Clinician and patient experiences when providing and receiving information and support for managing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A qualitative multiple methods study

Experiences of cancer survivors with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in the Netherlands: symptoms, daily limitations, involvement of healthcare professionals, and social support

PURPOSE

A significant proportion of cancer patients suffer from chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). This descriptive study aimed to examine patients' experience of CIPN symptoms, daily limitations, involvement of healthcare professionals, and social support.

METHODS

Cross-sectional data have been collected in the Netherlands via a national online questionnaire comprising closed items only (February 2021).

RESULTS

Out of 3752 respondents, 1975 received chemotherapy only (i.e., without targeted therapy) and were therefore included. The majority (71.2%) reported symptoms in both hands and feet (e.g., tingling and loss of sensation or diminished sensation). Participants reported most limitations in household chores, social activities, hobbies, sports, walking, and sleeping and least in family/(taking care of) children, cycling, driving, self-care, eating and drinking, and sexuality and intimacy. Many patients indicated that their healthcare professionals informed them about the possibility of CIPN development before treatment (58.4%), and they paid attention to CIPN during and after treatment (53.1%). However, many patients (43%) reported a lack of information on what to do when CIPN develops. Few participants (22%) visited their general practitioner (GP) for CIPN. In general, patients' social environments sometimes to always showed empathy to patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptoms of CIPN are frequently reported and can result in various daily limitations. Support from professionals and peers is crucial in managing CIPN, which is sometimes lacking. Appropriate guidance and support should be provided to patients to decrease the impact of CIPN on daily life. Future research should investigate differences in chemotherapeutic agents and the resulting symptoms and consequences.

Exploring Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Management Practice Patterns Among Oncology Clinicians

OBJECTIVES

Approximately 60% of cancer survivors receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy experience chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) (eg, hand and foot numbness, tingling, or pain). There is only one recommended pharmacological treatment (duloxetine) and one modestly beneficial nonpharmacological treatment (exercise) for CIPN. However, data suggest national guideline recommendations are not routinely practiced. Further, less is known about nurses' CIPN management practices. The purpose of this convergent mixed methods study was to explore oncology clinicians' self-reported practices and perceptions regarding CIPN prevention and management.

METHODS

Oncology clinicians at three cancer centers completed a survey about their recommendations for CIPN prevention and management in practice. A subset of clinicians also participated in a semi-structured interview to explore their perspectives of and motivations for implementing CIPN assessment, prevention, and management in practice. Quantitative data were described (eg, frequency or median) and qualitative data were analyzed using inductive content analysis.

RESULTS

This study (N = 44 survey responses; n = 9 interviews) resulted in four themes: (1) clinicians primarily recommend gabapentin for CIPN management and often observe cryotherapy used for CIPN prevention, but these interventions are complicated by discomfort, intolerable side effects, and efficacy concerns; (2) clinicians perceive CIPN as troublesome and desire additional information and resources regarding CIPN prevention and management; (3) CIPN-related education provided by clinicians may be limited by patient retention of the amount of education received about cancer treatment and other factors; (4) clinicians use subjective CIPN assessment to screen at each visit for common CIPN symptoms (eg, numbness or tingling) and the impact of symptoms on day-to-day activities.

CONCLUSIONS

Discrepancies persist between evidence-based guidelines on CIPN management and current oncology clinician practices.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Clinician involvement is needed when developing education and resources to help oncology clinicians provide the most evidence-based care to potentially prevent and manage their patients' CIPN.

Knowledge levels of oncology nurses regarding evidence-based practices in the assessment and management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

Objective

The study aimed to determine the level of oncology nurses' knowledge of evidence-based practice for assessing and managing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN).

Methods

This study employed a descriptive and cross-sectional research design. It was carried out with oncology nurses who were working at a university hospital in the Western Region of Turkey and who were members of the Oncology Nursing Association. The sample of the study consisted of 96 nurses who met the inclusion criteria.

Results

The study sample comprised 94.8% female oncology nurses, 57.3% of whom held an undergraduate degree, and over half (58.5%) of whom were employed as clinical nurses. A majority of nurses (76.0%) indicated that they had not received any training in peripheral neuropathy. 35.4% of the nurses assessed patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy for peripheral neuropathy at each visit/each chemotherapy cycle. A total of 43.8% of nurses indicated that they frequently assessed patients for peripheral neuropathy at the conclusion of the treatment protocol. The oncology nurses assessed the patient-reported symptoms of motor neuropathy (58.3%), sensory neuropathy (56.3%), autonomic neuropathy (51.0%), neuropathic pain (55.2%), and co-occurring symptoms (52.1%) on a frequent basis. The nurses reported that they assessed muscle strength (56.3%), gait and balance (58.3%), and quality of life (52.1%) "frequently". In contrast, they assessed deep tendon reflex (41.7%), neurological tests (36.5%), and social activities (46.8%) "rarely".

