1
|
Glackin A, Marino JL, Peate M, McNeil R, Orme LM, McCarthy MC, Sawyer SM. Experiences of Oncofertility Decision-Making and Care in a National Sample of Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Patients and Parents. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2024; 13:170-179. [PMID: 37535814 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2023.0036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Cancer and its treatments are known to compromise fertility in adolescents and young adults (AYAs). The emotional burden of possible infertility is reduced in those who receive supportive oncofertility care. In legal minors, provision of health care must consider the legal context and desire that AYAs have for autonomous decision-making, together with their competence to make health decisions. This has important implications for how oncofertility discussions may, or may not, involve parents. The aim of this study was to explore oncofertility decision-making and care experiences in a national Australian sample of AYA cancer patients and their parents. Methods: AYAs aged 15-25 years and parents were recruited from 17 cancer care sites and CanTeen Australia as part of a national AYA cancer care study. The cross-sectional survey included open-ended questions regarding oncofertility care experiences. We used reflexive thematic analysis to identify themes. Results: Data were available for 99 AYAs and 111 parents. Four themes were identified: emotional care needs; parent-AYA dynamics including AYA autonomy and agency; decision-making considerations including values and practicalities; and reflections on oncofertility care and follow-up. Both AYAs and parents placed importance on AYA autonomy in fertility decision-making, but many AYAs appreciated the role of parents in providing support and guidance throughout the process. Conclusion: Health care professionals are encouraged to autonomously engage AYAs around fertility decision-making, while concurrently offering opportunities that promote parental support. Better psychological support and follow-up oncofertility care are also needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aoife Glackin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jennifer L Marino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Specialty of Child and Adolescent Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michelle Peate
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Robyn McNeil
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisa M Orme
- ONTrac at Peter Mac, Victorian Youth Cancer Service, Peter MacCallum Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maria C McCarthy
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Children's Cancer Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susan M Sawyer
- Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Neylon K, Condren C, Guerin S, Looney K. What Are the Psychosocial Needs of Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer? A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2023; 12:799-820. [PMID: 37130327 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2022.0130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Adolescents and young adults with cancer (AYACs) have become recognized as a unique group in recent years. The unique developmental context and related challenges of being a young person with a cancer diagnosis can lead to a distinct and diverse set of psychosocial issues. Existing research has attempted to explore these psychosocial needs and challenges and to develop appropriate and individualized interventions. However, the needs of this group remain unmet, with ongoing calls for individualized support. This systematic review addressed the research question, "what are the psychosocial needs of AYACs aged 15-24 years?." PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases were searched to identify relevant studies from January 2000 to December 2022 (inclusive). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods designs were included and 29 studies met inclusion criteria. Findings provide an overview of needs from the existing literature and support the idea of a changing constellation of psychosocial needs for AYACs in areas such as identity, relationships, mental health, autonomy, and occupation. The main implications for theory and future research include the importance of the developmental context and consideration of discrepancies in the age range used within the literature to define this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Neylon
- School of Psychology, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Caoimhe Condren
- School of Psychology, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Suzanne Guerin
- School of Psychology, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kathy Looney
- School of Psychology, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pawłowski P, Ziętara KJ, Michalczyk J, Fryze M, Buchacz A, Zaucha-Prażmo A, Zawitkowska J, Torres A, Samardakiewicz M. Fertility Preservation in Children and Adolescents during Oncological Treatment-A Review of Healthcare System Factors and Attitudes of Patients and Their Caregivers. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4393. [PMID: 37686669 PMCID: PMC10487203 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Oncofertility is any therapeutic intervention to safeguard the fertility of cancer patients. Anti-cancer therapies (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, etc.) entail the risk of reproductive disorders through cytotoxic effects on gamete-building cells, especially those not yet fully developed. This literature review analyzes the available data on securing fertility in pediatric and adolescent populations to identify the methods used and describe aspects related to financing, ethics, and the perspective of patients and their parents. Topics related to oncofertility in this age group are relatively niche, with few peer-reviewed articles available and published studies mostly on adults. Compared to pubertal individuals, a limited number of fertility preservation methods are used for prepubertal patients. Funding for the procedures described varies from country to country, but only a few governments choose to reimburse them. Oncofertility of pediatric and adolescent patients raises many controversies related to the decision, parents' beliefs, having a partner, ethics, as well as the knowledge and experience of healthcare professionals. As the fertility of young cancer patients is at risk, healthcare professionals should make every effort to provide them with an opportunity to fulfill their future reproductive plans and to have a family and offspring. Systemic solutions should form the basis for the development of oncofertility in pediatric and adolescent populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Pawłowski
- Student Scientific Association at the Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (P.P.); (J.M.)
| | - Karolina Joanna Ziętara
- Student Scientific Association at the Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (P.P.); (J.M.)
| | - Justyna Michalczyk
- Student Scientific Association at the Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (P.P.); (J.M.)
| | - Magdalena Fryze
- Department of Psychology, Psychosocial Aspects of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (M.F.); (M.S.)
| | - Anna Buchacz
- Youth Cancer Europe, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Agnieszka Zaucha-Prażmo
- Department of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Transplantology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (A.Z.-P.); (J.Z.)
| | - Joanna Zawitkowska
- Department of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Transplantology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (A.Z.-P.); (J.Z.)
| | - Anna Torres
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland;
| | - Marzena Samardakiewicz
- Department of Psychology, Psychosocial Aspects of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; (M.F.); (M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Clasen NHZ, van der Perk MEM, Neggers SJCMM, Bos AME, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM. Experiences of Female Childhood Cancer Patients and Survivors Regarding Information and Counselling on Gonadotoxicity Risk and Fertility Preservation at Diagnosis: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15071946. [PMID: 37046607 PMCID: PMC10093478 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15071946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Childhood cancer patients and their families are increasingly offered oncofertility care including information regarding their risk of gonadal damage by paediatric oncologists, fertility counselling by fertility specialists and fertility preservation options. However, experiences regarding oncofertility care are underreported. We aimed to summarize the available evidence of experiences of female childhood cancer patients and survivors regarding oncofertility care. Methods: Manuscripts were systematically identified using the PubMed and Embase database. From, respectively, 1256 and 3857 manuscripts, 7 articles were included and assessed, including risk of bias assessment. Outcome measures included data describing experiences of female childhood cancer patients and survivors, regarding fertility information, counselling and/or preservation. Results: Female patients and survivors are variably satisfied with fertility information, report challenges in communication with healthcare professionals and prefer to receive general information at diagnosis and detailed fertility information later. Regrets after fertility counselling are underreported, but are associated with refusing fertility preservation. Lastly, regardless of counselling, female patients and survivors report fertility concerns about their future children’s health and effect on relationships. Conclusion: Currently, the satisfaction with oncofertility care varies and female patients or survivors report regrets and concerns regardless of receiving fertility information or counselling. These results may help to improve the content of fertility information, communication skills of healthcare professionals and timing of counselling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikita H Z Clasen
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sebastian J C M M Neggers
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section Endocrinology, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annelies M E Bos
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Division of Child Health, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584EA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Barriers to Oncofertility Care among Female Adolescent Cancer Patients in Canada. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:1583-1593. [PMID: 35323333 PMCID: PMC8947634 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29030133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Revised: 02/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
High survival rates in adolescent cancer patients have shifted the medical focus to the long-term outcomes of cancer treatments. Surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation increase the risk of infertility and infertility-related distress in adolescent cancer patients and survivors. The aims of this narrative review were to (1) describe the psychosocial impacts of cancer-related infertility in adolescents, (2) identify multilevel barriers to fertility preservation (FP) conversations and referrals, and (3) conclude with evidence-based clinical solutions for improving the oncofertility support available to Canadian adolescents. The results of this review revealed that FP decisions occur within the patient, parent, and health care provider (HCP) triad, and are influenced by factors such as parent attitudes, patient maturity, and HCP knowledge. Decision tools and HCP education can promote the occurrence of developmentally appropriate fertility discussions. At the systems level, cost and resource barriers prevent patients from receiving sufficient fertility information and referrals. Clinical models of care (MOCs) can define interdisciplinary roles and referral pathways to improve the integration of oncofertility services into adolescent cancer care. The continued integration of oncofertility care will ensure that all Canadian adolescents receive the exemplary medical and psychological support necessary to make empowered decisions about their own fertility.
