A global survey on the attitudes of neurologists and psychiatrists about functional/psychogenic/dissociative/nonepileptic-seizures/attacks, in the search of its name

PURPOSE

We conducted an observational study to investigate the opinions of neurologists and psychiatrists all around the world who are taking care of patients with seizures [epilepsy and functional seizures (FS)].

METHODS

Practicing neurologists and psychiatrists from around the world were invited to participate in an online survey. On 29th September 2022, an e-mail including a questionnaire was sent to the members of the International Research in Epilepsy (IR-Epil) Consortium. The study was closed on 1st March 2023. The survey, conducted in English, included questions about physicians' opinions about FS and anonymously collected data.

RESULTS

In total, 1003 physicians from different regions of the world participated in the study. Both neurologists and psychiatrists identified "seizures" as their preferred term. Overall, the most preferred modifiers for "seizures" were "psychogenic" followed by "functional" by both groups. Most participants (57.9%) considered FS more difficult to treat compared to epilepsy. Both psychological and biological problems were considered as the underlying cause of FS by 61% of the respondents. Psychotherapy was considered the first treatment option for patients with FS (79.9%).

CONCLUSION

Our study represents the first large-scale attempt of investigating physicianś attitudes and opinions about a condition that is both frequent and clinically important. It shows that there is a broad spectrum of terms used by physicians to refer to FS. It also suggests that the biopsychosocial model has gained its status as a widely used framework to interpret and inform clinical practice on the management of patients.

The natural history of terms describing functional (neurological) disorders in the medical literature of the last 60 years

BACKGROUND

Functional neurological disorders (FND), a subtype of functional disorders (FD), are a frequent motive for neurology referrals. The various presentations and the unknown physiopathology of FD have led to the multiplication of terms describing these disorders over the years.

METHODS

We examined the FD-related articles published from 1960 to 2020 in PubMed and PsycINFO databases. We searched for: psychogenic, somatization, somatoform, medically unexplained symptoms, hysteria, conversion disorder, dissociative, functional neurological disorder, and functional disorder. Use rates in the title, abstract, keyword, or MeSH fields were collected over successive 5-year periods. After correcting for off-topic results, we examined proportional distribution over time, term associations, and disciplinary fields (neurology and psychiatry). Term impact was estimated via H-index and number of citations.

RESULTS

We found that none of the terms is prevailing in the recent medical literature. We observed three trends in the use rates: stability, increase, and decrease of use over time. While most of the terms were present in a stable proportion of the publications, hysteria and psychogenic lost popularity over time. We found a differential preference for terminology between disciplines. Functional neurological disorder showed the highest citation impact, yielding 10% of highly cited publications.

CONCLUSION

We found a dynamic and evolving use of the different terms describing FD in the last 60 years. Despite the tendency to use the term functional in the recent highly cited publications, its low prevalence and coexistence with several other terms suggest that a precise, explanatory and non-offensive term remains yet to be found.

Functional Neurological Disorders: Clinical Spectrum, Diagnosis, and Treatment

BACKGROUND

Functional neurological disorders (FNDs) are common but often misdiagnosed.

REVIEW SUMMARY

The incidence of FNDs is between 4 and 12 per 100,000, comparable to multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and it is the second most common diagnosis in neurology clinics. Some clues in the history are sudden onset, intermittent time course, variability of manifestation over time, childhood trauma, and history of other somatic symptoms. Anxiety and depression are common, but not necessarily more than in the general population. Although there are no tests currently capable of demonstrating whether symptoms are willfully produced, there may not be a clear categorical difference between voluntary and involuntary symptoms. The prognosis of an FND is linked to early diagnosis and symptom duration, but unfortunately, the majority of the patients are diagnosed after considerable delays.

CONCLUSIONS

A positive diagnosis of FNDs can be made on the basis of history and neurological signs without reliance on psychological stressors. Past sensitizing events and neurobiological abnormalities contribute to the pathogenesis of FNDs. Physical rehabilitation and psychological interventions alone or in combination are helpful in the treatment.

Functional seizures are not less important than epilepsy

•

People with functional seizures often suffer from psychiatric comorbidities.

