Prevention of Thyroidectomy Scars in Korean Patients Using a New Combination of Intralesional Injection of Low-Dose Steroid and Pulsed Dye Laser Starting within 4 Weeks of Suture Removal

A prospective study to evaluate the treatment effect of pulsed dye laser on thyroidectomy hypertrophic scars using 3D imaging analysis

OBJECTIVES

The pulsed dye laser (PDL) is an effective modality for preventing and improving hypertrophic scars (HSs). However, the heterogeneity of the parameter settings of the laser and subjective scar assessment methods used in most studies resulting in uncertainty with treatment plans. Therefore, we investigated the treatment effect of the PDL (V-beam; Candela Laser Corporation) on HSs in post-thyroidectomy patients using three-dimensional imaging analysis and intended to provide a systemic and optimal treatment protocol.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with HS after thyroidectomy underwent eight treatment sessions with the 595 nm PDL (with the dose gradually increased by 0.5 J/cm² ) at 4- to 6-week intervals. Patients with an elevated lesion also received intralesional corticosteroid (ICS) treatment. After every two treatment sessions, we assessed the patients' HS using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), a patient satisfaction questionnaire, and with a three-dimensional (3D) skin imaging device (Antera 3D™; Miravex Limited).

RESULTS

In repeated-measures analysis of variance, the mean VSS and patient satisfaction significantly improved (p < 0.001), with significant differences in these values observed until the sixth and eighth treatment sessions, respectively. In the quantitative analysis using Antera 3D™, the mean height, pigmentation, and vascularity scores were observed to be significantly improved (p < 0.001). Significant differences in these values were observed until the fourth, second, and eighth treatment sessions, respectively. Subgroup analysis according to ICS treatment showed no significant differences in scar characteristics between those with and without ICS treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we found that the PDL was effective in reducing scar height, vascularity, and pigmentation in patients with thyroidectomy HS using 3D imaging analysis. Furthermore, we have suggested a cost-effective treatment plan with the 595 nm PDL.

Early Postoperative Polydeoxyribonucleotide Injections Prevent Hypertrophic Scarring after Thyroidectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

Polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) is known to enhance wound healing, but there has been no clinical trial investigating the effect of PDRN on scar prevention in surgical wounds. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PDRN administration in preventing postoperative scars.

APPROACH

In this randomized controlled trial (NCT05149118), 44 patients who underwent open thyroidectomy were randomly assigned to the PDRN treatment or untreated control group. Only patients in the treatment group received two consecutive injections of PDRN one and two days after surgery. The modified Vancouver Scar Scale (mVSS), patients' subjective symptoms, erythema index (EI), melanin index (MI), and scar height were assessed three months after surgery.

RESULTS

Patients in the treatment group had lower mVSS scores (1.619 ± 1.244 vs. 2.500 ± 1.540, respectively; P = 0.059) and a significantly lower vascularity subscore (0.476 ± 0.512 vs. 0.900 ± 0.447, respectively; P = 0.010) than those in the control group at the 3-month follow-up. Compared with the control group, the level of subjective symptoms, EI, and scar height were all significantly lowered in the PDRN injection group. No specific side effects related to PDRN injection were observed.

INNOVATION

This is the first clinical study which demonstrated that PDRN injections rapidly decreased postsurgical wound erythema and as a result, significantly reduced both excessive scar formation and accompanying symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Early postoperative injection of PDRN is an effective and safe treatment to prevent hypertrophic scars and improve scar outcomes.

Effectiveness of a combination therapy using non-ablative fractional laser and intralesional triamcinolone injection for thyroidectomy scar treatment: a prospective, randomized, blinded pilot study

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of thyroid cancer has increased dramatically, and postoperative scars are placed at easily visible locations. Many patients show stronger desire for scar prevention. So far, numerous approaches have been discussed for the treatment of scars; this study is conducted to verify whether the early application of combined therapy contributes to minimal scar formation.

METHODS

Between March 2019 and December 2019, total of 64 patients with thyroidectomy scars of a size greater than 4.5 cm located on the anterior neck were enrolled in this prospective pilot study. Subjective and objective evaluation were carried out using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) at one, two, and six months after operation. Results were compared between a treatment group and a non-treatment group.

RESULTS

In PSAS score, the mean values of pain, itching sensation, pliability, thickness, and relief were significantly higher in the laser and steroid treatment group (p = 0.009, p = 0.000, p = 0.013, p = 0.002, and p = 0.007). The value of color of the scars showed no significant differences (p = 0.504). In OSAS score, parameter of thickness, relief, and surface area score was significantly higher score in the combination group (p = 0.029, 0.035, and 0.020), while vascularity, pigmentation, and pliability were not significantly different between two groups (p = 0.548, p = 0.983, and p = 0.128).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that early combination therapy contributes to scar improvement to a meaningful extent based on POSAS. We believe that the combined therapy has a synergy effect on scar management, which improves the patients' quality of life in relation to their postoperative scars.