Collapse
|
6
|
Martinez-Ibarra NA, Remolina-Bonilla YA, Buerba-Vieregge HH, Barragan-Carrillo R, Castro-Alonso FJ, Mateos-Corella S, Bourlon MT. Oncofertility and Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients Across the Twitterverse. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:926668. [PMID: 35846298 PMCID: PMC9278620 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.926668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Infertility is a major problem affecting children, adolescents, and young adults (AYAs) with cancer, either due to the disease itself or because of oncologic treatment. Oncofertility (OF) focuses on counseling cancer patients about fertility risks and preservation options. However, OF and fertility preservation (FP) conversations on Twitter and their impact are unknown. We aim to characterize the users and type of content of these conversations. MATERIALS AND METHODS This observational study analyzed tweets with the hashtags "#Oncofertility" and "#FertilityPreservation" over eight months. We classified Twitter accounts by user type and country. Tweets were categorized by content type, and retweets and likes were quantified. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. RESULTS A total of 399 tweets from 223 different accounts were evaluated. Twitter accounts comprised 22 countries and stemmed from high, upper-middle, and lower-middle-income countries in 86.5%, 5.4%, and 6.3%, respectively; no accounts from low-income countries were found. Accounts were mostly from physicians (37%) and healthcare centers (20%); we did not find any patient accounts. The most common content category was informative tweets directed to patients (30.8%), followed by discussion/sharing of medical papers (25.6%). Only 14.5% of tweets contained information about children and adolescents. Still, only 4.5% were aimed at children. Retweets were absent in 16.5% of the tweets, and 80.7% did not have comments. CONCLUSION OF and FP discussions on Twitter were limited to interactions among medical professionals. Also, advocacy groups showed limited activity on social media. Even though a significant proportion of tweets directed to patients were found, no active involvement of patients was observed. Finally, limited number of tweets (4.5%) were directed to children and adolescents. There is a need to raise awareness about the effects of cancer on fertility in this group. Currently, Twitter is not a resource of information for children and AYAs with cancer who need OF counseling and fertility preservation. Our results open a debate on how to promote the use of social media in the future to improve the quality of OF information available, awareness, and care since there is an unmet need for fertility preservation access in young cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nayeli A. Martinez-Ibarra
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición “Salvador Zubirán”, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Yuly A. Remolina-Bonilla
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición “Salvador Zubirán”, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Hector H. Buerba-Vieregge
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición “Salvador Zubirán”, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Regina Barragan-Carrillo
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición “Salvador Zubirán”, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Francisco J. Castro-Alonso
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de Oaxaca, San Bartolo Coyotepec, Mexico
| | - Samantha Mateos-Corella
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición “Salvador Zubirán”, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Maria T. Bourlon
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición “Salvador Zubirán”, Mexico City, Mexico
- *Correspondence: Maria T. Bourlon,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Grégoire-Briard F, Mitsakakis N, Hayawi L, Dumont T. Evaluation of Fertility Preservation Counseling and Treatments for Female Oncology Patients in an Urban Pediatric Canadian Center. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2021; 11:518-524. [PMID: 34936499 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2021.0149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Several international organizations and guidelines have recommended implementation of structured fertility preservation (FP) discussions with patients and their families before initiation of chemotherapy and radiation treatments in children. This study aimed to identify current trends and rates in FP counseling and treatments at a Canadian pediatric tertiary care center. Objectives were to measure guideline adherence for FP counseling at our institution by determining (1) the frequency of FP counseling in pediatric female oncological patients at our institution, (2) the frequency of FP treatment in this study population, and (3) the factors associated with FP pre-treatment counseling. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed, including all pediatric and adolescent female patients (age <18) seen in consultation by the oncology team. Demographic data, as well as documentation of FP counseling and referral to a reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) specialist and subsequent FP treatment were collected. Results: A total of 89 female pediatric patients were included in our study. Forty-two patients received fertility counseling (47.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 37.2-57.5). Only 29/42 (69.0%; 95% CI: 54-80.9) received counseling before onset of treatment. A 12/42 (41.4%; 95% CI: 25-59.3) of the patients who received FP counseling were referred to an REI specialist and 11/12 proceeded with FP treatment (37.9%, 95% CI: 22.7-56). Conclusion: This study presents contemporary data on the rates of FP counseling in Canadian pediatric female oncological patients and demonstrates low rates of FP counseling in our patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florence Grégoire-Briard
- Division of Gynecology, Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicholas Mitsakakis
- CHEO Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lamia Hayawi
- CHEO Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tania Dumont
- Division of Gynecology, Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,CHEO Research Institute, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abelman SH, Cron J. Contraception Counseling and Use Among Adolescent and Young Adult Female Patients Undergoing Cancer Treatment: A Retrospective Analysis. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2020; 33:652-657. [PMID: 33010464 PMCID: PMC7527283 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2020.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2020] [Revised: 09/19/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Adolescent and young adult (AYA) women undergoing cancer treatment face unique reproductive health risks. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of sexual health counseling and contraception use in the oncology setting, and to identify patient factors associated with these outcomes. DESIGN Retrospective chart review. SETTING Yale New Haven Hospital from 2013 to 2018. PARTICIPANTS Female patients 15-25 years of age receiving cancer treatment, excluding those treated with surgery only. INTERVENTIONS None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Outcomes of documented sexual health counseling and contraception use were assessed for frequency. Associations between patient factors and these outcomes were assessed using Pearson χ2 and Fisher exact tests, and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of these outcomes. RESULTS In this cohort (n = 157), the median age was 20.5 years, and the most common diagnoses were hematologic (40.8%) and thyroid (31.2%) malignancies. Of the patients, 33.1% were documented as receiving sexual health counseling, and 48.4% used contraception. Younger patients (15-20 years of age) were less likely to receive counseling (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.14-0.70, P = .005). Receiving counseling (OR 3.36, 95% CI 1.35-8.34, P = .009) and sexual activity (OR 4.18, 95% CI 1.80-9.68, P = .001) were significantly associated with contraception use. CONCLUSIONS Sexual health counseling was documented infrequently during oncologic care for AYA women, especially for younger patients. However, such conversations were associated with a higher likelihood of contraception use. There is a need to improve rates of counseling in this high-risk setting, in which adolescents may be more vulnerable with regard to sexual health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julia Cron
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Korte E, Schilling R, Balcerek M, Campbell H, Dirksen U, Herrmann G, Kepakova K, Kepak T, Klco-Brosius S, Kruseova J, Kunstreich M, Lackner H, Langer T, Panasiuk A, Stefanowicz J, Strauß G, Ranft A, Byrne J, Goldbeck L, Borgmann-Staudt A. Fertility education for adolescent cancer patients: Gaps in current clinical practice in Europe. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2020; 29:e13279. [PMID: 32567091 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As adolescent cancer patients may suffer from infertility following treatment, fertility counselling is essential. Our aim was to explore the current situation in four European countries in terms of (I) education about the risk for infertility, (II) counselling on fertility preservation, (III) patients' knowledge on fertility, (IV) sufficiency of information and (V) uptake of cryopreservation. METHODS In total, 113 patients (13-20 years) at 11 study centres completed a self-report questionnaire three and six months after cancer diagnosis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS As many as 80.2% of participants reported having received education about the risk for infertility prior to treatment, 73.2% recalled counselling on fertility preservation. Only 52.3% stated they felt sufficiently informed to make a decision. Inability to recall counselling on fertility preservation (OR = 0.03, CI: 0.00-0.47) and female gender (OR = 0.11, CI: 0.03-0.48) was associated with lower use of cryopreservation, whereas older age was associated with higher use. CONCLUSION Fertility counselling was available to a relatively high proportion of patients, and it did influence the utilisation of cryopreservation. However, many patients did not feel sufficiently informed. Further improvement is needed to enable adolescent cancer patients to make an informed decision on fertility preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Korte
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Ralph Schilling
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Magdalena Balcerek
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health, BIH, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Uta Dirksen
- University Hospital Essen Pediatrics III, West German Cancer Centre, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Research Centre (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gloria Herrmann
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Katerina Kepakova
- University Hospital Brno & International Clinical Research Center (FNUSA-ICRC), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Kepak
- University Hospital Brno & International Clinical Research Center (FNUSA-ICRC), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Marina Kunstreich
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Haematology and Immunology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Herwig Lackner
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Thorsten Langer
- Paediatric Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Joanna Stefanowicz
