Gamma Knife radiosurgery for hypothalamic hamartoma preserves endocrine functions

Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Hypothalamic Hamartoma: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study on Safety, Efficacy, and Complication Profile

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is a safe and effective treatment option for hypothalamic hamartomas (HH), but there is no consensus opinion on its timing, dosage, and follow-up. The aim of this study was to define the safety, efficacy, outcome, and complication profile of GKRS in this patient population.

METHODS

This retrospective multicentric study involved 39 patients with the mean age of 16 ± 14.84 years. Early seizures resulted in an earlier age of diagnosis in 97% of patients. At baseline, no endocrine abnormalities were seen in 75% of patients while 18.9% showed precocious puberty (PP). The median target volume was 0.55 cc (0.1-10.00 cc), and a median margin dose of 16 Gy (8.1-20.0 Gy) was delivered in a single session. All patients were evaluated for clinical, endocrinological, and radiological outcomes.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 5 (0.1-15) years. The median target volume of the cohort was 0.55 (0.35-1.77) cc. The largest HH was of 10 cc. 24/39 (61.5%) were small HH (Regis I-III). At presentation, 94.8% patients suffered from seizures (87.18% with gelastic seizures). 7/39 patients (17.9%) were presented with both PP and epilepsy. Only one (2.6%) patient presented with PP alone. 29 patients had more than 3-year follow-up. All received ≥16 Gy targeting complete HH. 28% of patients showed regression in HH volume. Patients with Regis grade I-III and longer follow-up (>75 months) showed gradual improvement in seizures. 16/29 patients (55.2%) achieved good seizure control (Engel I/II) while 13 (44.8%) were in Engel III/IV status. Nine patients needed adjuvant treatment because of poor seizure control. Eight patients suffered from transient increase in seizures. One patient developed poikilothermia, and 2 patients developed new onset hormonal deficiency.

CONCLUSION

GKRS is a safe and effective modality for treatment of HH with significant improvement in seizure control with minimal disruption of endocrine profile. It provides an excellent safety, efficacy, and complication profile, especially for small HH. Latency of results and its adjuvant nature remain the areas of research and breakthroughs among contemporary treatment options.

Epileptic encephalopathies secondary to hypothalamic hamartomas treated with radiosurgery: A case series

OBJECTIVE

Hypothalamic hamartomas are congenital lesions that typically present with gelastic seizures, refractory epilepsy, neurodevelopmental delay, and severe cognitive impairment. Surgical procedures have been reported to be effective in removing the hamartomas, however, they are associated with significant morbidity. Therefore, it is not considered a safe therapeutic modality. Image-guided robotic radiosurgery (CyberKnife® Radiosurgery System) has been shown to provide good outcomes without lasting complications.

METHODS

This series of cases describes the clinical, radiological, radiotherapeutic, and postsurgical outcomes of five patients with epileptic encephalopathies secondary to hypothalamic hamartomas who were treated with CyberKnife®.

RESULTS

All patients exhibited refractory epilepsy with gelastic seizures and were unsuitable candidates for surgical resection The prescribed dose ranged between 16 and 25 Gy, delivered in a single fraction for four patients and five fractions for one patient while adhering strictly to visual pathway constraints. After radiosurgery, four patients maintained seizure control (one with an Engel class Ia, three with an Engel class 1d), and another presented sporadic, nondisabling gelastic seizures (with an Engel class IIa). After 24-26 months of follow-up, in three patients, their intelligence quotient scores increased. No complications were reported.

SIGNIFICANCE

This report suggests that Cyberknife may be a good option for treating hypothalamic hamartoma, particularly in cases where other noninvasive alternatives are unavailable. Nevertheless, additional studies are essential in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the technique in these cases.

Minimally Invasive Destructive, Ablative, and Disconnective Epilepsy Surgery

Conventional epilepsy surgery performed by microsurgical dissection typically requires large cranial working windows created with high-speed drills and lengthy incisions. In the past few decades, minimally invasive techniques have been developed with smaller incisions, comparable efficacy, shorter hospitalizations, and better safety profiles. These minimally invasive alternatives utilize stereotactic, ultrasonic, radiotherapeutic, and endoscopic techniques. Although not able to completely replace conventional surgery for all etiologies of epilepsy, these minimally invasive techniques have revolutionized modern epilepsy surgery and have been an invaluable asset to the neurosurgeon's repertoire. The endoscope has allowed for surgeons to have adequate visualization during resective and disconnective epilepsy surgeries using keyhole or miniature craniotomies. Modern stereotactic techniques such as laser interstitial thermal therapy and radiofrequency ablation can be used as viable alternatives for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy and can destroy lesional tissue deep areas without the approach-related morbidity of microsurgery such as with hypothalamic hamartomas. These stereotactic techniques do not preclude future surgery in the settings of treatment failure and have been used successfully after failed conventional surgery. Multiple ablation corridors can be performed in a single procedure that can be used for lesioning of large targets or to simplify treating multifocal epilepsies. These stereotactic techniques have even been used successfully to perform disconnective procedures such as hemispherotomies and corpus callosotomies. In patients unable to tolerate surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery is a minimally invasive option that can result in improved seizure control with minimal procedural risks. Advances in minimally invasive neurosurgery provide viable treatment options for drug-resistant epilepsy with quicker recovery, less injury to functional brain, and for patients that may otherwise not choose conventional surgery.

