Increased adverse events associated with antiepileptic drugs in anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein 1 encephalitis

Efficacy of immunotherapy and prognosis in anti-LGI1 encephalitis patients: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy for LGI1 antibody encephalitis, and consider the predictors of poor outcomes following immunotherapy.

METHODS

We searched PubMed and Embase for articles reporting the immunotherapy data of anti-LGI1 encephalitis patients. The proportions of patients with poor outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score > 2) at 3 months, 12 months, and the last follow-up, as well as the odds ratio [OR] of predictors were pooled.

RESULTS

The review included 162 articles with 1066 patients. The proportion of patients with poor functional outcomes was 21% at 3 months, 14% at 12 months, and 14% at the last follow-up after receiving immunotherapy. The proportion of patients with reported relapse was 16.6%. The mean duration from onset to the first relapse was 15.6 months. Predictors significantly associated with poor outcomes were age (increase of 1 year), the presence of cognitive impairment, and CSF LGI1 antibody positive. We did not find a statistically significant association between the worst mRS score in the acute phase, the presence of faciobrachial dystonic seizures (FBDS), days from symptom onset to immunotherapy, second-line treatment, maintenance immunotherapy, or follow-up time and outcomes.

INTERPRETATION

Although most patients respond to immunotherapy, a minority of patients still have poor outcomes. Advanced age, cognitive impairment, and CSF LGI1 antibody positive are associated with an increased risk of poor outcomes. However, due to the insufficiency of the data, these conclusions need to be interpreted with caution.

Anti-LGI1 encephalitis with initiating symptom of seizures in children

Background

Anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1) encephalitis is infrequently reported but more and more recognizable in children. Here we give detailed description of the clinical features and long-term outcome of three cases of childhood onset anti-LGI1 encephalitis.

Methods

Three anti-LGI1 encephalitis patients were hospitalized in the Department of Pediatrics at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. Data about the clinical manifestations, treatments and long-term follow-up outcomes were described in detail.

Results

Case 1 showed an adolescent girl with initiating symptom of acute-onset frequent focal seizures. Her serum LGI1-antibody test was positive, and she had a good response to antiseizure medication (ASM) and IVIG. Case 2 showed a preschool-age boy with long-period refractory focal seizures and recent behavioral change. Both serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tests of LGI1-antibody were positive, and the MRI showed progressive atrophy in the left hemisphere. The symptoms got improved after receiving second-line immunotherapy initially but there are still the sequelae of drug-resistant epilepsy and mild to moderate intellectual disability. Case 3 showed an adolescent boy with initiating symptom of acute-onset frequent focal seizures. Both serum and CSF tests of LGI1-antibody were positive, and he had a good response to immunotherapy. By analyzing all literature-reported 19 pediatric cases, we found pediatric anti-LGI1 encephalitis is more common in female and adolescent. Seizures and behavioral changes were the most common symptoms. CSF pleocytosis and LGI1-antibodies results were mostly negative. Most patients showed good response to immunotherapy.

Conclusion

Childhood onset anti-LGI1 encephalitis is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome, ranging from typical limbic encephalitis to isolating focal seizures. It is important to test autoimmune antibodies when encountering similar cases and repeat antibody testing if necessary. Timely recognition leads to earlier diagnosis and more rapid initiation of effective immunotherapy and potentially better outcomes.

Use of anti-seizure medications in different types of autoimmune encephalitis: A narrative review

Seizures are the main manifestation of the acute phase of autoimmune encephalitis (AE). Anti-seizure medications (ASMs) play an important role in controlling seizures in AE patients, but there is currently a lack of consensus regarding the selection, application, and discontinuation of ASMs. This narrative review focuses on the use of ASMs in patients with AE driven by different antibodies. The PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE databases were searched up until 30 October 2022 using prespecified search terms. We identified 2,580 studies; 23 retrospective studies, 2 prospective studies and 9 case reports were evaluated based on our inclusion criteria. Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartic-acid-receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis is the type of AE that responds best to ASMs, and long-term or combined use of ASMs may be not required in most patients with seizures; these results apply to both adults and children. Sodium channel blockers may be the best option for seizures in anti-leucine-rich-glioma-inactivated-1 (anti-LGI1) encephalitis, but patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis are prone to side effects when using ASMs. Cell surface antibody-mediated AE patients are more likely to use ASMs for a long period than patients with intracellular antibody-mediated AE. Clinicians can score AE patients' clinical characteristics on a scale to identify those who may require long-or short-term use of ASMs in the early stage. This review provides some recommendations for the rational use of ASMs in encephalitis mediated by different antibodies with the aim of controlling seizures and avoiding overtreatment.

