Sebastian SA, Padda I, Johal G. Supervised exercise training in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Curr Probl Cardiol 2024;
49:102426. [PMID:
38311273 DOI:
10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102426]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represents a prevalent and increasingly common condition. Recognized for its high incidence, there is a growing interest in exploring effective interventions, with exercise emerging as a critical component in the rehabilitation of HFpEF patients. We aim to update evidence on the impact of supervised exercise training on exercise capacity, diastolic function, arterial stiffness, and health-related quality of life (QoL) of individuals diagnosed with HFpEF.
METHODS
We systematically reviewed the literature, searching from inception to December 2023, utilizing databases such as MEDLINE (via PubMed), Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the ScienceDirect portal. Statistical analyses utilized RevMan 5.4 with a random-effects model. Outcomes were presented as the weighted mean difference (WMD) alongside corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI), and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test.
RESULTS
Our final analysis included 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of 346 participants, with an exercise follow-up duration of 12 to 48 weeks. In our pooled analysis, diastolic function, measured by E/A (WMD 0.01, 95 % CI: -0.04 to 0.05, p = 0.79; I2 = 0 %) and E/e' (WMD 0.87, 95 % CI: -11.09 to 12.83, p = 0.89; I2 = 69 %), showed no significant change post-exercise training. However, exercise capacity, measured by peak V̇o2 significantly improved (WMD 2.57, 95 % CI: 1.38 to 3.75, p < 0.0001; I2= 14 %). The QoL assessed by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLWHF) score remained unchanged (WMD -3.12, 95 % CI: -8.73 to 2.50, p = 0.28; I2 = 0 %), but the SF-36 physical functioning scale indicated significant improvement (WMD 9.84, 95 % CI: 2.94 to 16.73, p < 0.005; I2 = 0 %). Arterial stiffness and vascular function remained unaffected, as evidenced by arterial elastance (WMD -0.13, 95 % CI: -0.36 to 0.10, p = 0.26; I2 = 0 %) and total arterial compliance (WMD 0.12, 95 % CI: -0.26 to 0.49, p = 0.54; I2 = 0 %).
CONCLUSION
Exercise training is safe and significantly enhances exercise capacity and QoL in HFpEF, with no significant impact on diastolic function, arterial stiffness, or vascular function.
Collapse