A retrospective study of treosulfan versus busulfan-based conditioning in pediatric patients

Long-Term Complications after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation with Treosulfan- or Busulfan-Based Conditioning in Pediatric Patients with Acute Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Results of an Associazione Italiana Ematologia Oncologia Pediatrica Retrospective Study

Patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for hematologic malignancies during childhood have an increased risk of developing long-term sequelae that are in part attributable to the conditioning regimen. The present study aimed to assess the occurrence of long-term toxicities in a population of children who underwent HSCT for hematologic malignancies using either treosulfan or busulfan in the conditioning regimen. The cumulative incidences of growth impairment, altered gonadal function, altered thyroid function, cataracts, secondary malignant neoplasia, and altered pulmonary function were evaluated retrospectively by univariable and multivariable analyses in a population of 521 pediatric patients with acute leukemias or myelodysplastic syndromes treated in 20 Italian transplant centers affiliated with the Associazione Italiana Ematologia ed Oncologia Pediatrica (AIEOP). The median duration of follow-up for the entire study population was 7.1 years (range, 1 to 16 years). Overall, a larger proportion of patients given busulfan developed long-term toxicities compared to patients treated with treosulfan (34% versus 20%; P = .01). In univariable analysis, gonadal toxicity developed in 10% of patients who received treosulfan (95% confidence interval [CI], 3% to 15%), compared with 38% (95% CI, 24% to 39%) of busulfan-treated patients (P = .02), and this finding was confirmed by multivariable analysis (relative risk, .51; 95% CI, .34 to .76; P = .0009). We did not find any statistically significant associations between the occurrence of other long-term toxicities and the use of either busulfan or treosulfan. This study provides evidence that the use of treosulfan is correlated with a reduced incidence of gonadal toxicity in children undergoing HSCT for hematologic malignancies.

Reduced toxicity matched sibling bone marrow transplant results in excellent outcomes for severe congenital neutropenia

Severe congenital neutropenia (SCN) is caused by germline mutations, most commonly in ELANE, impacting neutrophil maturation and leading to high risk of life-threatening infections. Most patients with ELANE-mutant SCN can achieve safe neutrophil counts with chronic Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF). However, up to 10% of patients have neutropenia refractory to G-CSF and require allogeneic stem cell transplant. Traditional conditioning for these patients includes busulfan and cyclophosphamide which is associated with significant toxicities. We present five patients with SCN without myeloid malignancy transplanted using a reduced toxicity regimen of busulfan, fludarabine and thymoglobulin. 5 pediatric patients with SCN underwent matched sibling donor bone marrow transplant (MSD-BMT) between 2014-2022 on or per CHP14BT057 (NCT02928991), a prospective, single center trial testing elimination of cyclophosphamide from conditioning in pediatric patients with single lineage inherited BMF syndromes. All patients had MSDs and no evidence of MDS. Conditioning consisted of PK-adjusted busulfan, fludarabine, and thymoglobulin, with calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil GVHD prophylaxis. With median follow-up of 48.4 months, overall and event-free survival were 100%. There was no acute GVHD and one instance of chronic limited GVHD. Patients exhibited >95% donor myeloid chimerism at 5 years post-BMT. Two patients experienced CMV reactivation without end-organ disease, and no other viral reactivation or significant infections occurred. MSD-BMT with reduced toxicity myeloablation for SCN provides excellent outcomes while minimizing toxicity. These data suggest that busulfan, fludarabine, and ATG can be considered an efficacious, low-toxicity standard of care regimen for patients with SCN undergoing MSD-BMT.

Treosulfan vs busulfan conditioning for allogeneic bmt in children with nonmalignant disease: a randomized phase 2 trial

