1
|
Yan L, Hou Z, Fu W, Yu Y, Cui R, Miao Z, Lou X, Ma N. Association of periprocedural perfusion non-improvement with recurrent stroke after endovascular treatment for Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2022; 15:17562864221143178. [PMID: 36601085 PMCID: PMC9806435 DOI: 10.1177/17562864221143178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Predictors of recurrent stroke after endovascular treatment for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) remain uncertain. Objectives Among baseline characteristics, lesion features, and cerebral perfusion changes, we try to explore which factors are associated with the risk of recurrent stroke in symptomatic ICAS after endovascular treatment. Design Consecutive patients with symptomatic ICAS of 70-99% receiving endovascular treatment were enrolled. All patients underwent whole-brain computer tomography perfusion (CTP) within 3 days before and 3 days after the endovascular treatment. Baseline characteristics, lesion features, and cerebral perfusion changes were collected. Methods Cerebral perfusion changes were evaluated with RAPID software and calculated as preprocedural cerebral blood flow (CBF) < 30%, time to maximum of the residue function (Tmax) > 6 s, and Tmax > 4 s volumes minus postprocedural. Cerebral perfusion changes were divided into periprocedural perfusion improvement (>0 ml) and non-improvement (⩽ 0 ml). Recurrent stroke within 180 days was collected. The Cox proportional hazards analysis analyses were performed to evaluate factors associated with recurrent stroke. Results From March 2021 to December 2021, 107 patients with symptomatic ICAS were enrolled. Of the 107 enrolled patients, 30 (28.0%) patients underwent balloon angioplasty alone and 77 patients (72.0%) underwent stenting. The perioperative complications occurred in three patients. Among CBF < 30%, Tmax > 6 s, and Tmax > 4 s volumes, Tmax > 4 s volume was available to evaluate cerebral perfusion changes. Periprocedural perfusion improvement was found in 77 patients (72.0%) and non-improvement in 30 patients (28.0%). Nine patients (8.4%) suffered from recurrent stroke in 180-day follow-up. In Cox proportional hazards analysis adjusted for age and sex, perfusion non-improvement was associated with recurrent stroke [hazards ratio (HR): 4.472; 95% CI: 1.069-18.718; p = 0.040]. Conclusion In patients with symptomatic ICAS treated with endovascular treatment, recurrent stroke may be related to periprocedural cerebral perfusion non-improvement. Registration http://www.chictr.org.cn. Unique identifier: ChiCTR2100052925.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Long Yan
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology,
Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China,China National Clinical Research Center for
Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Zhikai Hou
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology,
Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China,China National Clinical Research Center for
Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Weilun Fu
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology,
Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China,China National Clinical Research Center for
Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Yu
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology,
Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China,China National Clinical Research Center for
Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Rongrong Cui
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology,
Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China,China National Clinical Research Center for
Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Zhongrong Miao
- Department of Interventional Neuroradiology,
Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China,China National Clinical Research Center for
Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Lou
- Department of Radiology, Chinese PLA General
Hospital, Beijing, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Müller M, Winz O, Gutsche R, Leijenaar RTH, Kocher M, Lerche C, Filss CP, Stoffels G, Steidl E, Hattingen E, Steinbach JP, Maurer GD, Heinzel A, Galldiks N, Mottaghy FM, Langen KJ, Lohmann P. Static FET PET radiomics for the differentiation of treatment-related changes from glioma progression. J Neurooncol 2022; 159:519-529. [PMID: 35852737 PMCID: PMC9477932 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04089-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the potential of radiomics applied to static clinical PET data using the tracer O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) to differentiate treatment-related changes (TRC) from tumor progression (TP) in patients with gliomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred fifty-one (151) patients with histologically confirmed gliomas and post-therapeutic progressive MRI findings according to the response assessment in neuro-oncology criteria underwent a dynamic amino acid PET scan using the tracer O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET). Thereof, 124 patients were investigated on a stand-alone PET scanner (data used for model development and validation), and 27 patients on a hybrid PET/MRI scanner (data used for model testing). Mean and maximum tumor to brain ratios (TBRmean, TBRmax) were calculated using the PET data from 20 to 40 min after tracer injection. Logistic regression models were evaluated for the FET PET parameters TBRmean, TBRmax, and for radiomics features of the tumor areas as well as combinations thereof to differentiate between TP and TRC. The best performing models in the validation dataset were finally applied to the test dataset. The diagnostic performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS Thirty-seven patients (25%) were diagnosed with TRC, and 114 (75%) with TP. The logistic regression model comprising the conventional FET PET parameters TBRmean and TBRmax resulted in an AUC of 0.78 in both the validation (sensitivity, 64%; specificity, 80%) and the test dataset (sensitivity, 64%; specificity, 80%). The model combining the conventional FET PET parameters and two radiomics features yielded the best diagnostic performance in the validation dataset (AUC, 0.92; sensitivity, 91%; specificity, 80%) and demonstrated its generalizability in the independent test dataset (AUC, 0.85; sensitivity, 81%; specificity, 70%). CONCLUSION The developed radiomics classifier allows the differentiation between TRC and TP in pretreated gliomas based on routinely acquired static FET PET scans with a high diagnostic accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marguerite Müller
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Comprehensive Diagnostic Center Aachen (CDCA), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany ,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Oliver Winz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Comprehensive Diagnostic Center Aachen (CDCA), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany ,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Robin Gutsche
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), Research Center Juelich (FZJ), Juelich, Germany ,RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ralph T. H. Leijenaar
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Kocher
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), Research Center Juelich (FZJ), Juelich, Germany ,Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christoph Lerche
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), Research Center Juelich (FZJ), Juelich, Germany
| | - Christian P. Filss
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Comprehensive Diagnostic Center Aachen (CDCA), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany ,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany ,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), Research Center Juelich (FZJ), Juelich, Germany
