Prophylaxis therapy with bypassing agents in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors undergoing surgery: A cost analysis in Spain

Recent advances in surgery and its perioperative treatment in people with hemophilia

Introduction: People with hemophilia (PWH) may require some surgical procedures (orthopedic surgery, cardiac surgery, neurosurgery, et cetera) throughout their lives.Areas covered: Articles on surgery and hemophilia published during the year 2020 were analyzed. The principal inclusion factor was a focal point on surgery in hemophilia. Articles that did not concentrate on this subject were not included.Expert opinion: Turoctocog alfa pegol appears to be efficacious for perioperative hemostatic treatment of all kind of surgical operations (minor and major) in PWH A. Long-acting recombinant coagulation factor IX (FIX) albumin fusion protein (rIX-FP) seems to facilitate perioperative management in PWH B. In people suffering from von Willebrand disease (VWD), the utilization of concentrates of von Willebrand factor (VWF) is commonly used for the decrease of exaggerated bleeding during surgical operations. On-demand management with 30-60 IU/kg may keep hemostasis under control during all kind of surgical operations. Factor concentrates with extended half-life (EHL) are a good option to standard half-life (SHL) products in PWH undergoing surgery, permitting diminished number of infusions and inferior consuming, particularly for EHL factor IX (FIX). Supplementary factor VIII (FVIII) and/or bypassing management have demonstrated to be secure and efficacious in association with emicizumab for major surgical procedures.

Prophylaxis therapy with bypassing agents in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors undergoing surgery: A cost analysis in Spain

Objectives

This study estimated the cost of prophylaxis with activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) and recombinant activated factor VIIa (rFVIIa) in surgical patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors in Spain.

Methods

A decision‐analytic model was developed to estimate the cost to the Spanish National Health System of providing haemostatic coverage in this haemophilia population, with age distribution and average weight derived from the literature, and the annual number of surgeries (0.33 per patient) from local data. Drug costs were calculated from official ex‐factory prices with a 7.5% mandatory deduction and recommended dosing regimens.

Results

The estimated average costs per patient were €10 100.73 (aPCC) and €14 265.89 (rFVIIa) for dental extraction, €24 043.88 (aPCC) and €62 301.08 (rFVIIa) for minor surgery and €126 595.81 (aPCC) and €347 731.09 (rFVIIa) for major surgery. Assuming an estimated 23 annual surgeries in this population (N = 69), distributed as 19% dental extraction, 50% minor surgery and 31% major surgery, the total annual cost of prophylaxis was €1 209 682.35 with aPCC and €3 221 929.28 with rFVIIa.

Conclusions

aPCC costs were 62.5% lower than rFVIIa. Assuming potential clinical equivalence, aPCC is a potentially cost‐saving option for surgical patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors.