Working beyond the patient and cancer for adolescents and young adults

Assessment of Psychological Distress Among Indian Adolescents and Young Adults with Solid Cancer Using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer

Purpose The incidence of cancer has increased in India with a visible impact on the young population (aged 15–39 years). The present study aims to evaluate psychological distress among Indian adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with solid cancer using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) distress thermometer.

Methods The demographic and clinical characteristics of AYAs patients (age 15–39 years) with cancer were recorded. Assessment of psychological distress of patients using the NCCN distress thermometer was performed at three time points over a period of 3 months. Distress thermometer scale and a self-administered questionnaire in English and Hindi languages was handed over to participants at three time points: at treatment commencement (T1), at 1 month, and 3 months (T2 and T3, respectively) into therapy.

Results Of the 259 patients, 63% were women and 37% men; the median age was 34 years. In total, 71 (27%) were ≤ 24 years old and 188 (73%) were>24 years old. Bone sarcoma (39%) was common cancer in AYA patients aged ≤ 24 years and breast cancer (21%) in >24 years of age. The distress scores in both the groups were the highest at diagnosis (T1) followed by that measured at 1 (T2) and 3 months (T3) after diagnosis. The distress score in the age ≤ 24 years was the highest (6.7) at T1, followed by those measured at T2 (2.6) and T3 (1.1) and among age>24 years was the highest (6.6) at T1, followed by those measured at T2 (2.6) and T3 (1.2). Among AYA patients>24 years old, worry, nervousness, sadness, transportation, and sleep were the top five identified problems and in ≤ 24 years old, the top identified problems were worry, financial support, sleep, nervousness, and sadness.

Conclusion Adolescents and young adults experience some level of distress associated with the cancer diagnosis, effects of the disease, treatment regardless of the stage and various transitions throughout the trajectory of the disease. The distress thermometer is an easy and useful tool for the assessment of psychological distress in AYA cancers. Early identification of distress burden with the distress thermometer leads to effective interventions in patients with cancer which could improve outcomes including survival in AYAs with cancer in India.

Screening for distress and needs: Findings from a multinational validation of the Adolescent and Young Adult Psycho-Oncology Screening Tool with newly diagnosed patients

OBJECTIVE

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) diagnosed with cancer commonly experience elevated psychological distress and need appropriate detection and management of the psychosocial impact of their illness and treatment. This paper describes the multinational validation of the Distress Thermometer (DT) for AYAs recently diagnosed with cancer and the relationship between distress and patient concerns on the AYA-Needs Assessment (AYA-NA).

METHODS

AYA patients (N = 288; 15-29 years, M_age  = 21.5 years, SD_age  = 3.8) from Australia (n = 111), Canada (n = 67), the UK (n = 85) and the USA (n = 25) completed the DT, AYA-NA, Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) and demographic measures within 3 months of diagnosis. Using the HADS as a criterion, receiver operating characteristics analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off score and meet the acceptable level of 0.70 for sensitivity and specificity. Correlations between the DT and HADS scores, prevalence of distress and AYA-NA scores were reported.

RESULTS

The DT correlated strongly with the HADS-Total, providing construct validity evidence (r = 0.65, p < 0.001). A score of 5 resulted in the best clinical screening cut-off on the DT (sensitivity = 82%, specificity = 75%, Youden Index = 0.57). Forty-two percent of AYAs scored at or above 5. 'Loss of meaning or purpose' was the AYA-NA item most likely to differentiate distressed AYAs.

CONCLUSIONS

The DT is a valid distress screening instrument for AYAs with cancer. The AYA-POST (DT and AYA-NA) provides clinicians with a critical tool to assess the psychosocial well-being of this group, allowing for the provision of personalised support and care responsive to individuals' specific needs and concerns.

Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Adolescents and Young Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: Special Considerations and Challenges

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) represent a challenging group of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) patients with specific needs. While there is growing evidence from comparative studies that this age group profits from intensified paediatric-based chemotherapy, the impact and optimal implementation of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in the overall treatment strategy is less clear. Over recent years, improved survival rates after myeloablative allogeneic HSCT for ALL have been reported similarly for AYAs and children despite differences in transplantation practise. Still, AYAs appear to have inferior outcomes and an increased risk of treatment-related morbidity and mortality in comparison with children. To further improve HSCT outcomes and reduce toxicities in AYAs, accurate stratification and evaluation of additional or alternative targeted treatment options are crucial, based on specific molecular and immunological characterisation of ALL and minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment during therapy. Age-specific factors such as increased acute toxicities and poorer adherence to treatment as well as late sequelae might influence treatment decisions. In addition, educational, social, work, emotional, and sexual aspects during this very crucial period of life need to be considered. In this review, we summarise the key findings of recent studies on treatment approach and outcomes in this vulnerable patient group after HSCT, turning our attention to the different approaches applied in paediatric and adult centres. We focus on the specific needs of AYAs with ALL regarding social aspects and supportive care to handle complications as well as fertility issues. Finally, we comment on potential areas of future research and concisely debate the capacity of currently available immunotherapies to reduce toxicity and further improve survival in this challenging patient group.