- Department of Pediatrics, Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Gabriele Strauß
- Helios Kliniken Berlin-Buch, Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Andreas Ranft
- University Hospital Essen Pediatrics III, West German Cancer Centre, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Research Centre (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Lutz Goldbeck
- Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Anja Borgmann-Staudt
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Norton W, Wright E. Barriers and Facilitators to Fertility-Related Discussions with Teenagers and Young Adults with Cancer: Nurses' Experiences. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2020; 9:481-489. [PMID: 32155354 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2019.0092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Improvements in cancer survival rates for teenagers and young adults (TYAs) have resulted in quality-of-life issues into survivorship becoming increasingly important. However, infertility is a potential late side effect of cancer treatment, which can negatively impact on quality of life. Advances in assisted reproductive technologies have resulted in increasingly effective fertility preservation (FP) options. Purpose: This study aimed to explore nurses' experiences of undertaking fertility-related discussions with TYAs with cancer aged 13-24 years. Methods: An interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach was used. Eleven purposively selected nurses working on a specialist TYA cancer unit participated in semistructured interviews. Data were analyzed using IPA. Results: Parents/family were experienced as self-appointed informal gatekeepers who were perceived to hold the power to control nurses' access to communicate with young people about fertility issues. Nurses adopted a supportive role, which was enhanced by the positive nature of their relationship with the TYA. Uncertainty was expressed over whether the TYA had been fully informed of their infertility risk and potential FP options. Conclusions: Nurses should manage parental involvement sensitively if TYAs are to make informed decisions regarding their future reproductive health. There is a need for clear role delineation in fertility discussions to ensure that TYAs are provided with the opportunity to discuss infertility risk and be referred to a specialist before initiating cancer treatment. Nurses should cultivate the primacy of the nurse-TYA relationship to improve fertility care. Further research into the factors that TYAs may consider beneficial within the nurse-patient relationship is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Norton
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, The Leicester School of Nursing and Midwifery, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Elaine Wright
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, The Leicester School of Nursing and Midwifery, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lin B, Gutman T, Hanson CS, Ju A, Manera K, Butow P, Cohn RJ, Dalla‐Pozza L, Greenzang KA, Mack J, Wakefield CE, Craig JC, Tong A. Communication during childhood cancer: Systematic review of patient perspectives. Cancer 2019; 126:701-716. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2019] [Revised: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Beryl Lin
- School of Public Health University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- School of Women's and Children's Health University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Talia Gutman
- School of Public Health University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research The Children's Hospital at Westmead Westmead New South Wales Australia
| | - Camilla S. Hanson
- School of Public Health University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research The Children's Hospital at Westmead Westmead New South Wales Australia
| | - Angela Ju
- School of Public Health University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research The Children's Hospital at Westmead Westmead New South Wales Australia
| | - Karine Manera
- School of Public Health University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research The Children's Hospital at Westmead Westmead New South Wales Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Psycho‐oncology Co‐operative Research Group School of Psychology University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Richard J. Cohn
- School of Women's and Children's Health University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre Sydney Children's Hospital Randwick New South Wales Australia
| | - Luciano Dalla‐Pozza
- Cancer Centre for Children The Children's Hospital at Westmead Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Katie A. Greenzang
- Dana‐Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Mack
- Dana‐Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts
| | - Claire E. Wakefield
- School of Women's and Children's Health University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre Sydney Children's Hospital Randwick New South Wales Australia
| | - Jonathan C. Craig
- School of Public Health University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research The Children's Hospital at Westmead Westmead New South Wales Australia
| | - Allison Tong
- School of Public Health University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research The Children's Hospital at Westmead Westmead New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Panagiotopoulou N, van Delft FW, Stewart JA. Fertility preservation knowledge, attitudes and intentions among children by proxy and adolescents with cancer. Reprod Biomed Online 2019; 39:802-808. [PMID: 31615724 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.07.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2019] [Revised: 06/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION The current study aimed to assess knowledge, attitudes and intentions in relation to fertility preservation among children, by proxy, and adolescents with cancer. Although fertility preservation options have been developed to mitigate the adverse long-term effects of life-saving cancer treatment on fertility, fertility is difficult for children and adolescents to conceptualize, especially when they face a cancer diagnosis. DESIGN This was a descriptive, semi-quantitative analysis. Adolescents and parents of children or adolescents within 6 months of a cancer diagnosis and undergoing gonadotoxic treatment were invited to participate. Seventy-one families completed and returned the study's questionnaire (91 questionnaires) over a period of 26 months. RESULTS The vast majority of participants were aware of the gonadotoxic effects of cancer treatment (85%) and had positive attitudes towards fertility preservation (>90%), but only a portion of them (20%) were willing to take action towards this goal. Although adolescent-parent pairs had similar attitudes towards fertility preservation, adolescents tended to be more sceptical about experimental fertility preservation options. Male post-pubertal cancer patients were more likely to be offered fertility preservation counselling or referral to a specialist in comparison to their younger and female counterparts. CONCLUSIONS Fertility preservation care has advanced but there are still gender and age differences in counselling and treatment initiation in the paediatric and adolescent cancer population. Interventions to improve provider-patient-parent communication regarding fertility preservation and to help patients address the observed intention-behaviour gap in relation to fertility preservation options are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikoletta Panagiotopoulou
- Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, International Centre for Life, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| | - Frederik W van Delft
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Sir James Spence Institute of Child Health, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jane A Stewart
- Newcastle Fertility Centre, International Centre for Life, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hanson CS, Gutman T, Craig JC, Bernays S, Raman G, Zhang Y, James LJ, Ralph AF, Ju A, Manera KE, Teixeira-Pinto A, Viecelli AK, Alexander SI, Blydt-Hansen TD, Dionne J, McTaggart S, Michael M, Walker A, Carter S, Wenderfer SE, Winkelmayer WC, Bockenhauer D, Dart A, Eddy AA, Furth SL, Gipson DS, Goldstein SL, Groothoff J, Samuel S, Sinha A, Webb NJ, Yap HK, Zappitelli M, Currier H, Tong A. Identifying Important Outcomes for Young People With CKD and Their Caregivers: A Nominal Group Technique Study. Am J Kidney Dis 2019; 74:82-94. [DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.12.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 12/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
14
|
Fidler MM, Frobisher C, Hawkins MM, Nathan PC. Challenges and opportunities in the care of survivors of adolescent and young adult cancers. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66:e27668. [PMID: 30815985 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2018] [Revised: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer are an understudied group. Much of what is known about long-term outcomes after AYA cancer has been derived from cohorts of childhood cancer survivors, which seldom include patients at the older end of the AYA age spectrum. In general, AYA cancer survivors have a lower risk for premature mortality, subsequent primary neoplasms and chronic health conditions than childhood cancer survivors. However, AYA cancer survivors are vulnerable to psychosocial challenges, concerns about fertility and relationships and financial toxicity. No single model is optimal for the care of these survivors, but it is generally agreed that all survivors require a survivor care plan that promotes their adherence to evidence-based surveillance guidelines. There is a need to create survivor cohorts that include the full range of AYA ages and diagnoses to be able to address the many pressing questions that remain unanswered in this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miranda M Fidler
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Cancer Control Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
| | - Clare Frobisher
- Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Michael M Hawkins
- Centre for Childhood Cancer Survivor Studies, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Paul C Nathan
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Adolescent and young adult cancer survivors' perceptions of participating in a survey – Ethical and methodological considerations. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2019; 39:55-61. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Revised: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
16
|
