2
|
Yu S, Fan Z, Ma L, Wang Y, Huang F, Zhang Q, Huang J, Wang S, Xu N, Xuan L, Xiong M, Han L, Sun Z, Zhang H, Liu H, Yu G, Shi P, Xu J, Wu M, Guo Z, Xiong Y, Duan C, Sun J, Liu Q, Zhang Y. Association Between Measurable Residual Disease in Patients With Intermediate-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia and First Remission, Treatment, and Outcomes. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2115991. [PMID: 34232303 PMCID: PMC8264648 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Measurable residual disease (MRD) is widely used as a therapy-stratification factor for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but the association of dynamic MRD with postremission treatment (PRT) in patients with intermediate-risk AML (IR-AML) has not been well investigated. Objective To investigate PRT choices based on dynamic MRD in patients with IR-AML. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study examined 549 younger patients with de novo IR-AML in the South China Hematology Alliance database during the period from January 1, 2012, to June 30, 2016, including 154 who received chemotherapy, 116 who received an autologous stem cell transplant (auto-SCT), and 279 who received an allogeneic SCT (allo-SCT). Subgroup analyses were performed according to dynamic MRD after the first, second, and third courses of chemotherapy. The end point of the last follow-up was August 31, 2020. Statistical analysis was performed from December 1, 2019, to September 30, 2020. Exposures Receipt of chemotherapy, auto-SCT, or allo-SCT. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end points were 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse and leukemia-free survival. Results Subgroup analyses were performed for 549 participants (314 male participants [57.2%]; median age, 37 years [range, 14-60 years]) according to the dynamics of MRD after 1, 2, or 3 courses of chemotherapy. Comparable cumulative incidences of relapse, leukemia-free survival, and overall survival were observed among participants who had no MRD after 1, 2, or 3 courses of chemotherapy. Participants who underwent chemotherapy and those who underwent auto-SCT had better graft-vs-host disease-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) than those who underwent allo-SCT (chemotherapy: hazard ratio [HR], 0.35 [95% CI, 0.14-0.90]; P = .03; auto-SCT: HR, 0.07 [95% CI, 0.01-0.58]; P = .01). Among participants with MRD after 1 course of chemotherapy but no MRD after 2 or 3 courses, those who underwent auto-SCT and allo-SCT showed lower cumulative incidence of relapse (auto-SCT: HR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.08-0.78]; P = .01; allo-SCT: HR, 0.08 [95% CI, 0.02-0.24]; P < .001), better leukemia-free survival (auto-SCT: HR, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.10-0.64]; P = .004; allo-SCT: HR, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.09-0.46]; P < .001), and overall survival (auto-SCT: HR, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.08-0.64]; P = .005; allo-SCT: HR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.11-0.59]; P = .001) vs chemotherapy. In addition, auto-SCT showed better GRFS than allo-SCT (HR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.21-0.98]; P = .04) in this group. Among participants with MRD after 1 or 2 courses of chemotherapy but no MRD after 3 courses, allo-SCT had superior cumulative incidence of relapse (HR, 0.10 [95% CI, 0.06-0.94]; P = .04) and leukemia-free survival (HR, 0.18 [95% CI, 0.05-0.68]; P = .01) compared with chemotherapy, but no advantageous cumulative incidence of relapse (HR, 0.15 [95% CI, 0.02-1.42]; P = .10) and leukemia-free survival (HR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.05-1.08]; P = .06) compared with auto-SCT. Among participants with MRD after 3 courses of chemotherapy, allo-SCT had superior cumulative incidences of relapse, leukemia-free survival, and overall survival compared with chemotherapy (relapse: HR, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.08-0.33]; P < .001; leukemia-free survival: HR, 0.19 [95% CI, 0.10-0.35]; P < .001; overall survival: HR, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.15-0.55]; P < .001) and auto-SCT (relapse: HR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.12-0.53]; P < .001; leukemia-free survival: HR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.18-0.73]; P = .004; overall survival: HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.26-0.94]; P = .04). Among participants with recurrent MRD, allo-SCT was also associated with advantageous cumulative incidence of relapse, leukemia-free survival, and overall survival compared with chemotherapy (relapse: HR, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.04-0.33]; P < .001; leukemia-free survival: HR, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.10-0.56]; P = .001; overall survival: HR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.13-0.75]; P = .01) and auto-SCT (relapse: HR, 0.28 [95% CI, 0.09-0.81]; P = .02; leukemia-free survival: HR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.12-0.76]; P = .01; overall survival: HR, 0.26 [95% CI, 0.10-0.70]; P = .007). Conclusions and Relevance This study suggests that clinical decisions based on dynamic MRD might be associated with improved therapy stratification and optimized PRT for patients with IR-AML. Prospective multicenter trials are needed to further validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sijian Yu
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiping Fan
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liping Ma
- Department of Hematology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu Wang
- Peking University People’s Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, Beijing, China
| | - Fen Huang
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qing Zhang
- Department of Hematology, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiafu Huang
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shunqing Wang
- Department of Hematology, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Na Xu
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li Xuan
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mujun Xiong
- Department of Hematology, The First People’s Hospital of Chenzhou, Chenzhou, China
| | - Lijie Han
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Zhiqiang Sun
- Department of Hematology, Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Hongyu Zhang
- Department of Hematology, Shenzhen Hospital of Peking University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Hui Liu
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guopan Yu
