β-blockers are associated with decreased leucocyte-platelet aggregate formation and lower residual platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate after angioplasty and stenting

Platelet-Leucocyte Aggregates as Novel Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Diseases

Simple Summary

Cardiovascular diseases are the most common cause of death worldwide. Hence, novel biomarkers are urgently needed to improve diagnosis and treatment. Platelet–leucocyte aggregates are conglomerates of platelets and leucocytes and are widely investigated as biomarkers in cardiovascular diseases. Platelet–leucocytes aggregates are present in health, but increase in patients with cardiovascular risk factors and acute or stable coronary syndromes, making them a potential diagnostic marker. Moreover, platelet–leucocyte aggregates predict outcomes after surgery or percutaneous treatment and could be used to monitor antiplatelet therapy. Emerging data about the participation of platelet–leucocyte aggregates in cardiovascular diseases pathogenesis make them an attractive target for novel therapies. Furthermore, simple detection with conventional flow cytometry provides accurate and reproducible results, although requires specific sample handling. The main task for the future is to determine the standardized protocol to measure blood concentrations of platelet–leucocyte aggregates and subsequently establish their normal range in health and disease.

Abstract

Platelet–leucocyte aggregates (PLA) are a formation of leucocytes and platelets bound by specific receptors. They arise in the condition of sheer stress, thrombosis, immune reaction, vessel injury, and the activation of leukocytes or platelets. PLA participate in cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Increased levels of PLA were revealed in acute and chronic coronary syndromes, carotid stenosis cardiovascular risk factors. Due to accessible, available, replicable, quick, and low-cost quantifying using flow cytometry, PLA constitute an ideal biomarker for clinical practice. PLA are promising in early diagnosing and estimating prognosis in patients with acute or chronic coronary syndromes treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). PLA were also a reliable marker of platelet activity for monitoring antiplatelet therapy. PLA consist also targets potential therapies in CVD. All of the above potential clinical applications require further studies to validate methods of assay and proof clinical benefits.

Effects of Carvedilol Versus Metoprolol on Platelet Aggregation in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The PLATE-BLOCK Study

Platelet aggregation plays a pivotal role in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In this setting, β-blockers (BBs) are used to counteract the effects of catecholamines on heart. Circulating catecholamines can also potentiate platelet reactivity, mainly through α₂- and β₂-adrenoceptors on human platelets' surface, thus BB may affect platelet aggregation; however, the effects of different BBs on platelet aggregation in contemporary-treated patients with ACS have been poorly investigated. One hundred patients with ACS on dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and ticagrelor were randomized to receive treatment with carvedilol, a nonselective BB (n = 50), or metoprolol, a selective β₁-blocker (n = 50), at maximum tolerated dose. Light transmission aggregometry was performed at randomization (T0) and at 30-day follow-up (T30), and the results were expressed as a percentage of maximum platelet aggregation (MPA). The primary end point was epinephrine-induced MPA at 30 days. Patients were predominantly men (80%), and mean age was 57.3 ± 9.7 years. The 2 randomized groups were well balanced for baseline characteristics. At T0, mean MPA was similar between the groups (18.96 ± 9.05 vs 18.32 ± 9.21 with 10 µM epinephrine, 14.42 ± 9.43 vs 15.98 ± 10.08 with 20 µM adenosine diphophate (ADP), and 13.26 ± 9.83 vs 14.30 ± 9.40 with 10 µM ADP for carvedilol and metoprolol, respectively, all p = NS). At 30 days, platelet aggregation induced by epinephrine was significantly lower in the carvedilol group than in the metoprolol group (23.52 ± 10.25 vs 28.72 ± 14.37, p = 0.04), with a trend toward the lower values of ADP-induced MPA (20 µM ADP 19.42 ± 13.84 vs 24.16 ± 13.62, p = 0.09; 10 µM ADP 19.12 ± 12.40 vs 22.57 ± 13.59, p = 0.19). In conclusion, carvedilol, a nonselective BB, reduces residual platelet reactivity in patients with ACS compared with the selective BB, metoprolol.