Prevalence and outcome of late-onset seizures due to autoimmune etiology: A prospective observational population-based cohort study

Clinical and paraclinical features of first unprovoked seizures in the elderly

PURPOSE

The prevalence of unprovoked seizures and epilepsy rises significantly in later life stages. This study examines various factors in elderly patients (over 65 years) with their first unprovoked seizures, comparing findings with younger patients.

METHODS

We analyzed electronic medical records of individuals with first unprovoked seizures retrospectively. Diagnosis was based on patient history and witness accounts, and exclusion of other potential causes. Data included demographics, physical examination, seizure characteristics, neuroimaging, EEG findings, laboratory markers, potential causes, prescribed anti-seizure medications (ASMs) at diagnosis and follow-up, seizure-related injuries and hospital stay length.

RESULTS

We enrolled 391 patients (mean age 73.02 ± 16.5, 219 females). Most had late-onset (≥65 years) seizures (n = 295, 75.5 %). Status epilepticus was diagnosed in 10.2 %, more in the late-onset group. Elderly patients most often had focal seizures with impaired consciousness, while younger patients had focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. (55.9 % vs 36.5 %). Late-onset seizures were linked to cerebrovascular diseases, small vessel disease, and cerebral atrophy, while early-onset cases were associated with brain tumors or unknown causes. Brain imaging revealed potentially epileptogenic abnormalities in 59.1 %. Positive paraneoplastic or autoimmune antibodies were found in 0.8 %. Abnormal EEGs were present in 25.9 %, more in the late-onset group. Most patients were discharged with levetiracetam (LEV) or lamotrigine (LTG) monotherapy. Nine patients with late-onset seizures died during in-hospital follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our findings can contribute to the improved identification and characterization of patients with late-onset seizures, facilitating targeted diagnostics and appropriate treatment in this challenging patient population.

Neurological autoantibody prevalence in chronic epilepsy: Clinical and neuropathologic findings

BACKGROUND

We aimed to explore the prevalence of autoimmune antibodies (Abs) in a large consecutive series with "chronic" epilepsy and without symptoms of autoimmune encephalitis; and to compare the immunopathology of brain tissue from drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) with and without Abs positivity.

METHODS

Neuronal and glial antibodies were detected in the serum of patients who were admitted to the wards of West China Hospital from October 2016 to September 2019 and had epilepsy by cell-based assays and tissue-based assays.

RESULTS

Twenty-one (6.8 %) of 328 patients had positive Ab findings for the following: dipeptidyl-peptidase-like protein-6 (n = 7), contactin-associated protein-like 2 (n = 5), glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (n = 4), gamma aminobutyric acid beta receptor (n = 2), N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (n = 2), and dopamine D2 receptor (n = 1). Antibodies were detected in 6.9 % (13/187) of epilepsy people with unknown etiology and 5.6 % (8/141) of patients with known etiology, respectively. Among 190 patients with DRE, 14 (7.3 %) patients were Abs-positive. There was no significant difference between individuals with seropositive and seronegative results in clinical manifestations, except that the history of febrile seizure was significantly more frequent in the seropositive group. Moreover, brain samples from 3 patients with Abs-positive DRE (with DPPX in 2 patients, and CASPR2 in 1 patient) and 18 patients with Abs-negative DRE were analyzed for immunopathology. We found higher expression of CD8-positive T-cells in the hippocampus of Abs-positive DRE group.

CONCLUSIONS

Neuronal antibodies are potentially involved in the process of "chronic" epilepsy, and CD8-positive T-cells may play an important role in this process.

