Exploring the causal inference of migraine on stroke: A Mendelian randomization study

Association between migraine and venous thromboembolism: a Mendelian randomization and genetic correlation study

Objective

Previous observational studies have reported an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among individuals with migraine. This study aimed to investigate the causal effect of migraine on the development of VTE, as well as explore the genetic correlation between them.

Methods

We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study using publicly available summary statistics from large-scale genome-wide association studies for migraine and VTE. Linkage disequilibrium score regression analysis was performed to estimate the genetic correlation between migraine and VTE.

Results

There were several shared risk variants (p-value < 5 × 10-8) between migraine and VTE. Linkage disequilibrium score regression analysis found a significant positive genetic correlation between migraine and VTE. The genetic correlations based on two migraine datasets were 0.208 (se = 0.031, p-value = 2.91 × 10-11) and 0.264 (se = 0.040, p-value = 4.82 × 10-11), respectively. Although main MR analysis showed that migraine was associated with an increased risk of VTE (odds ratio = 1.069, 95% confidence interval = 1.022-1.118, p-value = 0.004), the association attenuated to non-significance when using several other MR methods and using another set of genetic instruments. In addition, evidence of heterogeneity was found. Reverse MR analysis showed VTE was associated with increased risk of migraine with aura (odds ratio = 1.137, 95% confidence interval = 1.062-1.218, p-value = 2.47 × 10-4) with no evidence of pleiotropy and heterogeneity.

Conclusion

We showed suggestive evidence indicating an association between migraine and increased risk of VTE. Additionally, we found robust evidence suggesting that VTE is associated with an increased risk of migraine. The positive genetic correlation indicates that migraine and VTE has shared genetic basis. Further investigations will be necessary to address potential sex-specific effects in the analysis.

Circulating cytokines and vascular dementia: A bi-directional Mendelian randomization study

Inflammatory responses are associated with the development of vascular dementia (VaD). Circulating cytokines modulate the inflammatory response and are important for the immune system. To further elucidate the role of the immune system in VaD, we used Mendelian randomization (MR) to comprehensively and bi-directionally assess the role of circulating cytokines in VaD. Using state-of-the-art genome-wide association studies, we primarily assessed whether different genetic levels of 41 circulating cytokines affect the risk of developing VaD and, in turn, whether the genetic risk of VaD affects these circulating cytokines. We used inverse variance weighting (IVW) and several other MR methods to assess the bidirectional causality between circulating cytokines and VaD, and performed sensitivity analyses. Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) was inversely associated with VaD risk [odds ratio (OR): 0.74, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.60-0.92, P = 0.007, 0.007]. VaD was associated with seven circulating cytokines: macrophage inflammatory protein 1b (MIP-1 beta) [OR: 1.05, 95 % CI: 1.01-1.08, P = 0.009], Interleukin-12p70 (IL-12) [OR: 1.04, 95 % CI: 1.00-1.08, P = 0.047], Interleukin-17 (IL-17) [OR: 1.04, 95 % CI: 1.00-1.07, P = 0.038], Interleukin-7 (IL-7) [OR: 1.07, 95 % CI: 1.02-1.12, P = 0.009], Interferon gamma (IFN-γ) [OR: 1.03, 95 % CI: 1.00-1.07, P = 0.046], Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) [OR: 1.06, 95 % CI: 1.02-1.09, P = 0.001], Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) [P = 0.001], and Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) [P = 0.001]. Fibroblast growth factor basic (FGF-Basic) [OR: 1.04, 95 % CI: 1.01-1.08, P = 0.02] were positively correlated. Circulating cytokines are associated with VaD, and further studies are needed to determine whether they are effective targets for intervention to prevent or treat VaD.

Genetics of migraine: complexity, implications, and potential clinical applications

Migraine is a common neurological disorder with large burden in terms of disability for individuals and costs for society. Accurate diagnosis and effective treatments remain priorities. Understanding the genetic factors that contribute to migraine risk and symptom manifestation could improve individual management. Migraine has a strong genetic basis that includes both monogenic and polygenic forms. Some distinct, rare, familial migraine subtypes are caused by pathogenic variants in genes involved in ion transport and neurotransmitter release, suggesting an underlying vulnerability of the excitatory-inhibitory balance in the brain, which might be exacerbated by disruption of homoeostasis and lead to migraine. For more prevalent migraine subtypes, genetic studies have identified many susceptibility loci, implicating genes involved in both neuronal and vascular pathways. Genetic factors can also reveal the nature of relationships between migraine and its associated biomarkers and comorbidities and could potentially be used to identify new therapeutic targets and predict treatment response.

Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Migraine-Stroke Association from 2013 to 2023

Background

Both migraine and stroke heavily burden individuals, health systems, and society. The migraine-stroke association is of concern and has been studied widely. Our objective is to explore and overview the current research status and emerging trends.

Materials and Methods

Studies on migraine-stroke association from January 2013 to May 2023 were retrieved and screened from the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) database. Records fulfilling the selection criteria were downloaded and imported into CiteSpace for data mining and visualization.

Results

A total of 862 papers on migraine-stroke association were included. Annual publications grew slowly. The United States and European countries dominated research in this area. Harvard University published the largest number of articles, while the University of London was most active with other institutions. Ayata Cenk contributed the most articles, while KURTH T and NEUROLOGY were co-cited most. Research hotspots included migraine with aura, ischemic stroke, patent foramen ovale, cortical spreading depolarization, meta-analysis, cross-sectional study, and risk factors. Pathophysiology and small vessel disease represented research frontiers and emerging trends.

Conclusion

Our study scientifically outlines the migraine-stroke association over the past decade, presenting useful information.

Genetic liability to migraine and functional outcome after ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate the association of genetic liability to migraine with functional outcome after ischemic stroke using Mendelian randomization.

METHODS

Genetic proxies for migraine were obtained from the largest genome-wide association study meta-analysis of 102,084 migraine cases and 771,257 controls. Genetic associations with functional outcome after ischemic stroke were obtained from the Genetics of Ischemic Stroke Functional Outcome network study (N = 6021). Poor functional outcome after ischemic stroke was defined as a score of 3-6 on the modified Rankin scale at 3 months (N = 2280). The inverse-variance weighted method was used to estimate the association of genetic liability to migraine with functional outcome, and we performed sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of results.

RESULTS

Genetic liability to migraine was associated with poor functional outcome after ischemic stroke (odds ratio of poor functional outcome per doubling in migraine odds 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.45, p = 0.031). This association remained directionally consistent across sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides genetic support that migraine is associated with poor functional outcome after ischemic stroke. These findings warrant further follow-up and, if replicated, may have clinical implications for post-stroke recovery.

Neurological and psychiatric comorbidities of migraine: Concepts and future perspectives

BACKGROUND

This narrative review aims to discuss several common neurological and psychiatric disorders that show comorbidity with migraine. Not only can we gain pathophysiological insights by studying these disorders, comorbidities also have important implications for treating migraine patients in clinical practice.

METHODS

A literature search on PubMed and Embase was conducted with the keywords "comorbidity", "migraine disorders", "migraine with aura", "migraine without aura", "depression", "depressive disorders", "epilepsy", "stroke", "patent foramen ovale", "sleep wake disorders", "restless legs syndrome", "genetics", "therapeutics".

RESULTS

Several common neurological and psychiatric disorders show comorbidity with migraine. Major depression and migraine show bidirectional causality and have shared genetic factors. Dysregulation of both hypothalamic and thalamic pathways have been implicated as a possibly cause. The increased risk of ischaemic stroke in migraine likely involves spreading depolarizations. Epilepsy is not only bidirectionally related to migraine, but is also co-occurring in monogenic migraine syndromes. Neuronal hyperexcitability is an important overlapping mechanism between these conditions. Hypothalamic dysfunction is suggested as the underlying mechanism for comorbidity between sleep disorders and migraine and might explain altered circadian timing in migraine.

CONCLUSION

These comorbid conditions in migraine with distinct pathophysiological mechanisms have important implications for best treatment choices and may provide clues for future approaches.

Genetics of migraine: where are we now?

