Columnar metaplasia in the esophageal remnant after esophagectomy: a systematic review

Dysphagia After Esophageal Replacement and Its Treatment

Dysphagia occurs temporarily or permanently following esophageal replacement in at least half of the cases. Swallowing disorder, in addition to severe decline in the quality of life, can lead to a deterioration of the general condition, which may lead to death if left untreated. For this reason, their early detection and treatment are a matter of importance. Between 1993 and 2012, 540 esophageal resections were performed due to malignant tumors at the Department of Surgery, Medical Center of the University of Pécs. Stomach was used for replacement in 445 cases, colon in 38 cases, and jejunum in 57 cases. The anastomosis with a stomach replacement was located to the neck in 275 cases and to the thorax in 170 cases. The colon was pulled up to the neck in each case. There were 29 cases of free jejunal replacements located to the neck and 28 cases with a Roux loop reconstruction located to the thorax. Based on the literature data and own experience, the following were found to be the causes of dysphagia in the order of frequency: anastomotic stenosis, conduit obstruction, peptic and ischemic stricture, foreign body, local recurrence, functional causes, new malignant tumor in the esophageal remnant, and malignant tumor in the organ used for replacement. Causes may overlap each other, and their treatment may be conservative or surgical. The causes of many dysphagic complications might be prevented by improving the anastomosis technique, by better preservation the blood supply of the substitute organ, by consistently applying a functional approach, and by regular follow-up.

Appraisal of gastric stump carcinoma and current state of affairs

Gastric stump carcinoma, also known as remnant gastric carcinoma, is a malignancy arising in the remnant stomach following gastrectomy for a benign or malignant condition. Enterogastric reflux and preexisting risk factors in a patient with gastric cancer are the major contributors to the development of gastric stump carcinoma. The occurrence of gastric stump carcinoma is time-dependent and seen earlier in patients operated on for malignant rather than benign diseases. The tumor location is predominantly at the anastomotic site towards the stomach. However, it can occur anywhere in the remnant stomach. The pattern of lymph node involvement and the type of surgery required is distinctly different compared to primary gastric cancer. Gastric stump carcinoma is traditionally considered a malignancy with a dismal outcome. However, recent advances in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies have improved outcomes. Recent advances in molecular profiling of gastric stump carcinoma have identified distinct molecular subtypes, thereby providing novel therapeutic targets. Also, reports of gastric stump carcinoma following pancreatoduodenectomy and bariatric surgery highlight the need for more research to standardize the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of these tumors. The present review aims to provide an overview of gastric stump carcinoma highlighting the differences in clinicopathological profile and management compared to primary gastric carcinoma.

Today's Mistakes and Tomorrow's Wisdom in the Surgical Treatment of Barrett's Adenocarcinoma

Background

Barrett's esophagus is a premalignant condition caused by longstanding gastroesophageal reflux disease and may progress to low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and finally esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Summary

Barrett's adenocarcinoma can be treated either by endoscopic or surgical resection, depending on the clinical staging. Endoscopic resection is a safe and adequate treatment option for HGD, mucosal tumors, and low-risk submucosal tumors. Its role in the treatment of high-risk submucosal tumors and the role of organ-preserving sentinel node navigated surgery are still under investigation. Esophagectomy with neoadjuvant chemoradiation or perioperative chemotherapy is considered the standard of care for locally advanced Barrett's adenocarcinoma. Regarding operative technique, there is no proven superiority of one technique over another, although a minimally invasive transthoracic technique seems most commonly applied nowadays. In this review, state-of-the-art evidence and future expectations are presented regarding indications for resection, neoadjuvant or perioperative therapy, type of surgery, and postoperative follow-up for Barrett's adenocarcinoma.

Key Messages

In Barrett's adenocarcinoma, endoscopic resection is the standard treatment option for low-risk mucosal and submucosal tumors. For high-risk submucosal tumors, endoscopic submucosal dissection with close surveillance and sentinel node navigated surgery are currently being studied. For locally advanced cancer, a multimodal therapy including esophagectomy is the standard of care. Nowadays, in high-volume centers, a minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy with an intrathoracic anastomosis is the most common procedure for Barrett's adenocarcinoma.