Anticonvulsive treatment in autoimmune encephalitis: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Epileptic seizures are a common manifestation of autoimmune encephalitis (AIE). Immunosuppression (IT) is an efficient therapeutic approach, particularly in AIE associated with antibodies against extracellular structures. The role of antiseizure medication (ASM) is less clear. However, it may be beneficial in disease refractory to IT or in chronic post-AIE epilepsy.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review assessing the PubMed and Cochrane databases to identify all reports on patients with epileptic seizures due to AIE in whom ASM was used and report it according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards. We included case series (minimum 3 eligible patients), retrospective and prospective observational studies, and randomized controlled trials. The main outcome assessed was therapeutic efficacy of ASM. Secondary outcomes comprise number, type, and adverse effects of ASM. Descriptive statistics were used. The level of evidence was assessed according to the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.

RESULTS

We screened a total of 3371 studies and included 30 (7 prospective, 23 retrospective). The reports cover a total of 708 patients, the majority (72.5%) suffering from AIE with antibodies against extracellular structures. Type of AIE, seizure frequency, and number and type of ASM used were heterogenous. While most patients profited from IT and/or ASM, the effect of ASM could rarely be isolated. Nine studies report on patients who received ASM monotherapy or were on ASM for a relevant length of time before IT initiation or after IT failure. One study reports a significant association between seizure freedom and use of sodium channel inhibitors. However, levels of evidence were generally low.

CONCLUSION

Few robust data exist on the particular efficacy of ASM in autoimmune epileptic seizures. While these patients generally seem to respond less well to ASM or surgical interventions, sodium channel blockers may have an additional benefit compared to other substances. However, levels of evidence are low and early IT remains the mainstay of AIE therapy. Future trials should address optimal ASM selection and dosing in AIE.

Overview of treatment strategies in paraneoplastic neurological syndromes

Treatment strategies in paraneoplastic neurological syndromes rely on the three pillars of tumor treatment, immunotherapy, and symptomatic treatment, the first one being by far the most important in the majority of patients and syndromes. Classically, antibodies against extracellular antigens are directly pathogenic, and patients with these syndromes are more responsive to immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive treatments than the ones with antibodies against intracellular targets. This chapter first discusses some general principles of tumor treatment and immunotherapy, followed by a closer look at specific treatment options for different clinical syndromes, focusing on symptomatic treatments.

Seizures, Epilepsy, and NORSE Secondary to Autoimmune Encephalitis: A Practical Guide for Clinicians

The most recent International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) classification has included "immune etiology" along with other well-known causes of epilepsy. This was possible thanks to the progress in detection of pathogenic neural antibodies (Abs) in a subset of patients, and resulted in an increased interest in identifying potentially treatable causes of otherwise refractory seizures. Most autoimmune encephalitides (AE) present with seizures, but only a minority of cases evolve to long-term epilepsy. The risk of epilepsy is higher for patients harboring Abs targeting intracellular antigens (T cell-mediated and mostly paraneoplastic, such as Hu, CV2/CRMP5, Ma2, GAD65 Abs), compared with patients with neuronal surface Abs (antibody-mediated and less frequently paraneoplastic, such as NMDAR, GABAbR, LGI1, CASPR2 Abs). To consider these aspects, conceptual definitions for two entities were provided: acute symptomatic seizures secondary to AE, and autoimmune-associated epilepsy, which reflect the different pathophysiology and prognoses. Through this manuscript, we provide an up-to-date review on the current state of knowledge concerning diagnosis and management of patients with Ab-mediated encephalitis and associated epilepsy. Special emphasis is placed on clinical aspects, such as brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specificities, electroencephalographic (EEG) findings, cancer screening and suggestions for a rational therapeutic approach.

Limbic encephalitis

Limbic encephalitis (LE) is a clinical syndrome defined by subacutely evolving limbic signs and symptoms with structural and functional evidence of mediotemporal damage in the absence of a better explanation than an autoimmune (or paraneoplastic) cause. There are features common to all forms of LE. In recent years, antibody(ab)-defined subtypes have been established. They are distinct regarding underlying pathophysiologic processes, clinical and magnetic resonance imaging courses, cerebrospinal fluid signatures, treatment responsivity, and likelihood of a chronic course. With immunotherapy, LE with abs against surface antigens has a better outcome than LE with abs to intracellular antigens. Diagnostic and treatment challenges are, on the one hand, to avoid overlooking and undertreatment and, on the other hand, to avoid overdiagnoses and overtreatment. LE can be conceptualized as a model disease for the consequences of new onset mediotemporal damage by different mechanisms in adult life. It may be studied as an example of mediotemporal epileptogenesis.