•

People with FS report detrimental effects on social aspects of their lives.

•

FS are associated with a considerable direct and indirect economic burden.

•

FS have increased rates of mortality compared to healthy controls.

Functional seizures (FS) are frequently encountered in neurology clinics, often affect young adults, and have significant negative impacts on many aspects of a person’s life. In the current narrative review, we searched the literature regarding some of the consequences of FS (i.e., psychiatric comorbidities, social consequences, costs that are associated with the condition, cognitive impairment in patients with FS, the quality of life of the people with FS, and the increased risk of mortality that is associated with FS). Evidence shows that FS have significant negative consequences, comparable in their magnitude to those affecting patients with epilepsy. The clinical and scientific communities should take steps to address these consequences through clinical care and research that prioritizes, facilitates, and expedites evidence-based diagnosis and treatment for FS.

'It's both challenging and probably the most rewarding work' - A qualitative study of psychological therapy provider's experiences of working with people with dissociative seizures

Limited research exists exploring the experiences of psychological therapy providers (PTPs) working with people with dissociative seizures (DS). PTPs play a key role in the treatment of DS, yet sit at the end of a long, often ineffective process of diagnosis and waiting before treatment can commence. This qualitative study was undertaken involving 12 PTPs from specialist DS services throughout England and Scotland. Semi-structured interviews were carried out, using thematic analysis to evaluate the data. Four key themes were identified, "neurological to psychological", "putting the person with DS at the center", "treatment process", and "issues and impact of therapy with patients with DS". The findings showed that an unclear and uncomprehended diagnosis, together with waiting times had a detrimental impact on patients at the starting point of therapy. People with DS were perceived as a heterogeneous group whose treatment needed to be individualized, using the PTPs' full 'toolkit' of modalities and techniques, with a focus on improving quality of life, rather than reducing seizures. The study highlighted the complexity for PTPs of working with major but also accumulated minor traumas, compounded by the impact of DS on both PTPs and treatment. The desire of PTPs to be totally patient-focused meant that individualized treatment was considered essential and meant that participants were doubtful about the possibility of compiling an effective manual for the psychological treatment for DS.

International online survey of 1048 individuals with functional neurological disorder

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Functional neurological disorder (FND) is common, and symptoms can be severe. There have been no international large-scale studies of patient experiences of FND.

METHODS

A patient questionnaire was created to assess FND patient characteristics, symptom comorbidities and illness perceptions. Respondents were recruited internationally through an open access questionnaire via social media and patient groups over a month-long period.

RESULTS

In total, 1048 respondents from 16 countries participated. Mean age was 42 years (86% female). Median FND symptom duration was 5 years, and median time from first symptom to diagnosis was 2 years. Mean number of current symptoms (core FND and associated) was 9.9. Many respondents had associated symptoms, for example fatigue (93%), memory difficulties (80%) and headache (70%). Self-reported psychiatric comorbidities were relatively common (depression, 43%; anxiety, 51%; panic, 20%; and post-traumatic stress disorder, 22%). Most respondents reported that FND had multiple causes, including physical and psychological.

CONCLUSIONS

This large survey adds further evidence that people with FND typically have high levels of multiple symptom comorbidity with resultant distress. It also supports the notion that associated physical symptoms are of particular clinical significance in FND patients. Dualistic ideas of FND were not supported by respondents, who generally preferred to conceptualize the disorder as one at the interface of mind and brain. The need for a broad approach to this poorly served patient group is highlighted. Potential selection and response biases due to distribution of the survey online, mostly via FND patient groups, are a key limitation.

Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures in children

Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures (PNES) are a relatively common condition in children. While their clinical presentation resembles epileptic seizures, the underlying cause for PNES involves a multitude of bio-psychosocial factors. Patients may be misdiagnosed with epilepsy and subjected to unnecessary treatments, often delaying the diagnosis for years. A strong understanding of its symptomatology is essential for diagnosis of PNES. Successful management depends on effective teamwork that involves the neurologist as well as mental health professionals. This paper reviews the various aspects of PNES in children with emphasis on the clinical presentation, diagnosis as well as the underlying psychological basis and treatment.

When Mind Meets the Brain: Essentials of Well-Coordinated Management of Psychiatric Disorders in Neurological Diseases

BACKGROUND

The management of psychiatric disorders in neurological diseases (PDND) creates special challenges that cannot be adequately addressed by either psychiatry or neurology alone. However, the literature on clinician-friendly recommendations on how to coordinate neurological and psychiatric care is limited.

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review will provide practical instructions on how to efficiently integrate psychiatric and neurological care in inpatient management of PDND.

METHODS

We reviewed articles published as recently as January, 2021 in five electronic databases. We included articles that assessed human care, focused on adults, and examined how to better coordinate care between different medical specialties, particularly, between psychiatry and neurology.

RESULTS

Eighty-four manuscripts were included in this review, of which 23 (27%) discussed general principles of well-coordinated care of PDND in inpatient settings (first part of this review), and 61 (73%) were used to provide recommendations in specific neurological diseases (second part of this review).

CONCLUSIONS

General principles of well-coordinated care of PDND include recommendations for both the primary team (usually neurology) and the consulting team (psychiatry). Primary teams should delineate a specific question, establish roles, and follow up on the recommendations of the consulting team. Consultants should do their independent assessment, be organized and specific in their recommendations, and anticipate potential problems. One of the most important aspect to develop well-coordinated care is the establishment of clear, frank and, preferably oral, communication between the teams. Practical difficulties in the management of PDND include pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions as well as mutual dependency between psychiatry and neurology.

Updated Review on the Diagnosis and Primary Management of Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizure Disorders

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are paroxystic and episodic events associated with motor, sensory, mental or autonomic manifestations, which resemble epileptic seizures (ES), but are not caused by epileptogenic activity. PNES affect between 20% and 30% of patients attending at epilepsy centers and constitute a serious mental health problem. PNES are often underdiagnosed, undertreated and mistaken with epilepsy. PNES are diagnosed after medical causes (epilepsy, syncope, stroke, etc.) have been ruled out, and psychological mechanisms are involved in their genesis and perpetuation. For psychiatry, there is not a single definition for PNES; the DSM-IV and ICD-10/11 describe the conversion and dissociative disorders, and the DSM-5 describes the functional neurological disorders. However, patients with PNES also have a high frequency of other comorbidities like depression, particularly trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder. It has been postulated that PNES are essentially dissociations that operate as a defensive psychological mechanism that use the mind as a defense to deal with traumas. With the advent of VEEG in the 90s, the recognition of PNES has significantly increased, and several psychological treatments have been developed. In this manuscript, we carried out a state-of-the-art review, with the aim to provide a critical approach to the extensive literature about PNES, focusing on diagnostic aspects, the primary management, and the available treatments that have been shown to be effective for the improvement of PNES.

Epilepsy: Workup and Management in Adults

When managing epilepsy, there is a temptation to focus care with respect to the last and the next seizure. However, epilepsy is a multifaceted chronic condition and should be treated as such. Epilepsy comes with many physical risks, psychological effects, and socioeconomic ramifications, demanding a long-term commitment from the treating physician. Patients with epilepsy, compared to other chronically ill patient populations, have a worse quality of life, family function, and less social support. The majority of patients are well controlled on antiseizure drugs. However, approximately one-third will continue to have seizures despite optimized medical management. The primary aim of this article is to explore the long-term management of chronic epilepsy, and to address some of the particular needs of patients with chronic epilepsy.

