Primavera: A new therapeutical approach to vulvo-vaginal atrophy

Chemotherapy and Related Female Sexual Dysfunction: A Review of Literature

Context: Cancer is a detrimental illness that affects patients’ quality of life and other aspects of a healthy life. Chemotherapy has been shown to have a direct and indirect effect on the sex organs of women. Evidence Acquisition: We searched in databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Google scholar. The keywords for our search were as follows: “Chemotherapy” OR “Cancer treatment” AND “Sexual dysfunction “OR “Sexuality” OR "libido” OR "dyspareunia" OR "orgasmic disorder" OR "sexual disorder". We evaluated the articles based on their abstract and 92 studies were selected and used in the present study. Results: Chemotherapeutic agents damage ovaries and could cause premature ovarian failure. Furthermore, chemotherapy disturbs the femininity aspects of patients and reduces their libido. In this review article, we aimed at a better understanding the effect of chemotherapy on the sexual function of female cancer survivals. Conclusions: In conclusion, chemotherapy is one of the most common cancer treatments affecting sexual health aspects, such as decreased libido, arousal and orgasm, dyspareunia, dysfunction of the sexual response cycle before puberty, and vulvovaginal atrophy. However, many patients are reluctant to discuss their sexual problems.

Treatment of Urogenital Symptoms in Individuals With a History of Estrogen-dependent Breast Cancer: Clinical Consensus

SUMMARY

With an estimated 3.8 million breast cancer survivors in the United States, obstetrician-gynecologists often are on the front lines of addressing survivorship issues, including the hypoestrogenic-related adverse effects of cancer therapies or early menopause in survivors (1). Although systemic and vaginal estrogen are used widely for symptomatic relief of genitourinary syndrome of menopause in the general population, among individuals with a history of hormone-sensitive cancer, there is uncertainty about the safety of hormone-based therapy, leading many individuals with bothersome symptoms to remain untreated, with potential negative consequences on quality of life (2). An effective management strategy requires familiarity with a range of both hormonal and nonhormonal treatment options, knowledge about the pharmaceutical mechanisms of action, and the ability to tailor treatment based on individual risk factors. This clinical consensus document was developed using an a priori protocol in conjunction with two authors specializing in urogynecology and gynecologic oncology. This document has been updated to review the safety and efficacy of newer hormonal treatment options as well as nonhormonal modalities.

Awareness about Vulvovaginal Aesthetics Procedures among Medical Students and Health Professionals in Saudi Arabia

OBJECTIVE

 The present study aimed to explore the opinion and ethical consideration of vulvovaginal aesthetics procedures (VVAPs) among health professionals and medical students in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

 This is a cross-sectional study performed between January 2020 and April 2020. Data was collected through electronic media, WhatsApp, and emails. The results were analyzed by applying the Students t-test, and correlations were considered significant if they presented a p-value < 0.05.

RESULTS

 There is significant demand to educate doctors, health professionals, medical students, and gynecologists for the VVAPs to have a solid foundation, justified indications, and knowledge about various aesthetic options. Although female doctors, medical students, young doctors, and gynecologists have more knowledge about VVAPs, all health professionals ought to be aware of recent trends in vulvovaginal aesthetics (VVA). The present analysis determined that VVA should be under the domain of gynecologists, rather than under that of plastic surgeons, general surgeons, and cosmetologists. The majority of the participants considered that vaginal rejuvenation, "G-spot" augmentation, clitoral surgery, and hymenoplasty are not justifiable on medical grounds.

CONCLUSION

 The decision to opt for different techniques for vaginal tightening and revitalization should be taken very carefully, utilizing the shared decision-making approach. Ethical aspects and moral considerations are important key factors before embarking in the VVAPs purely for cosmetic reasons. Further research is required to determine the sexual, psychological, and body image outcomes for women who underwent elective VVAPs. Moreover, medical educators must consider VVAPs as part of the undergraduate and postgraduate medical curriculum.