Diagnostic challenges in patients with temporal lobe seizures and features of autoimmune limbic encephalitis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Consensus criteria for autoimmune limbic encephalitis (ALE) allow for a diagnosis even without neuronal antibodies (Abs), but it remains unclear which clinical features should prompt neuronal Ab screening in temporal lobe epilepsy patients. The aim of the study was to investigate whether patients with temporal lobe seizures associated with additional symptoms or signs of limbic involvement may harbor neuronal Abs, and which clinical features should prompt neuronal Ab screening in these patients.

METHODS

We identified 47 patients from a tertiary epilepsy center with mediotemporal lobe seizures and additional features suggestive of limbic involvement, including either memory deficits, psychiatric symptoms, mediotemporal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) hyperintensities or inflammatory cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Neuronal Ab testing was carried out at two independent reference laboratories (Bielefeld-Bethel, Germany, and Barcelona, Spain). All brain MRI scans were assessed by two reviewers independently.

RESULTS

Temporal lobe seizures were accompanied by memory deficits in 35/46 (76%), psychiatric symptoms in 27/42 (64%), and both in 19/42 patients (45%). Limbic T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery signal hyperintensities were found in 26/46 patients (57%; unilateral: n = 22, bilateral: n = 4). Standard CSF studies were abnormal in 2/37 patients (5%). Neuronal Abs were confirmed in serum and/or CSF in 8/47 patients (17%) and were directed against neuronal cell-surface targets (leucine-rich glioma inactivated protein 1: n = 1, contactin-associated protein-2: n = 1, undetermined target: n = 3) or glutamic acid decarboxylase in its 65-kD isoform (n = 3, all with high titers). Compared to Ab-negative patients, those who harbored neuronal Abs were more likely to have uni- or bilateral mediotemporal MRI changes (8/8, 100% vs. 18/38, 47%; p = 0.01, Fisher's exact test).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with temporal lobe seizures and additional limbic signs, 17% had neuronal Abs affirming ALE diagnosis. Mediotemporal MRI changes were found in all Ab-positive cases and had a positive likelihood ratio of 2.11 (95% confidence interval 1.51-2.95).

Autoimmune Encephalitis in Late-Onset Seizures: When to Suspect and How to Treat

Objective: This study was conducted to elucidate prevalence, clinical features, outcomes, and best treatment in patients with late-onset seizures due to autoimmune encephalitis (AE). Methods: This is a single-institution prospective cohort study (2012-2019) conducted at the Epilepsy Center at the University of Greifswald, Germany. A total of 225 patients aged ≥50 years with epileptic seizures were enrolled and underwent an MRI/CT scan, profiling of neural antibodies (AB) in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and neuropsychological testing. On the basis of their work-up, patients were categorized into the following three cohorts: definite, suspected, or no AE. Patients with definite and suspected AE were subsequently treated with immunosuppressive therapy (IT) and/or anti-seizure drug (ASD) therapy and were followed up (FU) regarding clinical and seizure outcome. Results: Of the 225 patients, 17 (8%) fulfilled the criteria for definite or suspected AE according to their AB profile and MRI results. Compared with patients with no evidence of AE, those with AE were younger (p = 0.028), had mesial temporal neuropsychological deficits (p = 0.001), frequently had an active or known malignancy (p = 0.006) and/or a pleocytosis (p = 0.0002), and/or had oligoclonal bands in CSF (p = 0.001). All patients with follow-up became seizure-free with at least one ASD. The Modified Rankin scale (mRS) at hospital admission was low for patients with AE (71% with mRS ≤2) and further decreased to 60% with mRS ≤2 at last FU. Significance: AE is an important etiology in late-onset seizures, and seizures may be the first symptom of AE. Outcome in non-paraneoplastic AE was favorable with ASD and IT. AB testing in CSF and sera, cerebral MRI, CSF analysis, and neuropsychological testing for mesial temporal deficits should be part of the diagnostic protocol for AE following late-onset seizures.

