The burden of decisional uncertainty in the treatment of status epilepticus

Detect, predict, and prevent acute seizures and status epilepticus

Status epilepticus is one of the most frequent pediatric neurological emergencies. While etiology is often influencing the outcome, more easily modifiable risk factors of outcome include detection of prolonged convulsive seizures and status epilepticus and appropriately dosed and timely applied medication treatment. Unpredictability and delayed or incomplete treatment may at times lead to longer seizures, thereby affecting outcomes. Barriers in the care of acute seizures and status epilepticus include the identification of patients at greatest risk of convulsive status epilepticus, potential stigma, distrust, and uncertainties in acute seizure care, including caregivers, physicians, and patients. Furthermore, unpredictability, detection capability, and identification of acute seizures and status epilepticus, limitations in access to obtaining and maintaining appropriate treatment, and rescue treatment options pose challenges. Additionally, timing and dosing of treatment and related acute management algorithms, potential variations in care due to healthcare and physician culture and preference, and factors related to access, equity, diversity, and inclusion of care. We outline strategies for the identification of patients at risk of acute seizures and status epilepticus, improved status epilepticus detection and prediction, and acute closed-loop treatment and status epilepticus prevention. This paper was presented at the 8th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures held in September 2022.

Descriptive epidemiology and health resource utilization for status epilepticus in the emergency department in the United States of America

OBJECTIVE

To describe the epidemiology and health resource utilization for convulsive status epilepticus (SE) in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

Retrospective descriptive study in the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS). Primary SE and secondary SE (SE in a case who visited the ED for other primary reason) were compared with non-SE seizures. Secondary SE is expected to have worse outcomes and higher costs because of another primary cause for ED visit.

RESULTS

In the period 2010-2014, there were 149,750 ED visits with primary SE; 83,459 ED with secondary SE; and 5,359,103 ED visits with non-SE seizures. On multivariable analysis adjusting for potential confounders, the odds of hospital admission were 7 times higher for primary SE than for non-SE seizures, and 5 times higher for secondary SE than for non-SE seizures; the odds of transfer to another hospital were 9 times higher for primary SE than for non-SE seizures, and 3 times higher for secondary SE than for non-SE seizures; the odds of death were 2.5 times higher for primary SE than for non-SE seizures, and 12 times higher for secondary SE than for non-SE seizures; and the charges (in January 2020 USA dollars) were $9000 higher in primary SE than in non-SE seizures, and $35,000 higher in secondary SE than in non-SE seizures.

CONCLUSION

Among all reasons for ED visits, SE, and in particular, secondary SE, are among the most resource-consuming conditions, being much more expensive than non-SE seizures in the ED.

VALTOCO® (Diazepam Nasal Spray) for the Acute Treatment of Intermittent Stereotypic Episodes of Frequent Seizure Activity

Valtoco® is a new FDA-approved nasal spray version of diazepam indicated for the treatment of acute, intermittent, and stereotypic episodes of frequent seizure activity in epilepsy patients six years of age and older. Although IV and rectal diazepam are already used to treat seizure clusters, Valtoco® has less variability in plasma concentration compared to rectal diazepam. Furthermore, the intranasal administration of Valtoco® is more convenient and less invasive than rectal or IV diazepam, making it ideal for self-administration outside of a hospital setting. Multiple clinical trials have taken place comparing Valtoco® to the oral, rectal, and IV forms of diazepam. Aside from mild nasal irritation and lacrimation, Valtoco® was found to have no increased safety risk in comparison to traditional forms of diazepam. This review of Valtoco® will include a history of diazepam prescribing and withdrawal treatment, Valtoco® drug information, its mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and a comprehensive review of clinical studies.