Tennyson RE, Griffiths HC. A Systematic Review of Professionals' Experiences of Discussing Fertility Issues with Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2019; 8:387-397. [PMID: 30900925 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2018.0146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Impaired fertility is one potential late effect of cancer, with 15% of adolescents and young adults with cancer (AYAC) at a high risk. Guidelines state that fertility advice should be available at diagnosis; however, research shows that this is not routinely provided. This can negatively affect patients' emotional well-being, mental health, and satisfaction with care. This review aimed to synthesize and critically evaluate studies investigating professionals' experiences of discussing fertility issues with AYAC patients and to understand the barriers and facilitating factors to having these conversations with this specific age group. Peer-reviewed qualitative and quantitative studies were identified by systematically searching eight databases. Fifteen articles reporting from 14 studies were included in the review. Participants reported patient, parent, professional, and institutional factors that influenced fertility discussions. The most commonly reported barriers were the lack of patient educational materials and staff training. Participants were more likely to discuss fertility with patients who were male; had less severe disease; and raised the issue of fertility themselves. The findings suggest that professionals' own values and opinions influence the likelihood of fertility being discussed, with implications for guidance and training. Further, institutional barriers lead to a lack of consistent provision for patients both nationally and internationally. A paucity of research looking solely at AYA populations was noted. A need for research comparing the experiences of different professional groups and exploring the extent to which reported barriers impact on fertility discussions was highlighted. There is also a need for higher-quality qualitative research adopting stronger methodology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebekah E Tennyson
- 1Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.,2Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services, Abingdon, United Kingdom
| | - Helen C Griffiths
- 3Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Logan S, Anazodo A. The psychological importance of fertility preservation counseling and support for cancer patients. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019; 98:583-597. [DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2018] [Accepted: 01/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Shanna Logan
- School of Women and Children's Health Faculty of Medicine University of New South Wales – Sydney Kensington NSW Australia
- Kids Cancer Center Sydney Children's Hospital Randwick NSW Australia
- Fertility& Research Center Royal Hospital for Women Randwick NSW Australia
| | - Antoinette Anazodo
- School of Women and Children's Health Faculty of Medicine University of New South Wales – Sydney Kensington NSW Australia
- Kids Cancer Center Sydney Children's Hospital Randwick NSW Australia
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Center Prince of Wales Hospital Randwick NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Anazodo A, Laws P, Logan S, Saunders C, Travaglia J, Gerstl B, Bradford N, Cohn R, Birdsall M, Barr R, Suzuki N, Takae S, Marinho R, Xiao S, Qiong-Hua C, Mahajan N, Patil M, Gunasheela D, Smith K, Sender L, Melo C, Almeida-Santos T, Salama M, Appiah L, Su I, Lane S, Woodruff TK, Pacey A, Anderson RA, Shenfield F, Ledger W, Sullivan E. How can we improve oncofertility care for patients? A systematic scoping review of current international practice and models of care. Hum Reprod Update 2019; 25:159-179. [PMID: 30462263 PMCID: PMC6390168 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmy038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Revised: 10/15/2018] [Accepted: 10/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fertility preservation (FP) is an important quality of life issue for cancer survivors of reproductive age. Despite the existence of broad international guidelines, the delivery of oncofertility care, particularly amongst paediatric, adolescent and young adult patients, remains a challenge for healthcare professionals (HCPs). The quality of oncofertility care is variable and the uptake and utilization of FP remains low. Available guidelines fall short in providing adequate detail on how oncofertility models of care (MOC) allow for the real-world application of guidelines by HCPs. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on the components of oncofertility care as defined by patient and clinician representatives, and identify the barriers, facilitators and challenges, so as to improve the implementation of oncofertility services. SEARCH METHODS A systematic scoping review was conducted on oncofertility MOC literature published in English between 2007 and 2016, relating to 10 domains of care identified through consumer research: communication, oncofertility decision aids, age-appropriate care, referral pathways, documentation, training, supportive care during treatment, reproductive care after cancer treatment, psychosocial support and ethical practice of oncofertility care. A wide range of electronic databases (CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, AEIPT, Education Research Complete, ProQuest and VOCED) were searched in order to synthesize the evidence around delivery of oncofertility care. Related citations and reference lists were searched. The review was undertaken following registration (International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) registration number CRD42017055837) and guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). OUTCOMES A total of 846 potentially relevant studies were identified after the removal of duplicates. All titles and abstracts were screened by a single reviewer and the final 147 papers were screened by two reviewers. Ten papers on established MOC were identified amongst the included papers. Data were extracted from each paper and quality scores were then summarized in the oncofertility MOC summary matrix. The results identified a number of themes for improving MOC in each domain, which included: the importance of patients receiving communication that is of a higher quality and in different formats on their fertility risk and FP options; improving provision of oncofertility care in a timely manner; improving access to age-appropriate care; defining the role and scope of practice of all HCPs; and improving communication between different HCPs. Different forms of decision aids were found useful for assisting patients to understand FP options and weigh up choices. WIDER IMPLICATIONS This analysis identifies core components for delivery of oncofertility MOC. The provision of oncofertility services requires planning to ensure services have safe and reliable referral pathways and that they are age-appropriate and include medical and psychological oncofertility care into the survivorship period. In order for this to happen, collaboration needs to occur between clinicians, allied HCPs and executives within paediatric and adult hospitals, as well as fertility clinics across both public and private services. Training of both cancer and non-cancer HCPs is needed to improve the knowledge of HCPs, the quality of care provided and the confidence of HCPs with these consultations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoinette Anazodo
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, High Street Randwick, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Nelune Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Botany Street, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paula Laws
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, High Street Randwick, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Shanna Logan
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Botany Street, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Fertility and Research Centre, Royal Hospital for Women, Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Carla Saunders
- Centre for Health Services Management, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jo Travaglia
- Centre for Health Services Management, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Brigitte Gerstl
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, High Street Randwick, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Nelune Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Natalie Bradford
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Richard Cohn
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, High Street Randwick, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Botany Street, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mary Birdsall
- Fertility Associates, 7 Ellerslie Racecourse Drive, Auckland City, New Zealand
| | - Ronald Barr
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nao Suzuki
- St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Kawasaki Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan
| | - Seido Takae
- St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Kawasaki Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan
| | - Ricardo Marinho
- Pro Criar Medicina Reprodutiva, Rua Bernardo Guimarães 2063, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Shuo Xiao
- Reproductive Health and Toxicology Lab, Dept. Environmental Health Sciences, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Discovery I, 915 Greene St, Rm 327, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Chen Qiong-Hua
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, 55 Zhenhai Road, Siming Qu, Xiamen Shi 35, China
| | - Nalini Mahajan
- Mother and Child Hospital, D-59 Defence Colony, New Delhi, India
| | - Madhuri Patil
- Dr. Patil’s Fertility and Endoscopy Center, Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology, Endoscopic Surgery and Andrology, Bangalore, India
| | - Devika Gunasheela
- Gunasheela Surgical & Maternity Hospital, No. 1, Dewan Madhava Road, Opp. M. N. Krishna Rao Park, Basavanagudi, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Kristen Smith
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University, 420 E Superior Street, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Leonard Sender
- Children’s Hospital Orange County, 1201 W La Veta Avenue, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Cláudia Melo
- Centro de Preservação da Fertilidade, Serviço de Medicina da Reprodução, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Edifício de São Jerónimo, Piso 2, Praceta Professor Mota Pinto, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Teresa Almeida-Santos
- Centro de Preservação da Fertilidade, Serviço de Medicina da Reprodução, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Edifício de São Jerónimo, Piso 2, Praceta Professor Mota Pinto, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Mahmoud Salama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University, 420 E Superior Street, Chicago, IL, USA
- Reproductive Medicine Department, National Research Center, Buhouth Street 33, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Leslie Appiah
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center–James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA
- Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Department of Paediatric Surgery, 700 Children’s Drive, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Irene Su
- University of California San Diego, 355 Dickinson St # 315, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Sheila Lane
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford, UK
- University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, UK
| | - Teresa K Woodruff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University, 420 E Superior Street, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Allan Pacey
- Academic Unit of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Level 4, The Jessop Wing, Tree Root Walk, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
| | - Richard A Anderson
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh University, 47 Little France Crescent, Scotland, UK
| | - Francoise Shenfield
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College London Hospital, 25 Grafton Way, London, UK
| | - William Ledger
