Effectiveness of topical pilocarpine in refractory oral lesions of pemphigus vulgaris: Results from an open-label, prospective, pilot study

Clinical and immunological predictors of post-rituximab paradoxical pemphigus flare: A prospective cohort study

Background Paradoxical flare of pemphigus following rituximab infusion has been reported previously, however, its incidence or risk factors have not been studied in detail. Objectives To evaluate the clinical and immunological predictors associated with post-rituximab paradoxical pemphigus flare. Materials and Methods This was a prospective cohort study including adult patients with pemphigus vulgaris or foliaceus who were treated with rituximab. Patients were administered 1000 mg of intravenous rituximab on days 0 and 14 (Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) protocol), with or without oral prednisolone and/or conventional immunosuppressive agents. Baseline clinical and immunological predictors of post-rituximab pemphigus flares were assessed. Results Fifty patients (mean age 40.44 ± 12.36 years) with a mean pemphigus disease area index (PDAI) score of 27.8 ± 15.48 were administered rituximab. Post-rituximab flare occurred in 10 (20%) patients after a mean of 14.1 ± 4.33 days after the first rituximab infusion. The mean baseline PDAI score (36.4 ± 11.7 vs. 25.6 ± 15.7, P = 0.02) and serum anti-Dsg1 levels (1216.8 ± 850.1 vs. 592 ± 562.12 RU/mL, P = 0.03) were statistically significantly higher in patients experiencing a flare. Using ROC-curve analysis, a PDAI score of 328 (OR 8.3, 95% CI 1.5-44.7) was 80% sensitive and 67.5% specific in predicting post-rituximab flare, while serum anti-Dsg1 level of 31137.78 RU/ml had a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 85%. There was no significant difference in terms of affected body surface area, type of pemphigus, starting prednisolone dose, oral immunosuppressive adjuvant, serum anti-Dsg3, serum anti-AchRM3, and peripheral CD19+ B cell population. Limitations Our study is limited by a relatively small sample size. Immunological factors were not evaluated at the time of pemphigus flare. Though these unexpected pemphigus flares are likely to be associated with rituximab infusion, the possibility of spontaneous disease exacerbation cannot be entirely excluded. Conclusions Patients with more severe pemphigus or high serum anti-Dsg1 are at risk of post-rituximab paradoxical flare, and may benefit from rituximab administration under close monitoring.

A Review on the Role of Pilocarpine on the Management of Xerostomia and the Importance of the Topical Administration Systems Development

Xerostomia is linked to an increased risk of dental caries, oral fungal infections, and speaking/swallowing difficulties, factors that may significantly degrade patients’ life, socially- or emotionally-wise. Consequently, there is an increasing interest in developing management approaches for confronting this oral condition, at which pilocarpine, a parasympathomimetic agent, plays a vital role. Although the therapeutic effects of orally administrated pilocarpine on the salivary gland flow and the symptoms of xerostomia have been proved by numerous studies, the systemic administration of this drug is affiliated with various adverse effects. Some of the typical adverse effects include sweating, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, rhinitis, dizziness and increased urinary frequency. In this vein, new strategies to develop novel and effective dosage forms for topical (i.e., in the oral cavity) pilocarpine administration, in order for the salivary flow to be enhanced with minimal systemic manifestations, have emerged. Therefore, the purpose of the current review is to survey the literature concerning the performance of topical pilocarpine delivery systems. According to the findings, the topical delivery of pilocarpine can be regarded as the equivalent to systemic delivery of the drug, efficacy-wise, but with improved patient tolerance and less adverse effects.