Adverse effects of fillers

Filler found in bone: Surgical removal of polyacrylamide hydrogel (Amazingel) from the mandible after 24 years: A case report and literature review

Polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAAG) is widely regarded as a safe soft tissue filler and has been extensively utilized for cosmetic enhancements, such as breast and facial augmentation in China from 1997 until its ban in 2006. Common complications associated with its use include inflammation, infection, granulomas, fibrosis, gel migration, and facial and soft tissue deformities. This case report describes a 45-year-old Chinese woman who experienced PAAG migration into her mandible 24 years after facial augmentation, causing irritation of the mandibular alveolar nerve - apparently the first documented instance of this occurrence. Surgical intervention was necessary to remove the migrated gel and associated calcifications. A literature review explored adverse events and management strategies for PAAG complications in cosmetic procedures. While generally considered safe, this report underscores the importance of meticulous injection techniques and careful anatomical site selection to prevent such severe complications.

Hydrogel Based on Riclin Cross-Linked with Polyethylene Glycol Diglycidyl Ether as a Soft Filler for Tissue Engineering

Hydrogels composed of natural polysaccharides have been widely used as filling materials, with a growing interest in medical cosmetology and skin care. However, conventional commercial dermal fillers still have limitations, particularly in terms of mechanical performance and durability in vivo. In this study, a novel injectable and implantable hydrogel with adjustable characteristics was prepared from succinoglycan riclin by introducing PEG diglycidyl ether as a cross-linker. FTIR spectra confirmed the cross-linking reaction. The riclin hydrogels exhibited shear-thinning behavior, excellent mechanical properties, and cytocompatibility through in vitro experiments. Furthermore, when compared with subcutaneous injection of a commercial hyaluronic acid hydrogel, the riclin hydrogels showed enhanced persistence and biocompatibility in Balb/c mice after 16 weeks. These results demonstrate the great potential of the riclin-based hydrogel as an alternative to conventional commercial soft tissue fillers.

High-Frequency Ultrasound for Long-term Safety Assessment of Poly-L-Lactic Acid Facial Filler

BACKGROUND

Injectable poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA) is a new type of biodegradable dermal filler that has been utilized for soft tissue filling. However, there is no convenient and reliable method to assess the long-term safety of PLLA filler.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the long-term safety of PLLA injection into nasolabial folds by high-frequency ultrasound and to select the ultrasonic probes with the most appropriate frequency.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After a 30-month PLLA injection into the deep dermis of the nasolabial fold, subjects were examined by high-frequency ultrasound with the 20 MHz and 50 MHz probes.

RESULTS

Twenty subjects with nasolabial fold contour deficiency were enrolled in this study. After a 30-month PLLA injection in nasolabial folds, PLLA degraded entirely in 16 subjects (16/20, 80%), and abnormal echo in the skin was observed in 4 subjects (4/20, 20%) caused by undegraded PLLA microparticles, PLLA microparticles deposition, fibrous nodules, and granuloma. The 20-MHz probe is more appropriate than the 50-MHz probe for evaluating the adverse effects of PLLA injection.

CONCLUSION

High-frequency ultrasound is a rapid, reliable, and noninvasive method to monitor the degradation condition of PLLA and the formation of papules and nodules associated with PLLA injection.

Puzzle Facelift: A non-surgical, whole treatment for facial modelling and rejuvenation

The assessment of correct anatomy of face and the evaluation of the dynamic interplay between anatomy and function, in order to get an overall improvement, is a leading topic in aesthetic surgery and has increased its impact in the recent years. A non-surgical impact technique reduces both post-treatment discomfort and the overall cost. Obtaining the simultaneous correction in forehead, nose, lips and chin means obtaining an overall improvement in face view. Likewise, the high predictability of the procedure and the absence of alloplastic implant, bone re-absorption and scars have to be considered in non-surgical aesthetic medicine. In conclusion, a single-session of profile correction using HA filler should be proposed to patient, every time the aesthetic practitioner sees a coexistence of forehead, nose lips and chin defects.

Non surgical facial reshaping using MD Codes

BACKGROUND

Both age-related and congenital volume deficiencies may be addressed through the injection of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers. Deep injection provides structural support, more superficial fat-tissue injection mediates contouring, and superficial intradermal use of HA filler and/or onabotulinumtoxinA may be used for refinement.

AIMS

To evaluate the clinical efficacy, patient satisfaction, and safety of the MD Codes approach as a proposed standardized methodology for full-face rejuvenation.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center study of 250 consecutive adult patients undergoing full-face rejuvenation with HA fillers (Vycross) and onabotulinumtoxinA based on the MD Codes approach.

RESULTS

The mean age was 39.4 ± 11.6 years, and 80.4% were female. All patients were treated with HA filler in the midface; 89.6% were also treated in the upper face, and 63.2% in the lower face. The mean number of syringes used was 14 ± 4 (range 4-25), with more syringes typically required in older versus younger patients. All patients received onabotulinumtoxinA treatment. Mean FACE-Q Appearance-Related Psychosocial Distress score decreased from 54.3 ± 9.3 pretreatment to 36.1 ± 8.9 at 3 months post-treatment (P < .05). The most common complications were bruising (35.2%), transient soft-tissue edema (14.0%), and prolonged periorbital edema (3.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Full-face rejuvenation based on the MD Codes approach provides significant esthetic improvements, with no major safety issues observed.

PMMA Safety for Facial Filling: Review of Rates of Granuloma Occurrence and Treatment Methods

PMMA is composed of microspheres suspended in bovine collagen. Once injected in a dermal area, the carrier is absorbed, giving place to collagen that gives volume and maintains the spheres in the place. This process may give origin to exacerbate foreign body reaction and granuloma. The frequency of such complication is not clear. The primary objective was to review and compare the frequencies of granuloma between the published studies. The secondary aim was to compare the therapies and efficacies. The series of cases in which PMMA was used as facial filler were reviewed, and the rate of granulomas was compared; the case report studies describing those complications were also reviewed, and the therapies and outcomes were quantified. The data showed general frequency of PMMA-related complications of 4.9% and granulomas 1.9%; the incidence of granuloma was 1/2075 patients-year, and the time to development ranged from 6 to 180 months. The most used therapies were steroid, surgery or both, with satisfactory results. In conclusion, considering the actual risks and benefits of PMMA, we may affirm that it is a safe filler; doctors and patients must be conscious of potential risks when deciding for its use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Non-infectious Granulomatous Lesions of the Orofacial Region

Granulomatous lesions of the orofacial region are a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by a granulomatous reaction to a variety of stimuli. Infectious agents, foreign material, systemic inflammation and metabolic disorders can all be associated with granulomatous inflammation. In the orofacial region primary causes of granulomatosis include foreign body reaction, delayed hypersensitivity to topical agents and idiopathic orofacial granulomatosis. Secondary causes of granulomas include infectious agents, sarcoid, and Crohn disease. For this review, infectious causes of orofacial granulomatosis (OFG) including bacteria, parasites and fungi will not be discussed.