Quality of life after bone sarcoma surgery around the knee: A long-term follow-up study

Shared decision making in primary malignant bone tumour surgery around the knee in children and young adults: protocol for a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Children and young adults needing surgery for a primary malignant bone tumour around the knee face a difficult, life-changing decision. A previous study showed that this population wants to be involved more in the decision-making process and that more involvement leads to less decisional stress and regret. Therefore, a well-designed and standardized decision-making process based on the principles of shared decision-making needs to be designed, implemented, and evaluated.

METHODS

We developed a shared decision-making (SDM) model for this patient population, including an online decision aid (DA). This model has been implemented in the standard care of patients with a primary malignant bone tumour around the knee. Following implementation, we will analyse its effect on the decision-making process and the impact on patient experiences using questionnaires and interviews. Moreover, potential areas for improvement will be identified.

DISCUSSION

Given the importance of involving patients and parents in surgical decision-making, particularly in life-changing surgery such as malignant bone tumour surgery, and given the lack of SDM models applicable for this purpose, we want to share our model with the international community, including our study protocol for evaluating and optimising the model. This study will generate valuable knowledge to facilitate the optimisation of current patient care for local treatment. The sharing of our implementation and study protocol can serve as an example for other centres interested in implementing SDM methods in an era characterized by more empowered patients and parents who desire autonomy and reliable and realistic information.

Japanese orthopaedic association (JOA) clinical practice guidelines on the management of malignant bone tumors - Secondary publication

BACKGROUND

In Japan, there are currently no general guidelines for the treatment of primary malignant bone tumors. Therefore, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association established a committee to develop guidelines for the appropriate diagnosis and treatment of primary malignant bone tumors for medical professionals in clinical practice.

METHODS

The guidelines were developed in accordance with "Minds Clinical Practice Guideline Development Handbook 2014″ and "Minds Clinical Practice Guideline Development Manual 2017". The Japanese Orthopaedic Association's Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Committee established guideline development and systematic review committees, drawing members from orthopedic specialists leading the diagnosis and treatment of bone and soft tissue tumors. Pediatricians, radiologists, and diagnostic pathologists were added to both committees because of the importance of multidisciplinary treatment. Based on the diagnosis and treatment algorithm for primary malignant bone tumors, important decision-making points were selected, and clinical questions (CQ) were determined. The strength of recommendation was rated on two levels and the strength of evidence was rated on four levels. The recommendations published were selected based on agreement by 70% or more of the voters.

RESULTS

The guideline development committee examined the important clinical issues in the clinical algorithm and selected 22 CQs. The systematic review committee reviewed the evidence concerning each CQ and a clinical value judgment was added by experts. Eventually, 25 questions were published and the text of each recommendation was determined.

CONCLUSION

Since primary malignant bone tumors are rare, there is a dearth of strong evidence based on randomized controlled trials, and recommendations cannot be applied to all the patients. In clinical practice, appropriate treatment of patients with primary malignant bone tumors should be based on the histopathological diagnosis and degree of progression of each case, using these guidelines as a reference.

Skeletal Muscle Measurements in Pediatric Hematology and Oncology: Essential Components to a Comprehensive Assessment

Children with hematologic and oncologic health conditions are at risk of impaired skeletal muscle strength, size, and neuromuscular activation that may limit gross motor performance. A comprehensive assessment of neuromuscular function of these children is essential to identify the trajectory of changes in skeletal muscle and to prescribe therapeutic exercise and monitor its impact. Therefore, this review aims to (a) define fundamental properties of skeletal muscle; (b) highlight methods to quantify muscle strength, size, and neuromuscular activation; (c) describe mechanisms that contribute to muscle strength and gross motor performance in children; (d) recommend clinical assessment measures; and (e) illustrate comprehensive muscle assessment in children using examples of sickle cell disease and musculoskeletal sarcoma.

Quantifying muscle strength, size, and neuromuscular activation in adolescent and young adult survivors of musculoskeletal sarcoma: Identifying correlates and responses to functional strengthening

BACKGROUND

Medical and surgical treatment for musculoskeletal sarcoma (MSS) place survivors at risk for impairments in muscle properties including muscle strength, muscle size, and neuromuscular activation. The purpose of this study was to explore muscle properties, gross motor performance, and quality of life (QoL) and the changes in response to a 6-week functional strengthening intervention (PT-STRONG) in MSS survivors of childhood cancer (CCS).

