Evaluating the risk-to-benefit ratio of using cotrimoxazole as a pneumocystis pneumonia preventative intervention among pemphigus patients treated with rituximab: A retrospective study with 494 patients

Infections in the era of immunobiologicals

Immunobiologicals represent an innovative therapeutic option in dermatology. They are indicated in severe and refractory cases of different diseases when there is contraindication, intolerance, or failure of conventional systemic therapy and in cases with significant impairment of patient quality of life. The main immunobiologicals used in dermatology basically include inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF), inhibitors of interleukin-12 and -23 (anti-IL12/23), inhibitors of interleukin-17 and its receptor (anti-IL17), inhibitors of interleukin-23 (anti-IL23), rituximab (anti-CD20 antibody), dupilumab (anti-IL4/IL13) and intravenous immunoglobulin. Their immunomodulatory action may be associated with an increase in the risk of infections in the short and long term, and each case must be assessed individually, according to the risk inherent to the drug, the patient general condition, and the need for precautions. This article will discuss the main risks of infection associated with the use of immunobiologicals, addressing the risk in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients, vaccination, fungal infections, tuberculosis, leprosy, and viral hepatitis, and how to manage the patient in the most diverse scenarios.

Cotrimoxazole as a Preventative Intervention for Pneumocystis Pneumonia in Pemphigus Patients Treated with Rituximab: A Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is a severe, life-threatening complication in patients treated with rituximab. However, there is no consensus on the primary prophylaxis for it in rituximab-treated pemphigus patients. Therefore, we sought to investigate the prophylactic efficacy and safety profile of cotrimoxazole for reducing the risk of developing PJP in pemphigus patients receiving rituximab.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study investigated 148 pemphigus patients undergoing a first cycle of rituximab between 2008 and 2021 at a tertiary referral center in northern Taiwan. Patients were divided into the prophylaxis group (N = 113) and the control group (N = 35) according to whether or not cotrimoxazole was administered. The primary outcome was the 1-year incidence of PJP in the two groups, while the secondary outcome was the incidence of cotrimoxazole-related adverse events.

RESULTS

Of the 148 patients enrolled in this study, three patients, all in the control group, developed PJP during the 1-year follow-up. The incidence of PJP (8.6%) in the control group was significantly higher than that in the prophylaxis group (0%) (p = 0.012). The incidence of cotrimoxazole-related adverse events was 2.7%, and none of the cases were associated with life-threatening conditions. In addition, the cumulative prednisolone dose was associated with a trend of a higher risk of PJP (p = 0.0483).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic cotrimoxazole significantly reduces the risk of PJP in a certain high-risk population and has a tolerable safety profile.

Elevated serum level of B-cell activating factor (BAFF) after rituximab therapy in pemphigus vulgaris patients suggests a possible therapeutic efficacy of B-cell depletion therapies combined with anti-BAFF agents

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is widely used for treatment of pemphigus patients. B-cell activating factor (BAFF) and a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) play key roles in B cell survival, maturation, and differentiation. Here, the effect of rituximab on BAFF and APRIL in patients with pemphigus vulgaris (PV) was studied.

METHODS

Fifty PV cases and 56 healthy individuals were recruited. Patients received rituximab for a period of 6 months. The levels of BAFF and APRIL were measured in the serum samples. The frequency of CD19+ B cells was measured by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

The level of BAFF was significantly higher in the patients at the baseline level than controls (P = 0.0005). The level of BAFF was significantly higher at the 3rd month follow-up compared to the baseline (P = 0.033). There was a significant increase in the BAFF level at the 6th month follow-up compared to baseline (P = 0.0134). There was no significant difference in the CD19+ B cells/total lymphocytes ratio in the PV patients between the 3rd and 6th month follow-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated BAFF in the sera could be associated with PV immunopathogenesis. Inhibition of BAFF after rituximab therapy might interfere with repopulation of B cells and confer a therapeutic approach in PV.