A case of acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau (ACH) successfully treated with sulfasalazine

Acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau and generalised pustular psoriasis: Should they be the same or different entities?

Pustular psoriasis is characterised by eruptions of neutrophilic sterile pustules. The European Rare and Severe Psoriasis Expert Network consensus defines pustular psoriasis into three subtypes; generalised pustular psoriasis (GPP), palmoplantar pustulosis and acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau (ACH). Mixed forms are categorised according to their predominant features. However, the Japanese Dermatological Association includes ACH under the diagnosis of GPP. This article aims to review the similarities and differences between ACH and GPP. Based on our review, interleukin (IL)-36RN mutations, the most frequent genetic findings in pustular psoriasis are found most commonly in GPP, followed by ACH. Genotypes of IL-36RN mutations among GPP patients and ACH patients are different between European and Asian ethnicities. IL-36 signalling pathway is the main mechanism. Metabolic diseases are common comorbidities and joint involvement can occur in 20.5%-36.4% of both conditions. Associated plaque psoriasis is more common in GPP than in ACH. Generally, ACH, even the generalised type, does not have systemic inflammation whereas GPP can occur with or without systemic inflammation. ACH can occur before, simultaneously, or after the development of GPP. However, response to treatment for GPP and ACH even in the same patients appear to be different. ACH seemed to be more recalcitrant to treatment than GPP but severe flare of GPP can lead to morbidity and mortality. Although GPP and ACH share genotypes and pathogenesis, we believe that ACH should be classified separately from GPP, and not under diagnosis of GPP. Future research is warranted to satisfactorily distinguish the two conditions.

Sulfasalazine in dermatology: A lesser explored drug with broad therapeutic potential

Sulfasalazine is an aminosalicylate primarily used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and ulcerative colitis. Its immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, and antiproliferative properties make it a potential therapeutic option for various dermatological disorders. Owing to its wide range of effects, it is often used off-label in dermatological diseases, such as alopecia areata, psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, lichen planus, and pemphigus. However, the level of evidence supporting its efficacy and safety in dermatology is limited. More research is needed to uncover the full potential of sulfasalazine in dermatology. The present article is a detailed review of the pharmacology, modes of action, side effects, and contraindications of sulfasalazine, along with an up-to-date review of the evidence underlying its use in various dermatological conditions.

Successful treatment of a case of idiopathic linear IgA bullous dermatosis with oral sulfasalazine

Linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD) is a rare acquired autoimmune chronic vesiculobullous dermatosis affecting primarily young children and older adults. We report a 17-year-old Chinese boy with a 2-month history of intense itching erythema or tense vesicles on healthy skin or on an erythematous base, with parts of lesions arising a characteristic "cluster of jewels" pattern. With the characteristics of vesicles or blisters on the skin, subepidermal blisters with neutrophilic infiltrate on histology, and linear IgA deposits on the basement membrane zone and absence of other immunoglobulins on direct immunofluorescence, LABD was dignosized. Sulfapyridine has also been reported as one of the best options of systemic therapy for LABD. Our patient successfully treated with only oral sulfasalazine (alternative medicine of sulfasalazine), which is safe and effective.

Exploring the therapeutic potential of sodium benzoate in acetic acid-induced ulcerative colitis in rats

Background Ulcerative colitis is a chronic mucosal inflammation of the large intestine mainly affecting the colon and rectum. The lack of effective and safe therapeutic agents led to the identification of new therapeutic agents to effectively manage the symptoms and complications of ulcerative colitis. The present study aimed to evaluate the protective effect of sodium benzoate in acetic acid-induced ulcerative colitis in rats. Methods Infusion of 3% acetic acid in the colon through the rectum was done to construct a rat model of ulcerative colitis. After 5 days of infusion, macroscopic, biochemical, and histopathological examinations and disease activity scoring of the colon were done to assess colonic damage. Results Acetic acid infusion resulted in severe inflammation in the colon assessed macroscopically and histopathologically. Moreover, it also led to increase in myeloperoxidase (MPO) and reduction in glutathione (GSH) levels. In the present study, repeated administration of sodium benzoate (400 and 800 mg/kg i.p.) and sulfasalazine (500 mg/kg orally) for 7 days, i.e. 2 days before and continued for 5 days after acetic acid infusion, significantly attenuated macroscopic damage and disease activity score as compared to disease control. Further, it also significantly reduced the levels of MPO and enhanced colonic levels of reduced GSH. However, the lower dose of sodium benzoate (200 mg/kg) did not show sufficient protective effect in acetic acid-induced ulcerative colitis. Further, sodium benzoate per se did not show any effect in normal rats. Conclusions The observed protective effect of sodium benzoate may be due to its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities in an ulcerative colitis model.