Optimal conditioning prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for children with non-malignant diseases is subject of ongoing research. This prospective, randomized, phase 2 trial compared safety and efficacy of busulfan with treosulfan based preparative regimens. Children with non-malignant diseases received fludarabine and either intravenous (IV) busulfan (4.8 to 3.2 mg/kg/day) or IV treosulfan (10, 12, or 14 g/m2/day). Thiotepa administration (2 × 5 mg/kg) was at the investigator's discretion. Primary endpoint was freedom from transplantation (treatment)-related mortality (freedom from TRM), defined as death between Days -7 and +100. Overall, 101 patients (busulfan 50, treosulfan 51) with at least 12 months follow-up were analyzed. Freedom from TRM was 90.0% (95% CI: 78.2%, 96.7%) after busulfan and 100.0% (95% CI: 93.0%, 100.0%) after treosulfan. Secondary outcomes (transplantation-related mortality [12.0% versus 3.9%]) and overall survival (88.0% versus 96.1%) favored treosulfan. Graft failure was more common after treosulfan (n = 11), than after busulfan (n = 2) while all patients were rescued by second procedures except one busulfan patient. CTCAE Grade III adverse events were similar in both groups. This study confirmed treosulfan to be an excellent alternative to busulfan and can be safely used for conditioning treatment in children with non-malignant disease.

Treosulfan-Based Conditioning Regimen In Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective Analysis on Behalf of the Spanish Group for Hematopoietic Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (GETH-TC)

Increasing data on treosulfan-based conditioning regimens before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) demonstrate the consistent benefits of this approach, particularly regarding acute toxicity. This study aimed to describe the results of treosulfan-based conditioning regimens in children, focusing on toxicity and outcomes when used to treat both malignant and nonmalignant diseases. This retrospective observational study of pediatric patients treated in Spain with treosulfan-based conditioning regimens before HSCT was based on data collection from electronic clinical records. We studied a total of 160 treosulfan-based conditioning HSCTs to treat nonmalignant diseases (n = 117) or malignant diseases (n = 43) in 158 children and adolescents. The median patient age at HSCT was 5.1 years (interquartile range, 2 to 10 years). The most frequent diagnoses were primary immunodeficiency (n = 42; 36%) and sickle cell disease (n = 42; 36%) in the nonmalignant disease cohort and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 15; 35%) in the malignant disease cohort. Engraftment occurred in 97% of the patients. The median times to neutrophil engraftment (17 days versus 14 days; P = .008) and platelet engraftment (20 days versus 15 days; P = .002) were linger in the nonmalignant cohort. The 1-year cumulative incidence of veno-occlusive disease was 7.98% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.6% to 13.6%), with no significant differences between cohorts. The 1-year cumulative incidence of grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was higher in the malignant disease cohort (18% versus 3.2%; P = .011). Overall, the malignant cohort had both a higher total incidence (9% versus 3%; P < .001) and a higher 2-year cumulative incidence (16% versus 1.9%; P < .001) of total chronic GVHD. The 2-year cumulative transplantation-related mortality was 15%, with no difference between the 2 cohorts. The 5-year overall survival was 80% (95% CI, 72% to 86%) and was higher in the nonmalignant cohort (87% versus 61%; P = .01). The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 25% in the malignant cohort. The 5-year cumulative GVHD-free, relapse-free survival rate was 60% (95% CI, 51% to 70%) and was higher in the nonmalignant cohort (72% versus 22%; P < .001). A treosulfan-based radiation-free conditioning regimen is feasible, achieving a high engraftment rate and 5-year overall survival, and is an emerging option for the first HSCT in nonmalignant diseases.

Treosulfan Versus Busulfan-based Conditioning in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

It is unclear whether there is a difference in outcomes with treosulfan or busulfan-based conditioning in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We reviewed the evidence on this topic through a systematic review and meta-analysis, the comparison between treosulfan and busulfan-based conditioning in pediatric patients undergoing HSCT for instance. Six studies were included. Meta-analysis showed that there was no difference in the incidence of acute graft versus host disease (odds ratio [OR]: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.57, 1.61), grade II to IV acute graft versus host disease (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.83, 1.72), chronic GVHD (OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.70, 2.00), and veno-occlusive disease (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.22, 3.85) between treosulfan and busulfan groups. Pooled analysis indicated marginally better survival with treosulfan-based conditioning (OR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.00, 2.44), however, these results were unstable on sensitivity analysis. A meta-analysis found no difference in transplant-related mortality (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.34, 1.42) between the two groups. Retrospective data from a heterogenous population indicates that there is no difference in the rate of GVHD after treosulfan versus busulfan-based conditioning for pediatric HSCT. A marginal improvement in survival was noted with treosulfan but the results remained unstable. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to provide better evidence.