Clonal Transitions and Phenotypic Evolution in Barrett's Esophagus

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma but our understanding of how it evolves is poorly understood. We investigated BE gland phenotype distribution, the clonal nature of phenotypic change, and how phenotypic diversity plays a role in progression.

METHODS

Using immunohistochemistry and histology, we analyzed the distribution and the diversity of gland phenotype between and within biopsy specimens from patients with nondysplastic BE and those who had progressed to dysplasia or had developed postesophagectomy BE. Clonal relationships were determined by the presence of shared mutations between distinct gland types using laser capture microdissection sequencing of the mitochondrial genome.

RESULTS

We identified 5 different gland phenotypes in a cohort of 51 nondysplastic patients where biopsy specimens were taken at the same anatomic site (1.0-2.0 cm superior to the gastroesophageal junction. Here, we observed the same number of glands with 1 and 2 phenotypes, but 3 phenotypes were rare. We showed a common ancestor between parietal cell-containing, mature gastric (oxyntocardiac) and goblet cell-containing, intestinal (specialized) gland phenotypes. Similarly, we have shown a clonal relationship between cardiac-type glands and specialized and mature intestinal glands. Using the Shannon diversity index as a marker of gland diversity, we observed significantly increased phenotypic diversity in patients with BE adjacent to dysplasia and predysplasia compared to nondysplastic BE and postesophagectomy BE, suggesting that diversity develops over time.

CONCLUSIONS

We showed that the range of BE phenotypes represents an evolutionary process and that changes in gland diversity may play a role in progression. Furthermore, we showed a common ancestry between gastric and intestinal-type glands in BE.

Functional syndromes and symptom-orientated aftercare after esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the cornerstone of esophageal cancer treatment but remains burdened with significant postoperative changes of gastrointestinal function and quality of life.

PURPOSE

The aim of this narrative review is to assess and summarize the current knowledge on postoperative functional syndromes and quality of life after esophagectomy for cancer, and to provide orientation for the reader in the challenging field of functional aftercare.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-esophagectomy syndromes include various conditions such as dysphagia, reflux, delayed gastric emptying, dumping syndrome, weight loss, and chronic diarrhea. Clinical pictures and individual expressions are highly variable and may be extremely distressing for those affected. Therefore, in addition to a mostly well-coordinated oncological follow-up, we strongly emphasize the need for regular monitoring of physical well-being and gastrointestinal function. The prerequisite for an effective functional aftercare covering the whole spectrum of postoperative syndromes is a comprehensive knowledge of the pathophysiological background. As functional conditions often require a complex diagnostic workup and long-term therapy, close interdisciplinary cooperation with radiologists, gastroenterologists, oncologists, and specialized nutritional counseling is imperative for successful management.

Severe Reflux and Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression After Esophageal Cancer Surgery

BACKGROUND

Approximately 30% of patients suffer from severe reflux after surgery for esophageal cancer, which may serve as a continuous reminder of the cancer and catalyze fear of recurrence.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between severe reflux and symptoms of anxiety and depression after esophageal cancer surgery.

METHODS

This was a nationwide prospective cohort study including all Swedish patients who underwent esophageal cancer surgery between 2013 and 2018. Patients reported reflux on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire module for gastroesophageal symptoms and psychological distress on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at 1 and 2 years after surgery. Repeated-measures logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity, body mass index, TNM classification, neoadjuvant therapy, surgery type, postoperative complications, antireflux medication, and elevated headrest at night.

RESULTS

Among 154 included patients, 43 (28%) and 37 (24%) reported severe reflux 1 and 2 years after surgery, respectively. No association between severe reflux and anxiety (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 0.7-6.3) or depression (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.3-4.6) was found 1 year after surgery. After 2 years, there was still no association between severe reflux and anxiety (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.3-2.8) or depression (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.5-3.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that severe reflux is not associated with anxiety or depression after esophageal cancer surgery.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

For esophageal cancer survivors, other factors than severe reflux may be more important for the psychological recovery.