Clinical features which predict neuronal surface autoantibodies in new-onset focal epilepsy: implications for immunotherapies

OBJECTIVE

To generate a score which clinically identifies surface-directed autoantibodies in adults with new-onset focal epilepsy, and evaluate the value of immunotherapy in this clinical setting.

METHODS

Prospective clinical and autoantibody evaluations in a cohort of 219 consecutive patients with new-onset focal epilepsy.

RESULTS

10.5% (23/219) of people with new-onset focal epilepsy had detectable serum autoantibodies to known or novel cell surface antigenic targets. 9/23 with autoantibodies were diagnosed with encephalitis, by contrast to 0/196 without autoantibodies (p<0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified six features which predicted autoantibody positivity (area under the curve=0.83): age ≥54 years, ictal piloerection, lowered self-reported mood, reduced attention, MRI limbic system changes and the absence of conventional epilepsy risk factors. 11/14 (79%) patients with detectable autoantibodies, but without encephalitis, showed excellent long-term outcomes (modified Rankin Score=0) despite no immunotherapy. These outcomes were superior to those of immunotherapy-treated patients with confirmed autoantibody-mediated encephalitis (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Seizure semiology, cognitive and mood phenotypes, alongside inflammatory investigation findings, aid the identification of surface autoantibodies among unselected people with new-onset focal epilepsy. The excellent immunotherapy-independent outcomes of autoantibody-positive patients without encephalitis suggests immunotherapy administration should be guided by clinical features of encephalitis, rather than autoantibody positivity. Our findings suggest that, in this cohort, immunotherapy-responsive seizure syndromes with autoantibodies largely fall under the umbrella of autoimmune encephalitis.

Recurrent seizures of autoimmune origin: emerging phenotypes

OBJECTIVE

Recurrent seizures of autoimmune origin (AEp) are one of the most frequent causes of recurrent seizures or suspected epilepsy of unknown cause. The aim of this study was to identify specific phenotypes corresponding to AEp.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed features of patients with recurrent seizures of unknown cause and investigated for suspected AEp (January 2015-May 2018). Patients were separated in: (1) AEpAb+: AEp with positive autoantibodies; (2) AEpAb-: suspected AEp (inflammatory central nervous system (CNS) profile) without autoantibodies; (3) NAEp: epilepsy without CNS inflammation.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine epileptic patients underwent a CSF antibody detection. From the remaining 57 epileptic patients (32 excluded for a differential diagnosis), 61.4% were considered as AEp. 21% were AEpAb+ (4 NMDAR, 2 GABAbR, 3 GAD-Ab, 2 LGi1, 1 CASPR2), 40.4% AEpAb-, and 38.6% NAE. AE (AEpAb+ and AEpAb-) was significantly associated with antibody prevalence in epilepsy (APE) score ≥ 4 (80%), encephalitic phase (71.4%), psychiatric involvement (64.7%), cognitive impairment (50%), and status epilepticus (41.2%). Within the group of 29 patients without encephalitic phase and with chronic epilepsy (NEPp), 34.5% were defined as AEp. 10.4% were AEpAb+ (2 GAD, 1 CASPR2) and 24.1% were AEpAb-. NEP AEp was associated with non-cerebral autoimmune disorders, short epileptic disease duration, and cognitive impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

Autoimmune cause (AEp) should be assessed in patient suffering from recurrent seizures of unknown cause. Acute encephalitis is clearly the main AEp phenotype. AEp was also defined in more than one-third of chronic epilepsy patients (NEP) of unknown cause. Then, AEp may be combined with other autoimmune comorbidities, a shorter evolution of recurrent seizures, and cognitive impairment.

