Diagnostic value of circulating microRNA-19b in heart failure

Small extracellular vesicles associated miRNA in myocardial fibrosis

Myocardial fibrosis involves the loss of cardiomyocytes, myocardial fibroblast proliferation, and a reduction in angiogenesis, ultimately leading to heart failure, Given its significant implications, it is crucial to explore novel therapies for myocardial fibrosis. Recently one emerging avenue has been the use of small extracellular vesicles (sEV)-carried miRNA. In this review, we summarize the regulatory role of sEV-carried miRNA in myocardial fibrosis. We explored not only the potential diagnostic value of circulating miRNA as biomarkers for heart disease but also the therapeutic implications of sEV-carried miRNA derived from various cellular sources and applications of modified sEV. This exploration is paramount for researchers striving to develop innovative, cell-free therapies as potential drug candidates for the management of myocardial fibrosis.

Diagnostic and prognostic significance of miR-320a-3p in patients with chronic heart failure

AIM

The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic value of miR-320a-3p in chronic heart failure (CHF).

METHODS

A total of 103 patients with CHF and 95 healthy controls were included in the study population. The expression level of serum miR-320a-3p was detected by qRT-PCR. The diagnostic effect of miR-320a-3p on CHF was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve. Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression were used to analyze the risk factors for 4-year prognosis of CHF patients. Bioinformatics analysis was used to analyze the possible target genes of miR-320a-3p and related signaling pathways.

RESULTS

Serum miR-320a-3p expression was increased in CHF patients, and the levels of BNP and LVEF were positively and negatively correlated with miR-320a-3p, respectively. The AUC value of ROC curve was 0.866, indicating that miR-320a-3p had high diagnostic accuracy for CHF. Survival curve and Cox analysis showed that high expression of miR-320a-3p was associated with poor prognosis in CHF patients, and age and miR-320a-3p were independent risk factors for prognosis in CHF patients. GO and KEGG analysis showed that the downstream target genes of miR-320a-3p were involved in biological processes such as cell adhesion, stem cell differentiation and neural development, and were enriched in mTOR, TNF, AMPK and other signaling pathways.

CONCLUSIONS

miR-320a-3p increased abnormally in CHF and was related to the severity of CHF. miR-320a-3p has the potential to be a diagnostic and prognostic marker for CHF.

Diagnostic performance of microRNAs in the detection of heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Chronic heart failure (CHF) can be classified as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Currently, there is an unmet need for a minimally invasive diagnostic tool for different forms of CHF. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic potential of circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) for the detection of different CHF forms via a systematic review and meta-analysis approach.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Comprehensive search on Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE identified 45 relevant studies which were used for qualitative assessment. Out of these, 29 studies were used for qualitative and quantitative assessment and allowed to identify a miRNA panel able to detect HFrEF and HFpEF with areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 and 0.79, respectively. A panel of eight miRNAs (hsa-miR-18b-3p, hsa-miR-21-5p, hsa-miR-22-3p, hsa-miR-92b-3p, hsa-miR-129-5p, hsa-miR-320a-5p, hsa-miR-423-5p, and hsa-miR-675-5p) detected HFrEF cases with a sensitivity of 0.85, specificity of 0.88 and AUC of 0.91. A panel of seven miRNAs (hsa-miR-19b-3p, hsa-miR-30c-5p, hsa-miR-206, hsa-miR-221-3p, hsa-miR-328-5p, hsa-miR-375-3p, and hsa-miR-424-5p) identified HFpEF cases with a sensitivity of 0.82 and a specificity of 0.61.

CONCLUSIONS

Although conventional biomarkers (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and B-type natriuretic peptide) presented a better performance in detecting CHF patients, the results presented here pointed towards specific miRNA panels with potential additive values to circulating natriuretic peptides in the diagnosis of different classes of CHF. Equally important, miRNAs alone showed a reasonable capacity for 'ruling out' patients with HFrEF or HFpEF. Additional studies with large populations are required to confirm the diagnostic potential of miRNAs for sub-classes of CHF.

The microRNA Expression Profiling in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Heart failure (HF) is a main consequence of cardiovascular diseases worldwide. Abnormal expression levels of microRNAs (miRNAs) in HF are observed in current studies. Novel biomarkers miRNAs may play an important role in the development of HF. Nevertheless, the inconsistency of miRNA expression limits the clinical application. We thus perform this systematic review of the miRNAs expression profiling to identify potential HF biomarkers.

Methods

The electronic databases of Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched to identify the miRNA expression profiles between HF subjects and non-HF controls before May 26th, 2021. The pooled results were shown as log10 odds ratios (logORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random-effect models. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to species, region, and sample source. The quality assessment of included studies was independently conducted based on Diagnostic Accuracy Study 2 (QUADAS-2). The sensitivity analysis was conducted based on sample size.

Results

A total of 55 miRNA expression articles reporting 276 miRNAs of HF were included. 47 consistently up-regulated and 10 down-regulated miRNAs were identified in the overall analysis, with the most up-regulated miR-21 (logOR 8.02; 95% CI: 6.76–9.27, P < 0.001) and the most down-regulated miR-30c (logOR 6.62; 95% CI: 3.04–10.20, P < 0.001). The subgroup analysis of sample source identified 35 up-regulated and 10 down-regulated miRNAs in blood sample, the most up-regulated and down-regulated miRNAs were miR-210-3p and miR-30c, respectively. In the region sub-groups, let-7i-5p and miR-129 were most up-regulated and down-regulated in Asian countries, while in non-Asian countries, let-7e-5p and miR-30c were the most dysregulated. It’s worth noting that miR-622 was consistently up-regulated in both Asian and non-Asian countries. Sensitivity analysis showed that 46 out of 58 (79.31%) miRNAs were dysregulated.

Conclusion

A total of 57 consistently dysregulated miRNAs related to HF were confirmed in this study. Seven dysregulated miRNAs (miR-21, miR-30c, miR-210-3p, let-7i-5p, miR-129, let-7e-5p, and miR-622) may be considered as potential non-invasive biomarkers for HF. However, further validation in larger-scale studies are needed to verify our conclusions.

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: A meta-analysis

Background

Catheter ablation (CA) is an effective treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The potential of CA to benefit AF patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is uncertain.

Hypothesis

CA may be safe and effective for patients with HFpEF.

Methods

The Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies evaluating CA for AF patients with HFpEF.

Results

A total of seven trials with 1696 patients were included. Pooled analyses demonstrated similar procedure and fluoroscopy time regarding the use of CA for patients with HFpEF and without HF (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.01–0.81, p = .05 and [WMD: 0.05; 95% CI: −0.18–0.28, p = .68]). Moreover, CA was effective in maintaining sinus rhythm (SR) in patients with HFpEF and noninferior for patients without HF [risk ratio (RR): 0.92; 95% CI: 0.76–1.10, p = .34). Additionally, CA tended to significantly maintain SR (RR: 4.73; 95% CI: 1.86–12.03, p = .001) and reduce rehospitalization for HF compared with medical therapy (RR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.19–0.71, p = .003). However, no significant differences were found between two groups regarding the mortality rate (p = .59).

Conclusion

CA is a potential treatment strategy for patients with HFpEF and demonstrates equivalent efficacy to that of patients without HF. Moreover, the benefits of CA in maintaining SR and reducing rehospitalization of HF patients were significantly better than those of medical therapy. Additional randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm our results.