| | - Gabriele Stoffels
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), Research Center Juelich (FZJ), Juelich, Germany
| | - Eike Steidl
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany ,University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany ,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elke Hattingen
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany ,University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany ,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joachim P. Steinbach
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany ,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany ,Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Gabriele D. Maurer
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany ,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany ,Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Alexander Heinzel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Comprehensive Diagnostic Center Aachen (CDCA), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany ,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany ,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), Research Center Juelich (FZJ), Juelich, Germany ,Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Felix M. Mottaghy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Comprehensive Diagnostic Center Aachen (CDCA), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany ,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany ,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Comprehensive Diagnostic Center Aachen (CDCA), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany ,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany ,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), Research Center Juelich (FZJ), Juelich, Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -11), Research Center Juelich (FZJ), Juelich, Germany ,Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gao XY, Wang YD, Wu SM, Rui WT, Ma DN, Duan Y, Zhang AN, Yao ZW, Yang G, Yu YP. Differentiation of Treatment-Related Effects from Glioma Recurrence Using Machine Learning Classifiers Based Upon Pre-and Post-Contrast T1WI and T2 FLAIR Subtraction Features: A Two-Center Study. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:3191-3201. [PMID: 32440216 PMCID: PMC7213892 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s244262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2019] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose We propose three support vector machine (SVM) classifiers, using pre-and post-contrast T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) subtraction and/or pre-and post-contrast T1WI subtraction, to differentiate treatment-related effects (TRE) from glioma recurrence. Materials and Methods Fifty-six postoperative high-grade glioma patients with suspicious progression after radiotherapy and chemotherapy from two centers were studied. Pre-and post-contrast T1WI and T2 FLAIR were collected. Each pre-contrast image was voxel-wise subtracted from the co-registered post-contrast image. Dataset was randomly split into training, and testing on a 7:3 ratio, accordingly subjected to a five fold cross validation. Best feature subsets were selected by Pearson correlation coefficient and recursive feature elimination, whereupon a radiomics classifier was built with SVM. The discriminating performance was assessed with the area under receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Results In all, 186 features were extracted on each subtraction map. Top nine T1WI subtraction features, top thirteen T2 FLAIR subtraction features and top thirteen combination features were selected to build optimal SVM classifiers accordingly. The accuracies/AUCs/sensitivity/specificity/PPV/NPV of SVM based on sole T1WI subtraction were 80.00%/80.00% (CI: 0.5370–1.0000)/100%/70.00%/62.50%/100%. Those results of SVM based on sole T2 FLAIR subtraction were 86.67%/84.00% (CI: 0.5962–1.0000)/100%/80%/71.43%/100%. Those results of SVM based on both T1WI subtraction and T2 FLAIR subtraction were 93.33%/94.00% (CI: 0.7778–1.0000)/100%/90%/83.33%/100%, respectively. Conclusion Pre- and post-contrast T2 FLAIR subtraction provided added value for diagnosis between recurrence and TRE. SVM based on a combination of T1WI and T2 FLAIR subtraction maps was superior to the sole use of T1WI or T2 FLAIR for differentiating TRE from recurrence. The SVM classifier based on combination of pre-and post-contrast subtraction T2 FLAIR and T1WI imaging allowed for the accurate differential diagnosis of TRE from recurrence, which is of paramount importance for treatment management of postoperative glioma patients after radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin-Yi Gao
- Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yi-Da Wang
- Department of Physics, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Shi-Man Wu
- Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Wen-Ting Rui
- Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - De-Ning Ma
- Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yi Duan
- Department of Physics, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - An-Ni Zhang
- Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhen-Wei Yao
- Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Guang Yang
- Department of Physics, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Yan-Ping Yu
- Institute of Cancer and Basic Medicine (ICBM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Magro-Checa C, Steup-Beekman GM, Huizinga TW, van Buchem MA, Ronen I. Laboratory and Neuroimaging Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Where Do We Stand, Where To Go? Front Med (Lausanne) 2018; 5:340. [PMID: 30564579 PMCID: PMC6288259 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by multi-systemic involvement. Nervous system involvement in SLE leads to a series of uncommon and heterogeneous neuropsychiatric (NP) manifestations. Current knowledge on the underlying pathogenic processes and their subsequent pathophysiological changes leading to NP-SLE manifestations is incomplete. Several putative laboratory biomarkers have been proposed as contributors to the genesis of SLE-related nervous system damage. Alongside the laboratory biomarkers, several neuroimaging tools have shown to reflect the nature of tissue microstructural damage associated with SLE, and thus were suggested to contribute to the understanding of the pathophysiological changes and subsequently help in clinical decision making. However, the number of useful biomarkers in NP-SLE in clinical practice is disconcertingly modest. In some cases it is not clear whether the biomarker is truly involved in pathogenesis, or the result of non-specific pathophysiological changes in the nervous system (e.g., neuroinflammation) or whether it is the consequence of a concomitant underlying abnormality related to SLE activity. In order to improve the diagnosis of NP-SLE and provide a better targeted care to these patients, there is still a need to develop and validate a range of biomarkers that reliably capture the different aspects of disease heterogeneity. This article critically reviews the current state of knowledge on laboratory and neuroimaging biomarkers in NP-SLE, discusses the factors that need to be addressed to make these biomarkers suitable for clinical application, and suggests potential future research paths to address important unmet needs in the NP-SLE field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- César Magro-Checa
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, Netherlands
| | | | - Tom W Huizinga
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Mark A van Buchem
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, C.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Itamar Ronen
- Department of Radiology, C.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|