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pengcheng Shi
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun Xu
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Meiqing Wu
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi, China
| | - Ziwen Guo
- Department of Hematology, Zhongshan People’s Hospital, Zhongshan, China
| | - Yiying Xiong
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Chongyang Duan
- Department of Biostatistics, Southern Medical University School of Public Health, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jing Sun
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qifa Liu
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ciftciler R, Demiroglu H, Haznedaroglu IC, Sayınalp N, Aksu S, Ozcebe O, Goker H, Aydın MS, Buyukasık Y. Impact of Time Between Induction Chemotherapy and Complete Remission on Survival Outcomes in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2019; 19:729-734. [PMID: 31540855 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2019.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Revised: 07/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/16/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The majority of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receive intensive induction chemotherapy for obtaining a complete remission (CR). Despite consolidation chemotherapy and advances in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, most of these patients finally relapse and die from AML. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of duration of remission achievement on survival of patients with newly diagnosed AML who achieve CR after induction chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed patients with AML who received first induction chemotherapy between 2001 and 2018. RESULTS The 5-year overall survival for patients who had early remission after induction chemotherapy and patients who had delayed remission after induction chemotherapy were 83% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.87) and 35% (95% CI, 0.31-0.39), respectively (P < .001). The 5-year disease-free survival for patients who had early remission after induction chemotherapy and patients who had delayed remission after induction chemotherapy were 81% (95% CI, 0.75-0.87) and 28% (95% CI, 0.21-0.35), respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSION In conclusion, time to entering CR is a predictor factor of overall survival and disease-free survival for patients with newly diagnosed AML who achieve CR after first induction chemotherapy. Patients achieving CR only after a lengthy time (eg, more than 29 days) should be considered to have high relapse rate and should undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafiye Ciftciler
- Department of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Haluk Demiroglu
- Department of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Nilgun Sayınalp
- Department of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Salih Aksu
- Department of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Osman Ozcebe
- Department of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hakan Goker
- Department of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Muruvvet Seda Aydın
- Department of Hematology, Ankara Numune Eduacation and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yahya Buyukasık
- Department of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yao J, Zhang G, Liang C, Li G, Chen X, Ma Q, Zhai W, Yang D, He Y, Jiang E, Feng S, Han M. Combination of cytogenetic classification and MRD status correlates with outcome of autologous versus allogeneic stem cell transplantation in adults with primary acute myeloid leukemia in first remission. Leuk Res 2017; 55:97-104. [PMID: 28189799 DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.01.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2016] [Revised: 01/09/2017] [Accepted: 01/19/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Both autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (auto- and allo-SCT) are treatment choice for adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after complete remission (CR). However, the decision-making remains controversial in some situations. To figure out the treatment choice, we retrospectively investigated 172 consecutive patients with primary AML who received auto- (n=46) or allo-SCT (n=126) from a single transplant center. Auto- and allo-SCT group demonstrated comparable overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.616, P=0.559, respectively). Cytogenetic classification and minimal residual disease (MRD) after one course of consolidation were identified as independent risk factors for DFS (hazard ratio (HR), 1.800; 95% CI, 1.172-2.763; P=0.007; HR, 2.042; 95%CI, 1.003-4.154; P=0.049; respectively). We subsequently found that auto- and allo-SCT offered comparable DFS to patients with favorable or intermediate risk and were tested MRDneg after one course of consolidation (P=0.270) otherwise auto-SCT were inferior due to increased risk of leukemia relapse. Our study indicated that the combination of cytogenetic classification and MRD monitoring correlated with outcome of auto- versus allo-SCT and might help the choice between the two types of SCT for adults with primary AML, which is of significance for patients with expected intermediate prognosis in the current scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianfeng Yao
- Transplant Center, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Tianjin, China
| | - Guixin Zhang
- Transplant Center, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Tianjin, China
| | - Chen Liang
- Transplant Center, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Tianjin, China
| | - Gang Li
- Transplant Center, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Tianjin, China
| | - Xin Chen
- Transplant Center, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Tianjin, China
| | - Qiaoling Ma
- Transplant Center, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Tianjin, China
| | - Weihua Zhai
- Transplant Center, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Tianjin, China
| | - Donglin Yang
- Transplant Center, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Tianjin, China
| | - Yi He
- Transplant Center, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Tianjin, China
| | - Erlie Jiang
- Transplant Center, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Tianjin, China
| | - Sizhou Feng
- Transplant Center, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Tianjin, China
| | - Mingzhe Han
- Transplant Center, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Tianjin, China.
| |
Collapse
|