Columnar epithelium morphology after esophagectomy: clinical insight into the development of Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND

The presence of Barrett's mucosa in the esophageal remnant is a result of post-esophagectomy anastomotic site exposure to gastric acid and is regarded as a human model of Barrett's esophagus onset. Here, we attempted to clarify the relationship between duodenogastric reflux and formation of columnar epithelium by following the changes over time after esophagectomy.

METHODS

A total of 96 patients underwent esophagectomy due to superficial cancer from April 2000 to March 2018 were included in this study. Cases were divided into two groups according to the reconstruction technique after esophagectomy as either the gastric pull-up (Ga) group and ileocolonic interposition (Ic) group. Previously obtained endoscopic pictures of the cases were reviewed retrospectively and chronologically.

RESULTS

There were 24 cases of columnar epithelium in the Ga group (42%) and 1 in the Ic group (2.6%) (P < 0.01) with 32 reflux cases (56%) in the Ga group and 1 (2.6%) in the Ic group (P < 0.01). Reflux precedes the development of columnar epithelium in both the Ga- and Ic groups. Multivariate analysis revealed surgical technique (odds ratio 10.6, 95% CI 1.2-97.5, P = 0.037) and reflux (odds ratio 4.5, 95% CI 1.3-15.6, P = 0.0017) as risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The development of columnar epithelium was preceded by reflux comprising principally gastric acid and was strongly associated with a strong inflammatory state.

Reflux after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction in the posterior mediastinum for esophageal cancer: original questionnaire and EORTC QLQ-C30 survey

Reflux following an esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction in the posterior mediastinum is a clinically significant problem. In this study, we investigated the frequency and impact of reflux on the quality of life (QOL) among 158 patients who underwent an esophagectomy for esophageal cancer using an original questionnaire and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Version 3.0 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Reflux frequency was assessed using the original questionnaire. The number of patients who complained of reflux every day, two or three times a week, once a week, or less than once a week was 16 (10.1%), 21 (13.3%), 26 (16.5%), and 60 (38.0%), respectively. Out of 35 patients (22.2%) reported no reflux symptoms. Patients were divided into two groups: those with reflux ≥ once/week (63 patients) and those with low frequency of symptoms (95 patients). Time elapsed following surgery was the only factor to influence reflux frequency. Reflux frequency decreased within two years of surgery; however, the frequency plateaued after more than two years. QOL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30. The ≥ once/week reflux group had a significantly lower global health status score than the low-frequency reflux group (59.6 ± 24.2 vs. 70.8 ± 20.7; P = 0.007). In addition, the ≥ once/week reflux group had a significantly lower social functioning score than the low-frequency reflux group (81.6 ± 24.1 vs. 88.4 ± 19.8; P = 0.035). Regarding symptoms, the ≥ once/week reflux group had significantly higher scores for fatigue, nausea, and vomiting, dyspnea and insomnia compared to the low-frequency reflux group (fatigue: 42.4 ± 21.9 vs. 28.9 ± 18.4, P < 0.001; nausea and vomiting: 17.3 ± 17.1 vs. 4.9 ± 10.6, P < 0. 001; dyspnea: 29.2 ± 26.0 vs. 21.7 ± 26.8, P = 0.043; insomnia: 22.2 ± 31.1 vs. 10.5 ± 21.7, P = 0.015). Thus, reflux after an esophagectomy was associated with a lower QOL.

Columnar metaplasia in the remnant esophagus is a long-term indicator for pneumonia after radical esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the long-term risk factors for pneumonia after esophageal reconstruction using a gastric tube via the posterior mediastinal route following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. The influence of columnar metaplasia in the remnant esophagus was specifically assessed.

METHODS

Among 225 patients who underwent esophagectomy between January 2004 and December 2010, the subjects were 54 patients who could be followed up for more than 5 years. Routine oncologic follow-up consisted of CT scanning of the abdomen and chest every 4-6 months and annual endoscopy. Data on the occurrence of pneumonia were collected by retrospective review of chest CT scans. Risk factors for pneumonia investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses included the age, gender, diameter of the stapler, length of the intrathoracic remnant esophagus, anastomotic stricture, and presence of columnar metaplasia in the remnant esophagus.

