Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy among White British and ethnic minority breast cancer survivors in the United Kingdom

Evaluation of adherence to pharmacological treatments by undocumented migrants with chronic diseases: a 10-year retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the time course of medication adherence and some of the factors involved in this process in undocumented migrants with chronic diseases.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A big non-governmental organisation in Milano, Italy, giving medical assistance to undocumented migrants.

PARTICIPANTS

1918 patients, 998 females and 920 males, with at least one chronic condition (diabetes, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), mental health disorders) seen over a period of 10 years (2011-2020). Their mean age was 49.2±13 years.

RESULTS

Adherence to medications decreased over 1 year in all patients. This was more evident during the first 2 months of treatment. Patients on only one medication were less adherent than those on more than one medication; at 6 months the percentage of patients with high adherence was 33% vs 57% (p<0.0001) for diabetes, 15% vs 46% (p<0.0001) for mental disorders and 35% vs 59% (p<0.0001) for CVDs. Patients with mental disorders had the lowest adherence: 25% at 6 months and 3% at 1 year. Mental disorders, when present as comorbidities, greatly reduced the probability of being highly adherent: risk ratio (RR) 0.72 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.91; p=0.006) at 3 months, RR 0.77, (95% CI 0.59 to 1.01; p=0.06) at 6 months, RR 0.35 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.94; p=0.04) at 1 year. This was especially evident for patients with CVDs, whose percentage of high adherents decreased to 30% (p=0.0008) at 6 months and to 3% (p=0.01) at 1 year. We also noted that highly adherent patients usually were those most frequently seen by a doctor.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions to increase medication adherence of undocumented migrants with chronic diseases are necessary, particularly in the first 2 months after beginning treatment. These should be aimed at people-centred care and include more outpatient consultations. Educational interventions should especially be taken into consideration for patients on monotherapy.

Beliefs about medicines' association with endocrine therapy adherence in early breast cancer survivors in Croatia

This observational, cross-sectional study conducted at the University Hospital Centre Zagreb (UHC Zagreb) aimed to explore patients' beliefs about adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) as well as their association with non-adherence and sociodemographic and clinical factors. Out of 420 early breast cancer (BC) patients included in the study, 79.5 % perceived AET necessary and important for their health, as measured by the Belief About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), with the mean necessity score (20.4 ± 3.68) significantly higher than the mean concerns score (13 ± 4.81) (p < 0.001). Based on the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5), 44.4 % (n = 182) of the participants were non-adherers, out of which 63.2 % (n = 115) were unintentional and 36.8 % (n = 67) intentional non-adherers. Significantly higher concern beliefs were found among patients that were younger (p < 0.001), employed (p < 0.001), intentionally non-adherent to AET (p = 0.006), had a lower body-mass index (p = 0.005) and a higher level of education (p < 0.001), were premenopausal at the time of diagnosis (p < 0.001), taking tamoxifen treatment (p = 0.05) and receiving ovarian suppression (p < 0.001). Younger patients should be recognized as being at risk of non-adherence as they hold greater concern beliefs about medicines.

Completeness of endocrine therapy information in the Primary Care Prescription Database (PCPD) and secondary care treatment datasets: A national population-based cohort study using routine healthcare data

BACKGROUND

Endocrine therapy (ET) is a widely used treatment for breast cancer. In the UK, use is typically initiated in secondary care, with subsequent treatment in primary care. Evaluating use of ET depends on data sources containing accurate and complete information. This study aimed to evaluate the completeness and consistency of ET recorded in primary and secondary care data (SCD) and determine the value of combining data sources in describing use of ET.

METHODS

This cohort study included women (50 + years) diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive invasive breast cancer in England, April-2015 to December-2019. Concordance of ET recorded in SCD and the Primary Care Prescription Database (PCPD) was evaluated. Factors associated with recording of ET in each setting were assessed using statistical models.

RESULTS

Overall 110,529 women were included. 94% had ET recorded in either SCD or PCPD. ET captured in SCD varied from 3% (in Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy data) to 52% (in the Cancer Outcomes and Services Dataset; COSD). By contrast, 93% of patients had an ET prescription in PCPD. Among patients with ET recorded, this was not captured in COSD for 45%. Capture in COSD was lowest for younger women, those with no comorbidity/frailty, with lower stage or HER2-positive disease, or with other treatments recorded. Overall concordance between COSD and PCPD was 57%, but varied substantially across NHS trusts (lowest decile≤28%; highest decile≥86%). Among women with ET recorded in both settings, the earliest record was in COSD for 97%; 59% of initial ET prescriptions recorded in COSD were not captured in PCPD. Combining PCPD and COSD data enabled estimation of ET duration.

CONCLUSIONS

PCPD is vital for understanding the use of ET within this population. Completeness of SCD could be improved by ensuring information on first ET prescription is recorded. PCPD (linked to SCD) is a valuable resource for examining patterns of care for patients with cancer, including treatment duration and adherence.