It's time for Mohs: Micrographic surgery for the treatment of high-risk basal cell carcinomas of the head and neck regions

Efficacy of micrographic surgery versus conventional excision in reducing recurrence for basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The standard of care for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) involves excision by conventional surgery (CS) with a predefined safety margin of resection or micrographic surgery (MS) with microscopic margin control. Previous studies have reported the superiority of MS in reducing recurrences for high-risk BCC and SCC. This systematic review aimed to assess MS and CS recurrence rates by including randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted for related studies in PubMed, LILACS, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINHAL and Cochrane until May 2023. RCTs and cohorts involving patients with BCC or SCC submitted to MS and CS were included. Risk of bias assessment followed Cochrane-recommended tools for RCTs and cohorts, and certainty of evidence followed the GRADE approach. Pooled estimates were used to determine the relative risk (RR) and absolute risk difference (RD) using a random-effects model. Seventeen studies were included, two RCTs and fifteen cohorts. There were 82 recurrences in 3050 tumours submitted to MS, with an overall recurrence rate of 3.1% (95% CI 2.0%-4.7%). For CS, there were 209 recurrences in 3453 tumours, with a recurrence rate of 5.3% (95% CI 2.9%-9.3%). The combined estimate of RR was 0.48 (95% CI 0.36-0.63), without heterogeneity nor evidence of publication bias (p > 0.3). The RD resulted in 2.9% (95% CI 1.0%-4.9%; NNT = 35). Regarding subgroup analysis, the RR for BBC was 0.37 (95% CI 0.25-0.54), and RD was 3.7% (95% CI 0.8%-6.5%; NNT = 28). For SCC, RR was 0.57 (95% CI 0.29-1.13), and RD was 1.9% (95% CI 0.8%-4.7%; NNT = 53). Among primary tumours, RR was 0.39 (95% CI 0.28-0.54), and for recurrent tumours was 0.67 (95% CI 0.30-1.50). There is moderate evidence based on two RCTs, and low evidence based on 15 cohort studies that MS is superior to CS in reducing recurrences of BCCs and primary tumours. The development of protocols that maximize the cost-effectiveness of each method in different clinical scenarios is paramount.

Implications of Malignancy, Radiation, and Timing of Major Nasal Reconstruction

Owing to the complex, multilayered anatomy of the nose in the central face, major nasal reconstruction can pose a significant challenge for reconstructive surgeons. It is the responsibility of reconstructive surgeons to have an understanding of the most common cutaneous malignancies and excisional techniques that may lead to complex nasal defects. The purpose of this article is to discuss these malignancies, excisional techniques, and impacts of radiation on tissue that has implications for reconstructive surgeons.

European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for diagnosis and treatment of basal cell carcinoma-update 2023

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common malignant tumour in white populations. Multidisciplinary experts from European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), European Dermatology Forum, European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes, and the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology developed updated recommendations on diagnosis and treatment of BCC. BCCs were categorised into 'easy-to-treat' (common) and 'difficult-to-treat' according to the new EADO clinical classification. Diagnosis is based on clinico-dermatoscopic features, although histopathological confirmation is mandatory in equivocal lesions. The first-line treatment of BCC is complete surgery. Micrographically controlled surgery shall be offered in high-risk and recurrent BCC, and BCC located on critical anatomical sites. Topical therapies and destructive approaches can be considered in patients with low-risk superficial BCC. Photodynamic therapy is an effective treatment for superficial and low-risk nodular BCCs. Management of 'difficult-to-treat' BCCs should be discussed by a multidisciplinary tumour board. Hedgehog inhibitors (HHIs), vismodegib or sonidegib, should be offered to patients with locally advanced and metastatic BCC. Immunotherapy with anti-PD1 antibodies (cemiplimab) is a second-line treatment in patients with a progression of disease, contraindication, or intolerance to HHI therapy. Radiotherapy represents a valid alternative in patients who are not candidates for or decline surgery, especially elderly patients. Electrochemotherapy may be offered when surgery or radiotherapy is contraindicated. In Gorlin patients, regular skin examinations are required to diagnose and treat BCCs at an early stage. Long-term follow-up is recommended in patients with high-risk BCC, multiple BCCs, and Gorlin syndrome.