Adult-onset temporal lobe epilepsy suspicious for autoimmune pathogenesis: Autoantibody prevalence and clinical correlates

Temporal lobe adult-onset seizures (TAOS) related to autoimmunity represent an increasingly recognized disease syndrome within the spectrum of epilepsies. In this context, certain autoantibodies (autoABs) were often associated with limbic encephalitis (LE). Here, we aimed to gain insights into (a) the distribution of ‘neurological’ autoABs (neuroABs, defined as autoABs targeting neuronal surface structures or ‘onconeuronal’ ABs or anti-glutamate acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD65) autoABs) in a large consecutive TAOS patient cohort, to characterize (b) clinical profiles of seropositive versus seronegative individuals and to find (c) potential evidence for other autoABs. Blood sera/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of TAOS patients (n = 800) and healthy donors (n = 27) were analyzed for neuroABs and screened for other autoABs by indirect immunofluorescence on hippocampal/cerebellar sections and immunoblots of whole brain and synaptosome lysates. Serological results were correlated with clinico-neuropsychological features. 13% of TAOS patients (n = 105) were neuroAB⁺, with anti-GAD65 and anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDAR) as most frequent autoABs in this group. In our screening tests 25% of neuroAB^- patients (n = 199) were positive (screening⁺), whereas all control samples were negative (n = 27). Intriguingly, key clinico-neuropsychological characteristics including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, epileptiform electroencephalographic (EEG) activity, and inflammatory cellular infiltrates in CSF were shared to a greater extent by neuroAB⁺ with neuroAB^-/screening⁺ patients than with neuroAB^-/screening^- patients. Serological testing in a large consecutive TAOS patient series revealed seropositivity for anti-GAD65 autoABs as the most frequent neuroAB. Intriguingly, neuroAB⁺ individuals were virtually indistinguishable from neuroAB^-/screening⁺ patients in several major clinical features. In contrast, neuroAB^-/screening^- TAOS patients differed in many parameters. These data support the potential presence of so far unrecognized autoABs in patients with TAOS.

HMGB1/CXCL12-Mediated Immunity and Th17 Cells Might Underlie Highly Suspected Autoimmune Epilepsy in Elderly Individuals

PURPOSE

Late-onset epilepsy due to autoimmune dysfunction has been reported. However, definitive diagnosis requires positive antibody results. As a result, patients with negative antibody results, but presenting with classical manifestation of autoimmune epilepsy, may be managed as suspected cases. In this study, we aim to isolate and profile the concentration of cytokines/chemokines in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the serum to ascertain if they could act as alternative diagnostic biomarkers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty patients aged ≥50 years were considered in this study. Ten patients were diagnosed with suspected autoimmune epilepsy (sAE) based on clinic manifestation, electroencephalogram, magnetic resonance imaging, and with negative antibody results of the serum and the CSF. The equivalent control group exhibited neurological disorders due to non-inflammatory pathologies. Serum and CSF were analyzed for cytokines/chemokines concentration, including interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, IL-17, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand (CXCL)12 and CXCL13, as well as high-mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB1) and B cell activation factor (BAFF)).

RESULTS

The CSF levels of IL-6, IL-17, HMGB1, and CXCL12 were significantly higher in the sAE group than in the control group. There was no difference in the CSF levels of IL-10, CXCL13 and BAFF. The serum levels of HMGB1 and CXCL12 were elevated in the sAE group compared with the control group, and there was no statistical difference in the serum levels of IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, CXCL13, and BAFF between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that cytokines/chemokines may act as alternative biomarkers for diagnosis of sAE. The activation of both HMGB1/CXCL12-mediated immunity and T helper cells 17 (Th17) cells may be playing a central role in the pathogenesis of sAE. We suggest that cytokines/chemokines be treated as adjuvant biomarkers, instead of solely relying on antibody screening test. However, a larger cohort in a prospective approach is required to validate our findings.

