, USA
| | | | | | | | - M Hassan Murad
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-Based Practice Center, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Elizabeth Seaquist
- Diabetes Center and the Division of Endocrinology & Metabolism, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Joseph I Wolfsdorf
- Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | | | - Wojtek Wiercioch
- McMaster University GRADE Centre and Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada Centre Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|