HER2-positivity rates in breast cancer: no variation over time when clinicopathological features and testing are stable

Clinicopathologic features of unexpectedly HER2 positive breast carcinomas: An institutional experience

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression occurs in 15-20 % of all breast carcinomas. These tumors are usually high-grade which often correlates with reduced overall survival and increased rates of recurrence. In a retrospective review, we identified 19 cases of unexpectedly HER2 positive (by immunohistochemistry and/or fluorescence in-situ hybridization) invasive breast carcinomas on core needle biopsies from a registry at Northwestern Memorial Hospital. These cases included low-grade tumors, invasive lobular carcinomas, classic type, and invasive carcinomas with special subtype features. Twelve of the tumors were histologic grade 1 and 7 were histologic grade 2. One of the grade 1 tumors had tubular features (8 %), 1 had cribriform features (8 %), 2 had mucinous features (17 %), 2 were invasive lobular carcinomas, classic type (17 %), and the rest were invasive carcinoma, no special type (50 %). The histologic grade 2 tumors included 5 invasive lobular carcinomas, classic type (71 %) and 2 invasive ductal carcinomas with mucinous features (29 %). By immunohistochemistry, 13 (65 %) were HER2 score 3+, 7 were score 2+ (35 %), and reflex fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) testing showed amplification in 6 cases, with 1 equivocal case amplified on excision. Despite the HER2 positive status in the selected cases, no unique morphologic features that would indicate aggressive behavior were identified. In clinical follow up, two patients were found to have recurrences, five had lymph node metastasis, and one had distant metastasis. None of the patients with recurrent disease were treated with trastuzumab, despite their positive HER2 results. These findings support that our population of HER2 positive carcinomas showed a similar rate of lymph node metastases and recurrence as poorly-differentiated tumors, supporting HER2 positivity as a poor prognostic indicator, irrespective of morphologic features. We recommend continuing to test all breast cancers, regardless of grade or special subtype features, to provide the most comprehensive treatment and prognostic information for both clinicians and patients.

Regional Variability in Percentage of Breast Cancers Reported as Positive for HER2 in California: Implications of Patient Demographics on Laboratory Benchmarks

OBJECTIVES

The expected regional variability in percent human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancers is not currently clear.

METHODS

Data from the 2006 to 2011 California Cancer Registry were examined by county and health service area. The influence of demographic and pathologic features was used in a multivariable logistic regression model to compare expected with observed HER2-positive percentages by region.

RESULTS

There was significant geographic variation by California counties (11.6%-26%). The reported HER2-positive percentage was higher when the population had higher stage, tumor size, grade, percent estrogen receptor negative, younger age, or lower socioeconomic status. Ethnic distribution of the population also influenced HER2-positive percentages. Using a multivariable logistic regression model, most regions had expected values based on their population characteristics; however, "outlier" regions were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

These results deepen our understanding of population characteristics' influence on the distribution of HER2-positive breast cancers. Taking these factors into account can be useful when setting laboratory benchmarks and assessing test quality.

Well-differentiated invasive breast cancers with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemistry: what is the yield of routine reflex in-situ hybridization testing?

AIMS

The 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) HER2 guidelines recommend testing all invasive breast cancers for HER2, typically with immunohistochemistry (IHC) followed by in-situ hybridization (ISH) when IHC is equivocal. As well-differentiated breast cancers are rarely HER2-positive, we assessed the value of routine reflex HER2 ISH testing for this subset of breast cancers.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We collected HER2 IHC 2+ cases and fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) data from primary breast cancers with well-differentiated tumour types (grade 1 ductal carcinomas, classic lobular carcinomas, tubular, cribriform and pure mucinous carcinomas) at our centre from 2010 to 2015. Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and IHC slides were reviewed to confirm tumour type, grade and IHC score based on ASCO/CAP 2013 guidelines and their recent revisions. Of 4633 invasive carcinomas, 1133 had a well-differentiated tumour type; 177 of these were HER2 IHC equivocal, three of which were low-level amplified by FISH (0.3% of all well-differentiated tumours). One amplified case was classic invasive lobular carcinoma and two were invasive ductal carcinomas, grade 1. One amplified case had chromosome 17 monosomy, and one was rescored as HER2 IHC 1+ upon review. 'Basolateral' staining was noted in one amplified case and in 65 of 174 (37.4%) non-amplified cases. This incomplete membranous staining pattern was observed in the majority of invasive ductal carcinomas that were rescored as 1+ according to the revised 2013 guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of HER2 amplification among well-differentiated breast cancers is very low. Basolateral staining in well-differentiated tumours may be overinterpreted as HER2 IHC 2+, but is rarely associated with HER2 amplification.

Phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled study of dovitinib in combination with fulvestrant in postmenopausal patients with HR+, HER2- breast cancer that had progressed during or after prior endocrine therapy

Background

Overexpression of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1), found in ≤8% of hormone receptor–positive (HR⁺), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2⁻) breast cancer cases, is correlated with decreased overall survival and resistance to endocrine therapy (ET). Dovitinib, a potent FGFR inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with FGFR pathway–amplified breast cancer.

Methods

In this randomized, placebo-controlled phase II trial, we evaluated whether the addition of dovitinib to fulvestrant would improve outcomes in postmenopausal patients with HR⁺, HER2⁻ advanced breast cancer that had progressed during or after prior ET. Patients were stratified by FGF pathway amplification and presence of visceral disease, and they were randomized 1:1 to receive fulvestrant plus dovitinib or placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

From 15 May 2012 to 26 November 2014, 97 patients from 36 centers were enrolled. The frequency of FGF pathway amplification was lower than anticipated, and the study was terminated early owing to slow accrual of patients with FGF pathway amplification. The median PFS (95% CI) was 5.5 (3.8–14.0) months vs 5.5 (3.5–10.7) months in the dovitinib vs placebo arms, respectively (HR, 0.68; did not meet predefined efficacy criteria). For the FGF pathway–amplified subgroup (n = 31), the median PFS (95% CI) was 10.9 (3.5–16.5) months vs 5.5 (3.5–16.4) months in the dovitinib vs placebo arms, respectively (HR, 0.64; met the predefined superiority criteria). Frequently reported adverse events in the dovitinib (diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, asthenia, and headache) and placebo (diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and asthenia) arms were mostly low grade.

Conclusions

The safety profile of dovitinib plus fulvestrant was consistent with the known safety profile of single-agent dovitinib. Dovitinib in combination with fulvestrant showed promising clinical activity in the FGF pathway–amplified subgroup. However, the data reported herein should be interpreted with caution, given that fewer PFS events occurred in the FGF pathway–amplified patients than was expected and that an effect of dovitinib regardless of FGR pathway amplification status cannot be excluded, because the population was smaller than expected.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01528345. Registered 31 January 2012.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-017-0807-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.