Conclusions

The study findings indicated that oncology nurses require further education and training in evidence-based practices for the assessment and management of CIPN.

Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Recent Update on Pathophysiology and Treatment

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a major long-lasting side effect of some chemotherapy drugs, which threatens cancer survival rate. CIPN mostly affects sensory neurons and occasionally motor neurons, causing numbness, tingling, discomfort, and burning pain in the upper and lower extremities. The pathophysiology of CIPN is not completely understood; however, it is believed that chemotherapies induce peripheral neuropathy via directly damaging mitochondria, impairing the function of ion channels, triggering immunological mechanisms, and disrupting microtubules. The treatment of CIPN is a medical challenge, and there are no approved pharmacological options. Currently, duloxetine and other antidepressants, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and ion-channel targeted therapies are commonly used in clinics to relieve the symptoms of CIPN. Several other types of drugs, such as cannabinoids, sigma-1 receptor antagonists, and nicotinamides ribose, are being evaluated in preclinical and clinical studies. This paper summarizes the information related to the physiology of CIPN and medicines that could be used for treating this condition.

Relationship between chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and physical activity in cancer survivors: A prospective longitudinal study

Objective

The purpose of this research is to evaluate the relationship between the degree of peripheral neuropathy associated with treatment and physical activity through the use of objective indicators such as wristband activity tracker and subjective evaluations obtained through interviews.

Methods

This study included 11 patients with gynecological cancer, gastrointestinal cancer, and malignant lymphoma. Participants were requested to wear a wristband activity meter at two time points: early and mid-treatment. Activity-meter step counts were compared with factors such as energy expenditure and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General during early and mid-treatment. Interviews were analyzed qualitatively and inductively.

Results

There was no difference in the number of steps taken by participants in the early and mid-treatment periods (P = 0.050), but they took more steps in the mid-treatment period than in the early period. Participants expended more energy during mid-treatment than early treatment, but these differences were not significant. We noted a correlation between the number of steps and energy expenditure in the mid-treatment period (r = 0.883). Comparisons between measures showed significant differences in "Impact" between early and mid-treatment on Distress and Impact Thermometer (P = 0.034). The impact of numbness on activity was assigned to three categories: loss of routine caused by numbness, coping with the numbness-related inconvenience using various resources, and acceptance of life with numbness with the support of others and self-strength.

Conclusions

The participants devised strategies to maintain activities despite experiencing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity. The use of activity meters may enhance patient motivation, which in our opinion, is beneficial for self-care education.

A qualitative evaluation of the oncologists', neurologists', and pain specialists' views on the management and care of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in The Netherlands

PURPOSE

In treating cancer, different chemotherapy regimens cause chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). Despite recent international guidelines, a gold standard for diagnosis, treatment, and care is lacking. To identify the current clinical practice and the physicians' point of view and ideas for improvement, we evaluated CIPN care by interviewing different specialists involved.

METHODS

We performed semi-structured, audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded interviews with a purposive sample of oncologists, pain specialists, and neurologists involved in CIPN patients' care. Data is analyzed by a constant comparative method for content analysis, using ATLAS.ti software. Codes, categories, and themes are extracted, generating common denominators and conclusions.

RESULTS

With oncologists, pain specialists, and neurologists, nine, nine, and eight interviews were taken respectively (including three, two, and two interviews after thematic saturation occurred). While useful preventive measures and predictors are lacking, patient education (e.g., on symptoms and timely reporting) is deemed pivotal, as is low-threshold screening (e.g., anamnesis and questionnaires). Diagnosis focusses on a temporal relationship to chemotherapy, with adjuvant testing (e.g., EMG) used in severe or atypical cases. Symptomatic antineuropathic and topical medication are often prescribed, but personalized and multidimensional care based on individual symptoms and preferences is highly valued. The limited efficacy of existing treatments, and the lack of standardized protocols, interdisciplinary coordination, and awareness among healthcare providers pose significant challenges.

CONCLUSION

Besides the obvious need for better therapeutic options, and multidisciplinary exploration of patients' perspectives, a structured and collaborative approach towards diagnosis, treatment, referral, and follow-up, nurtured by improving knowledge and use of existing CIPN guidelines, could enhance care.