RESULTS

The median age was 62.4 years (interquartile range: 55.8-68.0 years). Forty-three patients were men. Pneumonia was detected in 39 patients (72.2%). The incidence of columnar metaplasia in the remnant esophagus increases with time. Anastomotic stricture was significantly related to the absence of columnar metaplasia on endoscopy in the first year after esophagectomy (p = 0.013). Univariate analysis showed that the frequency of pneumonia was significantly related to the intrathoracic remnant esophagus length ≥4.4 cm (p = 0.014), age over 65 years (p = 0.014), and the presence of columnar metaplasia in the remnant esophagus in the fifth year after esophagectomy (p = 0.005). Among them, age over 65 years and the presence of columnar metaplasia in the remnant esophagus in the fifth year after esophagectomy were found to be independent indicators of the postoperative pneumonia by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Pneumonia occurred in 72.2% (39/54) of patients after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. The presence of columnar metaplasia after esophagectomy is an indicator for pneumonia over the long term.

Oesophageal replacement with stomach: A personal series and review of published experience

AIM

To describe the outcomes of oesophageal replacement using stomach in children.

METHODS

All children undergoing oesophageal replacement in a regional centre were prospectively recorded in a customised database and subjected to continual follow up. Complications within 30 days were classified as early, and all other complications were classified as late. Outcomes were related to a comprehensive analysis of published experience where studies were classified as having long-term follow up if the median duration exceeded 5 years.

RESULTS

Ten children underwent oesophageal replacement using the stomach between 1998 and 2016. Indications were oesophageal atresia (6), caustic ingestion (2), foreign body ingestion (1) and oesophageal hamartoma (1). Two children died at 2 and 7 months after gastric transposition. All survivors are under review, with a median follow up of 8.5 years (range 3-14 years). Complications occurred in every case. Among survivors, three had early complications and eight had late complications. Early complications included anastomotic leak (2) and lung compression by stomach (1). Late complications were anaemia (8), anastomotic stricture (7), oesophagitis (5), dumping syndrome (2), perforation of a jejunostomy (1), para-gastric hiatal hernia (1), gastric outlet obstruction (1), Barrett's oesophagus (1), prolonged inability to swallow (1) and recurrent lower respiratory tract infections (1). Among 57 publications, only three achieved complete long-term follow up. The incidence of reported complications was higher when follow up was complete.

CONCLUSIONS

Oesophageal replacement by gastric transposition in children leads to serious chronic morbidity. Published experience masks this because of incomplete and short follow up.

Columnar Metaplasia in the Esophageal Remnant After Esophagectomy: A Common Occurrence and a Valuable Insight Into the Development of Barrett Esophagus

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to establish the incidence of postesophagectomy columnar metaplasia and dysplasia, and the timescale over which it develops. It also aimed to assess if this epithelium is molecularly similar to sporadic Barrett esophagus, thereby confirming suitability as a research model.

BACKGROUND

Metaplasia in the esophageal remnant after esophagectomy is well described, but incidence and the potential for dysplasia are uncertain, and the clinical relevance unclear. Although proposed as a model for Barrett esophagus, no large studies have examined the molecular phenotype of postesophagectomy metaplasia.

METHODS

Patients underwent prospective endoscopic evaluation having previously undergone esophagectomy. The macroscopic appearance of the esophageal remnant was noted and biopsies taken. Specimens were stained using hematoxylin and eosin and by immunohistochemistry for cytokeratins 7 and 20, and Chromogranin A-proteins which have a well described expression pattern in sporadic Barrett esophagus.

RESULTS

Of the 126 eligible patients, 45 (36%) had evidence of metaplasia. There were no cases of dysplasia. Nonintestinalized columnar epithelium occurred earlier than specialized intestinal metaplasia (median 4.8 vs 8.1 yr; P = 0.025). Thirty-seven samples underwent immunohistochemical analysis. A classic cytokeratin 7/20 staining pattern was present in 23 cases (62%), within the prevalence range reported for sporadic Barrett.