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Botany Street, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Fertility and Research Centre, Royal Hospital for Women, Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Sullivan
- Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, 15 Broadway, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Takeuchi E, Shimizu M, Miyata K, Shimizu R, Matsunaga N, Moroi N, Fujisawa D, Mimura M, Kato M. A Content Analysis of Multidimensional Support Needs Regarding Fertility Among Cancer Patients: How Can Nonphysician Health Care Providers Support? J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2018; 8:205-211. [PMID: 30585752 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2018.0085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to identify support needs among young cancer patients regarding fertility-related issues to describe multidimensional support provided by nonphysician health care providers. METHODS Participants were cancer patients and their families who contacted the Hotline for Cancer Treatment and Reproduction at National Cancer Center Hospital in Japan. Medical charts were analyzed through content analysis. RESULTS A total of 51 participants met the inclusion criteria, of which 32 cases (63%) involved patients themselves, 13 (25%) patients' family members, and 6 (12%) both patients and their families. About patients' demographic status, 40% of the patients were female and 28% were in their thirties. Gynecological and breast cancer patients were the majority, and 24 patients (47%) had not yet started cancer treatment. As a result of content analysis regarding support needs, 9 categories and 55 codes were extracted. The categories included information about risk of infertility, information about means to maintain reproductive function, referral to specialists, support for economic burden, support for worry about cancer progression, support for psychological distress upon facing the risk of infertility, support for communication with oncologists, support for family relationships, and decisional aid. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that nonphysician health care providers should acquire knowledge about fertility preservation and provide psychological support within their specialties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emi Takeuchi
- 1 Division of Medical Support and Partnership, Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center , Tokyo, Japan .,2 Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine , Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mariko Shimizu
- 3 Consultation, Counseling, and Support Service Center, National Cancer Center Hospital , Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kayoko Miyata
- 3 Consultation, Counseling, and Support Service Center, National Cancer Center Hospital , Tokyo, Japan
| | - Rieko Shimizu
- 3 Consultation, Counseling, and Support Service Center, National Cancer Center Hospital , Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoko Matsunaga
- 3 Consultation, Counseling, and Support Service Center, National Cancer Center Hospital , Tokyo, Japan
| | - Natsuko Moroi
- 3 Consultation, Counseling, and Support Service Center, National Cancer Center Hospital , Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daisuke Fujisawa
- 2 Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine , Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaru Mimura
- 2 Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine , Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masashi Kato
- 1 Division of Medical Support and Partnership, Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center , Tokyo, Japan .,3 Consultation, Counseling, and Support Service Center, National Cancer Center Hospital , Tokyo, Japan .,4 Department of Psycho-oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital , Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Young K, Shliakhtsitsava K, Natarajan L, Myers E, Dietz AC, Gorman JR, Martínez ME, Whitcomb BW, Su HI. Fertility counseling before cancer treatment and subsequent reproductive concerns among female adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. Cancer 2018; 125:980-989. [PMID: 30489638 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2018] [Revised: 10/13/2018] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fertility counseling before cancer treatment has been advocated by clinical guidelines, though little is known about its long-term impact on the unique reproductive concerns of female adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors. The goal of this study was to measure the association between fertility counseling by fertility specialists before cancer treatment and subsequent reproductive concerns. METHOD A cross-sectional analysis was performed among 747 AYA survivors aged 18-40 years who had been recruited from cancer registries and physician and advocacy group referrals between 2015 and 2017. Participants self-reported information on past fertility counseling at cancer diagnosis, cancer type and treatment, and current reproductive concerns, as measured using the multidimensional Reproductive Concerns After Cancer scale. Multivariable log-binomial regression models tested associations between fertility counseling and reproductive concerns. RESULTS The mean age of the cohort was 33.0 years (standard deviation, 5.1 years), and the mean period since diagnosis was 7.7 years (standard deviation, 5.0 years). Seventy-three percent of participants were white, and 24% were Hispanic. Fertility counseling was reported by 19% of survivors; moderate to high overall reproductive concerns were reported by 44% of participants. In adjusted analysis, fertility counseling was significantly associated with moderate to high reproductive concerns (risk ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.45) and not modified by exposure to fertility-threatening treatments (Pinteraction = .23). CONCLUSION A large proportion of AYA cancer survivors across cancer types and treatment exposures reported moderate to high reproductive concerns, suggesting that there is a need to address these cancer-specific reproductive health concerns after treatment. Higher concerns, even with counseling, suggests the need to improve the quality of fertility counseling throughout the cancer continuum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Young
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California
| | - Ksenya Shliakhtsitsava
- Department of Pediatric Hematology & Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Loki Natarajan
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health and Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California
| | - Emily Myers
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California
| | - Andrew C Dietz
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California
| | - Jessica R Gorman
- School of Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon
| | - María Elena Martínez
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health and Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California
| | - Brian W Whitcomb
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts
| | - H Irene Su
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences and Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gutman T, Hanson CS, Bernays S, Craig JC, Sinha A, Dart A, Eddy AA, Gipson DS, Bockenhauer D, Yap HK, Groothoff J, Zappitelli M, Webb NJ, Alexander SI, Goldstein SL, Furth S, Samuel S, Blydt-Hansen T, Dionne J, Michael M, Wenderfer SE, Winkelmayer WC, Currier H, McTaggart S, Walker A, Ralph AF, Ju A, James LJ, Carter S, Tong A. Child and Parental Perspectives on Communication and Decision Making in Pediatric CKD: A Focus Group Study. Am J Kidney Dis 2018; 72:547-559. [DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
22
|
Perez S, Lambert SD, Lee V, Loiselle CG, Chan P, Gupta A, Lo K, Rosberger Z, Zelkowitz P. A fertility needs assessment survey of male cancer patients. Psychooncology 2018; 27:2747-2753. [PMID: 30176700 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2018] [Revised: 08/16/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe fertility-related informational needs and practices, and to examine if demographic characteristics are related to these needs and practices. METHODS A needs assessment survey was conducted at three Canadian cancer centres. RESULTS 192 male cancer patients (Mage = 33.6) completed the survey. Most patients (70%) recalled having had a discussion with a health care provider regarding their fertility and 44% banked their sperm. Patients reported not getting all the information that they wanted, eg, the risk that a future child may have the same type of cancer (78%), and what was covered by insurance plans (71%). Barriers to sperm preservation were urgency to begin cancer treatment (49%), not planning to have a child in the future (47%) and worries that cancer could be passed on to future children (38%). Participants' age and being the parent of a child were significantly associated with having had a discussion about fertility. Participants' age, province, being the parent of a child and the desire for future children were significantly associated with fertility preservation. CONCLUSIONS Discussions with health care providers were more frequent, and fertility preservation rates were higher than in past studies, but still not all patients' questions were answered. Misconceptions about passing on cancer to one's child, and that sperm preservation will delay treatment, should be dispelled. Health care providers can ask patients if they have any desire to have children in the future as a way to initiate a discussion of fertility preservation. Key information gaps and psychosocial resource needs are suggested to fully meet male cancer patients' fertility-related concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samara Perez
- Department of Psychiatry Montreal, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sylvie D Lambert
- School of Nursing Montreal, McGill University Ingram School of Nursing Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,St. Mary's Research Centre Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Virginia Lee
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Carmen G Loiselle
- School of Nursing Montreal, McGill University Ingram School of Nursing Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Segal Cancer Center Montreal, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Peter Chan
- McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Abha Gupta
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kirk Lo
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zeev Rosberger
- Department of Psychiatry Montreal, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Segal Cancer Center Montreal, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Phyllis Zelkowitz
