1
|
Kim DS, Yoon YI, Kim BK, Choudhury A, Kulkarni A, Park JY, Kim J, Sinn DH, Joo DJ, Choi Y, Lee JH, Choi HJ, Yoon KT, Yim SY, Park CS, Kim DG, Lee HW, Choi WM, Chon YE, Kang WH, Rhu J, Lee JG, Cho Y, Sung PS, Lee HA, Kim JH, Bae SH, Yang JM, Suh KS, Al Mahtab M, Tan SS, Abbas Z, Shresta A, Alam S, Arora A, Kumar A, Rathi P, Bhavani R, Panackel C, Lee KC, Li J, Yu ML, George J, Tanwandee T, Hsieh SY, Yong CC, Rela M, Lin HC, Omata M, Sarin SK. Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines on liver transplantation. Hepatol Int 2024; 18:299-383. [PMID: 38416312 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-023-10629-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
Liver transplantation is a highly complex and challenging field of clinical practice. Although it was originally developed in western countries, it has been further advanced in Asian countries through the use of living donor liver transplantation. This method of transplantation is the only available option in many countries in the Asia-Pacific region due to the lack of deceased organ donation. As a result of this clinical situation, there is a growing need for guidelines that are specific to the Asia-Pacific region. These guidelines provide comprehensive recommendations for evidence-based management throughout the entire process of liver transplantation, covering both deceased and living donor liver transplantation. In addition, the development of these guidelines has been a collaborative effort between medical professionals from various countries in the region. This has allowed for the inclusion of diverse perspectives and experiences, leading to a more comprehensive and effective set of guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-Sik Kim
- Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young-In Yoon
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Beom Kyung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Jun Yong Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jongman Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Hyun Sinn
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Jin Joo
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - YoungRok Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong-Hoon Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho Joong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki Tae Yoon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University College of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Young Yim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Cheon-Soo Park
- Department of Surgery, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Deok-Gie Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hae Won Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Won-Mook Choi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Eun Chon
- Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Woo-Hyoung Kang
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinsoo Rhu
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Geun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yuri Cho
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Ilsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Pil Soo Sung
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Han Ah Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Hoon Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Si Hyun Bae
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Mo Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Mamun Al Mahtab
- Department of Hepatology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Soek Siam Tan
- Department of Medicine, Hospital Selayang, Batu Caves, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Zaigham Abbas
- Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Ananta Shresta
- Department of Hepatology, Alka Hospital, Lalitpur, Nepal
| | - Shahinul Alam
- Crescent Gastroliver and General Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Anil Arora
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital New Delhi, New Delhi, India
| | - Ashish Kumar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital New Delhi, New Delhi, India
| | - Pravin Rathi
- TN Medical College and BYL Nair Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Ruveena Bhavani
- University of Malaya Medical Centre, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | | | - Kuei Chuan Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jun Li
- College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ming-Lung Yu
- Department of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | | | | | - H C Lin
- Endoscopy Center for Diagnosis and Treatment, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Masao Omata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yamanashi Central Hospital, Yamanashi, Japan
- University of Tokyo, Bunkyo City, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
You H, Wang F, Li T, Xu X, Sun Y, Nan Y, Wang G, Hou J, Duan Z, Wei L, Jia J, Zhuang H. Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B (version 2022). J Clin Transl Hepatol 2023; 11:1425-1442. [PMID: 37719965 PMCID: PMC10500285 DOI: 10.14218/jcth.2023.00320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
To facilitate the achieving of the goal of "eliminating viral hepatitis as a major public health threat by 2030" set by the World Health Organization, the Chinese Society of Hepatology together with the Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases (both are branches of the Chinese Medical Association) organized a panel of experts and updated the guidelines for prevention and treatment of chronic hepatitis B in China (version 2022). With the support of available evidence, this revision of the guidelines focuses on active prevention, large scale testing, and expansion of therapeutic indication of chronic hepatitis B with the aim of reducing the hepatitis B related disease burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong You
- Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Fusheng Wang
- The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Taisheng Li
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoyuan Xu
- Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yameng Sun
- Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuemin Nan
- Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | | | - Jinlin Hou
- Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhongping Duan
- Beijing You-An Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Lai Wei
- Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Jidong Jia
- Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Zhuang
- Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
| | - Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association; Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases, Chinese Medical Association
- Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
- Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
- Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Beijing You-An Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
- Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sheng LP, Zhang JC, Zhong ZQ, Sheng XH, Ren J, Wang GQ. High-potency nucleos(t)ide analogues alone or plus immunoglobulin for HBV prophylaxis after liver transplantation: a meta-analysis. Hepatol Int 2023; 17:1113-1124. [PMID: 36592270 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-022-10466-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimum prophylactic regimen against hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) in HBV-infected patients is uncertain but of great clinical relevance. New evidence suggests that hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG)-free approach would become a reasonable choice in the era of high-potency nucleos(t)ide analogues (HPNAs). We aimed to provide robust estimates for long-term survival and HBV recurrence in patients receiving different HBV-prophylaxis strategies after LT. METHODS We did a systematic review and meta-analysis using both pseudo-individual patient data recovered from included studies (IPDMA) and conventional trial-level aggregate data meta-analysis (ADMA). Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using different Cox proportional hazard models accounting for inter-study heterogeneity. ADMA was conducted to pool outcomes at specific time points. RESULTS A total of 16 studies involving 7897 patients and 41 studies involving 9435 were eligible for IPDMA and AMDA, respectively. Cumulative HBV recurrence rate and overall survival (OS) at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years post-LT were 0.3%, 0.9%, 1.2%, 1.7% and 95.6%, 89%, 86.4%, 86.4% in the HPNAs (i.e., entecavir and tenofovir) + HBIG combination group vs. 0.6%, 0.6%, 1.2%, 1.7% and 94.5%, 86.8%, 84.8%, 81.2% in the HPNAs monotherapy group (HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.56-2.60, p = 0.64; HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.70-1.69, p = 0.72), respectively. The results were compatible with AMDA. CONCLUSION A similar HBV recurrence and overall survival were found in patients who used HPNAs (mainly entecavir) monotherapy as in those who received a combination of HPNAs and HBIG. These findings address concerns regarding the safety and effectiveness of HPNAs monotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Ping Sheng
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Center for Liver Diseases, Peking University International Hospital, Life Park Road No.1, Chang Ping District, Beijing, 102206, China
| | - Jun-Chang Zhang
- Intensive Care Unit, Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhi-Qiang Zhong
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Xue-Han Sheng
- The First Clinical Medical College of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Jing Ren
- Department of Infectious Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Gui-Qiang Wang
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Center for Liver Diseases, Peking University International Hospital, Life Park Road No.1, Chang Ping District, Beijing, 102206, China.
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Niemann G, Germer M, Hauf M, Poelsler G, Röder J, Schüttrumpf J. Hyperimmunplasma: Gewinnung, Verarbeitung und therapeutische
Anwendungen. TRANSFUSIONSMEDIZIN 2023. [DOI: 10.1055/a-1894-1146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
ZusammenfassungDas Prinzip der passiven Immunisierung ist seit dem 19. Jahrhundert bekannt und
wird auch bei aktuellen Pandemien als Ansatz zur Prophylaxe und Therapie
eingesetzt. Der Schutz wird hierbei übertragen durch Blut, Serum oder
Plasma, welche Immunglobuline gegen spezifische Krankheitserreger,
Bakterientoxine oder sonstige Antigene enthalten, sowie durch aus Humanplasma
industriell aufgereinigte Immunglobuline. Die aktuell verwendeten
Reinigungsverfahren für Immunglobuline aus Humanplasma beruhen auf der
von Edwin J. Cohn entwickelten Fraktionierung von Plasma. Zur Gewinnung von
Immunglobulinen mit hohen Antikörpertitern gegen spezifische Antigene,
sogenannte Hyperimmunglobuline, muss zunächst Hyperimmunplasma gezielt
von ausgewählten Spendern gewonnen werden. Diese Spender haben
erhöhte Antikörpertiter gegen spezifische Krankheitserreger,
Bakterientoxine oder sonstige Antigene, wenn sie im Rahmen einer vorangegangenen
Infektion natürlich immunisiert wurden, einen zugelassenen Impfstoff zur
Immunisierung erhalten haben oder gezielt zum Zweck der Plasmaspende immunisiert
wurden. Aktuell sind in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz
Hyperimmunglobulinprodukte für verschiedene Anwendungen im Patienten
zugelassen, von denen die meisten aus humanem Blutplasma gewonnen werden. Um die
Herstellung der Produkte und damit letztlich die Behandlung der Patienten
gewährleisten zu können, werden resiliente Lieferketten
benötigt. Hierzu bedarf es unter anderem Änderungen in den
Rahmenbedingungen für die Spenderimmunisierung in Deutschland.
