Echocardiographic imaging of the Medtronic Micro Vascular Plug ™ during off label placement in the premature infant with patent ductus arteriosus

Transcatheter Pulmonary Artery Banding in High-Risk Neonates: In-Vitro Study Provoked by Initial Clinical Experience

PURPOSE

Very high-risk, ductal-dependent or complex two-ventricle patients with associated comorbidities often require pulmonary blood flow restriction as bridge to a more definitive procedure, but current surgical options may not be well-tolerated. An evolving alternative utilizes a fenestrated Micro Vascular Plug (MVP) as a transcatheter, internal pulmonary artery band. In this study, we report a case series and an in-vitro evaluation of the MVP to elicit understanding of the challenges faced with device implantation.

METHODS

Following single-center, retrospective review of eight patients who underwent device placement, an in-vitro flow study was conducted on MVP devices to assess impact of device and fenestration sizing on pulmonary blood flow. A mathematical model was developed to relate migration risk to vessel size. Results of the engineering analysis were compared to the clinical series for validation.

RESULTS

At median follow-up of 8 months (range 1-15), survival was 63% (5/8), and 6 (75%) patients underwent subsequent target surgical intervention with relatively low mortality (1/6). Occluder-related challenges included migration (63%) and peri-device flow, which were evaluated in-vitro. The device demonstrated durability over normal and supraphysiologic conditions with minimal change in fenestration size. Smaller vessel size significantly increased pressure gradient due to reduced peri-device flow and smaller effective fenestration size.

CONCLUSION

Device oversizing, with appropriate adjustment to fenestration size, may reduce migration risk and provide a clinically appropriate balance between resulting pressure gradient and Qp:Qs. Our results can guide the interventionalist in appropriately selecting the device and fenestrations based on patient-specific anatomy and desired post-implantation flow characteristics.

Percutaneous Closure of the Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Infants ≤2 kg: IMPACT Registry Insights

OBJECTIVES

Percutaneous patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure is becoming the standard of care for definitive closure in progressively smaller and younger neonates. The objective of this study was to assess safety and feasibility of percutaneous PDA closure in patients ≤2 kg.

METHODS

This was a cohort study using the IMPACT Registry (Improving Pediatric and Adult Congenital Treatments) from the American College of Cardiology Foundation's National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Patients who were ≤2 kg at the time of percutaneous PDA closure were included. The primary outcome was the composite of technical failure and/or major adverse event.

RESULTS

A total of 1587 attempted PDA closures were included, with a 3% incidence of technical failure and 5.5% incidence of the composite outcome. Major adverse events were observed in 3.8% of the patients; the most common events were device embolization requiring retrieval and unplanned cardiac or vascular surgery in 1.3% and 1.3% of cases, respectively. The incidence of the composite outcome was associated with the need for arterial access (P < .001) as well as annual hospital volume of percutaneous PDA closures in infants ≤2 kg (P = .001). The incidence of the composite outcome has decreased overtime, whereas median weight at the time of procedure has also diminished.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous PDA closure appears to be safe and feasible procedures in infants ≤2 kg. The incidence of major adverse events has continued to decline over the years and seems to have a strong correlation with individual center case volumes and expertise.

Percutaneous Closure of Patent Ductus Arteriosus

Percutaneous-based patent ductus arteriosus closure is technically feasible among infants less than 1.5 kg. However, marked heterogeneity in the type and nature of adverse events obscures current safety profile assessments. Although data on the risks of postdevice closure syndrome remain promising, a lack of comparative trials of surgical ductal ligation and inconsistent surveillance across published studies obscure confidence in present estimates of safety and efficacy. To minimize risk and yield the greatest benefits, clinical studies of patent ductus arteriosus treatment should consider incorporating more robust assessments to ensure that infants at greatest risk for adverse ductal consequences are included.

Embolization of vascular abnormalities in children with congenital heart diseases using medtronic micro vascular plugs

This study aimed at evaluating our experience with Micro Vascular Plug (MVP) for embolization of vascular abnormalities in children with congenital heart diseases (CHDs). MVP is one of the most recent additions to the armamentarium for peripheral embolization. Data on its use in congenital cardiology are scarce. Medical records of children with CHDs who had embolizations with MVPs between April 2015 and September 2020 were reviewed. Immediate and follow-up data were assessed. A total of 153 patients underwent 172 procedures during which 240 embolizations using 259 MVPs were attempted. Median age and weight were 34.9 months (IQR, 4-75 months) and 12.5 kg (IQR, 4.8-19.4 kg), respectively. Targets were abnormal systemic arteries (n = 163), patent arterial ducts (n = 26), venous (n = 45), and coronary-cameral fistulas (n = 6). Median vessel diameter was 3.3 mm (IQR, 2.5-4 mm). Veins were larger than arteries (2.3 mm > 2.1 mm, p < 0.01). MVPs were implanted in narrower diameters compared to manufacturer's recommendations. Compared to veins, solitary implanted MVPs in arteries were additionally oversized at 12.4%, 5.1%, and 7.9% for MVP-3Q, 5Q, and 7Q, respectively. Additional occlusion material (16.7%) and 2 MVPs (5.8%) were needed at the same site for complete closure. Implantation and procedure success rates were 99.2% and 96.7%, respectively. Five complications were treated percutaneously (n = 4) and surgically (n = 1). Efficacy of vascular embolization using MVPs was demonstrated in the largest cohort of children with CHDs and a variety of clinical settings. Immediate and stable closure is obtained with a single device in most cases. Detailed device selection chart according to vessel type and diameter is proposed to achieve intended outcomes.

Percutaneous Closure of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Infants 1.5 kg or Less: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate technical success and safety of percutaneous patent ductus arteriosus closure in infants ≤1.5 kg.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Data sources included Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, and PubMed from inception to April 2020. Publications were included if they had a clear definition of the intervention as percutaneous patent ductus arteriosus closure in infants ≤1.5 kg. Data extraction was independently performed by multiple observers. Primary outcome was technical success and secondary outcomes were adverse events (AEs). Subgroup analysis was performed in infants ≤6.0 kg. Data were pooled by using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

We included 28 studies, including 373 infants ≤1.5 kg and 69 studies enrolling 1794 infants ≤6.0 kg. In patients ≤1.5 kg, technical success was 96% (95% CI, 93%-98%; P = .16; I² = 23%). The overall incidence of AE was 27% (95% CI, 17%-38%; P < .001; I² = 70%) and major AEs was 8% (95% CI, 5%-10%; P = .63; I² = 0%). There were 5 deaths related to the procedure (2%; 95% CI, 1%-4%; P = .99; I² = 0%); 4 of these deaths occurred in infants <0.8 kg. The probability of technical failure was inversely related to age at the time of the procedure (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.830-0.974; P = .009). Weight at intervention has decreased over time and procedural success has increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous patent ductus arteriosus closure is feasible in infants ≤1.5 kg with few major AEs. The procedural success rate is high, despite performing the intervention in smaller patients.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42020145230.