- Department of Psychiatry Montreal, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry Montreal, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Barlevy D, Wangmo T, Ash S, Elger BS, Ravitsky V. Oncofertility Decision Making: Findings from Israeli Adolescents and Parents. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2018; 8:74-83. [PMID: 30153089 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2018.0016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To date, few studies qualitatively investigate adolescent oncofertility decision making. This qualitative study seeks to understand the experiences of adolescents and parents in making oncofertility decisions within the pronatalist context of Israeli society. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted in Israel with adolescents between the ages of 12 and 19 years who were in remission for at least 2 months and had been offered fertility preservation (FP) of sperm, ova, or ovary cryopreservation, and their parents, separately. Transcripts were thematically analyzed. RESULTS Thirty-five interviews were conducted-16 with adolescents and 19 with parents-representing 20 cases of FP decision making. Adolescents and parents do not necessarily view decision making in the same way. Both parties mention a variety of factors in and justifications for FP decisions. Although most participants imagine the adolescent will use cryopreserved biological materials only if s/he experiences reproductive difficulties, nearly all participants do not recall having discussed what to do with these materials in the case of death. Many adolescents and parents feel comfortable waiting to take further action regarding adolescent fertility until the topic has greater relevance to the adolescent's life. Satisfaction with FP decision making is nearly unanimous, regardless of whether FP was pursued. CONCLUSION As in other cultural contexts, Israeli adolescents and parents demonstrate multifaceted decision making with respect to oncofertility. A significant finding from this study suggests that health professionals shy from discussing posthumous planning of cryopreserved materials with adolescent cancer patients and their parents. Further investigation is warranted to determine whether this is a uniquely Israeli phenomenon, the cause for it, and how to overcome it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorit Barlevy
- 1 Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Tenzin Wangmo
- 1 Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Shifra Ash
- 2 Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petach Tiqva, Israel
| | - Bernice S Elger
- 1 Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Vardit Ravitsky
- 3 Bioethics Program, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Jibb L, Croal L, Wang J, Yuan C, Foster J, Cheung V, Gladstone B, Stinson J. Children’s Experiences of Cancer Care: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Studies. Oncol Nurs Forum 2018; 45:527-544. [DOI: 10.1188/18.onf.527-544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
25
|
Tam S, Puri N, Stephens D, Mitchell L, Giuliani M, Papadakos J, Gupta AA. Improving Access to Standardized Fertility Preservation Information for Older Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer: Using a User-Centered Approach with Young Adult Patients, Survivors, and Partners to Refine Fertility Knowledge Transfer. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2018; 33:528-535. [PMID: 27671919 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-016-1108-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients under 40 should be made aware of their fertility risks and preservation options throughout their care. However, discussions on fertility preservation (FP) do not routinely occur. With a dearth of FP resources, oncology providers may lack knowledge around FP. Thus, informational needs can be unmet, leading to anxiety and distress in patients. Provision of pertinent and timely information can help patients cope better with their diagnosis. FP pamphlets were developed for men and women with cancer. A cross-sectional in-house survey, using convenience sampling, evaluated the pamphlets' effectiveness and measured ease of understanding, acceptability, and perceived utility. Patients and partners were also asked to provide recommendations and complete the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (S-TOFHLA) measuring health literacy level. This helps determine if health literacy influences perception of pamphlet effectiveness. All participants (n = 56) reviewed both pamphlets. Fifty-four participants (96 %) found the pamphlet for men useful, while 29 participants (52 %) improved their male fertility knowledge. The pamphlet for women was useful for 52 participants (93 %) and improved knowledge in 35 (63 %) of them. Although the majority of participants had adequate health literacy (98 %), there was insufficient sample diversity to determine if health literacy influenced the pamphlet's effectiveness. Participants indicated preference in receiving verbal (73 %) and written (66 %) information over watching videos or in-class education. They recommended including fertility clinics, financial resources, and statistics in the brochures. These FP pamphlets were concluded as effective in supporting patients in making FP decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seline Tam
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Adolescent and Young Adult Program, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Natasha Puri
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Adolescent and Young Adult Program, College of Arts & Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Derek Stephens
- Hospital for Sick Children, Biostatistics, Design & Analytics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Laura Mitchell
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Adolescent and Young Adult Program, Lawrence S Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Meredith Giuliani
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, & Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Janet Papadakos
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Oncology Patient and Family Education, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Abha A Gupta
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hughes N, Stark D. The management of adolescents and young adults with cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2018; 67:45-53. [PMID: 29753962 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2018] [Revised: 05/03/2018] [Accepted: 05/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA) with cancer are young people developing serious illness when at the interface between the responsibilities of paediatric and adult cancer services. Personally, they are in a period of transition both biologically and in major social roles (Sawyer et al., 2018) [1]. For these and other reasons they present a unique set of clinical challenges in their management. Over the last 20 years the requirement for specific services to address their needs has been identified and this has become a growing field of research. Despite this survival rates still lag behind those of children and older adults with cancer (Gatta et al., 2009) [2]. Why do AYA patients have worse outcomes? The observation is that the reason is multifactorial with path to diagnosis, unique cancer biology, uncertainty of treatment protocol, compliance issues and poor recruitment to clinical trials all playing a part. In this review we will discuss the unique challenges faced by healthcare professionals when managing AYA patients who are commonly and accurately described as being in an 'interface' position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Hughes
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, UK.
| | - Dan Stark
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's Institute of Oncology, Beckett Street, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Tang M, Webber K. Fertility and pregnancy in cancer survivors. Obstet Med 2018; 11:110-115. [PMID: 30214475 DOI: 10.1177/1753495x18757816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2017] [Accepted: 01/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer survivors are increasing as improvements in cancer diagnosis and treatment translate to improved outcomes. As cancer survivors in their reproductive years contemplate pregnancy, it is important to understand the impact of cancer and its treatment on fertility and pregnancy outcomes. Cancer treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy can affect patients' fertility, and strategies are available to help preserve the future fertility of survivors. The potential impact of previous cancer diagnoses and treatments on pregnancy and maternal and fetal outcomes needs to be assessed and discussed with survivors, with support from materno-fetal medicine specialists and high-risk antenatal services as needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Tang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - Kate Webber
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Niepage M, Georgievski G, Shama W, Lucchetta S. Exploring Adolescents' Cancer Journey Through Photovoice: A Narrative Synthesis. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2018; 7:15-21. [DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2017.0073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Niepage
- Department of Social Work, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Georgi Georgievski
- Department of Social Work, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Wendy Shama
- Department of Social Work, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sonia Lucchetta
- Department of Social Work, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Algarroba GN, Sanfilippo JS, Valli-Pulaski H. Female fertility preservation in the pediatric and adolescent cancer patient population. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 48:147-157. [PMID: 29221705 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2017] [Accepted: 10/15/2017] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
The 5-year survival rate for childhood cancer is over 80%, thereby increasing the number of young women facing infertility in the future because of the gonadotoxic effects of chemotherapy and radiation. The gonadotoxic effects of childhood cancer treatment vary by the radiation regimen and the chemotherapeutic drugs utilized. Although the American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend fertility preservation for all patients, there are several barriers and ethical considerations to fertility preservation in the pediatric and adolescent female population. Additionally, the fertility preservation methods for pre- and postpubertal females differ, with only experimental methods available for prepubertal females. We will review the risk of chemotherapy and radiation on female fertility, the approach to fertility preservation in the pediatric and adolescent female population, methods of fertility preservation for both pre- and postpubertal females, barriers to fertility preservation, cost, and psychological and ethical considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela N Algarroba
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3550 Terrace St., Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
| | - Joseph S Sanfilippo
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket St., Suite 5150, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
| | - Hanna Valli-Pulaski
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 204 Craft Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zarnegar S, Gosiengfiao Y, Rademaker A, Casey R, Albritton KH. Recall of Fertility Discussion by Adolescent Female Cancer Patients: A Survey-Based Pilot Study. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2017; 7:249-253. [PMID: 29058500 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2017.0079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Many adolescent female cancer patients will survive into their reproductive years. Pediatric oncologists are advised to discuss oncofertility during treatment planning. In this pilot study, 19 adolescent females completed a retrospective survey assessing recall of a fertility discussion, satisfaction with fertility knowledge, and multiple factors that may influence recall, including parental involvement in decision-making. Eleven respondents (58%) remembered a discussion about infertility risk and 9 (47%) about fertility preservation. Most who recalled a discussion were satisfied with their fertility knowledge (10/11, 90.9%). In this study, we validated the feasibility of survey administration and identified trends in oncofertility counseling at our center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Zarnegar