METHODS

Eight lower extremity MSS CCS (13-23 years old) performed baseline testing and three completed PT-STRONG. Participants completed measurements of knee extension strength using handheld dynamometry, vastus lateralis (VL) and rectus femoris (RF) muscle thickness using ultrasonography at rest, and neuromuscular activation using electromyography during strength testing and a step-up task. Participants also completed gross motor and QoL assessments.

RESULTS

Compared with the non-surgical limb, MSS CCS had lower surgical limb knee extension strength, VL muscle thickness, and RF step-up muscle rate of activation (RoA). Compared with normative values, MSS CCS had decreased bilateral knee extension strength, gross motor performance, and physical QoL. Positive correlations among muscle strength, muscle thickness, and gross motor performance were identified. After PT-STRONG, MSS CCS had improvements in VL muscle thickness, VL and RF RoA duing step-up, gross motor performance, and physical QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive association between larger muscle thickness with greater knee extension strength, and higher knee extension strength with better gross motor performance indicate that comprehensive physical therapy assessment and interventions that identify and target impairments in muscle properties to guide clinical decision making should be considered for MSS CCS into survivorship.

Osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant tumour of the bone. Osteosarcoma incidence is bimodal, peaking at 18 and 60 years of age, and is slightly more common in males. The key pathophysiological mechanism involves several possible genetic drivers of disease linked to bone formation, causing malignant progression and metastasis. While there have been significant improvements in the outcome of patients with localized disease, with event-free survival outcomes exceeding 60%, in patients with metastatic disease, event-free survival outcomes remain poor at less than 30%. The suspicion of osteosarcoma based on radiographs still requires pathological evaluation of a bone biopsy specimen for definitive diagnosis and CT imaging of the chest should be performed to identify lung nodules. So far, population-based screening and surveillance strategies have not been implemented due to the rarity of osteosarcoma and the lack of reliable markers. Current screening focuses only on groups at high risk such as patients with genetic cancer predisposition syndromes. Management of osteosarcoma requires a multidisciplinary team of paediatric and medical oncologists, orthopaedic and general surgeons, pathologists, radiologists and specialist nurses. Survivors of osteosarcoma require specialized medical follow-up, as curative treatment consisting of chemotherapy and surgery has long-term adverse effects, which also affect the quality of life of patients. The development of osteosarcoma model systems and related research as well as the evaluation of new treatment approaches are ongoing to improve disease outcomes, especially for patients with metastases.

Quality of Life and Limb Functionality in Adolescents and Young Adults Surviving Bone Tumors in the Lower Extremity in a Developing Country: A Cross-Sectional Study

Introduction Due to higher survival rates among patients with bone tumors, there is a growing interest in determining these individuals' limb functionality and psychosocial prognosis.

Objectives This study aimed to analyze the differences in functionality and quality of life (QoL) related to health in patients diagnosed with a malignant bone tumor during childhood, according to the type of surgery performed.

Materials and Methods A cross-sectional study was performed for patients older than 14 years who treated for osteosarcoma or Ewing's sarcoma of the lower limb by who receiving surgery. To assess lower limb functionality and QoL among patients surviving malignant bone tumors, 19 patients surviving osteosarcoma or Ewing's sarcoma of the lower extremity were studied. An evaluation of functionality and QoL was done using the “Enneking and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 scales.” We compared the functional results according to the surgical technique used. Categorical variables were compared according to the Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests, with an established 95% level of significance.

Results QoL among patients who had conservative surgery was not significantly better than amputee patients in the physical or mental aspects, nor in any of their components. Limb functionality, according to Enneking's staging, was significantly higher in non-amputee patients (p = 0.035).

Conclusion According to the data analysis done in this study, the QoL was found to be not significantly different, based on the type of surgery performed; however, there were differences in limb functionality.

