The PERS2ON score for systemic assessment of symptomatology in palliative care: a pilot study

Integrating palliative care into multiple myeloma management : Optimizing quality of life across the disease continuum

BACKGROUND

Multiple myeloma (MM) poses significant challenges due to its complex symptomatology and evolving treatment landscape. While therapeutic advances have improved survival outcomes, holistic management of MM requires addressing the numerous physical and psychosocial needs of patients. Palliative care (PC) offers a comprehensive approach to symptom management and supportive care on a physical, psychosocial and spiritual level; however, its role in MM remains underexplored.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study examines the outcome of 22 MM patients admitted to the Division of Palliative Medicine at the Medical University of Vienna. We investigated reasons for admission, symptom severity, functional status, length of stay and overall survival.

RESULTS

Most common reasons for palliative care unit (PCU) admission were nutritional problems (82%), fatigue (77%) and pain (68%). Median ECOG score at PCU admission was 3. The timepoint within the timeline of myeloma disease at which hospitalization took place varied greatly. Some patients were hospitalized shortly after diagnosis, other patients after many years of active disease and therapy. Median time from MM initial diagnosis to first PCU stay was 4.3 years (range 0.6-23.8 years). The median length of hospital (PCU) stay was 11 days (range 1-127days) and 45% of patients died during PCU hospitalization. The reduction in symptom burden as a result of the inpatient stay in the PCU is reflected in the PERS2ON score, which was measured on the day of admission (median 23 days, range 6-32 days) and on the day of discharge (median 16 days, range 7-20 days).

CONCLUSION

PC interventions effectively addressed the complex symptom burden experienced by patients with MM. Multidimensional approaches encompassing physical, psychological and social domains proved instrumental in optimizing quality of life. Integrating PC principles into MM management paradigms is essential to prioritize patient-centered care across the disease continuum.

Examining Variability in Intra-Hospital Patient Referrals to Specialized Palliative Care: A Comprehensive Analysis of Disciplines and Mortality

Background: In Austria, specialized palliative care (SPC) access is limited, with unclear referral criteria, making it challenging to identify hospitalized patients requiring SPC and determine referral timing and mortality at the palliative care unit (PCU). Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients who underwent a palliative care (PC) needs assessment between March 2016 and November 2021 and were subsequently admitted to the PCU of Austria's largest academic hospital. Demographic, clinical, and standardized referral form data were used for analysis, employing descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Results: Out of the 903 assessed patients, 19% were admitted to the PCU, primarily cancer patients (94.7%), with lung (19%) and breast cancer (13%) being most prevalent. Common referral reasons included pain (61%) and nutritional problems (46%). Despite no significant differences in referral times, most patients (78.4%) died in the PCU, with varying outcomes based on cancer type. Referral reasons like pain (OR = 2.3), nutritional problems (OR = 2.4), and end-of-life care (OR = 6.5) were significantly associated with the outcome PCU mortality. Conclusions: This study underscores Austria's SPC access imbalance and emphasizes timely PC integration across disciplines for effective advance care planning and dignified end-of-life experiences in PCUs.

Integrating Palliative Care Into the Management of Genitourinary Malignancies

Palliative care (PC) plays a critical role in managing the difficulties associated with genitourinary malignancies. Its primary aim is to improve the overall health of patients, provide support to both patients and their caregivers, and help individuals to navigate the complex decisions about treatment and end-of-life care. PC takes a holistic approach to patient care, recognizing that genitourinary malignancies affect multiple aspects of a person's life. By addressing physical, emotional, social, and spiritual needs, PC aims to provide comprehensive support that is consistent with the patient's values and preferences. The goal is to optimize comfort, minimize distress, and enhance the patient's quality of life throughout the course of the illness. PC is not a one-off intervention, but an ongoing source of support. This article aims to provide a thorough overview of the critical elements involved in addressing the challenges posed by genitourinary cancers, emphasizing the importance of palliative interventions. We will highlight the multifaceted aspects of care and explore strategies to optimize the overall well-being of patients throughout the course of treatment for genitourinary malignancies.