Adequacy of surgical margins, re-excision, and evaluation of factors associated with recurrence: a retrospective study of 769 basal cell carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Achieving adequate surgical margins and preventing recurrence are important in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma (BCC).

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the adequacy of surgical margins and the re-excision rates in patients with primary BCC who underwent standard surgical treatment using our proposed algorithm and to define the risk factors in patients with recurrent BCC.

METHODS

The medical records of patients who were histopathologically diagnosed with BCC were reviewed. An algorithm created based on previous literature was used to determine the distribution of optimal surgical margins adequacy and re-excision rates.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were observed between the cases with and without recurrence in age at diagnosis (p=0.004), tumor size (p=0.023), tumor location in the H zone of the face (p=0.005), and aggressive histopathological subtype (p=0.000). When the tumors were evaluated for adequacy of deep and lateral surgical margins and re-excision rates, higher rates of adequate excision (457 cases, 68.0%) and re-excision (43 cases, 33.9%) were noted for tumors in the H or M zone.

STUDY LIMITATIONS

Inadequate follow-up of newly diagnosed patients in terms of recurrence and metastasis and the retrospective application of our proposed algorithm are the limitations of the present study.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that if BCC was detected at an early age and at an early stage, recurrence was lower. The H and M zones were the regions with the highest rates of optimal surgical outcomes.

Clinicopathological factors influencing the number of stages of Mohs surgery for basal cell carcinoma

Background

Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) is commonly used to treat high-risk basal cell carcinoma (BCC).

Objectives

Correlate clinicopathologic preoperative features with the number of MMS stages (primary endpoint) and margins (secondary endpoint) required for BCC complete excision.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed BCCs treated by MMS in a 2-year period at the study’s institution. Variables studied included the patient gender, age, immune status, lesion size, location, if it was a primary, recurrent, or persistent tumor, histopathologic characteristics, number of surgical stages, and amount of tissue excised.

Results

116 BCCs were included. The majority (61.2%, n = 71) required a single-stage surgery for complete clearance, requiring a final margins of 3.11 ± 2.35 mm. Statistically significant differences between locations in different high-risk areas (periocular, perioral, nose, ear) and the number of MMS stages required for complete excision (p = 0.025) were found, with periocular tumours requiring the highest mean of stages (2.29 ± 0.95). An aggressive histopathology significantly influenced the number of MMS stages (p = 0.012). Any significant relation between clinicopathological features and variation in the final surgical margins was found, just certain tendencies (male patients, persistent tumor, periocular location, and high-risk histopathological tumors required larger margins). Neither patient age or tumor dimension correlated significantly with both number of MMS stages and final surgical margins.

Study limitations

Limitations of this study include its single-center nature with a small sample size, which limits the value of conclusions.

Conclusion

Main factors related to a greater number of MMS stages were periocular location and high-risk histopathological subtype of the tumor.

Recurrence rate of basal cell carcinoma among different micrographic surgery techniques: Systematic review with meta-analysis

In high-risk basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), micrographic surgery (MS) has high tissue preservation and low recurrence rates. The Mohs technique is the most commonly used technique, with limited use of other MS techniques. No studies have been designed to compare the MS methods. This review aimed to assess BCC recurrence rates of different MS techniques. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to search for related studies in PubMed, LILACS, EMBASE, SCOPUS, WEB OF SCIENCE, CINHAL, and COCHRANE until March 2021. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies involving patients with BCC and indications for different MS techniques were included. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently by three peer reviewers, as was the risk of bias assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. Pooled estimates were assessed using the random-effects model (Logit), and heterogeneity was assessed by the chi-square test (χ² ). Stata Software version 17.0 was used for analysis. Eighteen studies were included, 2 RCTs and 16 observational studies. The overall recurrence rate was 2% (95% CI, 1.0-3.0%; χ² = 46.2; p = 0.00; 18 studies, 10,424 BCCs). In studies using the Mohs technique, the recurrence rate was 3.0% (95% CI, 1.0-5.0%; χ² = 11.0; p = 0.00; 6 studies; 1,582 BCCs), with the Munich technique 3.0% (95% CI, 2.0-5.0%; χ² = 0.0; no heterogeneity; 3 studies; 404 BCCs), with Tubingen technique 1% (95% CI, 1.0-2.0%; χ² = 12.1; p = 0.00; 8 studies; 8,374 BCCs) and with the Muffin technique 0.0% (95% CI, 0.0-6.0%; 1 study; 64 BCCs). Relapse rates between MS techniques were low and appeared to be similar. However, the design of this review and the absence of primary studies that directly compare the techniques do not allow us to assert the superiority between them.

