Early ischemia identification employing 2D speckle tracking selective layers analysis during dobutamine stress echocardiography

PURPOSE

Two-dimensional (2D) strain derived from speckle tracking proved to be feasible and accurate in the quantitative evaluation of myocardial ischemia during stress echocardiography. We compared the accuracy in detecting myocardial ischemia of the transmural segmental analysis with an endocardial specific evaluation in 20 patients undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and coronary angiography.

METHODS

Peak systolic global strain (G-ε) and at the subendocardial level (Endo-ε) were measured off-line at rest, a low dose, and peak stress; then, we compared the results with wall-motion analysis and significant coronary artery disease (CAD > 70% diameter stenosis). Endocardial strain variation from basal to low and peak dose was computed both for global or subendocardial analysis. The utilization of the ROC curve allowed us to derive optimal cutoffs, sensibility and specificity for ischemic segments.

RESULTS

The subendocardial analysis at high dose showed to be able to increase significantly the accuracy of the test to detect the ischemic segments (sens 90.2% vs 85.4%; spec 93.1% vs 92.2%). Moreover, at the low dose, the subendocardial analysis showed to be able to increase significantly, mostly the specificity of the test (sens 69.6% vs 68.3%; spec 92.2% vs 86.2%). Notably, the strain subendocardial analysis at low dose showed to reach a high specificity, similar to the peak dose transmural analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of subendocardial strain during DSE is feasible and can increase the accuracy of the test. Moreover, the subendocardial strain during DSE can reach a high specificity, even limiting the test at a low dose infusion.

The additional utility of two-dimensional strain in detection of coronary artery disease presence and localization in patients undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiogram

BACKGROUND

Dobutamine stress echocardiogram (DSE) is a feasible and safe exercise-independent stress modality for diagnoses of coronary artery disease (CAD), but it is subjective, and operator dependant. Two-dimensional strain at peak stress could overcome these limitations and thus increase the accuracy of DSE.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a prospective observational study in which 80 patients underwent DSE, two-dimensional strain at peak stress, and coronary angiography. Global longitudinal strains (GLS) cutoff point of -16.75 had 77.42% sensitivity and 83.33% specificity to detect significant CAD. Global circumferential strain (GCS) cutoff point of -20.75 had 93.55% sensitivity and 66.67% specificity to detect significant CAD (P=.003, areas under the curve [AUC]=0.73). The average territorial strain cutoff point for significant left anterior descending (LAD) lesion was -15.4 with 77.78% sensitivity and 82.86% specificity (P=.0001, AUC=0.78) and for non-LAD lesion was -16.9 with 82.93% sensitivity and 53.85% specificity (P=.0009, AUC=0.69). Two-dimensional strain at peak stress showed better agreement than DSE as regard number of vessels affected (K=0.579 vs 0.107), LAD lesion detection (K=0.783 vs 0.438), and non-LAD lesion detection (K=0.699 vs 0.233). Global longitudinal strain (GLS) at peak stress reduced DSE false positivity by 83%; the number of false-positive patients was reduced from 18 patients to only three patients.

CONCLUSION

Two-dimensional strain at peak stress had an incremental value over DSE visual assessment/ wall-motion score index (WMSI) in reducing false-positive results of DSE. Two-dimensional strain at peak stress had greater accuracy than DSE alone not only in detection of significant CAD but also in detection of number of vessels with significant lesion as well as CAD localization.