POMSNAME: an aide-mémoire to improve the assessment and documentation of palliative care - a longitudinal project

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based palliative care requires comprehensive assessment and documentation. However, palliative care is not always systemically documented - this can have implications for team communication and patient wellbeing. The aim of this project was to determine the effectiveness of an aide-mémoire - POMSNAME - to prompt the comprehensive assessment of the following domains by clinicians: pain, orientation and oral health, mobility, social situation, nausea and vomiting, appetite, medication, and elimination.

METHODS

A placard depicting the aide-mémoire was distributed to community-based nurses who received training and support. The case notes of palliative care patients were evaluated one month before the intervention, and was repeated at one month, eight months, and fifty months following the intervention. The 235 case notes pertained to patients who received palliative care from a team of 13 registered nurses at one community health service.

RESULTS

The documented assessment of palliative care patients improved across all nine domains. The most significant improvements pertained to patients' social situation, orientation, and nausea, eight months after the aide-mémoire was introduced (170.1%, 116.9%, and 105.6%, respectively, all at p < .001). Although oral health and medication assessment declined one-month after the aide-mémoire was introduced (-41.7% and-2.1%, respectively), both subsequently improved, thereafter, at both 8 months and 50 months after the aide-mémoire was introduced.

CONCLUSIONS

The improvement of palliative care documentation across all nine domains demonstrates the potential of the POMSNAME aide-mémoire to prompt the comprehensive assessment of patients by clinicians with generalist expertise. Research is required to determine whether other domains warrant inclusion and how.

What defines the comprehensive assessment of needs in palliative care? An integrative systematic review

BACKGROUND

The comprehensive assessment of needs in palliative care identifies where patients most want attention to guide clinical decisions that tailor care provision from their first encounters.

AIM

To define how and what needs are identified by the comprehensive assessment of needs in the original peer-reviewed articles in the field of palliative care.

DESIGN

An integrative systematic review as outlined by Whittemore and Knafl. Quality appraisal performed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science databases searched through May 2019 and updated in July 2020.

RESULTS

Forty-nine articles met inclusion criteria for original articles in English or Spanish reporting comprehensive assessment of needs of adult patients receiving palliative care. The majority (41/49) of studies were moderate to high quality. Two themes were identified: (1) How a comprehensive assessment of needs should be carried out in palliative care, which reflected a preference to develop structured tools for assessment; (2) What needs of patients should be assessed in the comprehensive assessment of needs in palliative care, which conveyed a trend to assess beyond core domains - physical, psychological, social, spiritual - with information and practical most prevalent, but with substantial variation in specifying and classifying needs into domains.

CONCLUSIONS

The assessment of needs in palliative care is comprehensive but lacks consensus on the needs and domains that should be assessed by the palliative care team. Future studies should better define what needs can be standardized into the assessment to improve process of care and patient satisfaction.

Care workers’ experiences discussing financial issues with families facing end-of-life decisions

Numerous studies have confirmed the presence of financial difficulties for families when a loved one is at the end of life. However, few studies examine the discussions family members have with care workers about financial issues during end of life. The research presented here examines the experiences that care workers have with family members expressing financial concerns and how care workers respond. I conducted in-depth interviews with fifty-eight care workers, defined in this study as clergy, patient advocates, and nurses who had experiences talking with families about financial issues. Transcripts of the interviews served as the data set. I transcribed, coded and analyzed the data. Families talk about financial issues openly, although sometimes guiltily. Some families express difficulties implicitly, and in these cases, care workers often had to piece together information based on other statements and behaviors of the family. Care workers suggest solutions at the interpersonal, organizational, inter-organizational, social, and national levels. Findings also support prior research that it is important for families to have end-of-life discussions before death is imminent so that families may plan accordingly, and offer insights about care workers and their role in making financial discussions easier for families.