Minimal clinically important differences in SF-36 global score: Current value in orthopedic oncology

The SF-36 is widely used to evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with musculoskeletal tumors. Instead of typical methods, calculating the SF-36 Global Score has recently become an increasingly common reporting approach. However, numerical changes lack clear clinical relevance. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is useful for interpreting changes in functional scores by defining the smallest change patients may perceive as clinically meaningful. The aim of this study is to determine the MCID of the SF-36 Global Score in orthopedic oncology patients, which has not been reported to date. Three-hundred ten patients who underwent surgery and completed two surveys during postoperative follow-up were reviewed. The two most common methods for calculating the SF-36 Global Score were used: (1) anchor-based methods and receiver operating characteristic analysis based on one-half of the SD of change score and standard error of measurement at baseline and; (2) distribution-based methods. Using anchor-based methods, the MCIDs of SF-36 Global Scores #1 and #2 were 2.7 (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.85) and 2.5 (AUC = 0.79) for improvement, and -1.5 (AUC = 0.81) and -0.6 (AUC = 0.83) for deterioration, respectively. Using distribution-based methods, the MCIDs of SF-36 Global Scores #1 and #2 were 4.1 and 4.4 by half SD, and 4.1 and 4.5 by standard error of measurement, respectively. Our findings provide benchmark values, which can serve as a reference for future studies in musculoskeletal tumor patients using the SF-36 Global Score as a single measure for HRQoL.

Biology and technology in the surgical treatment of malignant bone tumours in children and adolescents, with a special note on the very young

PURPOSE

The main challenge in reconstruction after malignant bone tumour resection in young children remains how and when growth-plates can be preserved and which options remain if impossible.

METHODS

We describe different strategies to assure best possible long-term function for young children undergoing resection of malignant bone tumours.

RESULTS

Different resources are available to treat children with malignant bones tumours: a) preoperative planning simulates scenarios for tumour resection and limb reconstruction, facilitating decision-making for surgical and reconstructive techniques in individual patients; b) allograft reconstruction offers bone-stock preservation for future needs. Most allografts are intact at long-term follow-up, but limb-length inequalities and corrective/revision surgery are common in young patients; c) free vascularized fibula can be used as stand-alone reconstruction, vascularized augmentation of structural allograft or devitalized autograft. Longitudinal growth and joint remodelling potential can be preserved, if transferred with vascularized proximal physis; d) epiphysiolysis before resection with continuous physeal distraction provides safe resection margins and maintains growth-plate and epiphysis; e) 3D printing may facilitate joint salvage by reconstruction with patient-specific instruments. Very short stems can be created for fixation in (epi-)metaphysis, preserving native joints; f) growing endoprosthesis can provide for remaining growth after resection of epi-metaphyseal tumours. At ten-year follow-up, limb survival was 89%, but multiple surgeries are often required; g) rotationplasty and amputation should be considered if limb salvage is impossible and/or would result in decreased function and quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Several biological and technological reconstruction options must be merged and used to yield best outcomes when treating young children with malignant bone tumours.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V Expert opinion.

Gait outcomes following proximal tibial tumor resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Despite the proximal tibia being a common site of primary malignant bone tumors, there is limited information about gait function following proximal tibial tumor resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction (PTR).

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the impact of PTR on gait and quality of life?

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of patients ≥18 years old who were ≥2 years post-PTR compared to a control group of similar age and sex distribution. Eighteen participants (9 PTR, 9 Control) were recruited. Gait spatial-temporal data, joint kinematics and kinetics were collected at preferred and fast walking speeds. Community walking cadence, health-related quality of life (SF-36) and knee joint torque were assessed. Comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVAs with Bonferroni corrections for multiple comparisons. Nonparametric tests were used for data not normally distributed.

RESULTS

Mean age was 31 years for each group (PTR range = 18-42 yrs, Control range = 18-44 yrs). Compared to both control and nonsurgical limbs, the surgical limb exhibited significantly decreased % single limb support time, reduced heel rise during terminal stance and an absence of normally occurring knee flexion angles, extensor moments and power generation during initial double limb support. Additionally, a reduced peak plantar flexor moment was found for the surgical as compared to the control limb. The number of gait abnormalities increased during fast walking. Significantly reduced surgical knee extensor torque on isokinetic testing and weakness of the knee and ankle on clinical examination support gait findings. During community walking, the number of low frequency strides was an average of 5.3 % greater for the PTR group (p <  0.05). Norm-based PTR group SF-36 component scores were within normal values (53.4 physical, 56.5 mental).

SIGNIFICANCE

Gait abnormalities were consistent with ankle muscle resection and transposition and knee extensor mechanism disruption. Despite these deficits, walking speed and quality of life were relatively normal.