An investigation into the preferred terminology for functional seizures

There is considerable debate in the literature regarding what to call functional seizures, with terms such as pseudoseizures, nonepileptic attack disorder (NEAD), and dissociative seizures being used. Provision of an accurate diagnosis and coherent explanation is a vital first step in the management of functional seizures and can result in cessation or reduced frequency for some individuals. This study investigated preferences for and offensiveness of terms used to describe functional seizures, and expectations for recovery with psychological treatment. A sample of 87 healthy adults completed an online survey, in which eight different diagnostic terms were ranked in order of preference (1 - most preferred, 8 - least preferred): functional nonepileptic attacks (FNEA), dissociative seizures, functional seizures, psychogenic seizures, NEAD, pseudoseizures, conversion disorder, and hysteria. Replicating Stone and colleagues protocol, each term was investigated for five connotations. Offense scores were calculated from the number of participants who selected 'yes' to at least one of the negative connotations ('Putting it on', 'Mad', and 'Imagining Symptoms'). Expectations about the possibility of recovering through medical or psychological treatment were also recorded. Functional nonepileptic attack was ranked the highest preferred term with dissociative seizures and functional seizures closely following. Nonepileptic attack disorder was the least offensive term, with FNEA and functional seizures joint second. Unsurprisingly, the three least preferred terms were also the most offensive: pseudoseizures, conversion disorder, and hysteria. Expectations of nonrecovery from psychological treatment were lowest for terms implicating a psychological cause: pseudoseizures, dissociative seizures, psychogenic seizures, and hysteria. The results suggest that either the terms FNEA or functional seizures should be adopted by healthcare professionals and patients, as they are the most preferred, least offensive, and expectations for nonrecovery with psychological treatment were moderate compared with the other terms. Limitations and areas for future research are discussed.

A survey of physicians' opinions about functional seizures (psychogenic nonepileptic seizures)

OBJECTIVES

Opinions of healthcare professionals may shape their attitudes towards any given condition and patient population. The aim of the current study was to gather the views of healthcare providers on some of the issues on symptomatology and terminology of functional seizures (FS).

METHODS

This was a questionnaire study that was sent to all neurologists and psychiatrists practicing in Fars province, Iran. The survey included six questions: one question about professional qualifications, one question on the participants' personal experience with the topic of interest (i.e., FS), and four questions probing their opinions about the matter of interest.

RESULTS

Of the 81 physicians approached, 69 responded (response rate: 85%; 32 psychiatrists and 37 neurologists). Physicians held varying opinions on some of the key issues (e.g., terminology, semiology, and driving permission) in this patient population. Participants were almost evenly split on how to make an advice on driving permission in these patients. Most physicians endorsed "psychogenic nonepileptic seizures" to label this condition.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights some of the challenging issues surrounding FS. Investigators should explore the pathophysiology and nature of FS and whether these patients have any difficulties with driving and other important issues in their daily lives.

Terminology for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: Making the case for "functional seizures"

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to review the literature on the terminologies for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) and make a proposal on the terminology of this condition. This proposal reflects the authors' own opinions.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE (accessed from PubMed) and EMBASE from inception to October 10, 2019 for articles written in English with a main focus on PNES (with or without discussion of other functional neurological disorders) and which either proposed or discussed the accuracy or appropriateness of PNES terminologies.

RESULTS

The search strategy reported above yielded 757 articles; 30 articles were eventually included, which were generally of low quality. "Functional seizures" (FS) appeared to be an acceptable terminology to name this condition from the perspective of patients. In addition, FS is a term that is relatively popular with clinicians.

CONCLUSION

From the available evidence, FS meets more of the criteria proposed for an acceptable label than other popular terms in the field. While the term FS is neutral with regard to etiology and pathology (particularly regarding whether psychological or not), other terms such as "dissociative", "conversion", or "psychogenic" seizures are not. In addition, FS can potentially facilitate multidisciplinary (physical and psychological) management more than other terms. Adopting a universally accepted terminology to describe this disorder could standardize our approach to the illness and facilitate communication between healthcare professionals, patients, their families, carers, and the wider public.

Early communication is key - Designing a new communication tool to immediately empower people with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

INTRODUCTION

Patient empowerment and shared decision-making has been increasingly recognized as key factors for a favorable prognosis. This is particularly true in complex brain disorders such as psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) which go along with several challenges. People with PNES (PW-PNES) often feel lost in the healthcare system. Early clear communication is one of the few favorable prognostic variables. Our goal was to design a new ultrashort user-friendly communication tool allowing immediate patient empowerment.

METHODS

We conceptualized a design thinking process with patient engagement of PW-PNES. Together with a larger group of PW-PNES, we developed a comprehensive user-friendly 1-page document summarizing the key features of PNES. We applied document engineering (DE) as a cognitive science-based new methodology. Document engineering is well established in the aviation, oil, and mining industries and measurably reduces comprehension and performance errors.

RESULTS

The design thinking process encompassed 5 phases (empathize, ideate, define, prototype, and test). A prototype of a 1-page document, the 1-Pager-PNES, was created which contained the essential 7 domains organized in a simple structure such as a promise-question-answer (PQA) format. Information was kept poignant, complete, easy-to-read integrating cognitive principles to optimize navigation. The prototype "1-Pager-PNES" was subsequently tested in a 7-member focus group. All patients expressed significant improvement in understanding their disease and felt immediately empowered. Implementing their specific feedbacks, reiterative testing, and involving PNES experts resulted in the final version of the "1-Pager-PNES".

CONCLUSION

A promising new communication tool reduced to 1-page only is introduced which improves patient guidance and enables better coping mechanisms with this complex disease. The patient/user is empowered quickly through finding answers to pressing questions. Our study is unique for three reasons: 1) it engaged patients in the developing process, 2) it produced a tool for immediate communication for PW-PNES, which follows principles of human behavior and cognitive science, and 3) it used cross-industry thinking. Despite all limitations, we consider our small pilot study an inspiration for future studies with focus on patient empowerment through user-friendly documents.

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures publications in PubMed: Geographical distribution of the publications

PURPOSE

The aim of the current study was to depict a comprehensive geographical picture of the existing literature on psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) and to highlight the needs for future works.

METHODS

We searched the electronic database PubMed on June 8, 2019 for articles that included any of the related key words to analyze all the relevant literature. We applied the advance search; field was adjusted to the title and dates were adjusted to 01/01/2000 until 06/08/2019. We selected the relevant articles. Location of the study was determined according to the affiliation(s) of the authors.

RESULTS

1017 papers were included. Interest in research and publication on PNES has risen over the past two decades. Six hundred and nine full length research original papers and 199 review articles were published on PubMed from 2000 until 2019. Continent-wise, most articles were from North America and Europe (41.1% of the whole publications from Europe and 40.8% from North America; 833 papers totally), followed by Asia (92 papers), Oceania (36 papers) and South America (31 publications), while only 0.9% of the papers (9 papers) were from Africa.

CONCLUSION

A global campaign is necessary to inform and educate the world on the issue of PNES and its significance. While PNES merit further epidemiological investigations, there is a significant disparity with regard to the location of the studies. There is a huge need to invest more on studies on various aspects of PNES in many places in the world, including African nations, India, and China.

Pins and PNES: Systematic content analysis of Pinterest for information on psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES)

Pinterest is a visual search based, the fourth largest social networking site in the U.S. with 81% of its users being women. Because of Pinterest's popularity and the high incidence of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) among women, the aim of our current study was to perform a thorough content analysis of information available about PNES on Pinterest. The systematic search of Pinterest using various PNES related keywords revealed 57 unique pins. This was followed by content analysis by two independent reviewers. Most (87.7%) pins included in the final analysis reported at least one factor indicative of PNES. Most common were the consistent association of PNES with emotional triggers (61.4%), history of current or remote abuse (57.9%), and seizure's unresponsiveness to antiepileptic drugs (38.6%). Semiology of PNES was reported in 77.2% pins and two-thirds (66.6%) mentioned diagnostic procedures. Psychogenic nonepileptic seizure treatment and prognosis were reported in 68.4% and 56.1% pins, respectively. Around one-third of pins were from academic resources. More than 80% of pins targeted lay people with the primary aim of education and awareness and used a neutral or positive tone. To our knowledge, even though most pins have scientifically sound information, this widely popular web-based resource seems to be underutilized by academia, healthcare workers, and stakeholders for the dissemination of awareness about PNES.

Nonepileptic Episodic Events

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review addresses the scope, evaluation, treatments, and outcomes of patients with nonepileptic episodic events with a focus on psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Differentiation of the types of events, including a review of terminology, is included, as well as a brief review of special patient populations with these disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are continued efforts to develop tools to improve the diagnosis of these disorders. A thorough evaluation with trained personnel and physicians knowledgeable in the assessment and treatment of these disorders is important. Although inpatient video-EEG monitoring in an epilepsy monitoring unit remains the gold standard for diagnosis, the assessment of clinical and historical factors is critical and can be useful in expediting the process and improving diagnostic certainty. International efforts have recently assisted in providing guidelines for the evaluation of the psychogenic disorders and may help target educational and other resources to underserved areas.