CONCLUSIONS

Columnar metaplasia is common following esophagectomy, but the absence of dysplasia in this large cohort is reassuring. Presence of specialized intestinal metaplasia is associated with increased time from surgery, suggesting this represents later disease. Immunohistochemistry staining is similar to sporadic Barrett, suggesting that this group of patients represent an accurate human model for the development of Barrett.

Trefoil Factor Expression in a Human Model of the Early Stages of Barrett's Esophagus

BACKGROUND

Trefoil proteins are believed to have an important role in mucosal protection and repair in the gastrointestinal tract. They are well recognized in Barrett's esophagus and considered a potential biomarker for the condition. Metaplasia occurring in the esophageal remnant after esophagectomy is a human model for the early stages of development of Barrett's esophagus.

AIMS

To assess expression of trefoil proteins in post-esophagectomy columnar epithelium and to use trefoils as a molecular tool to understand regenerative mucosa in the esophagus.

METHODS

Patients with columnar metaplasia in the esophageal remnant were recruited from a large esophago-gastric cancer center. Trefoil factor expression was determined using immunohistochemical techniques.

RESULTS

Samples were obtained from 37 patients. TFF1 and TFF2 were expressed by all samples in a similar pattern to that described in studies of sporadic Barrett's esophagus. TFF3 was less widely expressed and was significantly associated with time elapsed between surgery and endoscopy. Median time from surgery to endoscopy was 8.1 years for patients with TFF3 expression versus 3.4 years for those without (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Widespread expression of trefoils in this environment suggests that these proteins have an important role in development of Barrett's metaplasia. TFF3 expression may be absent in the early stages of metaplasia and may represent more established columnar epithelium. Biopsy samples from post-esophagectomy patients provide a valuable resource to study the early stages of Barrett's esophagus.

The Barrett's Gland in Phenotype Space

Barrett's esophagus is characterized by the erosive replacement of esophageal squamous epithelium by a range of metaplastic glandular phenotypes. These glandular phenotypes likely change over time, and their distribution varies along the Barrett's segment. Although much recent work has addressed Barrett's esophagus from the genomic viewpoint-its genotype space-the fact that the phenotype of Barrett's esophagus is nonstatic points to conversion between phenotypes and suggests that Barrett's esophagus also exists in phenotype space. Here we explore this latter concept, investigating the scope of glandular phenotypes in Barrett's esophagus and how they exist in physical and temporal space as well as their evolution and their life history. We conclude that individual Barrett's glands are clonal units; because of this important fact, we propose that it is the Barrett's gland that is the unit of selection in phenotypic and indeed neoplastic progression. Transition between metaplastic phenotypes may be governed by neutral drift akin to niche turnover in normal and dysplastic niches. In consequence, the phenotype of Barrett's glands assumes considerable importance, and we make a strong plea for the integration of the Barrett's gland in both genotype and phenotype space in future work.

Barrett oesophagus: lessons on its origins from the lesion itself

Barrett oesophagus develops when the lower oesophageal squamous epithelium is replaced with columnar epithelium, which shows both intestinal and gastric differentiation. No consensus has been reached on the origin of Barrett oesophagus. Theories include a direct origin from the oesophageal-stratified squamous epithelium, or by proximal migration of the gastric cardiac epithelium with subsequent intestinalization. Variations of this theory suggest the origin is a distinctive cell at the squamocolumnar junction, the oesophageal gland ducts, or circulating bone-marrow-derived cells. Much of the supporting evidence comes from experimental models and not from studies of Barrett mucosa. In this Perspectives article, we look at the Barrett lesion itself: at its phenotype, its complexity, its clonal architecture and its stem cell organization. We conclude that Barrett glands are unique structures, but share many similarities with gastric glands undergoing the process of intestinal metaplasia. We conclude that current evidence most strongly supports an origin from stem cells in the cardia.