1
|
Adrian RJ, Alerhand S, Liteplo A, Shokoohi H. Is pulmonary hypertension protective against cardiac tamponade? A systematic review. Intern Emerg Med 2024; 19:1987-2003. [PMID: 38622465 DOI: 10.1007/s11739-024-03566-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
The presence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) may affect whether cardiac tamponade physiology develops from a pericardial effusion. Specifically, the increased intracardiac pressure and right ventricular hypertrophy associated with PH would seemingly increase the intrapericardial pressure threshold at which the right-sided chambers collapse. In this systematic review, we examined the impact of PH on the incidence, in-hospital and long-term mortality, and echocardiographic findings of patients with cardiac tamponade. Using the PRISMA guideline, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Academic Search Premier, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Database for studies investigating PH and cardiac tamponade. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to analyze the quality of returned studies. Primary outcomes included the incidence of cardiac tamponade, as well as in-hospital and long-term mortality rates. Secondary outcomes were the presence or absence of echocardiographic findings of cardiac tamponade in patients with PH. Forty-three studies (9 cohort studies and 34 case reports) with 1054 patients were included. The incidence of cardiac tamponade was significantly higher in patients with PH compared to those without PH, 2.0% (95% CI 1.2-3.2%) vs. 0.05% (95% CI 0.05-0.05%), p < 0.0001, OR 40.76 (95% CI 24.8-66.9). The incidence of tamponade in patients with a known pericardial effusion was similar in those with and without PH, 20.3% (95% CI 12.0-32.3%) and 20.9% (95% CI 18.0-24.1%), p = 0.9267, OR 0.97 (95% CI 0.50-1.87). In patients with tamponade, those with PH demonstrated a significantly higher in-hospital mortality than those without PH, 38.8% (95% CI 26.4-52.8%) vs. 14.4% (95% CI 14.2-14.6%), p < 0.0001, OR 3.77 (95% CI 2.12-6.70). Long-term mortality in patients with tamponade was significantly lower in those with PH than in those without PH, 45.5% (95% CI 33.0-58.5%) vs. 59.1% (95% CI 54.7-63.4%), p = 0.0258, OR 0.576 (95% CI 0.33-1.01). However, after stratifying by non-malignant etiologies, the long-term mortality benefit for those with PH disappeared. In the studies that described specific echocardiographic findings of cardiac tamponade, only 10.5% of patients with PH and tamponade showed right atrial and right ventricular collapse. When evaluating patients with pericardial effusions, physicians must recognize the effects of underlying PH on the incidence, in-hospital and long-term mortality rates, and potentially atypical echocardiographic presentation of cardiac tamponade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert James Adrian
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - Stephen Alerhand
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 185 S. Orange Ave, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA
| | - Andrew Liteplo
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Hamid Shokoohi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Douflé G, Dragoi L, Morales Castro D, Sato K, Donker DW, Aissaoui N, Fan E, Schaubroeck H, Price S, Fraser JF, Combes A. Head-to-toe bedside ultrasound for adult patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Intensive Care Med 2024; 50:632-645. [PMID: 38598123 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07333-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
Bedside ultrasound represents a well-suited diagnostic and monitoring tool for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) who may be too unstable for transport to other hospital areas for diagnostic tests. The role of ultrasound, however, starts even before ECMO initiation. Every patient considered for ECMO should have a thorough ultrasonographic assessment of cardiac and valvular function, as well as vascular anatomy without delaying ECMO cannulation. The role of pre-ECMO ultrasound is to confirm the indication for ECMO, identify clinical situations for which ECMO is not indicated, rule out contraindications, and inform the choice of ECMO configuration. During ECMO cannulation, the use of vascular and cardiac ultrasound reduces the risk of complications and ensures adequate cannula positioning. Ultrasound remains key for monitoring during ECMO support and troubleshooting ECMO complications. For instance, ultrasound is helpful in the assessment of drainage insufficiency, hemodynamic instability, biventricular function, persistent hypoxemia, and recirculation on venovenous (VV) ECMO. Lung ultrasound can be used to monitor signs of recovery on VV ECMO. Brain ultrasound provides valuable diagnostic and prognostic information on ECMO. Echocardiography is essential in the assessment of readiness for liberation from venoarterial (VA) ECMO. Lastly, post decannulation ultrasound mainly aims at identifying post decannulation thrombosis and vascular complications. This review will cover the role of head-to-toe ultrasound for the management of adult ECMO patients from decision to initiate ECMO to the post decannulation phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghislaine Douflé
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine of the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, 585 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2N2, Canada.
| | - Laura Dragoi
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine of the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Diana Morales Castro
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine of the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kei Sato
- Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Level 3 Clinical Sciences Building, Chermside, QLD, 4032, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Dirk W Donker
- Intensive Care Center, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Cardiovascular and Respiratory Physiology, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Nadia Aissaoui
- Service de Médecine intensive-réanimation, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Eddy Fan
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine of the University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hannah Schaubroeck
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Susanna Price
- Departments of Cardiology and Intensive Care, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - John F Fraser
- Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Level 3 Clinical Sciences Building, Chermside, QLD, 4032, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Alain Combes
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, APHP Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
- Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Butcher A, Castillo C. Point-of-Care Echocardiographic Evaluation of the Pericardium. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2024; 45:84-90. [PMID: 38056788 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2023.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
Acute pericardial conditions, such as tamponade, are often rapidly progressive and can become life-threatening without timely diagnosis and intervention. In this review, we aim to describe bedside ultrasonographic evaluation of the pericardium and diagnostic criteria for tamponade, identify confounders in the diagnosis of pericardial tamponade, and delineate procedural details of ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Butcher
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Thoracic Surgery, South Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, 305 E Main St., Bay Shore, NY 11706.
| | - Cesar Castillo
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Baylor College of Medicine, Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center, 6720 Bertner Ave, Houston, TX 77030
| |
Collapse
|