Cerebrospinal Fluid Findings in Patients With Autoimmune Encephalitis-A Systematic Analysis

Autoimmune encephalitides (AIE) comprise a group of inflammatory diseases of the central nervous system (CNS), which can be further characterized by the presence of different antineuronal antibodies. Recently, a clinical approach for diagnostic criteria for the suspected diagnosis of AIE as well as definitive AIE were proposed. These are intended to guide physicians when to order the antineuronal antibody testing and/or facilitate early diagnosis even prior to the availability of the specific disease-confirming test results to facilitate prompt treatment. These diagnostic criteria also include the results of basic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis. However, the different antibody-defined AIE subtypes might be highly distinct with regard to their immune pathophysiology, e.g., the pre-dominance of specific IgG subclasses, IgG1, or IgG4, or frequency of paraneoplastic compared to idiopathic origin. Thus, it is conceivable that the results of basic CSF analysis might also be very different. However, this has not been explored systematically. Here, we systematically reviewed the literature about the 10 most important AIE subtypes, AIE with antibodies against NMDA, AMPA, glycine, GABAA, and GABAB receptors as well as DPPX, CASPR2, LGI1, IgLON5, or glutamate decarboxylase (GAD), with respect to the reported basic CSF findings comprising CSF leukocyte count, total protein, and the presence of oligoclonal bands (OCB) restricted to the CSF as a sensitive measure for intrathecal IgG synthesis. Our results indicate that these basic CSF findings are profoundly different among the 10 different AIE subtypes. Whereas, AIEs with antibodies against NMDA, GABAB, and AMPA receptors as well as DPPX show rather frequent inflammatory CSF changes, in AIEs with either CASPR2, LGI1, GABAA, or glycine receptor antibodies CSF findings were mostly normal. Two subtypes, AIEs defined by either GAD, or IgLON5 antibodies, did not fit into this general pattern. In AIE with GAD antibodies, positive OCBs in the absence of other changes were typical, while the CSF in IgLON5 antibody-positive AIE was characterized by elevated protein.

Diagnosing autoimmune encephalitis based on clinical features and autoantibody findings

INTRODUCTION

Autoimmune encephalitides have been accepted as a reproducible and treatable new group of diseases. At present, there is concern that such diagnoses might be made too liberally. Areas covered: This article suggests how to make valid diagnoses. They should consist of three elements: the clinical syndrome, the associated antibody and the presumed cause or predisposition. Recently, an international consortium published formal clinical criteria for autoimmune encephalitides to enable diagnoses even if antibody testing is not (immediately) available and to prevent overinterpretation of questionable antibody results. Antibody testing has greatly benefitted from the introduction of cell-based assays for the demonstration of antibodies against surface antigens. Paraneoplastic or post-infectious situations, side effects of tumor therapies or genetic predispositions help to explain why a patient develops autoimmune encephalitis. Expert opinion: With the application of this three-fold diagnostic system, clinicians can counsel patients regarding therapy and prognosis, while researchers can form meaningful patient cohorts. An operationalization of criteria would be advantageous.

Nonlesional late-onset epilepsy: Semiology, EEG, cerebrospinal fluid, and seizure outcome characteristics

INTRODUCTION

Incidence and prevalence of epilepsy increase with advancing age. Although the majority of late-onset epilepsies are of lesional origin, a considerable proportion of patients present with unknown etiology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the semiological, electroencephalographic (EEG), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) characteristics as well as the 12-month seizure outcome in a cohort of patients with nonlesional late-onset epilepsy (≥55 years).