Real-Life Experiences of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients with Cancer: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis Study

PURPOSE

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy is an unpleasant symptom experienced by most cancer survivors who receive neurotoxic chemotherapy. It is not life threatening; however, it impairs sensorimotor skills, thereby interfering with daily activities and reducing the quality of life. Healthcare providers are becoming increasingly aware of the significance of its management. Nonetheless, a lack of understanding remains. This study aimed to understand the experience of cancer survivors with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.

DATA SOURCES

The selection and search for relevant literature conformed to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols guidelines. Four databases were searched for literature exploring the experiences of cancer survivors with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Moreover, articles from reference lists were retrieved. Of 969 collected articles, 13 qualitative studies were included. The seven-step meta-ethnography developed by Noblits and Hare was used to analyze and synthesize selected studies. This study complied with the enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research guidelines.

CONCLUSION

Three themes ("Tough and challenging life with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy," "Being patient in a chaotic life," and "Transition to a new way of life") and six subthemes were derived after reviewing, analyzing, and synthesizing selected study findings. They faced difficult daily challenges and endured psychologically chaotic moments; however, they gradually learned to live with the symptoms and adapted their way of life.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

This review emphasizes the importance of the need for personalized nursing interventions promoting self-management and new adaptation strategies for gaining better understanding of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Exploring Patients' Understanding of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

Little quantitative evidence exists surrounding patients' level of understanding of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) symptoms (numbness, tingling, pain in the hands/feet) and consequences (e.g., negatively affect physical functioning or chemotherapy dosing) at the beginning of chemotherapy. The purpose of this cross-sectional, secondary analysis was to describe CIPN knowledge and education patterns among adults early in a course of neurotoxic chemotherapy for the treatment of cancer (< three infusions). Following consent, participants completed an electronic questionnaire about their perceptions of CIPN symptoms, incidence, and education. Participants (N = 92) were mainly female (76%), white (91%), and diagnosed with breast (46%) or gastrointestinal (40%) cancers. Most participants without CIPN (n = 48) did not expect to develop CIPN (45%) or were unaware of CIPN as a side-effect (30%). Furthermore, 71% of participants without CIPN (n = 31) estimated CIPN to occur in ≤ 30% of patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy. Overall, participants learned about CIPN from their doctor or nurse prior to beginning chemotherapy (90%). Clinicians delivered education about CIPN symptoms (75%), but less frequently delivered education about CIPN management (14%), or the impact of CIPN on the ability to continue chemotherapy (16%) or physical functioning (24%). Finally, participants reported that a discussion with their doctor/nurse would be the best way to learn about CIPN (92%). Results revealed that participants without CIPN were largely unaware of the adverse consequences or incidence of CIPN during treatment. Further research is needed to investigate optimal methods to promote patient-clinician communication about CIPN during chemotherapy to enhance patients' retention of CIPN information and activation in their care.

Co-designing a cancer care intervention: reflections of participants and a doctoral researcher on roles and contributions

BACKGROUND

Patient and Public Involvement is most usually framed in the context of designing, conducting and/or disseminating research. Participatory methods such as Experience-Based Co-Design (EBCD) further allow service users to directly engage in developing, testing and implementing interventions and services alongside healthcare staff. This paper aims to explore how participants in an EBCD project came-over time-to perceive their role and involvement in co-designing a cancer care intervention.

METHODS

The findings are based on our reflections, a research diary, email correspondence and fieldnotes from co-design events. Co-design participants who attended most of the ten co-design events took part through written reflections or audio-recorded video calls. Ten reflective pieces were collected from clinicians (n = 4), PPI group members/patient participants (n = 4), a doctoral researcher (n = 1) and a visual illustrator (n = 1). Inductive data analysis of participant reflections was carried out using reflexive thematic analysis. Meeting fieldnotes, email correspondence and the researcher's diary were deductively analysed using the initial themes generated from this inductive analysis.

RESULTS

Five main themes were identified: (1) changing perception of roles during the co-design process, (2) defining a 'co-designer', (3) engagement and ownership, (4) role of the research facilitator in maintaining momentum, and (5) perceived benefits of involvement.

CONCLUSION

Our findings show the changing perceptions of roles and contributions among participants over time. Patients typically described their role as co-designers in terms simply of sharing their experiences. In contrast, clinicians perceived themselves as co-designers because they were working with patients who were actively involved in decision-making. Levels of engagement were affected by several factors such as time and facilitation, but most participants came to view themselves as co-owners of the intervention. Overall, participants perceived their involvement as a positive experience with clinicians also reporting wider positive impacts on their clinical practice.