Stereotactic radiosurgery as the initial management option for small-volume hypothalamic hamartomas with intractable epilepsy: a 35-year institutional experience and systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Young patients with hypothalamic hamartomas (HHs) often present with intractable epilepsy. Currently there are no established management guidelines for HH. The authors retrospectively reviewed their single-institution experience to delineate the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

METHODS

Seven patients with HHs (4 females; median age 13.7 years, range 2.5-25 years) with no prior resection underwent SRS between 1987 and 2022. The clinical history, epilepsy profile, radiographic findings, and neurological outcomes were characterized. HH topographical types were classified according to the Régis classification. Outcome measures included Engel seizure classification, HH response, and the need for additional surgical interventions.

RESULTS

All patients had Engel class IV epilepsy. A Leksell Gamma Knife was used to deliver a median margin dose of 18 Gy (range 16-20 Gy) to a median hamartoma volume of 0.37 cm3 (range 0.20-0.89 cm3). Seizure reduction was confirmed in 6 patients, and 2 patients had regression of their hamartoma. Two patients underwent resection and/or laser interstitial thermal therapy after SRS. At follow-up, 1 patient was seizure free, 4 patients achieved Engel class II, 1 patient had Engel class III, and 1 patient had Engel class IV seizure outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

SRS as the initial management option for HH was associated with a low risk of adverse effects. In this institutional series reviewing small-volume HHs treated with SRS, no adverse radiation effect was detected, and the majority of patients experienced seizure reduction. SRS should be considered as the first-line treatment for seizure control in patients with small-volume HHs.

Safety and Efficacy of Primary Hypofractionated Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Giant Hypothalamic Hamartoma

OBJECTIVE

To describe the feasibility, safety, efficacy, and complication profile of primary hypofractionated gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS), and practical nuances of performing the same in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Three pediatric patients (age range 17-65 mo) underwent primary hypofractionated GKRS in 2-3 consecutive days with interfraction interval of 24 h. All patients had precocious puberty and were on GnRH analogue. Frame based GKRS done with 8.1-9.2 Gy radiation per fraction at 50% isodose in 2-3 fractions targeting the entire hamartoma volume. The mean target volume was 5.67 cc (4.45-7.39 cc). The authors followed these patients for clinical and endocrinological assessment at every 6 mo interval while the repeat MRI done at 6 mo and then annually. The seizure outcome analysis was done using Engel scale.

RESULTS

At a mean follow up of 27 mo (24-30 mo), 2 patients became Engel class 3 while one achieved Engel class 1 control. 2 patients showed halted pubertal growth with no additional hormonal aberration. 2 patients showed significant volumetric reduction (48% and 32%) and patchy necrosis inside the hypothalamic hamartoma (HH). There was no deficit in visual function, memory and cognition. One patient showed reduction in aggressiveness.

CONCLUSION

Giant HH are exceptionally difficult neurological diseases. Primary hypofractionated GKRS may be an alternative approach as mono/multitherapy with promising results and minimal complication.

Is surgery effective for treating hypothalamic hamartoma causing isolated central precocious puberty? A systematic review

The aim of this review was to determine the role of surgery in treating hypothalamic hamartoma (HH) causing isolated central precocious puberty (CPP). Literature review was done according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Patients with isolated CPP due to HH, managed with surgical resection, were included. We found 33 studies, reporting 103 patients (76 pedunculated, 27 sessile). Patients were considered "cured" if the symptoms of PP had regressed and the hormone profile had normalized after surgery. Indications for surgery included hamartoma deemed surgically resectable (n-12), for the purpose of tissue diagnosis (n-3), partial response/failure of preoperative therapy (n-9), and unable to afford/to avoid long-term medical therapy (n-7). The extent of resection was total (TR) (n-39), near total/subtotal (NTR/STR) (n-20), partial (PR) (n-35), or unspecified (n-9). On follow-up (range: 3 months-16 years), 73.6% (56/76) of patients with pedunculated HH were cured, while 17.1% (13/76) had partial relief. Only 3/27 (11.1%) of patients with sessile HH were cured. All patients with a pedunculated hamartoma who underwent TR (n=36) improved, with 88.88% cured of the symptoms. Surgery had no effect in 17/23 (73.9%) patients with sessile HH who underwent PR. Psychological symptoms improved in 10/11 patients. There was no mortality. Permanent complications, in the form of 3rd nerve palsy, occurred in 3.7% (2/54) of the patients. To conclude, in the current era of availability of GnRH analogs, surgical resection in a subset of patients may be acceptable especially for small pedunculated hamartomas.