SUMMARY

The prompt and accurate diagnosis of nonepileptic episodic events and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures is possible with current technology, and the appropriate and targeted use of evidence-based treatments may help improve patient quality of life and avoid unnecessary disability in patients with these disorders.

Research on dissociative seizures: A bibliometric analysis and visualization of the scientific landscape

Dissociative seizures are a common and often elusive differential diagnosis in epilepsy centers. Considering their high prevalence, long diagnostic delays, and disappointing rates of treatment response, scientific research dedicated to dissociative seizures is surprisingly scarce. In order to chart the scientific landscape of dissociative seizures and to visualize thematic clusters and trends in research, a comprehensive bibliometric analysis was performed. The Web of Science database was examined to identify relevant English language documents from the last half-century. A total of 1751 documents with titles referring to dissociative seizures were identified. Automated textual analysis of all titles and abstracts revealed that research clusters around three major topics: differential diagnosis in epilepsy centers, management and treatment, and psychopathology. Time analysis of term networks revealed that the focus of clinical research has moved from diagnostic procedures to treatment approaches. Furthermore, interest within etiological research is shifting from an emphasis on early life trauma and personality traits to the role of anxiety and emotion regulation. With respect to individual contributing authors, a relatively small network of prolific scientists with a remarkable degree of collaboration emerges. By mapping relevant publications, it becomes evident that dissociative seizures still represent a subject mostly within the realm of neurology and epileptology, with a tendency to settle in the latter domain. This analysis sheds light on an important niche subject and highlights trends in research focus and output.

An Overview of Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures: Etiology, Diagnosis and Management

The purpose of this review is to provide an update of the research regarding the etiology, diagnosis and management of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES). A literature search using Pubmed, Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE database was performed from 2000 up to August 2017. We have evaluated the different factors leading to PNES as well as the diagnostic approach and management of this disorder which continue to be very difficult. The coexistence of epilepsy and PNES poses special challenges and requires the coordinated efforts of the family physicians, psychiatrists, psychologists and neurologists. Although this condition has an overall poor prognosis, a multidisciplinary approach in the diagnosis and management of this disorder would likely improve the outcomes. We have proposed a diagnostic and treatment algorithm for PNES and suggested a national registry of patients suffering from this condition. The registry would contain data regarding treatment and outcomes to aid in the understanding of this entity.

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: a concise review

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are commonly diagnosed and treated at epilepsy centers; however, their neurobiology is still poorly understood. Diagnosis relies on a multidisciplinary evaluation and is usually based on different combinations of data. They are diagnosed most reliably by recording a seizure while under video-EEG monitoring. Treatment includes multiple phases. Fewer than 40% of adults with PNES are expected to become seizure-free within 5 years after diagnosis. This article presents a concise review of the current literature about the definition, diagnosis, epidemiology, clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of PNES.

Psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) on the Internet: Online representation of the disorder and frequency of search terms

PURPOSE

The nature of the symptoms associated with PNES require a multidisciplinary health team. There are too few professionals with an adequate understanding of PNES and therefore many are not able to provide patients with necessary information. In the age of the internet, it is not surprising that patients or caregivers might look for answers online. The purpose of this project was to investigate the online representation of PNES and search frequency for PNES and its associated terms.

METHODS

To determine online representation, searches of: Google®, twitter®, YouTube®, and Instagram® for "PNES" and associated terms were conducted. Websites, tweets, and films were classified by host and exclusivity of information. PNES and associated terms search frequency was determined through Google Trends®.

RESULTS

Professional and patient sites exclusively about PNES were outnumbered by sites that only mentioned PNES in fewer than three posts. Patients tended to favor less traditional hosting options than did professionals. On twitter®, different keyword preferences were identified for professionals and patients. On YouTube® there was a substantial selection of videos of which 22 were professionally produced. Google Trends®, revealed the terms most commonly used to search for this topic were in order: (1) "PNES;" (2) "NEAD;" and (3) "pseudoseizure."

