A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of intralesional tranexamic acid versus platelet rich plasma in the treatment of melasma

Autolougous platelet concentrates in esthetic medicine

This narrative review summarizes current knowledge on the use of autologous platelet concentrates (APCs) in esthetic medicine, with the goal of providing clinicians with reliable information for clinical practice. APCs contain platelets that release various growth factors with potential applications in facial and dermatologic treatments. This review examines several facial esthetic applications of APCs, including acne scarring, skin rejuvenation, melasma, vitiligo, stretchmarks, peri-orbital rejuvenation, peri-oral rejuvenation, hair regeneration and the volumizing effects of APC gels. A systematic review of literature databases (PubMed/MEDLINE) was conducted up to October 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the English language on APCs for facial rejuvenation and dermatology. A total of 96 articles were selected including those on platelet rich plasma (PRP), plasma-rich in growth factors (PRGF), and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF). Clinical recommendations gained from the reviews are provided. In summary, the use of APCs in facial esthetics is a promising yet relatively recent treatment approach. Overall, the majority of studies have focused on the use of PRP with positive outcomes. Only few studies have compared PRP versus PRF with all demonstrating superior outcomes using PRF. The existing studies have limitations including small sample sizes and lack of standardized assessment criteria. Future research should utilize well-designed RCTs, incorporating appropriate controls, such as split-face comparisons, and standardized protocols for APC usage, including optimal number of sessions, interval between sessions, and objective improvement scores. Nevertheless, the most recent formulations of platelet concentrates offer clinicians an ability to improve various clinical parameters and esthetic concerns.

The Biological Role of Platelet Derivatives in Regenerative Aesthetics

Bioproducts derived from platelets have been extensively used across various medical fields, with a recent notable surge in their application in dermatology and aesthetic procedures. These products, such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), play crucial roles in inducing blood vessel proliferation through growth factors derived from peripheral blood. PRP and PRF, in particular, facilitate fibrin polymerization, creating a robust structure that serves as a reservoir for numerous growth factors. These factors contribute to tissue regeneration by promoting cell proliferation, differentiation, and migration and collagen/elastin production. Aesthetic medicine harnesses these effects for diverse purposes, including hair restoration, scar treatment, striae management, and wound healing. Furthermore, these biological products can act as adjuvants with other treatment modalities, such as laser therapy, radiofrequency, and microneedling. This review synthesizes the existing evidence, offering insights into the applications and benefits of biological products in aesthetic medicine.

Intradermal injection of tranexamic acid versus platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of melasma: a split-face comparative study

Millions of people throughout the world suffer from the acquired condition of hyperpigmentation known as melasma. Melasma is characterized by symmetrically oriented hyperpigmented macules and patches. Many treatment options are available with variable degrees of efficacy and tolerability. The aim of the work was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and safety of intradermal tranexamic acid (TXA) versus intradermal platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the treatment of various types of melasma. The current split-face prospective study included 40 cases with melasma. Tranexamic acid (TXA) was injected intradermally into the right side of the face by using a concentration of 4 mg/ml, while platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was injected intradermally into the left side. In both sides, a total of three sessions of treatment were provided, once every 4 weeks. Digital photographs were taken before each treatment session and 3 months after the last session. The modified melasma area severity index (mMASI) grading system and dermoscopy were used to assess the improvement in the condition. The disease severity and percentage of improvement were assessed by mMASI score before and after therapy across both sides of the face. along with determining the degree of satisfaction and side effects among the included cases. The mean mMASI score before therapy in the TXA side was 4.59 ± 2.87, while in the PRP side, the mean mMASI score before therapy was 4.72 ± 2.72 with no statistically significant difference between the two sides (p = 0.841). After 3 months of treatment, the mean mMASI score in the TXA-treated side was 2.49 ± 1.58 with a mean percentage of decrease of 45.67 ± 8.10%, while in the PRP side, the mean mMASI score after treatment was 2.17 ± 1.41 with a mean percentage of decrease of 53.66 ± 11.27%. There was a high statistically significant decrease in the mMASI score after treatment on both sides (p < 0.001); however, the percentage of score reduction in the PRP side compared to the TXA side was statistically higher. Intradermal injection with PRP revealed higher efficacy in the treatment of melasma as compared to TXA injection with no significant difference regarding the associated side effects.