A new entity of abdominal squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary

Case report: HPV related pelvic retroperitoneal squamous cell cancer of unknown primary presenting as ovary neoplasm

INTRODUCTION

Retroperitoneal tumors (RPTs) of the pelvis are rare and often present asymptomatically. We report a rare case of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related primary retroperitoneal squamous cell carcinoma (PRSCC) that was preoperatively misdiagnosed as adnexal cancer.

CASE PRESENTATION

A menopausal 59-year-old woman presented with right leg pain persisting for two months. Imaging revealed a heterogeneous lesion in the right adnexal area; however, the uterus and left ovary appeared normal. Laboratory tests showed slightly elevated levels of cancer 125 (CA 125) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) antigens. The patient underwent surgical staging for the suspected ovarian cancer. Intraoperatively, the bilateral adnexa and uterus appeared normal. A lesion identified in the right pelvic retroperitoneal cavity was resected and its pathological analysis revealed SCC and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III (CIN III) and immunohistochemical expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (p16) in the cervix. HPV 16 was identified by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The patient chose not to undergo any additional postoperative treatment. Her leg pain disappeared the day after the procedure but recurred a year later. A new tumor was detected on computed tomography (CT) in the same area.

DISCUSSION

PRSCC is rare and can be misdiagnosed as a gynaecological neoplasm. HPV can migrate to the retroperitoneal space and act as a carcinogen in this location.

CONCLUSIONS

HPV infection may contribute to the development of PRSCC. Complete surgical resection, with adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy, is a viable treatment approach.

HPV-related metastatic retroperitoneal pelvic squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary origin in a patient previously treated for endometrial cancer

INTRODUCTION

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is metastatic disease with no identifiable site of origin. Retroperitoneal squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary is extremely rare. There are limited reports regarding treatment recommendations and outcomes for women with this disease.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

Here we present the case of a woman with human papillomavirus (HPV)-related metastatic retroperitoneal pelvic squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary previously treated for endometrial cancer as well as a review of the existing reports on this topic. Surgical removal of the tumor was performed, the treatment had effective immediate results.

DISCUSSION

There are a few reports describing CUPs in the retroperitoneal space. Most retroperitoneal tumors are asymptomatic and may be found incidentally during a regular examination, as in the case presented here. A full pelvic exam including inspection of the vulva, colposcopy and anoscopy should be performed, particularly in HPV-associated CUPs. Pathologic testing including immunohistochemistry and special staining and molecular testing of the tumor may be needed.

CONCLUSION

It is important to find the primary origin of cancer to treat it successfully. If the primary tumor cannot be identified, immunohistochemistry and molecular testing of the tumor may help identify the nature of malignant disease and help guide appropriate treatment.

The diagnosis and treatment for a patient with cancer of unknown primary: A case report

Background: Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a class of metastatic malignant tumors whose primary location cannot be determined. The diagnosis and treatment of CUP are a considerable challenge for clinicians. Herein, we report a CUP case whose corresponding primary tumor sites were successfully identified, and the patient received proper treatment. Case report: In February 2022, a 74-year-old woman was admitted to the Medical Oncology Department at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital for new lung and intestinal tumors after more than 9 years of breast cancer surgery. After laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy, pathology revealed mucinous adenocarcinoma; the pathological stage was pT2N0M0. Results from needle biopsies of lung masses suggested poorly differentiated cancer, ER (-), PR (-), and HER2 (-), which combined with the clinical history, did not rule out metastatic breast cancer. A surgical pathology sample was needed to determine the origin of the tumor tissue, but the patient's chest structure showed no indications for surgery. Analysis of the tumor's traceable gene expression profile prompted breast cancer, and analysis of next-generation amplification sequencing (NGS) did not obtain a potential drug target. We developed a treatment plan based on comprehensive immunohistochemistry, a gene expression profile, and NGS analysis. The treatment plan was formulated using paclitaxel albumin and capecitabine in combination with radiotherapy. The efficacy evaluation was the partial response (PR) after four cycles of chemotherapy and two cycles combined with radiotherapy. Conclusion: This case highlighted the importance of identifying accurate primary tumor location for patients to benefit from treatment, which will provide a reference for the treatment decisions of CUP tumors in the future.

Systematic review of the CUP trials characteristics and perspectives for next-generation studies

BACKGROUND

Research on therapeutic strategies for patients with unknown primary cancer (CUP) has been underwhelming. This paper summarized and evaluated the CUP therapeutic research over the previous five years. Based on this evaluation, recommendations for clinical trial designs are made to improve the impact of CUP research on patients.

METHODS

Published and ongoing research were evaluated. PubMed was searched from January 1, 2015, to November 1, 2021. The start date of 2015 was chosen to identify research published after ESMO issued new diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines. The US National Library of Medicine indexed ongoing clinical trials.

FINDINGS

Of the 244 CUP studies indexed in PubMed, 11.9% were prospective studies, and 4.9% were clinical trials. The review protocol deemed 65 publications eligible for full-text review. Eleven studies evaluating therapeutic regimens were retained. The two prospective studies and non-randomized trials showed promising outcomes for site-specific treatments. Randomized clinical trials were less promising; however, the trials had recruitment challenges resulting in biased accrual and the inability to keep pace with advancing diagnostics and therapeutics. Most of the 35 ongoing studies were phase II single-arm trials assessing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or site-specific therapies among CUP patients with suspected favorable prognoses.

CONCLUSION

Our evaluation suggests two prospective clinical trial designs that addressed recent study design and recruitment challenges. A visionary approach uses a multi-arm, multistage randomized trial to address rapid advancements in diagnosis and therapy. A pragmatic approach utilizes a single-arm trial with historical controls to overcome comparison group and recruitment challenges.