The Italian consensus conference on the role of rehabilitation for children and adolescents with leukemia, central nervous system, and bone tumors, part 1: Review of the conference and presentation of consensus statements on rehabilitative evaluation of motor aspects

Because of increasing survival rates in pediatric oncology, attention is focusing on cancer and its treatment-related side effects. Rehabilitation may reduce their impact. However, the literature does not provide strong evidence regarding rehabilitation pathways. Therefore, the Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology organized a consensus conference on the role of rehabilitation of motor impairments in children/adolescents affected by leukemia, central nervous system, and bone tumors to define recommendations for daily practice. The grading of recommendation assessment, developing and evaluation (GRADE) method was used in order to formulate questions, select outcomes, evaluate evidence, and create recommendations. This paper includes the results on the rehabilitation assessment.

What Are the Minimum Clinically Important Differences in SF-36 Scores in Patients with Orthopaedic Oncologic Conditions?

BACKGROUND

The SF-36 is widely used to evaluate the health-related quality of life of patients with musculoskeletal tumors. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is useful for interpreting changes in functional scores because it defines the smallest change each patient may perceive. Since the MCID is influenced by the population characteristics, MCIDs of the SF-36 should be defined to reflect the specific conditions of orthopaedic oncology patients.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the MCID of SF-36 physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores in patients with orthopaedic oncologic conditions when calculated with distribution-based methods? (2) What is the MCID of SF-36 PCS and MCS scores in patients with orthopaedic oncologic conditions when calculated by anchor-based methods?

METHODS

Of all 960 patients who underwent surgery from 1999 to 2005, 32% (310) of patients who underwent musculoskeletal oncologic surgery and completed two surveys during postoperative follow-up were reviewed. We evaluated a dataset that ended in 2005, completing follow-up of data accrued as part of the cooperative effort between the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the Council of Musculoskeletal Specialty Societies to create patient reported quality of life instruments for lower extremity conditions. This effort, started in 1994 was validated and widely accepted by its publication in 2004. We believe the findings from this period are still relevant today because (1) this critical information has never been available for clinicians and researchers to distinguish real differences in outcome among orthopaedic oncology patients, (2) the SF-36 continues to be the best validated and widely used instrument to assess health-related quality of life, and unfortunately (3) there has been no significant change in outcome for oncology patients over the intervening years. SF-36 PCS and MCS are aggregates of the eight scale scores specific to physical and mental dimension (scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better health). Their responsiveness has been shown postoperatively for several surgical procedures (such as, colorectal surgery). Two different methods were used to calculate the MCID: the distribution-based method, which was based on half the SD of the change in score and standard error of the measurement at baseline, and anchor-based, in which a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed. The anchor-based method uses a plain-language question to ask patients how their individual conditions changed when compared with the previous survey. Answer choices were "much better," "somewhat better," "about the same," "somewhat worse," or "much worse." The ROC curve-derived MCIDs were defined as the change in scores from baseline, with sensitivity and specificity to detect differences in patients who stated their outcome was, about the same and those who stated their status was somewhat better or somewhat worse. This approach is based on each patient's perception. It considers that the definition of MCID is the minimal difference each patient can perceive as meaningful.

RESULTS

Using the distribution-based method, we found that the MCIDs of the PCS and MCS were 5 and 5 by half the SD, and 6 and 5 by standard error of the measurement. In the anchor-based method, the MCIDs of the PCS and MCS for improvement/deterioration were 4 (area under the curve, 0.82)/-2 (area under the curve, 0.79) and 4 (area under the curve, 0.72)/ (area under the curve, 0.68), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Since both anchor-based and distribution-based MCID estimates of the SF-36 in patients with musculoskeletal tumors were so similar, we have confidence in the estimates we made, which were about 5 points for both the PCS and the MCS subscales of the SF-36. This suggests that interventions improving SF-36 by less than that amount are unlikely to be perceived by patients as clinically important. Therefore, those interventions may not justify exposing patients to risk, cost, or inconvenience. When applying new interventions to orthopaedic oncology patients going forward, it will be important to consider these MCIDs for evaluation purposes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Cross-Cultural Validation of the Italian Version of the Bt-DUX: A Subjective Measure of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Who Underwent Surgery for Lower Extremity Malignant Bone Tumour

