Predicting primary treatment failure using interim FDG-PET scanning in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

The value of semiquantitative PET features and end-of-therapy PET in grade 3B follicular lymphoma

Grade 3B follicular lymphoma (G3BFL) is a rare lymphoma thought to sit on a continuum between low-grade FL and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The prognostic impact of quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) metrics such as total metabolic tumour volume (TMTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) have been extensively analysed in FL and DLBCL, but G3BFL data are lacking. Here, we describe PET outcomes and radiomic characteristics in 46 G3BFL cases uniformly treated with R-CHOP (like) chemotherapy. Central semi-automated PET TMTV, TLG, and SUVmax analyses, using MIM software, were correlated with clinical outcomes and compared with published results in low-grade FL and DLBCL. In G3BFL, the end-of-treatment complete metabolic response was associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS; p = 0.002) and overall survival (OS; p = 0.04). G3BFL median TLG (1455) and SUVmax (16.50) sit between published values for low-grade FL (TLG: 1112, SUVmax: 11.3) and DLBCL (TLG: 3004, SUVmax: 24.35). No association between TMTV (>350 cm3) and survival was seen (PFS: p = 0.24; OS: p = 0.40). High SUVmax (>19.2) and TLG (>2760) both conferred inferior PFS but not OS (PFS: SUVmax p = 0.004; TLG p = 0.05). These data support the routine incorporation of PET radiomics at baseline and treatment response for G3BFL.

Utility of FDG-PET in predicting the histology of relapsed or refractory lymphoma

ABSTRACT

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is a valuable prognostic tool in modern lymphoma care. In this study, we explored the use of quantitative FDG-PET parameters in predicting the histology of suspected relapsed or refractory (R/R) lymphoma. We retrospectively analyzed 290 FDG-PET scans performed for suspected R/R lymphoma. FDG-PET parameters measured were maximum and mean standardized uptake value (SUVMax and SUVMean), total metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to obtain the optimal thresholds that best discriminate (1) benign vs R/R lymphoma, (2) indolent vs aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), and (3) aggressive transformation of indolent NHL. We found that although all 4 FDG-PET parameters discriminated R/R lymphoma from benign histology, TLG was the best performing parameter (optimal cut-off ≥245, sensitivity 63%, specificity 86%, positive predictive value [PPV] 97%, negative predictive value [NPV] 30%, area under the curve [AUC] 0.798, and P < .001). SUVMax discriminated aggressive from indolent NHL with modest accuracy (optimal threshold ≥15, sensitivity 46%, specificity 79%, PPV 82%, NPV 38%, AUC 0.638, and P < .001). In patients with a prior diagnosis of indolent NHL, SUVMax was a modest predictor of transformation (optimal cut-off ≥12, sensitivity 71%, specificity 61%, PPV 50%, NPV 78%, AUC 0.676, and P .006). Additionally, SUVMax ≥25 and an increase in SUVMax (ΔSUVMax) from baseline ≥150% were highly specific (96% and 94%, respectively). These FDG-PET thresholds can aid in identification of suspected R/R lymphoma cases with higher likelihood of R/R disease and aggressive transformation of indolent NHL, guiding the necessity and urgency of biopsy.

PET/CT in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: An Update

Non-Hodgkin lymphomas represents a heterogeneous group of lymphoproliferative disorders characterized by different clinical courses, varying from indolent to highly aggressive. ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT is the current state-of-the-art diagnostic imaging, for the staging, restaging and evaluation of response to treatment in lymphomas with avidity for ¹⁸F-FDG, despite it is not routinely recommended for surveillance. PET-based response criteria (using five-point Deauville Score) are nowadays uniformly applied in FDG-avid lymphomas. In this review, a comprehensive overview of the role of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET in Non-Hodgkin lymphomas is provided, at each relevant point of patient management, particularly focusing on recent advances on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma, with brief updates also on other histotypes (such as marginal zone, mantle cell, primary mediastinal- B cell lymphoma and T cell lymphoma). PET-derived semiquantitative factors useful for patient stratification and prognostication and emerging radiomics research are also presented.

Immune priming with avelumab and rituximab prior to R-CHOP in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: the phase II AvR-CHOP study

Immune evasion, due to abnormal expression of programmed-death ligands 1 and 2 (PD-L1/PD-L2), predicts poor outcomes with chemoimmunotherapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has limited efficacy at relapse but may sensitise relapsed lymphoma to subsequent chemotherapy. ICI delivery to immunologically intact patients may thus be the optimal use of this therapy. In the phase II AvR-CHOP study, 28 patients with treatment-naive stage II-IV DLBCL received sequential avelumab and rituximab priming ("AvRp;" avelumab 10 mg/kg and rituximab 375 mg/m2 2-weekly for 2 cycles), R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone for 6 cycles) and avelumab consolidation (10 mg/kg 2-weekly for 6 cycles). Grade 3/4 immune-related adverse events occurred in 11%, meeting the primary endpoint of a grade ≥3 irAE rate of <30%. R-CHOP delivery was not compromised but one patient ceased avelumab. Overall response rates (ORR) after AvRp and R-CHOP were 57% (18% CR) and 89% (all CR). High ORR to AvRp was observed in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (67%; 4/6) and molecularly-defined EBV-positive DLBCL (100%; 3/3). Progression during AvRp was associated with chemorefractory disease. Two-year failure-free and overall survival were 82% and 89%. An immune priming strategy with AvRp, R-CHOP and avelumab consolidation shows acceptable toxicity with encouraging efficacy.

Interim FDG18-PET SUVmax Variation Adds Prognostic Value to Deauville 5-Point Scale in the Identification of Patients with Ultra-High-Risk Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Interim response evaluation by ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (iPET) in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) could be important to rule out disease progression and has been suggested to be predictive of survival. However, treatment guidance by iPET is not yet recommended for DLBCL in clinical practice. We aimed to compare the predictive value of iPET when utilizing the visual Deauville 5-point scale (DS) and the semiquantitative variation of maximum standardized uptake value (ΔSUV_max).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 85 patients diagnosed with DLBCL and uniformly treated with standard protocols. iPET with DS of 1-3 and/or ΔSUV_max ≥66% was defined as negative. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the independent factors affecting progression free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) and to estimate PFS and OS.

RESULTS

iPET positivity, measured by DS or ΔSUV_max, showed predictive value of disease refractoriness, improved by combining DS and ΔSUV_max. After a median follow-up of 50.1 months, iPET was an independent predictor for both PFS and OS when interpreted by DS, but only for PFS by ΔSUV_max. Combined visual and semiquantitative analysis (D4-5 & ΔSUV_max<66%) was an independent predictor of PFS and OS, and allowed to identify an ultra-high-risk subgroup of patients with very dismal outcome, increasing the discriminating capacity for iPET.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that combined DS and ΔSUV_max in iPET assessment predicts refractory disease and distinguishes ultra-high-risk DLBCL patients with a very dismal prognosis, who may benefit from PET-guided therapy adjustment.