Local ablative treatment with surgery and/or radiotherapy in single-site and oligometastatic carcinoma of unknown primary

BACKGROUND

Single-site carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) is recognised as a distinct favourable subtype in the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) classification. There is broad consensus that these patients are candidates for local ablative treatment strategies with surgery and/or radiotherapy, but data on their outcomes are scarce.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this study, we have addressed the prospects of cure and prognostic factors in a retrospective cohort of 63 patients who were eligible for local treatment at our centre.

RESULTS

Median event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 15.6 months and 52.5 months, respectively. Of 61 patients who received local treatment, 20 (32.8%) remained event-free over a median follow-up of 28 months. Baseline clinical parameters including affected organ, number, volume and histology of metastases had no significant impact on prognosis, whereas deleterious TP53 mutations and DNA copy number loss emerged as independent adverse risk factors with respect to EFS. Surgical treatment was associated with improved OS as compared to radiation-based therapy.

CONCLUSION

Our study advocates to pursue localised treatment with surgery and/or radiotherapy whenever feasible and implies that genetic parameters might additionally determine the clinical course of single-site CUP patients.

Cancer of Unknown Primary: Challenges and Progress in Clinical Management

Distant metastases are the main cause of cancer-related deaths in patients with advanced tumors. A standard diagnostic workup usually contains the identification of the tissue-of-origin of metastatic tumors, although under certain circumstances, it remains elusive. This disease setting is defined as cancer of unknown primary (CUP). Accounting for approximately 3-5% of all cancer diagnoses, CUPs are characterized by an aggressive clinical behavior and represent a real therapeutic challenge. The lack of determination of a tissue of origin precludes CUP patients from specific evidence-based therapeutic options or access to clinical trial, which significantly impacts their life expectancy. In the era of precision medicine, it is essential to characterize CUP molecular features, including the expression profile of non-coding RNAs, to improve our understanding of CUP biology and identify novel therapeutic strategies. This review article sheds light on this enigmatic disease by summarizing the current knowledge on CUPs focusing on recent discoveries and emerging diagnostic strategies.

Carcinoma of unknown primary with hepatic metastases: a need of judicious and contemplative diagnostic algorithm

Carcinoma of Unknown Primary presenting primarily as hepatic metastases encompasses a dismal subgroup of tumors with a median survival of 5.9 months. Adenocarcinoma is the most common histological subtype identified upon biopsy and the primary tumor remains undetectable in the majority of cases despite extensive workup. It is important to have a validated and standardized algorithm to follow these tumors to avoid unnecessary tests, as the wishes and health status of the patient represent the principal concerns. The purpose of this paper is to briefly review the current literature on carcinoma of unknown primary with hepatic metastases and propose a standardized diagnostic approach.

The management of patients with cancer of unknown primary in middle-income countries: an ESO-AROME survey

Aim: To report on the management strategies in patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP) in middle-income countries. Methods: We conceived a survey of 20 items concerning the management of patients with CUP in daily clinical practice. Only participants from lower- and higher-middle-income countries, as per the World Bank Classification, were eligible for this study. Results: The indications for the first-line treatment did not differ between the two economic regions, whereas those for second-line treatment were more prevalent in higher-middle-income countries. The use of targeted therapy based on immunohistochemistry alone was higher in lower-middle-income countries, although the access to CUP classifiers was similar between the two regions. Conclusions: Proper recommendations must ensure that the economic burden is minimized and that other benefits outweigh the limited survival benefit achieved in patients with CUP.

Progress in refining the clinical management of cancer of unknown primary in the molecular era

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is an enigmatic disease entity encompassing heterogeneous malignancies without a detectable primary tumour, despite a thorough diagnostic workup. A minority of patients with CUP (15-20%) can be assigned a putative primary tissue of origin according to clinical and histopathological findings and typically have a more favourable prognosis with the use of corresponding tumour type-specific therapies. Thus, the majority of patients with CUP have disease that cannot be assigned to a culprit primary tumour, are treated with empirical chemotherapy and have a poor prognosis. In the molecular era, the use of (epi)genomic or transcriptomic CUP classifiers and DNA or RNA sequencing offers two, sometimes overlapping, therapeutic strategies: tumour type-specific therapy and biomarker-guided therapy. Published data reveal that the accuracy of site-of-origin predictions made using CUP classifiers ranges between 54% and 98% when compared with the assignment made according to the recommended clinicopathological criteria. These advances have led to promising results in non-randomized prospective studies evaluating the efficacy of tumour type-specific therapy; however, the favourable outcomes were not confirmed in randomized controlled studies comparing this approach with standard empirical chemotherapy. Currently, the evidence supporting the use of biomarker-guided therapies is limited to case reports and small case series. In this Review, we discuss the clinical management of CUP in the era of precision medicine. We focus on the advances in understanding the biology of CUP, the implications for the diagnosis and classification of CUP according to the tissue of origin and the shift away from empirical therapy towards tailored therapy.

Exploring the biological hallmarks of cancer of unknown primary: where do we stand today?

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) affects a small percentage of the general population. Nonetheless, a substantial number of these patients have a poor prognosis and consequently succumb to their illness within a year of diagnosis. The natural history of CUP is characterised by early metastasis from the unknown primary site, aggressive course and resistance to conventional chemotherapy. Unfortunately, the processes by which this orphan disease originates and progresses have not been fully elucidated and its biology remain unclear. Despite the conceptual progress in genetic and molecular profiling made over the past decade, recognition of the genetic and molecular abnormalities involved in CUP, as well as the identification of the tissue of origin remain unresolved issues. This review will outline the biology of CUP by exploring the hallmarks of cancer in order to rationalise the complexities of this enigmatic syndrome. This approach will help the reader to understand where research efforts currently stand and the pitfalls of this quest.