The purpose of this study was to translate the English bone tumour DUX (Bt-DUX-Eng) questionnaire for lower extremity bone tumour patients, a disease-specific quality of life (QoL) instrument, into Italian and then examine the validity of the Italian version of Bt-DUX (Bt-DUX-It). The adaptation and translation process included forward translation, back-translation, and a review of the back-translation by an expert committee. The Bt-DUX-It was validated in a sample of adolescents treated for lower extremity osteosarcoma in Italy. Assessments included the Bt-DUX, the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS), and the European Organization for Research and Treatment Core Quality of Life Questionnaire of Cancer Patients (EORTC QLQ-C30). Fifty-one patients with a median age of 20 years (range: 15-25) completed the questionnaires. The mean Bt-DUX score was 70 (range: 16.30-100). The internal consistency of the overall score and that of the Bt-DUX-It was good: Cronbach's α was 0.95. Spearman's correlation coefficient between the Bt-DUX (total and domain scores) and EORTC QLQ C30 and TESS were overall moderate to good, reaching a p-value <0.01 in all cases. The Bt-DUX-It version is a useful tool for measuring QoL in patients with bone tumour and has similar internal consistency, construct validity, and discrimination as those of the Dutch and English versions.

[Physiotherapy in early rehabilitation of patients with bone sarcomas after arthroplasty of large bones and joints]

ACTUALITY

The modern method of treating patients with tumor lesions of the bones is the replacement of large bones and joints with the inclusion of reconstructive plastic component. The main functional postoperative disorders of this method (limitation of mobility in the operated joint, pain, muscle hypotrophy and edema of the operated limb) obstruct the ability of patients to return to a full life, which makes their early rehabilitation extremely urgent. Orthopedics uses a number of physical factors for this. The literature presents data on the absence of negative effects of low-frequency electro- and magnetotherapy in the treatment of late complications of oncopedic surgery on a number of bone sarcomas, which allowed them to be included in early rehabilitation for the first time.

AIM OF STUDY

Development of a complex of early rehabilitation of patients with bone tumors after arthroplasty of large bones and joints and evaluation of its effectiveness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective, open, nonrandomized, controlled study included 36 patients aged 19-67 years (Me 42 years old) with primary malignant and metastatic bone tumors who underwent endoprosthesis replacement of large bones and joints with the inclusion of reconstructive plastic component (plastic by displaced muscles, synthetic mesh) and received local low-frequency magnetotherapy, low-intensity infrared laser radiation, electroneuromyostimulation and therapeutic exercises. Physiotherapy began from the first day after the operation and lasted for 10 days. To assess the functional result, the international MSTS scale was used.

RESULTS

The combined use of the reconstructive plastic component during radical surgery and physiotherapy made it possible to obtain good functional result at 63,9% of patients, satisfactory functional results in 36.1% of patients according to the MSTS scale at the time of discharge. The function of the saved limb in 10 patients after distal femoral resection with knee replacement was 80% of normal function, in 7 patients after proximal tibia resection - 72%; in 13 patients after proximal resection of the femur with hip replacement - 59%; in 5 patients after proximal resection of the humerus with endoprosthetics of the shoulder joint - 61.3%; and in 1 patient after proximal resection of the ulna with endoprosthetics of the elbow joint - 70%.

CONCLUSION

The multidisciplinary approach to the early rehabilitation of patients with bone tumors made it possible to achieve functional results in a short time, reduce the time spent by patients in the surgical department without increasing the number of postoperative complications. Based on the preliminary obtained results, it is necessary to continue the study on a larger number of patients and with a longer follow-up period.

Minimal clinically important differences in Toronto Extremity Salvage Score for patients with lower extremity sarcoma

BACKGROUND

The Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) is the most widely used patient-reported outcome measure for orthopaedic oncology patients. However, minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) in the TESS have not been analyzed. The aim of this study was to define the MCIDs of TESS in patients with lower extremity sarcoma.

METHODS

A total of 85 patients were investigated to calculate the MCIDs for TESS. Three different methods were used: 1) distribution-based methods based on one-half of the standard deviation and standard error of measurement (SEM) at the baseline, 2) anchor-based and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and 3) anchor-based using Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) analysis.

RESULTS

The MCIDs at 6 months were 4.9-7.8 by distribution-based methods and 4.3-4.4 by anchor-based methods. The MCIDs at 12 months were 4.0-6.9 by distribution-based methods and 10.6-11.6 by anchor-based methods.

CONCLUSIONS

We calculated MCID values for the TESS based on distribution- and anchor-based approaches. Our results seem reasonable since MCIDs calculated by the different approaches had similar values. This knowledge will enable clinicians to identify meaningful functional improvements in sarcoma patients.

