Prevention and treatment of atherosclerosis in haemophilia - how to balance risk of bleeding with risk of ischaemic events

Cardiovascular Risk Scores among Asymptomatic Adults with Haemophilia

BACKGROUND

The mortality rate of Brazilian people with haemophilia (PwH) is decreasing, but the relative incidence of deaths associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) is increasing.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to describe the CVD risk score of PwH according to Pooled Cohort Equations Risk (PCER) Calculator tool and its treatment recommendations. We also compared the PCER estimates with the respective Framingham Risk Score (FRS).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included male PwH ≥ 40 years treated at the Comprehensive Haemophilia Treatment Centre of Pernambuco (Recife/Brazil). PwH with a previous CVD event or a low-density lipid cholesterol ≥ 5.0 mmol/L were excluded. Interviews, medical file reviews, and blood tests were performed. The PCER tool was used to estimate the CVD risk and compare it with the respective FRS. A p-value < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.

RESULTS

Thirty PwH were included. Median age was 51.5 [interquartile range-IQR; 46.0-59.5] years. The prevalence of obesity, systemic arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypertriglyceridaemia, hypercholesterolaemia, and hypoHDLaemia were 20%, 67%, 24%, 14%, 47%, and 23%, respectively. The median PCER score was 6.9% [IQR; 3.1-13.2], with 50% having a high risk (PCER ≥ 7.5%). Statin use was suggested for 54% of PwH. Blood pressure was poorly controlled in 47% of PwH. The agreement between PCER and FRS was 80% (κ = 0.60; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Half of the male people with haemophilia aged 40 years or older had a 10-year high risk of developing CVD with strong recommendations to improve control of dyslipidaemia and blood pressure.

Burden of congenital hemophilia A requiring treatment in Japan: The HIKOBOSHI study

Background

Treatment of congenital hemophilia A (HA) in Japan has greatly improved with the widespread adoption of prophylactic factor (F)VIII concentrates. However, it is unknown if this has translated into a real‐world reduction in disease and treatment burden.

Objectives

To describe HA disease burden in Japan based on information from two medical information databases, JMDC and Real World Data Co., Ltd. (RWD).

Methods

Eligible individuals were diagnosed with congenital HA and prescribed FVIII concentrates, bypassing agents, or emicizumab. Treatment patterns and disease burden data were derived from health insurance claims and electronic medical records.

Results

Data on 459 people with HA were retrospectively collected from 2005 to 2020 in the JMDC database (median [min, max] of 37 [2, 186] months of available records), and 229 people with HA from 1985 to 2020 in the RWD database (median [min, max] of 154 [0, 409] months of available records). Mean (standard deviation) ages at the time of the first record were 25.0 (16.8) years (JMDC) and 19.2 (20.3) years (RWD). In the JMDC database, mean monthly FVIII dose increased from 2201 IU in 2005 to 8239 IU in 2013 to 11,377 IU in 2019; HA‐related drug costs increased accordingly. Mean (95% confidence interval) annual outpatient and out‐of‐hours visits decreased slightly between 2013 and 2019 (outpatient visits: from 22.9 [16.8–29.0] to 14.3 [12.6–16.1] per person; out‐of‐hours visits: from 1.3 [0.2–2.5] to 0.6 [0–1.4]). There was no change in mean number of hospitalizations.

Conclusions

Challenges remain in HA, including treatment burden, outpatient visits, and hospitalizations.

Defining high bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a consensus document from the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk

Identification and management of patients at high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention are of major importance, but a lack of standardization in defining this population limits trial design, data interpretation, and clinical decision-making. The Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) is a collaboration among leading research organizations, regulatory authorities, and physician-scientists from the United States, Asia, and Europe focusing on percutaneous coronary intervention-related bleeding. Two meetings of the 31-member consortium were held in Washington, DC, in April 2018 and in Paris, France, in October 2018. These meetings were organized by the Cardiovascular European Research Center on behalf of the ARC-HBR group and included representatives of the US Food and Drug Administration and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, as well as observers from the pharmaceutical and medical device industries. A consensus definition of patients at high bleeding risk was developed that was based on review of the available evidence. The definition is intended to provide consistency in defining this population for clinical trials and to complement clinical decision-making and regulatory review. The proposed ARC-HBR consensus document represents the first pragmatic approach to a consistent definition of high bleeding risk in clinical trials evaluating the safety and effectiveness of devices and drug regimens for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Defining High Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Identification and management of patients at high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention are of major importance, but a lack of standardization in defining this population limits trial design, data interpretation, and clinical decision-making. The Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) is a collaboration among leading research organizations, regulatory authorities, and physician-scientists from the United States, Asia, and Europe focusing on percutaneous coronary intervention-related bleeding. Two meetings of the 31-member consortium were held in Washington, DC, in April 2018 and in Paris, France, in October 2018. These meetings were organized by the Cardiovascular European Research Center on behalf of the ARC-HBR group and included representatives of the US Food and Drug Administration and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, as well as observers from the pharmaceutical and medical device industries. A consensus definition of patients at high bleeding risk was developed that was based on review of the available evidence. The definition is intended to provide consistency in defining this population for clinical trials and to complement clinical decision-making and regulatory review. The proposed ARC-HBR consensus document represents the first pragmatic approach to a consistent definition of high bleeding risk in clinical trials evaluating the safety and effectiveness of devices and drug regimens for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Haemophilia and ageing

Advances in the development of effective and safe treatments for haemophilia over the last 50 years have resulted in a significant increase in the life expectancy of persons with haemophilia (PWH). The management of this new cohort of middle-aged and elderly PWH is challenging because of the opposing risks of haemophilia and age-related cardiovascular disease and malignancy. Furthermore, this cohort of ageing PWH has the additional comorbidities of human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C and chronic haemophilic arthropathy. This article reviews the prevalence, underlying mechanisms and treatment strategies for managing these comorbidities. International collaboration is essential for registry data and further prospective trials to inform optimal evidence-based management for this rare disorder in the future.

Current concepts in the management of stable ischemic heart disease and acute coronary syndrome in patients with hemophilia

Coronary artery disease (CAD), including stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS), remains the leading cause of death in the US and one of the primary modalities used in the treatment of CAD is percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Despite the potential benefits of PCI in high risk CAD patients, the risk of hemorrhage presents a dilemma in the treatment of patients with hemophilia A and B. In an attempt to provide guidance on the management of SIHD and ACS in patients with hemophilia, we present the case of a patient with moderate hemophilia B and ACS who subsequently underwent PCI followed by a review of the associated literature.

Comorbidities and inhibitors in adult patients with haemophilia: issues, costs and management strategies

Along with greater life expectancy in patients with haemophilia has been an increase in associated haemophilia-related (arthropathy, osteoporosis, viral infections) and age-related (cardiovascular disease, renal disease, cancer and others) comorbidities, many of which are only just emerging as the population ages. At present, experience in managing these comorbidities is limited. As the demographic shift continues, haemophilia care centres can expect to encounter more patients with greater levels of complexity. In the absence of evidence-based information to guide the management of adult patients with haemophilia, it is important that the scientific position be reviewed on a regular basis. To this end, several topics relevant to the clinical management of adult patients with haemophilia were examined in a symposium entitled Comorbidities and inhibitors in adult patients with haemophilia: issues, costs and management strategies held on 11 February 2015 in Helsinki, Finland, in conjunction with the 8th Annual Congress of the European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders. This article is a summary of that event.