The PERSONS score: A new tool for cancer patients' symptom assessment in simultaneous care and home care settings

BACKGROUND

Scientific societies recommend early interaction between oncologic and supportive care, but there is still a lack of systematic evaluations regarding symptoms from the perspective of oncologists.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the PERSONS score, in both "simultaneous care" and "supportive care" settings using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) as a comparator.

RESULTS

From November 2017 to April 2018, 67 and 110 consecutive patients were enrolled in outpatient and home care cohorts, respectively. The final study population comprised 163 patients. There were no significant changes over time in the total PERSONS scores and total ESAS scale. The intra-interviewer reliability (ICC2,1) and inter-interviewer reliability (ICC2,k) showed good reproducibility (test-retest) in each group of patients: 0.60 (0.49-0.70) and 0.82 (0.75-0.87), respectively, for the home care patients and 0.73 (0.62-0.81) and 0.89 (0.83-0.93), respectively, for the outpatient cohort. There were high correlations between PERSONS and ESAS, both at the baseline and final assessments. The mean PERSONS and ESAS scores between the home care patients and outpatients were not different at the baseline and final assessments. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for the PERSONS total score revealed good diagnostic ability. Area under the curve (AUC) was 0.825 and 0.805 for improvement and deterioration, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The PERSONS score is an easy to apply tool for symptom assessment. Importantly, the PERSONS score showed high concordance with the established ESAS scale and, therefore, provides an alternative for everyday use in supportive care assessment.

Retrospective qualitative pilot study incorporating patients' personal life aspects on admission to palliative care : What should we know about patients to give them the best possible care?

BACKGROUND

This pilot study examined which of a patient's personal aspects should be taken into account in a hospital setting on admission to the palliative care unit (PCU) by asking patients the question "what should I know about you as a person to help me take the best care of you that I can?"

METHODS

This retrospective study used qualitative methodology to thematically analyze answers from 14 patients admitted to the PCU of the Medical University of Vienna during July and August 2018. The question "what should I know about you as a person to help me take the best care of you that I can?" was asked on the day of admission, notes were taken during the interview and the patient's answers were written out immediately afterwards. Data were analyzed using NVivo 12.

RESULTS

Results revealed four topics: characterization of one's personality, important activities, social bonding, and present and future concerns regarding the patient's illness. Data showed that this question enabled patients to describe themselves and what was important to them. This might result in an improved sense of self-esteem in patients and represents an opportunity for professionals to treat patients in a more individualized manner; however, patient reactions also revealed a reluctance to address certain personal issues within a medical context.

CONCLUSION

The study results provide insights into the benefits of paying more attention to personal life aspects of severely ill patients on admission to a PCU. Addressing individual aspects of patients' lives might improve the healthcare professional-patient relationship.

Demystification of palliative care: what palliative care teams don't want you to think about them

There is robust data that palliative care is prolonging life while there are still prejudices towards this discipline that have to be demystified. Patients, relatives and caregivers benefit from the concept of early integration of palliative care and therefore, palliative care should not be mainly regarded as end-of-life care.

The PERSONS score for symptoms assessment in simultaneous care setting: A pilot study

One of the first steps to early integrate palliative care into oncology practice is a timely and efficient evaluation of symptoms (Bakitas et al., 2015; Davis et al., 2015; Temel et al., 2010). In a recent position paper, the Italian Association of Medical Oncology tells oncologists that they "must be able to prevent, recognize, measure, and treat all cancer-related symptoms" (Zagonel et al., 2017). Major international scientific societies such as the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the European Society of Medical Oncology have often defined the key role of symptoms evaluation and management to force the integration of palliative care into oncology (Davis et al., 2015; Ferrel et al., 2017). Nevertheless, a recent survey conducted by the Italian Association of Medical Oncology shows that only 20% of oncologists regularly uses valid tools to evaluate symptoms, 45% exclusively use them in the context of clinical trials, 30% use them only occasionally, and 5% never use them (Zagonel et al., 2016).

Research roundup

Synopses of a selection of recently published research articles of relevance to palliative care.