Collapse
|
7
|
Neuberger J. Long-term Care of the Adult Liver Transplant Recipient. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2022; 12:1547-1556. [PMID: 36340310 PMCID: PMC9630008 DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2022.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
While outcomes after liver transplantation have increased over the last two decades, this is primarily as a consequence of a reduction in early deaths and survival of those who survive the first 6 months has not significantly changed. Causes of premature death and graft loss include cardiovascular disease, renal impairment, malignancy and some infections. As the number of transplant recipients increase, care is being given by primary and secondary care clinicians. Management of the well patient is crucially dependent on careful assessment and where appropriate intervention, especially of cardiovascular risk - such as advice about avoidance of weight gain; management of hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and diabetes; and provision of appropriate lifestyle advice. Other interventions include surveillance for de novo malignancies, active management of immunosuppressive regimen with the need to tailor immunosuppression to the individual. Prompt investigation of abnormalities of liver function is essential. Immune-mediated graft damage still occurs but is less common as a cause for graft loss. Adherence is sometimes an issue, especially in teenagers and young adults, and should be considered and support given where needed. Immunisations (avoiding live and attenuated vaccines) should be encouraged. Recurrence of disease remains an issue, and some interventions (such as appropriate use of antiviral therapy for those grafted with viral hepatitis, use of ursodeoxycholic acid for those grafted for primary biliary cholangitis or long-term steroids for those grafted for autoimmune disease) may improve and maintain graft function. Close collaboration between recipient and the attending clinicians in primary, secondary and tertiary care and close attention to modifiable conditions will lead to improved outcomes.
Collapse
Key Words
- CMV, Cytomegalovirus
- CNI, Calcineurin inhibitor
- DRR-4i, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor
- GLP 1RA, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists
- HBIG, Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin
- HBV, Hepatitis B Virus
- HCC, Hepatocellular carcinoma
- HCV, Hepatitis C virus
- LDL-C, Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
- LT, Liver transplant
- MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease
- MRC, Magnetic resonance cholangiography
- NAFLD, Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
- NIDDK, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
- NODAT, New onset diabetes after transplant
- NUC, Nucleos(t)ide analogues
- PBC, Primary Biliary Cholangitis
- PSC, Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
- SGLT2i, sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors
- SRTR, Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients
- TMPT, Thiopurine S-methyltransferase
- USA, United States of America
- cardiovascular disease
- follow-up
- liver transplant
- mRNA, messenger Ribonucleic acid
- mTORi, mammalian Target of rapamycin inhibitor
- malignancy
- recurrent disease
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Neuberger
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lai Q, Mennini G, Giovanardi F, Rossi M, Giannini EG. Immunoglobulin, nucleos(t)ide analogues and hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplant: A meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Invest 2021; 51:e13575. [PMID: 33866547 PMCID: PMC8365701 DOI: 10.1111/eci.13575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 04/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) represents an efficient strategy for reducing the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT). Unfortunately, the long-term use of HBIG presents high costs. Therefore, the use of prophylaxis based only on nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUC) has been recently postulated. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of HBIG ± NUC vs HBIG alone or NUC alone in post-LT HBV recurrence prophylaxis. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Cochrane databases. The primary outcome investigated was the HBV recurrence after LT. Three analyses were done comparing the effect of (a) HBIG + NUC vs HBIG alone; (b) HBIG+NUC vs NUC alone; and (c) HBIG alone vs NUC alone. Sub-analyses were also performed investigating the effect of low and high genetic barrierto-recurrence NUC. RESULTS Fifty-one studies were included. The summary OR (95%CI) showed a decreased risk with the combination of HBIG + NUC vs HBIG alone for HBV recurrence, being 0.36 (95% CI = 0.22-0.61; P < .001). HBIG + NUC combined treatment reduced HBV reappearance respect to NUC alone (OR = 0.22; 95% CI = 0.16-0.30; P < .0001). Similarly, HBIG alone was significantly better than NUC alone in preventing HBV recurrence (OR = 0.20; 95% CI = 0.09-0.44; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS Prophylaxis with HBIG is relevant in preventing post-LT HBV recurrence. Its combination with NUC gives the best results in terms of protection. The present results should be considered in light of the fact that also old studies based on lamivudine use were included. Studies exploring in detail high genetic barrier-to-recurrence NUC and protocols with definite use of HBIG are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quirino Lai
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Department of General and Specialistic Surgery, Umberto I Polyclinic of Rome, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Mennini
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Department of General and Specialistic Surgery, Umberto I Polyclinic of Rome, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Giovanardi
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Department of General and Specialistic Surgery, Umberto I Polyclinic of Rome, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Rossi
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Department of General and Specialistic Surgery, Umberto I Polyclinic of Rome, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Edoardo G Giannini
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|