Mohs Micrographic Surgery Versus Standard Excision for Basal Cell Carcinoma in the Head and Neck: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The objective of this study was to quantitatively compare outcomes between standard excision (SE) and Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for basal cell carcinoma (BCC). A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines and a search of electronic databases was conducted to identify all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing the outcomes of SE versus MMS for BCC. The primary outcome was the recurrence rate for primary and recurrent BCC. The secondary outcomes included the cost of treatment, aesthetic results, the rate of incomplete excision, and the surgical defect size post excision. Five studies enrolling 2060 lesions were identified. There was a statistically significant difference between MMS and SE groups in terms of recurrence rate for primary BCCs (odds ratio (OR) = 0.44, confidence interval (CI) = 0.16 to 0.97, P = 0.04) and recurrent BCCs (OR = 0.33, CI = 0.12 to 0.97, P = 0.04). For secondary outcomes, MMS had improved results compared with SE, except for mean cost. In conclusion, both primary and secondary BCCs treated with MMS have a reduced recurrence rate and defect size thus simplifying reconstruction. However, due to higher costs and operative time attributed to MMS, it should be reserved for high-risk BCCs.

Non-coding RNA dysregulation in skin cancers

Skin cancers are the most common cancers worldwide. They can be classified in melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), the latter includes squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). In recent years, the crucial role of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) in skin cancer pathogenesis has become increasingly evident. NcRNAs are functional RNA molecules that lack any protein-coding activity. These ncRNAs are classified based on their length: small, medium-size, and long ncRNAs. Among the most studied ncRNAs there are microRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and circular RNA (circRNAs). ncRNAs have the ability to regulate gene expression at transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels and are involved in skin cancer cell proliferation, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis. Many ncRNAs exhibit tissue- or cell-specific expression while others have been correlated to tumor staging, drug resistance, and prognosis. For these reasons, ncRNAs have both a diagnostic and prognostic significance in skin cancers. Our review summarizes the functional role of ncRNAs in skin cancers and their potential clinical application as biomarkers.

The role of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in skin cancer development: 26S proteasome-activated NF-κB signal transduction

The Ubiquitin-Proteasome System plays a central role in signal transduction associated with stress, in the skin in particular by the control of NF-κB pathways. Under normal conditions, the inhibitory protein IκB is phosphorylated by kinases, then ubiquitinated and ends up at the proteasome to be degraded. The present short review discusses recent progress in the inhibition of NF-κB activation by proteasome inhibitors prevents the degradation of protein IκB, which accumulates in the cytosol, and there by the activation of NF-κB. Moreover, would not only limit the expression of adhesion molecules and cytokines involved in metastatic processes, but also increase the sensitivity of cancer cells to apoptosis. Considering this fact, the activity of NF-κB is regulated by the phosphorylation and proteasome-dependent degradation of its inhibitor Iκb. In this scenario, the use of a proteasome inhibitor might be an effective strategy in the treatment of skin cancer with constitutive activation of NF-κB.

Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of carcinoma worldwide. BCC development is the result of a complex interaction between environmental, phenotypic and genetic factors. However, despite the progress in the field, BCC biology and mechanisms of resistance against systemic treatments have been poorly investigated. The aim of the present review is to provide a revision of BCC histological and molecular features, including microRNA (miRNA) dysregulation, with a specific focus on the molecular basis of BCC systemic therapies. Papers from the last ten years regarding BCC genetic and phenotypic alterations, as well as the mechanism of resistance against hedgehog pathway inhibitors vismodegib and sonidegib were included. The involvement of miRNAs in BCC resistance to systemic therapies is emerging as a new field of knowledge.