Body image, self-esteem, and quality of life in patients with primary malignant bone tumors

BACKGROUND

Patients with primary malignant bone tumors are facing different challenges in their everyday lives due to improved treatment and prolonged survival. This raises the question whether and to what extent their quality of life, body image, and self-esteem is affected by their disease. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the quality of life, body image and self-esteem of patients with primary malignant bone tumors compared to a healthy control group.

METHODS

A total of 56 patients (39 male, 17 female; average age 33.8 [± 14.29] years) who were treated with either osteosarcoma or Ewing-Sarcoma at the authors' institution between Jan 1989 and May 2015 were included into the study (mean follow-up: 9.1  ± 6.6] years). The control group consisted of 58 (average age 24.4 [± 3.1] years, 31 male, 27 female) healthy medical students. Standardized questionnaires were used to assess quality of life (SF-36), body image (MBSRQ) and self-esteem (RSE-scale). Student's t test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Quality of life (SF-36) (in physical categories) and body image (MBSRQ) was significantly lower in patients with primary malignant bone tumors compared to healthy cohort (p < 0.001). Self-esteem was not affected i n patients and did not show any difference compared to control group (23.96 vs. 24.00).

DISCUSSION

Physical categories of quality of life and body image sensation of patients with primary malignant bone tumors are worse compared healthy controls. However, self-esteem does not seem to be affected by the condition and its management. Patients can be encouraged about this at the time of diagnosis of a primary malignant bone tumor.

Qualitative study exploring patients experiences of being diagnosed and living with primary bone cancer in the UK

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to explore the experiences of patients with primary bone cancer.

DESIGN

Qualitative study design using semistructured interviews and focus groups.

SETTING

Hospitals across the UK and recruitment through UK sarcoma charities and support groups.

METHODS

Semistructured telephone/face-to-face interviews and focus groups with a purposive sample of 26 participants. Data were analysed using Framework Analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients (n=26) with primary bone cancer aged 13-77 years. The majority were male (69%), white (85%); diagnosed within 4 years (54%); and had lower limb sarcoma (65%). Ten participants had undergone an upper/lower limb amputation (39%).

RESULTS

The health-related quality-of-life domains of physical, emotional and social well-being and healthcare professionals' role were the overarching themes of analysis. The physical domain anchored patient experiences. The intensity and length of treatment, the severity of side-effects, the level of disability after surgery and the uncertainty of their prognosis had an impact on patient's self-image, confidence, mood and identity, and caused disruption to various aspects of the patients' social life, including their relationships (emotional and sexual) and participation in work/school and leisure activities. Adaptation was influenced by the way patients dealt with stress and adversity, with some finding a new outlook in life, and others struggling with finding their 'new normal'. Family and friends were the main source of support. Healthcare professional's expertise and support was critical. Rehabilitation services had a considerable role in patient's physical and emotional well-being, but inequitable access to these services was apparent.

CONCLUSIONS

This study described the impact of primary bone cancer on patients' well-being and adjustment over time with the identification of influencing factors of better/worse experiences. It showed that impact was felt after end of treatment and affected patients at different life stages. Holistic models of survivorship care are needed.

A Critical Review of the Impact of Sarcoma on Psychosocial Wellbeing

Background

Previous reviews of outcomes in specific sarcoma populations suggest patients have poor quality of life. In most of these reviews, there is a predominant focus on physical function rather than psychosocial outcome. The aim of this review was to describe the psychosocial impact of diagnosis and treatment on patients with all types of sarcoma.

Methods

Searches were conducted through six electronic databases for publications of any study design using a validated patient-reported outcome measure reporting the psychosocial impact in this population.

Results

Eighty-two studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most (65%) were assessed of being of reasonable quality. The most common aspect of psychosocial wellbeing measured was quality of life (80%). Due to the heterogeneity of methods, outcomes, and populations, it was not possible to make definitive conclusions. It seems there is an improvement in the physical aspects of quality of life over time but not in psychosocial function or mental health. There was no change in mental health scores, but patients reported an improvement in adjusting to normal life. There are no differences according to the type of surgery patients receive, and psychosocial outcomes tend to be poorer than the general population. There is no consistency in identifying the factors that predict/influence psychosocial wellbeing.

Conclusion

The published literature does not provide a clear understanding of the impact of sarcoma diagnosis and treatment on psychosocial wellbeing. Instead, the review demonstrates a need for well-designed studies in this area and a more consistent approach to the measurement of patient-reported outcomes, which include psychosocial domains. Recommendations for future research have been proposed.