"Do I still have epilepsy?" Epilepsy identity 15-20 years after anterior temporal lobectomy

Psychosocial outcomes six months after epilepsy surgery: A perspective on coping strategies

OBJECTIVE

Epilepsy negatively affects the social functioning of patients. Epilepsy surgery is a treatment with superior rates of seizure freedom. The psychosocial outcomes after epilepsy surgery depend on several factors, including the patient's coping style. It is important to identify the patients who are at risk of experiencing psychosocial difficulties after epilepsy surgery and consult them for psychiatric interventions. This study aimed to assess changes in social adaptation, felt stigma, self-esteem, and self-efficacy after epilepsy surgery, and the effect of coping strategies, sociodemographic and epilepsy-related variables, and post-surgical seizure outcomes on these results.

METHODS

Thirty adult patients with temporal lobe epilepsy who were candidates for surgery were included in the study (mean age: 33.07, mean seizure onset age: 17.2, mean duration of epilepsy: 15.8). The patients were assessed before and 6 months after epilepsy surgery using the Epilepsy Self-Efficacy Scale, Social Adaptation Self-Evaluation Scale, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Felt Stigma Scale, and Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory.

RESULTS

The patients' self-efficacy levels were increased after surgery (p = 0.005). Postsurgical social adaptation levels were associated with higher positive reinterpretation and growth, active coping, and planning (p = 0.016, p = 0.005, p = 0.002, respectively). Postsurgical self-efficacy levels were positively associated with active coping and planning (p = 0.003, p = 0.035, respectively). Postsurgical self-esteem (p = 0.012, p = 0.049, p = 0.034, respectively) and stigma (p = 0.029, p = 0.014, p = 0.027, respectively) were negatively associated with positive reinterpretation and growth, active coping, and planning. Furthermore, being employed presurgical period was associated with better postsurgical social adaptation (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The psychosocial outcomes after epilepsy surgery depend not only on seizure outcomes. Understanding the factors beyond seizure freedom, allows healthcare professionals to have a pivotal role in exploring and managing patients' expectations, fostering a more comprehensive and realistic dialogue about potential outcomes. Considering employed patients had better psychosocial outcomes, we suggest patients' families, healthcare professionals, and epilepsy support organizations should work collaboratively to support people with epilepsy in terms of providing job opportunities.

Validation of the Taiwanese version of the Epilepsy Surgery Satisfaction Questionnaire (Tw-ESSQ-19)

OBJECTIVE

Satisfaction with epilepsy surgery in Mandarin-speaking countries remains unknown. We aimed to validate in our Taiwanese patients an existing instrument to measure patient satisfaction with epilepsy surgery, the 19-item Epilepsy Surgery Satisfaction Questionnaire (ESSQ-19).

METHODS

Consecutive patients with epilepsy who received epilepsy surgery one year earlier in Taipei Veterans General Hospital were recruited and provided clinical and demographic data. The Mandarin version of the ESSQ-19 for the Taiwanese population and eight other questionnaires were completed to assess construct validity. To evaluate the validity and reliability of the tool, the data were analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis, Spearman's rank correlation, and internal consistency analysis.

RESULTS

The study involved 120 patients (70 F/50 M, median age 35 years [IQR = 28-41]). The mean summary score (±SD) of the Tw-ESSQ-19 was 82.5 ± 14.5. The mean scores of the four domains were 90.3 ± 15.4 (surgical complications), 83.2 ± 16.7 (seizure control), 80.1 ± 17.3 (recovery from surgery), and 76.6 ± 18.3 (psychosocial functioning). The questionnaire was shown to have good construct validity with satisfactory goodness-of-fit of the data (standardized root mean square residual = 0.0492; comparative fit index = 0.946). It also demonstrated good discriminant validity (being seizure free [AUC 0.78; 95% CI 0.68-0.89], endorsing depression [AUC 0.84; 95% CI 0.76-0.91], self-rating epilepsy as disabling [AUC 0.71; 95% CI 0.58-0.84], and self-rating epilepsy as severe [AUC 0.78; 95% CI 0.64-0.93]), high internal consistency in four domains (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83-0.96), and no significant floor/ceiling effects of the summary score.

SIGNIFICANCE

The Mandarin version of the ESSQ-19 adapted for the Taiwanese population is a reliable and valid self-reported questionnaire for assessing patient satisfaction with epilepsy surgery.