Surgical treatment of hypothalamic hamartomas

Hypothalamic hamartomas are aberrant masses, composed of abnormally distributed neurons and glia. Along endocrine and cognitive symptoms, they may cause epileptic seizures, including the specific gelastic and dacrystic seizures. Surgery is the treatment of drug-resistant hamartoma epilepsy, with associated positive results on endocrine, psychiatric, and cognitive symptoms. Recently, alternatives to open microsurgical treatment have been proposed. We review these techniques and compare their efficacy and safety. Open resection or disconnection of the hamartoma, either through pterional, transcallosal, or transventricular approach, leads to good epileptological control, but its high complication rate, up to 30%, limits its indications. The purely cisternal peduncular forms remain the only indication of open, pterional approach, while other strategies have been developed to overcome the neurological, endocrine, behavioral, or cognitive complications. Laser and radiofrequency thermocoagulation-based disconnection through robot-guided stereo-endoscopy has been proposed as an alternative to open microsurgical resection and stereotactic destruction. The goal is to allow safe and complete disconnection of a possibly complex attachment zone, through a single intraparenchymal trajectory which allows multiple laser or radiofrequency probe trajectory inside the ventricle. The efficacy was high, with 78% of favorable outcome, and the overall complication rate was 8%. It was especially effective in patients with isolated gelastic seizures and pure intraventricular hamartomas. Stereotactic radiosurgery has proved as efficacious and safer than open microsurgery, with around 60% of seizure control and a very low complication rate. Multiple stereotactic thermocoagulation showed very interesting results with 71% of seizure freedom and 2% of permanent complications. Stereotactic laser interstitial thermotherapy (LiTT) seems as effective as open microsurgery (from 76 to 81% of seizure freedom) but causes up to 20% of permanent complications. This technique has however been highly improved by targeting only the epileptogenic onset zone in the hamartoma, as shown on preoperative functional MRI, leading to an improvement of epilepsy control by 45% (92% of seizure freedom) with no postoperative morbidity. All these results suggest that the impact of the surgical procedure does not depend on purely technical matters (laser vs radiofrequency thermocoagulation or stereotactic vs robot-guided stereo-endoscopy) but relies on the understanding of the epileptic network, including inside the hamartoma, the aim being to plan an effective disconnection or lesion of the epileptogenic part while sparing the adjacent functional structures.

Hypothalamic hamartomas in adulthood: Clinical spectrum and treatment outcome-A unicenter experience

INTRODUCTION

Clinical manifestations of the hypothalamic hamartoma-epilepsy syndrome (HH-ES) in adulthood are variable. Efficacy of therapeutic options and outcome are diverse.

METHODS

Retrospective study of adult patients diagnosed with a HH in magnetic resonance imaging and epilepsy who attended our tertiary Epilepsy Unit between 2003 and 2018. We report the clinical and electroencephalographic features of a series of adult patients with HH and related epilepsy seen in our center together with the treatments and seizure outcome.

RESULTS

We describe a series of eight patients. Five males (62.5%), median age at evaluation was 28.5 years (IQR: 15.5). Clinical manifestations included focal with preserved and impaired awareness emotional seizures (gelastic seizures [GS]) in six patients (75%), focal tonic, atonic with impaired awareness and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. Mild GS were the only symptom in one patient. Three patients (37.5%) had endocrinological disturbances such as obesity and hypothyroidism. Fifty percent of the patients showed psychiatric comorbidity such as anxiety disorder and aggressiveness, and two patients had psychomotor delay. Seven patients (87.7%) had drug-resistant seizures and three of them were treated with radiosurgery. Out of the treated group, only one (33.3%) became seizure-free 2 years after surgery but developed psychiatric problems. The other two patients had an Engel IV outcome and received a vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) implant. VNS did not lead to changes either in intensity nor in seizure frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypothalamic hamartoma-epilepsy syndrome clinical manifestations in adult patients are as variable as at pediatric age. Outcome of therapeutic options such as radiosurgery or VNS may be poorer at this stage.