Combined treatment with omalizumab and secukinumab in a patient with chronic spontaneous urticaria and psoriasis

Combination treatment with monoclonal antibodies for the management of severe asthma and immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a comprehensive review

Biological drugs have revolutionized the management of severe asthma, and a tailored treatment approach made it possible to consider remission as an achievable treatment target. The incidence of autoimmune diseases is increasing in many parts of the world. Patients suffering from severe asthma, eligible or already treated with an asthma-approved biologic agent, may suffer from another immune-mediated inflammatory disease (IMID) that could require the simultaneous use of a second monoclonal antibody. The real-life studies available in the literature describing the concurrent administration of an asthma-approved biologic agent with another biologic for a different immune disease, obtained through a systematic search on online databases based on monoclonal antibodies, were collected and analyzed. 26 articles were included in this review according to the prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. All included papers were retrospective in nature. Study designs were case reports (n=18), case series (n=3), retrospective chart reviews (n=3), retrospective observational studies (n=1), and cohort studies (n=1). The study is intended to present, within the current literature, all the administered combinations of severe asthma-approved biologics with monoclonal antibodies for a different indication. Those were grouped according to the IMID for whom the second biologic agent, with a different mechanism of action, was prescribed. The combinations prescribed to the cohort of patients specifically treating uncontrolled severe asthma were deeper evaluated in the discussion section, since an analysis of these therapeutic combinations deriving from real-life experiences may be useful to optimize the management of patients with severe asthma, ultimately leading to improved patient care and outcomes. Prospective registries and future studies are required to assess the safety and efficacy of combination therapies for severe asthmatic patients who suffer from an IMID.

Omalizumab treatment in combination with any other biologics: Is it really a safe duo?

BACKGROUND

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a mast cell-mediated disease, which is sometimes associated with various inflammatory disorders. Omalizumab is a commonly used biological agent, which is a recombinant, humanized, monoclonal antibody against human immunoglobulin E. However, there are only few reports about the combination of omalizumab for CSU with any other biologics for accompanying inflammatory diseases in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the patients whose treatment of omalizumab for CSU were combined with any other biologics for associated inflammatory disorders and to describe whether these combinations might have any safety concerns.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with CSU treated with omalizumab concurrently using another biological agent for their other dermatological conditions.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients, 19 women and 12 men, were evaluated. The mean age was 45.13 years. The median duration of omalizumab was 11 months. Biological agents which patients were treated other than omalizumab were as follows: adalimumab biosimilar (n = 3), ustekinumab (n = 4), secukinumab (n = 17) and ixekizumab (n = 7). The median duration of concurrent use of omalizumab and other biologics was 8 months. None of the drug combinations was stopped because of side effects.

CONCLUSION

This observational study demonstrated that omalizumab treatment for CSU in combination with any other biological agents for dermatological disorders appeared to be well tolerated without any major safety concerns.

Stepping Down Treatment in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: What We Know and What We Don't Know

In chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), wheals, angioedema, or both appear spontaneously for > 6 weeks. Current recommended treatment options for urticaria target mast cell mediators such as histamine, or activators, such as autoantibodies. The goal of CSU treatment is to treat the disease until it is gone as effectively and safely as possible. As no cure is available for CSU as of now, the treatment is aimed at continuously suppressing disease activity, with complete control of the disease and a normalization of quality of life. To achieve this, pharmacological treatment should be continued until no longer needed. Treatment of CSU should follow the basic principles of treating as much as needed and as little as possible taking into consideration that the activity of the disease may vary. Since CSU is a disease with spontaneous remission, it is hard to tell, in patients with complete control and no signs or symptoms, when medication is no longer needed. The current international guideline for urticaria suggests that the treatment can be stepped down once a patient is free of signs and symptoms. Other reasons for stepping down the treatment of CSU patients include safety concerns or issues, pregnancy or wanting to become pregnant, and economic factors. As of now, it is unclear over which period, with what intervals and with which dosages CSU treatment should be stepped down. Guidance on this is needed for all recommended therapies: (i) standard-dosed second-generation H1-antihistamine (sgAH), (ii) higher than standard-dosed sgAH, (iii) standard-dosed omalizumab, (iv) higher than standard-dosed omalizumab, and (v) cyclosporine. However, there is a lack of controlled trials on the step down and discontinuation of these treatments. Here, we aim to provide a summary of what is known and what needs to be investigated in further studies, based on our own experience and real-world evidence.