Migraine is a complex brain disorder explained by the interaction of genetic and environmental factors. In monogenic migraines, including familial hemiplegic migraine and migraine with aura associated with hereditary small-vessel disorders, the identified genes code for proteins expressed in neurons, glial cells, or vessels, all of which increase susceptibility to cortical spreading depression. The study of monogenic migraines has shown that the neurovascular unit plays a prominent role in migraine. Genome-wide association studies have identified numerous susceptibility variants that each result in only a small increase in overall migraine risk. The more than 180 known variants belong to several complex networks of "pro-migraine" molecular abnormalities, which are mainly neuronal or vascular. Genetics has also highlighted the importance of shared genetic factors between migraine and its major co-morbidities, including depression and high blood pressure. Further studies are still needed to map all of the susceptibility loci for migraine and then to understand how these genomic variants lead to migraine cell phenotypes.

Migraine genetics: Status and road forward

BACKGROUND

Migraine is considered a multifactorial genetic disorder. Different platforms and methods are used to unravel the genetic basis of migraine. Initially, linkage analysis in multigenerational families followed by Sanger sequencing of protein-coding parts (exons) of genes in the genomic region shared by affected family members identified high-effect risk DNA mutations for rare Mendelian forms of migraine, foremost hemiplegic migraine. More recently, genome-wide association studies testing millions of DNA variants in large groups of patients and controls have proven successful in identifying many dozens of low-effect risk DNA variants for the more common forms of migraine with the number of associated DNA variants increasing steadily with larger sample sizes. Currently, next-generation sequencing, utilising whole exome and whole genome sequence data, and other omics data are being used to facilitate their functional interpretation and the discovery of additional risk factors. Various methods and analysis tools, such as genetic correlation and causality analysis, are used to further characterise genetic risk factors.

FINDINGS

We describe recent findings in genome-wide association studies and next-generation sequencing analysis in migraine. We show that the combined results of the two most recent and most powerful migraine genome-wide association studies have identified a total of 178 LD-independent (r² < 0.1) genome-wide significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), of which 99 were unique to Hautakangas et al., 11 were unique to Choquet et al., and 68 were identified by both studies. When considering that Choquet et al. also identified three SNPs in a female-specific genome-wide association studies then these two recent studies identified 181 independent SNPs robustly associated with migraine. Cross-trait and causal analyses are beginning to identify and characterise specific biological factors that contribute to migraine risk and its comorbid conditions.

CONCLUSION

This review provides a timely update and overview of recent genetic findings in migraine.

The relationship between major depression and migraine: A bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Background

Previous epidemiological and other studies have shown an association between major depressive disorder (MDD) and migraine. However, the causal relationship between them remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the causal relationship between MDD and migraine using a bidirectional, two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach.

Methods

Data on MDD and migraine, including subtypes with aura migraine (MA) and without aura migraine (MO), were gathered from a publicly available genome-wide association study (GWAS). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) utilized as instrumental variables (IVs) were then screened by adjusting the intensity of the connection and removing linkage disequilibrium. To explore causal effects, inverse variance weighting (IVW) was used as the primary analysis method, with weighted median, MR-Egger, simple mode, and weighted mode used as supplementary analytic methods. Furthermore, heterogeneity and pleiotropy tests were carried out. Cochran's Q-test with IVW and MR-Egger was used to assess heterogeneity. Pleiotropy testing was carried out using the MR-Egger intercept and MR-PRESSO analysis methods. A leave-one-out analysis was also used to evaluate the stability of the findings. Finally, we used migraine (MA and MO) levels to deduce reverse causality with MDD risk.

Results

Random effects IVW results were (MDD-Migraine: odds ratio (OR), 1.606, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.324-1.949, p = 1.52E-06; MDD-MA: OR, 1.400, 95%CI, 1.067-1.8378, p = 0.015; MDD-MO: OR, 1.814, 95%CI, 1.277-2.578, p = 0.0008), indicating a causal relationship between MDD levels and increased risk of migraine (including MA and MO). In the inverse MR analysis, the findings were all negative, while in sensitivity analyses, the results were robust except for the study of MA with MDD.

Conclusion

Our study confirms a causal relationship between MDD levels and increased risk of migraine, MA, and MO. There was little evidence in the reverse MR analysis to suggest a causal genetic relationship between migraine (MA and MO) and MDD risk levels.