Determining the Independent Risk Factors for Worse SCAR-Q Scores and Future Scar Revision Surgery

BACKGROUND

Scar revisions have been increasing in number. Patient-reported outcome measures are one tool to aid scar modulation decision-making. The aims of this study were to determine patient, scar, and clinical risk factors for (1) low SCAR-Q Appearance, Symptom, and Psychosocial Impact scores and how this differs for children; and (2) the potential need for future scar revision surgery to better identify such patients in a clinical setting.

METHODS

A multicenter international cross-sectional cohort study based on survey data of participants with traumatic, surgical, and burn scars attending plastic, hand, and burn clinics in four countries was conducted following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist. Univariate analysis to identify risk factors and multivariable logistic analysis to select risk factors were completed. Collinearity for nonindependent factors and C statistic for model discrimination were also calculated.

RESULTS

Seven hundred thirty-one participants completed the study booklet, and 546 participants (74.7 percent) had full data. Independent risk factors were determined to be a bothersome scar and perception of scarring badly for all three scales. Risk factors for self-reporting the need for future surgery included a health condition, scarring badly, scar diagnosis, prior scar revision, and low Psychosocial Impact scores. We did not identify evidence of multicollinearity. C statistics were high (0.81 to 0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first multicenter international study to examine independent risk factors for low patient-reported outcome measure scores and the potential need for future scar revision surgery. Patients that perceive themselves as scarring badly and having a bothersome scar were at a higher risk of scar appearance concern, an increased symptom burden, and poorer psychosocial impact scores.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Evaluating outcomes of pulsed dye laser therapy combined with intralesional triamcinolone injection after surgical removal of hypertrophic cesarean section scars

BACKGROUND

Recently, pulsed dye laser (PDL) combined with triamcinolone intralesional injection (TAILI) has been introduced for surgical scar prevention. However, little is known about this procedure's effectiveness in preventing hypertrophic scar following surgical scar removal.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of early intervention using PDL combined with TAILI after surgical removal of hypertrophic cesarean section (CS) scars.

METHODS

The medical records of 35 patients who underwent early intervention using PDL and TAILI after removal of hypertrophic CS scars were retrospectively reviewed. The scars' average Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) scores before scar removal and 3 months after the final treatment were compared.

RESULTS

The patients received 4.23 treatments on average and were followed up for a mean period of 7.74 months. The mean final VSS was 3.11 ± 1.52 and was significantly lower than that of the previous VSS (9.29 ± 1.74, p = 0.000). VSS of the previous CS scar, and the presence or absence of keloid formation in other areas, was associated with treatment outcome (p = 0.003 and 0.008, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Early intervention using PDL combined with TAILI could prevent the recurrence or progression of hypertrophic CS scarring after surgical scar removal.

Combination Treatment of Intra/Perilesional Botulinum Toxin-A Injection and Ablative Fractional Laser for Better Clinical Outcomes of Hypertrophic Fibrotic Thyroidectomy Scars Following Fractional Ablative Laser Resurfacing

BACKGROUND

Recent reports have shown that intralesional botulinum toxin type-A (BTX-A) works on scar cosmesis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of combination treatment of laser and BTX-A injection and compare the effects of conventional intralesional injection and intra- and perilesional BTX-A injection on fibrotic thyroidectomy scars.

METHODS

Patients with fibrotic thyroidectomy scars showing insufficient responses to previous ablative fractional laser (AFL) treatment were enrolled. Combination treatment with AFL and BTX-A injection was performed. Patients who received intra/perilesional BTX-A injections were classified into group A. Group B was patients in whom the injection was performed only intralesionally. The improvement was assessed based on the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS).

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients was included. Statistically significant improvement in pliability and total VSS score after the combination treatment were observed in overall patient group. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that pliability, height, and total VSS improved significantly in group A. In group B, only pliability significantly improved.

CONCLUSION

BTX-A injection combined with AFL can provide better relief for the previously treated fibrotic thyroidectomy scars. Injection of BTX-A not only into the scar itself, but also into perilesional muscles that can exert tension on the scar site may provide additional benefit in flattening scar height.

Current Protocol for Aesthetic Scar Management in Thyroid Surgery

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

We compared the scar quality when different protocols were applied, and eventually aim to find the optimal scar management protocol.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a prospective, randomized, and blinded comparison of different scar management protocols in a single center.