CONCLUSION

A variety of professional and patient internet content about PNES can be found online. Professional sites offered accurate and empirically-validated information on the disorder and tended to use traditional hosting options. Future professional initiatives might consider novel hosting options and higher-frequency terms to reach their audience more effectively.

Nonepileptic seizures in the pediatric population: A qualitative study of patient and family experiences

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to characterize the experience of nonepileptic seizures (NES) in young people (0-19years) and their families, referred to a UK specialist (tertiary) pediatric hospital. The topics investigated include: accessing healthcare, how the diagnosis was first explained, impact on home life and school, coping strategies, and ideas about naming and causes.

METHODS

Ten young people with NES and 29 family members took part in focus groups and telephone interviews. The data generated were analyzed qualitatively with thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Six themes were identified from participant experiences: upset and afraid, missing out, feeling misunderstood, confusion and uncertainty, less than epilepsy, and making sense and moving on. Participants described severe disruption to multiple domains of functioning at home, educationally, and in social activities. Young people felt guilty but also overprotected, while family members felt that they were failing as parents. The journey to diagnosis and treatment was seen as unnecessarily tortuous, with access to care and treatment pathways poorly defined. Participants described feeling that a wide variety of professionals did not believe their experiences, showed pejorative attitudes, and left them feeling isolated and marginalized. The young people and family members found NES a difficult disorder to understand and sometimes could not differentiate it from epilepsy. Epilepsy was used as a benchmark for several comparisons, including highlighting the lack of support for and information about NES. Families disliked being told that it was "good news" that their child did not have epilepsy and questioned if their child should be present during initial diagnostic discussions. Participants described stressful situations as a common trigger for NES. Young people showed ambivalence towards the need to understand the condition or the choice of name used for it, whereas family members considered this crucial for achieving recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Young people and families who live with NES experience considerable distress and impairment. Pathways to diagnosis need to be streamlined, and better integration of pediatric, mental health, and educational services is required. The use of the "good news" story to discuss the diagnosis with families should be reconsidered, as families seem to interpret this as indicating that there is no effective treatment. Educational resources and support groups for young people and families are needed. Greater understanding of experiences may allow investigation of the pathogenic mechanism and inform possible management approaches. Training of health professionals in communicating with young people and families with NES must be improved.

Psychiatric comorbidity in psychogenic nonepileptic seizures compared with epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNESs) are closely linked with psychological distress, but their etiology is not well-understood. We reviewed psychiatric comorbidity in PNESs and epileptic seizures (ESs) with an aim to assist understanding, diagnosis, and management of PNESs.

METHODS

A search of Web of Science, MEDLINE (PubMed), PsycINFO, and Scopus identified 32 relevant studies on the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity in PNESs. We used meta-analysis to compare psychiatric comorbidity between PNESs and ESs.

RESULTS

Samples with PNESs had high rates of psychiatric comorbidity overall (53-100%), notably including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and personality and anxiety disorders. Compared with ESs, samples with PNESs had more psychiatric comorbidity overall (RR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.14-1.48, p<0.0001) with significantly elevated risks found for PTSD, personality disorder, and anxiety but not depression.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychiatric disorders are more common in PNESs than ESs. Because of methodological limitations of available studies, causality cannot be established; prospective longitudinal designs are required.

A Therapeutic Approach to Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures

OPINION STATEMENT

The diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) is usually made in the seizure monitoring unit (SMU; also commonly named the epilepsy monitoring unit) after PNES are recorded on video-EEG. The diagnosis should be discussed with the patient thoroughly. The discussion should focus on how the diagnosis was reached and that the diagnosis is real and treatable. When the diagnosis is communicated well, some patients may improve significantly without further interventions. Next, a psychiatric evaluation should be completed, ideally before discharge from the SMU. After discharge, the patient should undergo cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), the only treatment for PNES that is supported by high-quality evidence. Other therapies, including psychodynamic therapy and different types of group therapy can be considered in some patients, although high-level evidence to support their use is lacking. Some patients may benefit from selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), especially when psychiatric comorbidities are present. This should be considered on a case-by-case basis.