Telemedicine in epilepsy and encephalitis: previous research and indication guidelines in Korea

Telemedicine is an emerging field of medicine that has become more important during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic era and is being studied actively in various medical fields. In neurology, the introduction of telemedicine is accelerating worldwide under the label of teleneurology. So far, few studies have been conducted on telemedicine for patients with epilepsy. In nonmetropolitan areas, video-based clinics have been demonstrated to be effective for seizure control, and smartphone-based diagnosis has also been confirmed to be accurate. Indeed, after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine has been used to treat patients with epilepsy around the world. Few studies have examined the use of telemedicine for patients with autoimmune encephalitis. One showed that telephone-based evaluation is sufficient to assess the cognitive reserve of leucine-rich glioma inactivated-1-antibody encephalitis patients, thereby diagnosing their dementia. Telephone-based outpatient clinics are temporarily permitted under Korean medical law, and telemedicine can be attempted for clinically stable patients with epilepsy in Korea. In addition, patients with autoimmune encephalitis in stable or improving status may also be candidates for treatment with telemedicine. This review presents evidence for the safety and efficacy of telemedicine to treat epilepsy and encephalitis patients and discusses indication guidelines. Based on our literature review and current Korean medical law, we suggest tentative guidelines for telemedicine in the fields of epilepsy and autoimmune encephalitis.

Contemporary advances in antibody-mediated encephalitis: anti-LGI1 and anti-Caspr2 antibody (Ab)-mediated encephalitides

Encephalitides with antibodies directed against leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1) and contactin-associated protein-like 2 (Caspr2) represent two increasingly well characterised forms of autoimmune encephalitis. Both share overlapping and distinct clinical features, are mediated by autoantibodies directed against differing proteins complexed with voltage-gated potassium channels, with unique genetic predisposition identified to date. Herein we summarise disease mechanisms, clinical features, treatment considerations, prognostic factors and clinical outcomes regarding these disorders.

Predictors and prognoses of epilepsy after anti-neuronal antibody-positive autoimmune encephalitis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the incidence and predictors of epilepsy after anti-neuronal antibody-positive autoimmune encephalitis (AIE). The clinical outcomes of patients with epilepsy after AIE were also explored.

METHODS

A total of 111 AIE patients were retrospectively evaluated. Post-AIE epilepsy (PAEE) was defined as at least one unprovoked seizure occurring six or more months after discharge from hospital.

RESULTS

The incidence of acute symptomatic seizures was 80.2% (89/111) in our AIE patients. Furthermore, of the 89 AIE patients with seizures, 29 (32.6%) presented with seizures as the initial symptom. Overall, 44 out of 111 AIE patients (39.6%) had unprovoked seizures after six months, meeting our definition of PAEE. The independent risk factors for PAEE incidence included an initial presentation with new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), delayed immunotherapy treatment, the complication of a lung infection during admission, the requirement for mechanical ventilation during hospitalization, parietal lesions observed in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and focal slow waves on electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

Early initiation of immunotherapy and lung infection treatment may reduce the risk of conversion of symptomatic seizures to chronic epilepsy in the acute phase of AIE. In general, PAEE patients could have a good prognosis if treated properly and in a timely fashion.

Characteristics and outcome-related factors of seizure at the first onset of autoimmune encephalitis: A retrospective study

Aims

Seizure outcome of autoimmune encephalitis (AE) varies from seizure‐free to refractory epilepsy, and the associated factors remain unclear. We aimed to describe seizure characteristics, identify seizure outcome‐related factors, and discuss the medication strategy of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) at the first onset of AE.

Methods

We retrospectively studied the data of 86 patients with clinically diagnosed AE. The clinical characteristics were described using a chi‐square test. Seizure outcome‐related factors were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results

56 patients were finally enrolled, with antibodies to N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptor found in 29, to γ‐aminobutyric acid receptor B found in 13, and to leucine‐rich glioma‐inactivated protein 1 found in 14. Status epilepticus occurrence and onset with seizure lead to a poor seizure outcome, while administration of human gamma globulin and a low antibody titer contributed to a good seizure outcome.

Conclusions

In the acute phase, seizure characteristics may be considered in the utilization of AEDs. For patients with seizure‐free status in the acute phase, clinical manifestation (onset with seizure or not, whether status epilepticus occurs or not), therapy regimen (human gamma globulin administered or not), and antibody titer may be considered when formulating the strategy for withdrawal of AEDs post‐acute phase.

Clinical Approach to Autoimmune Epilepsy

Autoimmune epilepsy is a newly emerging area of epilepsy. The concept of “autoimmune” as an etiology has recently been revisited thanks to advances in autoimmune encephalitis and precision medicine with immunotherapies. Autoimmune epilepsy presents with specific clinical manifestations, and various diagnostic approaches including cerebrospinal fluid analysis, neuroimaging, and autoantibody tests are essential for its differential diagnosis. The diagnosis is often indeterminate despite performing a thorough evaluation, and therefore empirical immunotherapy may be applied according to the judgment of the clinician. Autoimmune epilepsy often manifests as new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE). A patient classified as NORSE should receive empirical immunotherapy as soon as possible. On the other hand, a morecautious, stepwise approach is recommended for autoimmune epilepsy that presents with episodic events. The type of autoimmune epilepsy is also an important factor to consider when choosing from among various immunotherapy options. Clinicians should additionally take the characteristics of antiepileptic drugs into account when using them as an adjuvant therapy. This expert opinion discusses the diagnostic and treatment approaches for autoimmune epilepsy from a practical point of view.