METHODS

We allocated 126 patients who underwent thyroidectomy via collar neck incision randomly into three groups. Patients in group A were treated with tissue adhesive only. Patients in group B were treated by means of subcuticular suturing and early scar management with a non-ablative fractional laser (NAFL) and intralesional triamcinolone injection (ILI). Patients in group C had skin closure with tissue adhesive and early scar management. At 6 months after the operation, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and the width of the final scar were compared.

RESULTS

Comparing the sum of PSAS, groups B and C showed significant higher satisfaction than did group A (22.81 ± 11.66 in group A, 10.9 ± 5.14 in group B, and 15.19 ± 9.98 in group C). In the sum of OSAS, group B also showed a significant difference than did groups A and C (17.74 ± 6.75 in group A, 10.26 ± 3.60 in group B, and 14.52 ± 6.48 in group C). Also, group B showed a narrower scar width than did groups A and C.

CONCLUSIONS

Our finding suggests that subcuticular suturing using barbed suture material and early treatment with a combination therapy using NAFL and ILI showed a favorable aesthetic outcome for both patients and operators. Based on our algorithmic approach for thyroidectomy scar, we anticipate an optimal aesthetic outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II Laryngoscope, 131:E2188-E2195, 2021.

Mitigation of Postsurgical Scars Using Lasers: A Review

Background:

Most postsurgical scars are considered esthetically and functionally acceptable. Currently, there is no definite consensus treatment for postsurgical scarring. The purpose of this review is to shed some light on the value of scar mitigation and the efficacy of different lasers employed on postsurgical wounds.

Methods:

A systematic literature review and computational analysis were conducted to identify relevant clinical articles that pertained to the use of lasers for mitigating postsurgical scars. Articles included the National Institutes of Health–National Center for Biotechnology Information–PubMed search and sources cited from relevant studies after 1995. Trials that attributed pre- and posttreatment scores of scar severity based on a verified scar evaluation scale (eg, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, Vancouver Scar Scale, Global Assessment Scale) were chosen. Clinical assessments varied for each study. To adequately assess the efficacy of the modalities, the final scaled scar appearance scores were realigned and normalized to a standard scale for unbiased comparison.

Results:

After filtering through a total of 124 studies, 14 relevant studies were isolated and thus included in the review. Studied lasers were as follows: Pulsed dye laser (PDL), carbon dioxide, diode, potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP), and erbium glass (Er-Glass) lasers.

Conclusion:

Treatment with lasers in the postsurgical wound healing phase is safe, effective, and advised in mitigation of pathologic scar formation.

Combination therapy using non-ablative fractional laser and intralesional triamcinolone injection for hypertrophic scars and keloids treatment

Combinations of various treatment modalities were shown to be more effective than monotherapy when treating hypertrophic scars and keloids. This study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of combination therapy with non-ablative fractional laser and intralesional steroid injection. From May 2015 to June 2017, a total of 38 patients with hypertrophic scars or keloids were evaluated. The control group of 21 patients received steroid injection alone, and 17 patients (the combined group) received 1550-nm erbium-glass fractional laser treatment and steroid injection simultaneously. The mean number of treatment sessions was statistically fewer in the combined group than in the control group (6.95 vs 5.47, P = .042). There was a significant difference in the patient's scale in the combined group (14.62 vs 22.82, P = .005); however, the observer's scale was not significantly different (17.92 vs 20.55, P = .549). The recurrence rate was 38.1% (8/21) in the control group and 35.3% (6/17) in the combined groups and showed no significant difference (P = .859). However, the mean remission period was statistically longer in the combined group (3.00 months vs 4.17 months, P = .042). Combination therapy with non-ablative fractional laser and intralesional steroid injection showed better results for the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids with fewer treatment sessions, better patient satisfaction, and longer remission periods.

Combined Treatment with Botulinum Toxin and 595-nm Pulsed Dye Laser for Traumatic Scarring

Traumatic scars on skin covering areas of high movement, especially areas on the face, can be stressful for patients. We report two cases of traumatic scars that occurred on the chin, and that were successfully treated with a combined therapy of 595-nm pulsed dye laser (PDL) and intramuscular injection of botulinum toxin. After the treatment, good cosmetic results were achieved in both patients. The only adverse effect during and after the treatments was mild pain, which resolved within several days without any additional treatment. In conclusion, the combination of 595-nm PDL and intramuscular botulinum toxin injection was shown to be a safe and effective treatment for traumatic scars on the mobile chin area in Korean patients.