- 1 Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, New York
| | - Yasmin Gosiengfiao
- 2 Pediatric Hematology, Oncology & Stem Cell Transplantation, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago , Chicago, Illinois
| | - Alfred Rademaker
- 3 Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine , Chicago, Illinois
| | - Robert Casey
- 4 Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders , Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Karen H Albritton
- 5 Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cook Children's Hospital , Fort Worth, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Logan S, Perz J, Ussher J, Peate M, Anazodo A. A systematic review of patient oncofertility support needs in reproductive cancer patients aged 14 to 45 years of age. Psychooncology 2017; 27:401-409. [DOI: 10.1002/pon.4502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2017] [Revised: 06/28/2017] [Accepted: 07/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S. Logan
- School of Women and Children's Health; Faculty of Medicine, UNSW; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - J. Perz
- Centre for Health Research, School of Medicine; Western Sydney University; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - J.M. Ussher
- Centre for Health Research, School of Medicine; Western Sydney University; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - M. Peate
- Psychosocial Health and Wellbeing (emPoWeR) Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital; University of Melbourne; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - A. Anazodo
- School of Women and Children's Health; Faculty of Medicine, UNSW; Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Sydney Children's Hospital; Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Prince of Wales Hospital; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Barlevy D, Elger BS, Wangmo T, Ravitsky V. Adolescent oncofertility discussions: Recommendations from a systematic literature review. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2017; 8:106-115. [PMID: 28949840 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2017.1305006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing cancer incidence and survivorship rates have made late-term effects, such as effects on fertility, a salient issue for adolescent cancer patients. While various barriers make it difficult for health care professionals to discuss oncofertility with adolescents and their parents, there are numerous reasons to hold such discussions, based on professional obligations and the ethical principles of respect for autonomy and beneficence. This systematic literature review presents and critically examines recommendations for adolescent oncofertility discussions. METHODS Conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, this systematic literature review includes English, French, and German articles published up until December 31, 2014. Articles were sought via a combination of search terms in four databases. RESULTS Eighty of 96 articles included in this review address recommendations for improving adolescent oncofertility discussions. These recommendations deal with how, when, what, and with whom professionals ought to have these discussions, as well as various systemic barriers and ways to address them. CONCLUSIONS Based upon the principles of beneficence, respect for autonomy, and justice, we endorse several recommendations for oncofertility discussions with adolescents and their parents, including having a specific professional on the health care team initiate these discussions with all newly diagnosed patients; regularly doing so before, during, and after treatment; allowing adolescents to decide for themselves whom they wish to include in such discussions; employing various forms of communication; obtaining both adolescent assent and parental consent for fertility preservation (FP) procedures, especially at each stage (e.g., procurement and use); properly educating and training professionals to discuss oncofertility; promoting interdisciplinary collaboration; creating and implementing guidelines and policies; and ensuring equity of access to FP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorit Barlevy
- a Institute for Biomedical Ethics , University of Basel
| | | | - Tenzin Wangmo
- a Institute for Biomedical Ethics , University of Basel
| | - Vardit Ravitsky
- b Bioethics Program, School of Public Health , University of Montreal
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Vindrola-Padros C, Dyer KE, Cyrus J, Lubker IM. Healthcare professionals' views on discussing fertility preservation with young cancer patients: a mixed method systematic review of the literature. Psychooncology 2017; 26:4-14. [PMID: 26890220 PMCID: PMC5025377 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2015] [Revised: 11/16/2015] [Accepted: 01/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In spite of efforts to guarantee patients are adequately informed about their risk of fertility loss and offered treatment for fertility preservation (FP), previous studies have reported that this topic is not routinely discussed with patients, especially with younger patient populations. A mixed method systematic review was undertaken to explore the factors shaping the discussion of FP with children (0-15 years) and adolescents/young adults (16-24 years) with cancer. METHODS Six databases were searched independently using a combination of keywords and controlled vocabulary/subject headings relating to cancer and fertility. Inclusion criteria consisted of: (a) being published in a peer-reviewed journal, (b) a focus on healthcare professionals' (HCPs') beliefs, attitudes, or practices regarding fertility issues in cancer patients, (c) primary data collection from HCPs, and (d) a focus on HCPs who provide services to young patients. Of the 6276 articles identified in the search, 16 articles presenting the results of 14 studies were included in the final review. RESULTS Common themes reported across studies indicate that five main factors influence HCPs' discussion of FP with young cancer patients: (a) HCPs' knowledge, (b) HCPs' sense of comfort, (c) patient factors (i.e., sexual maturity, prognosis, partnership status, and whether or not they initiate the conversation), (d) parent factors (i.e., HCPs' perception of the extent of their involvement), and (e) availability of educational materials. CONCLUSIONS Future work should ensure that HCPs possess knowledge of cancer-related FP and that they receive adequate training on how to consent and discuss information with young patients and their parents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karen E. Dyer
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - John Cyrus
- Tompkins-McCaw Library, Virginia Commonwealth University Libraries, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - Irene Machowa Lubker
- Tompkins-McCaw Library, Virginia Commonwealth University Libraries, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Benedict C, Thom B, Kelvin JF. Fertility preservation and cancer: challenges for adolescent and young adult patients. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2016; 10:87-94. [PMID: 26730794 DOI: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW With increasing survival rates, fertility is an important quality of life concern for many young cancer patients. There is a critical need for improvements in clinical care to ensure patients are well informed about infertility risks and fertility preservation options and to support them in their reproductive decision-making prior to treatment. RECENT FINDINGS Several barriers prevent fertility from being adequately addressed in the clinical context. Providers' and patients' incomplete or inaccurate understanding of infertility risks exacerbate patients' reproductive concerns. For female patients in particular, making decisions about fertility preservation before treatment often leads to decision conflict, reducing the likelihood of making informed, value-based decisions, and posttreatment regret and distress. Recent empirically based interventions to improve provider training around fertility issues and to support patient decision-making about fertility preservation show promise. SUMMARY Providers should be knowledgeable about the infertility risks associated with cancer therapies and proactively address fertility with all patients who might one day wish to have a child. Comprehensive counseling should also include related issues such as contraceptive use and health implications of early menopause, regardless of desire for future children. Although the negative psychosocial impact of cancer-related infertility is now well accepted, limited work has been done to explore how to improve clinical management of fertility issues in the context of cancer care. Evidence-based interventions should be developed to address barriers and provide psychosocial and decision-making support to patients who are concerned about their fertility and interested in fertility preservation options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Benedict
- aDepartment of Medicine, Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, Manhasset bSurvivorship Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Stinson JN, Jibb LA, Greenberg M, Barrera M, Luca S, White ME, Gupta A. A Qualitative Study of the Impact of Cancer on Romantic Relationships, Sexual Relationships, and Fertility: Perspectives of Canadian Adolescents and Parents During and After Treatment. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2016; 4:84-90. [PMID: 26812556 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2014.0036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to gain insight into perspectives around core domains of adolescent development--romantic relationships, sexual relationships, and fertility--from the vantage point of Canadian adolescents and parents during and after cancer treatment. METHODS Twenty adolescents (12-17 years old at interview) and 20 parents (who may or may not have had an adolescent interviewed) participated in this study. Using a semistructured guide, adolescents and parents were interviewed separately. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Transcribed interview data were independently coded according to the study objectives by two trained analysts. Codes were organized into categories that reflected emerging themes. Discrepancies in coding were resolved through discussion with the lead investigator. RESULTS Qualitative analysis revealed main themes for adolescents and parents related to: (1) romantic relationships (opinions on the importance of dating in the context of cancer, expectations that cancer will impact future relationships, dating as a source of moral support, and limited opportunities to engage with partners); (2) sexual relationships (thoughts related to the impact of cancer on future sexual relationships); (3) fertility (initiating treatment as a primary concern and fear of infertility and perceived consequences); and (4) recommendations for care (access to knowledge and support through adolescent-friendly and accessible means). CONCLUSION Findings from this study highlight cancer-specific relationship and fertility issues faced by adolescents and provide important direction to the development of interventions that may ultimately improve the psychosocial health of adolescents during and after cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer N Stinson
- 1 Department of Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .,2 Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .,3 Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lindsay A Jibb
