Various regimens for prophylactic treatment of patients with haemophilia

Long-term impact of primary prophylaxis on joint status in patients with severe hemophilia A

Background

Primary prophylaxis with factor VIII concentrates is the therapeutic gold standard for severe hemophilia A. Although this approach will change substantially with the use of nonsubstitutive therapies, the long-term effects of primary prophylaxis remain unclear. We present information on joint health with tailored primary prophylaxis in a consecutive series at a single center.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 60 patients who did not develop early inhibitors. The annual bleeding rate and annual joint bleeding rate, prophylaxis characteristics, physical activity, adherence, and development of inhibitors were compared between those with and without joint involvement at the end of follow-up. Joint involvement was defined as a Hemophilia Joint Health Score or Hemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with an ultrasound score ≥1.

Results

Among 60 patients with median follow-up of 113 ± 6 months after starting prophylaxis, 76.7% had no joint involvement at the end of the follow-up. Those without joint involvement started prophylaxis at a younger median age (1 [IQR 1-1] year vs 3 [IQR 2-4.3] years). They also had lower annual joint bleeding rate (0.0 [IQR 0-0.2] vs 0.2 [IQR 0.1-0.5]), were more often physically active (70% vs 50%), and had lower trough factor VIII levels. Adherence to treatment was not significantly different between groups.

Conclusion

Initiation of primary prophylaxis at a younger age was the main factor associated with long-term preservation of joint status in patients with severe hemophilia A.

PHAREO study: Perceived and observed accessibility to therapeutic drugs used for treating patients with inherited bleeding disorders

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

The dispensing of clotting factor concentrates in hospital pharmacies imposes accessibility constraints on patients and their caregivers, thereby increasing the disease burden. Very few studies have addressed these issues so far in terms of individual perceptions and actual difficulties. The PHAREO study aims to report patient's perception of treatment accessibility and evaluate spatial accessibility.

METHODS

The PHAREO study is an observational survey based on a questionnaire specifically designed for the study purpose in collaboration with patients' representatives in the second demographic and economic French region.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We collected 293 responses (participation rate of 64.1%) which show that 89.8% of respondents were either very or rather satisfied with regard to access to treatment. However, respondents reported difficulties in accessing the hospital pharmacy. The data also showed that 79.2% of respondents tended to over-estimate travel time which was reported above their acceptable threshold for 39.2% of them. The main determinants of dissatisfaction were parental burden (OR 2.5 [1.3; 4.8], p = 0.008) and waiting time at the hospital pharmacy (OR 1.5 [1.1;2.0], p = 0.016, per 10 min increase).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The PHAREO study provides subjective and objective data regarding satisfaction levels of persons with haemophilia and other coagulation deficiencies, with a high representativeness rate for patients on prophylaxis (87.5%). Both respondents and hospital pharmacists pled for an evolution of the current dispensing circuit to improve access to treatment and reduce the burden for patients. Currently, the community pharmacists are apart from the dispensing circuit. The authors propose improvements in the pathway of care for patients and their caregivers by including the community pharmacists alongside the hospital pharmacists in a centralized coordination scheme.

Inpatient Health Care Utilization in Children With Hemophilia Before and After the Joint Outcome Study Publication

The "Joint Outcomes Study" (JOS) demonstrated improved joint outcomes for patients receiving primary prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy. The impact of primary prophylaxis on inpatient health care utilization is not well-defined. To evaluate changes in hospitalization care of children with hemophilia before and after the 2007 JOS publication, this study utilized the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) to evaluate admissions for patients with hemophilia A or B (age, 2 to 7) admitted between January 2002 and 2006 (pre-JOS) and January 2010 and 2014 (post-JOS). Discharge diagnosis codes and clinical transaction classifications were used to differentiate bleeding episodes, infections, bypass agent use, length of stay, and intensive care unit (ICU) management. Overall, admissions for bleeding episodes did not change (26.5% of admissions pre-JOS vs. 23.6% post-JOS, P=0.10). However, admissions for suspected infections increased (3.0% of admissions pre-JOS vs. 7.2% post-JOS, P<0.01) while confirmed infections remained stable. Meanwhile, ICU utilization decreased (7.8% of admissions pre-JOS vs. 4.9% post-JOS, P<0.01). The necessity for ICU care in children with hemophilia has decreased since publication of the JOS. However, expanded adoption of primary prophylaxis is associated with more hospitalizations for suspected systemic infections, likely due to utilization of central venous catheters to deliver clotting factor concentrates.

Modified Primary Prophylaxis in Previously Untreated Patients With Severe Hemophilia A in Iran

BACKGROUND

Recently the low-dose tailoring method of primary prophylaxis has been introduced for previously untreated patients with hemophilia A.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose tailoring method of primary prophylaxis in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this pre-post interventional study, 33 patients with severe hemophilia A who were previously untreated and affiliated to universities in the capital city and southern Iran were evaluated during 2014 to 2015. Modified primary continuous prophylaxis was used for patients with age below 3 years old, after first and before the second episodes of obvious clinical bleeding in large joints or large soft tissue hematoma or large amount of bleeding. Prophylaxis was started by 25 IU/kg once per week and increased to twice or 3 times a week according to defined bleeding events.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis and age of starting prophylaxis were: 4 months (at birth, 22 mo) and 12 months (1 to 35 mo), respectively. Mean annual bleeding rate of patients after prophylaxis was 1.08±2.21 episodes per year. None of the patients had inhibitors before therapy. Inhibitor was present in 5 patients (15.1%) after prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

It seems that modified primary continuous prophylaxis has been successful in reducing bleeding episodes in children with severe hemophilia A and in the texture of lower cost it can improve quality of life of these patients, especially in developing countries where financial resources are limited.

Hemophilia: What the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon Needs to Know

Hemophilia will be encountered in the oral and maxillofacial surgeon's office. A thorough understanding of hemophilia is necessary to safely care for these patients. One must understand the severity of the patient's hemophilia as well as whether or not inhibitors are present. The patient's surgical management will be influenced by these two factors. In addition to the possible need to transfuse factors or desmopressin, special care must be taken perioperatively to avoid bleeding complications. This article reviews the overall management of hemophilia A and B as well as the specific perioperative management of these patients.