METHOD

A total of 54 patients with newly diagnosed nonlesional late-onset epilepsy (NLLOE) were retrospectively evaluated for seizure type using the most recent International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) classification of seizure types, EEG characteristics, and CSF profile and followed-up for at least 12 months after epilepsy onset. Results were compared with a gender-matched control group of 58 patients with nonlesional early-onset epilepsy (NLEOE).

RESULTS

The predominant seizure types in NLLOE were focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (30%) as well as focal onset impaired awareness motor seizures (IAMS) (22%) and focal onset impaired awareness nonmotor seizures (IANMS) (22%). The predominant seizure types in NLEOE were focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (43%) as well as focal onset aware nonmotor seizures (ANMS) (31%) and IAMS (31%). Focal onset impaired awareness nonmotor seizures were found to be more characteristic in patients with NLLOE (p = 0.019; α < 0.05; NLLOE: 22.2% vs. NLEOE: 8.6%). Electroencephalography revealed no significant differences between groups. Of interest, three patients with NLLOE (8%) presented with oligoclonal bands (OCB) in CSF albeit absence of antineuronal antibodies. Seizure-free rate was 70%. Adverse effects from medication leading to antiepileptic drug (AED) change were reported in 12 patients (22%), valproate was the best tolerated AED in patients with NLLOE [adverse effects in 9%, compared with 12% (gabapentin) and 26% (levetiracetam)].

CONCLUSIONS

Using the most recent classification system, different patterns of semiological characteristics were identified: NLLOE more frequently present with IANMS, whereas patients with NLEOE rather have ANMS. Oligoclonal bands were only detected in patients with NLLOE, indicating that careful exclusion of autoimmune encephalitis in this patient group is warranted. Our findings may help to more accurately identify and characterize patients with NLLOE to improve targeted diagnostics and adequate treatment in this challenging group of patients.

Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis is infrequently associated with neuronal autoantibodies

Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE-HS) is characterized by its well-defined clinical profile. Limbic encephalitis is increasingly recognized as a possible etiology of adult-onset MTLE-HS, and neuronal autoantibodies have been detected in patients even without previous signs of encephalitis. The aim of this study is to analyze the frequency of specific autoantibodies in patients with MTLE-HS. A case-control study was carried out with 100 patients with MTLE-HS and 50 healthy controls. Sera samples from subjects were tested by indirect immunofluorescence assay for detection of anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDA-R), anti-contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CASPR2), anti-leucine-rich glioma inactivated 1 (LGI1), anti-gamma aminobutyric acid B receptor (GABA-B-R), anti-alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid 1 and 2 receptors (AMPA-1-R and AMPA-2-R), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD65). Mean age of patients and controls was 41.2 vs 42 years, and 55% vs 56% were female. Mean duration of epilepsy was 27.2 years. No neuronal autoantibodies were found in either group, except for anti-GAD65 in 3 patients and 2 controls. This study adds to the mounting evidence that, in Brazilian patients, MTLE-HS without signs and symptoms of autoimmune encephalitis may be infrequently associated with these autoantibodies. Differences regarding accuracy of used methodologies for autoantibody detection and genetic and environmental characteristics are discussed. Further works with different methodologies tested simultaneously in different populations may help clarify the incongruent study results about autoantibodies in MTLE-HS.

Improvement in anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antibody-mediated temporal lobe epilepsy with amygdala enlargement without immunotherapy

Focal neuroinflammation is considered one of the hypotheses for the cause of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) with amygdala enlargement (AE). Here, we report a case involving an adult female patient with TLE-AE characterized by late-onset seizures and cognitive impairment. Anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antibodies were detected in her cerebrospinal fluid. However, administration of appropriate anti-seizure drugs (ASD), without immunotherapy, improved TLE-AE associated with NMDAR antibodies. In the present case, two clinically significant observations were made: 1) anti-NMDAR antibody-mediated autoimmune processes may be associated with TLE-AE, and 2) appropriate administration of ASD alone can improve clinical symptoms in mild cases of autoimmune epilepsy.