- 3 Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .,4 Division of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .,5 Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark Greenberg
- 4 Division of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .,5 Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .,6 Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maru Barrera
- 1 Department of Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .,4 Division of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .,6 Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie Luca
- 1 Department of Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Abha Gupta
- 4 Division of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .,6 Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .,8 Adolescent and Young Adult Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Matheson L, Boulton M, Lavender V, Collins G, Mitchell-Floyd T, Watson E. The Experiences of Young Adults With Hodgkin Lymphoma Transitioning to Survivorship: A Grounded Theory Study. Oncol Nurs Forum 2016; 43:E195-E2014. [DOI: 10.1188/16.onf.e195-e2014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
37
|
Bibby H, White V, Thompson K, Anazodo A. What Are the Unmet Needs and Care Experiences of Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer? A Systematic Review. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2016; 6:6-30. [PMID: 27454408 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2016.0012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess what is currently known about unmet needs and care experiences of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer, identify gaps in the research literature, and highlight potential areas for improvement in future research. METHODS Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases were searched to identify relevant studies from 1990 to July 2015. Eligible articles included self-reported care experiences or unmet needs of cancer patients aged between 15 and 30 years in the period between symptom onset and 2 years post-treatment. Qualitative and quantitative designs were included. RESULTS Forty-five articles from 39 studies (23 qualitative, 12 quantitative, and 4 mixed methods) were rated as "adequate" or "good" quality and reviewed. The majority included any cancer diagnoses and none was longitudinal. There was considerable variation in age ranges and time since diagnosis between studies. Only two studies used standardized survey tools, with both tools validated on adult populations. The most common areas assessed for care experiences and needs were information/communication and fertility. In addition, care experience studies commonly examined clinical expertise and age-appropriate settings, while unmet needs studies reported on emotional support and peer interaction. CONCLUSION Findings highlight the need for age-appropriate information and treatment facilities, access to emotional support services, and contact with peers. Fertility information and services are a priority issue for this group. Future research would benefit from a consistent definition of the AYA age range, increased used of standardized scales validated with this population, and longitudinal designs to assess changes over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Bibby
- 1 Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer , Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Victoria White
- 1 Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer , Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia .,2 School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne , Victoria, Australia
| | - Kate Thompson
- 3 ONTrac at Peter Mac Victorian Adolescent & Young Adult Cancer Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre , Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Antoinette Anazodo
- 4 Sydney Youth Cancer Service, Sydney Children's and Prince of Wales Hospitals , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ellis SJ, Wakefield CE, McLoone JK, Robertson EG, Cohn RJ. Fertility concerns among child and adolescent cancer survivors and their parents: A qualitative analysis. J Psychosoc Oncol 2016; 34:347-62. [DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2016.1196806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
39
|
Barlevy D, Wangmo T, Elger BS, Ravitsky V. Attitudes, Beliefs, and Trends Regarding Adolescent Oncofertility Discussions: A Systematic Literature Review. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2016; 5:119-34. [DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2015.0055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Dorit Barlevy
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Tenzin Wangmo
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Bernice S. Elger
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Vardit Ravitsky
- Bioethics Program, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Benedict C, Shuk E, Ford JS. Fertility Issues in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2016; 5:48-57. [PMID: 26812452 PMCID: PMC4779291 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2015.0024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 154] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Many adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors place great importance on fertility. This study explored AYAs' discussions of fertility in the context of discussing their survivorship experiences. METHODS Secondary analyses of a qualitative study of young adult survivors of adolescent cancers ("AYA survivors") was performed using semistructured individual interviews and focus groups. Analyses were conducted using grounded theory using thematic content analysis with an inductive data-driven approach. RESULTS Participants (n = 43) were 16-24 years old, diagnosed with cancer between ages 14 and 18 years, and were at least 6 months post-treatment. Before treatment, 5 males banked sperm and no females preserved fertility. More males (50%) than females (39%) reported uncertainty about their fertility. Three major categories emerged from the data: fertility concerns, emotions raised when discussing fertility, and strategies used to manage fertility concerns. Fertility concerns focused on dating/partner reactions, health risks, and what potential infertility would mean for their life narrative. Emotions included distress, feeling overwhelmed and hopeful/wishful thinking. Females were more likely to feel distressed and overwhelmed than males. Strategies to manage concerns included acceptance/"making do," desire to postpone concerns, and reliance on assisted reproductive technology. CONCLUSIONS Most AYAs in our study reported a number of reproductive concerns and fertility-related distress after treatment, which may affect other areas of psychosocial functioning. Females may be more at-risk for distress than males, particularly in situations of uncertainty and limited knowledge. Future work should explore how to best incorporate fertility-related informational and support services more fully into survivorship care. Implications for survivorship care are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Benedict
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, New York
| | - Elyse Shuk
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, New York
| | - Jennifer S Ford
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Hendershot E, Maloney AM, Fawcett S, Sarvanantham S, McMahon E, Gupta A, Mitchell L. Advanced practice nurses: Improving access to fertility preservation for oncology patients. Can Oncol Nurs J 2016; 26:40-45. [PMID: 31148620 DOI: 10.5737/236880762614045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer therapies such as chemotherapy, radiation therapy and surgery may place the future fertility of both children and young adults at risk. Oncofertility is a rapidly evolving area that involves increasing access to fertility preservation (FP) information and services. This manuscript aims to: a) highlight the fertility risks associated with cancer therapy and its psychosocial impact, b) describe FP options, c) discuss the unique challenges of FP in distinct cancer populations, and d) illustrate the pivotal role of APNs in oncofertility counselling and education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor Hendershot
- Nurse Practitioner, Pediatric Oncology, McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, ON. (Corresponding author)
| | - Anne-Marie Maloney
- Nurse Practitioner, Pediatric Hematology/Oncology and Fertility Preservation Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON.
| | - Sandy Fawcett
- Nurse Practitioner, Gattuso Rapid Diagnostic Breast Centre, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON.
| | - Sharmy Sarvanantham
- Nurse Practitioner, Gattuso Rapid Diagnostic Breast Centre, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON.
| | - Eileen McMahon
- Nurse Practitioner, Centre for Fertility and Reproductive Health, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON.
| | - Abha Gupta
- Medical Oncologist, The Hospital for Sick Children and Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON. Co-Medical Director of the Fertility Preservation Program at The Hospital for Sick Children and Medical Director of the Adolescent and Young Adult Program at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON.
| | - Laura Mitchell
- Clinical Nurse Specialist, Adolescent and Young Adult Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Panagiotopoulou N, Ghuman N, Sandher R, Herbert M, Stewart J. Barriers and facilitators towards fertility preservation care for cancer patients: a meta-synthesis. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2015; 27. [DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/12/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- N. Panagiotopoulou
- Newcastle Fertility Centre; International Centre for Life; Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Newcastle upon Tyne UK
| | - N. Ghuman
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department; Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Newcastle upon Tyne UK
| | - R. Sandher
- Institute of Human Genetics, International Centre for Life; Newcastle University; Newcastle upon Tyne UK
| | - M. Herbert
- Institute of Human Genetics, International Centre for Life; Newcastle University; Newcastle upon Tyne UK
| | - J.A. Stewart
- Newcastle Fertility Centre; International Centre for Life; Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Newcastle upon Tyne UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Deshpande NA, Braun IM, Meyer FL. Impact of fertility preservation counseling and treatment on psychological outcomes among women with cancer: A systematic review. Cancer 2015; 121:3938-47. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 135] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2015] [Revised: 06/20/2015] [Accepted: 07/21/2015] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Neha A. Deshpande
- Department of Psychiatry; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Boston Massachusetts
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Ilana M. Braun
- Department of Psychiatry; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Boston Massachusetts
- Department of Psychiatry; Harvard Medical School; Boston Massachusetts
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Boston Massachusetts
| | - Fremonta L. Meyer
- Department of Psychiatry; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Boston Massachusetts
- Department of Psychiatry; Harvard Medical School; Boston Massachusetts
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Boston Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|