CASPR2-IgG-associated autoimmune seizures

Autoimmune-associated seizure disorders

With the discovery of an expanding number of neural autoantibodies, autoimmune etiologies of seizures have been increasingly recognized. Clinical phenotypes have been identified in association with specific underlying antibodies, allowing an earlier diagnosis. These phenotypes include faciobrachial dystonic seizures with LGI1 encephalitis, neuropsychiatric presentations associated with movement disorders and seizures in NMDA-receptor encephalitis, and chronic temporal lobe epilepsy in GAD65 neurologic autoimmunity. Prompt recognition of these disorders is important, as some of them are highly responsive to immunotherapy. The response to immunotherapy is highest in patients with encephalitis secondary to antibodies targeting cell surface synaptic antigens. However, the response is less effective in conditions involving antibodies binding intracellular antigens or in Rasmussen syndrome, which are predominantly mediated by cytotoxic T-cell processes that are associated with irreversible cellular destruction. Autoimmune encephalitides also may have a paraneoplastic etiology, further emphasizing the importance of recognizing these disorders. Finally, autoimmune processes and responses to novel immunotherapies have been reported in new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) and febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES), warranting their inclusion in any current review of autoimmune-associated seizure disorders.

Autoimmune encephalitis antibody profiles and clinical characteristics of children with suspected autoimmune encephalitis

AIM

To identify the spectrum of autoimmune encephalitis antibody biomarkers (AE-Abs) in children with suspected autoimmune encephalitis and explore the clinical features indicating AE-Abs presence.

METHOD

We included children with suspected autoimmune encephalitis who underwent AE-Abs tests at the Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between June 2020 and June 2022. Clinical features suggestive of AE-Abs were analysed based on AE-Abs test results.

RESULTS

A total of 392 children were tested for AE-Abs with suspected autoimmune encephalitis. Of these, 49.5% were male, with a median age of 7 years 11 months (6 months-17 years 11 months); 93.6% (367/392) of all patients had both serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tests performed. The antibody-positive rate in the cohort was 23.7% (93/392), the serum antibody-positive rate was 21.9% (84/384), and the CSF antibody-positive rate was 20.8% (78/375). Eleven different AE-Abs were detected. Serum analysis revealed that N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor immunoglobulin-G (NMDAR-IgG) (15.1%) was greater than myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-IgG (14.6%) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-IgG (3.3%). CSF analysis revealed that NMDAR-IgG (16.3%) was greater than MOG-IgG (13.8%) and GFAP-IgG (3.3%). Compared with antibody-negative patients, antibody-positive patients were more often female (odds ratio [OR] 1.86, p = 0.03), with memory impairment (OR 2.91, p = 0.01) and sleep disorders (OR 2.08, p = 0.02).

INTERPRETATION

In children, the most frequent AE-Abs detected were NMDAR-IgG and MOG-IgG. Female sex, memory impairment, and sleep disorders predict a higher likelihood of AE-Abs.

Autoimmune central nervous system disorders: Antibody testing and its clinical utility

A rapidly expanding repertoire of neural antibody biomarkers exists for autoimmune central nervous system (CNS) disorders. Following clinical recognition of an autoimmune CNS disorder, the detection of a neural antibody facilitates diagnosis and informs prognosis and management. This review considers the phenotypes, diagnostic assay methodologies, and clinical utility of neural antibodies in autoimmune CNS disorders. Autoimmune CNS disorders may present with a diverse range of clinical features. Clinical phenotype should inform the neural antibodies selected for testing via the use of phenotype-specific panels. Both serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are preferred in the vast majority of cases but for some analytes either CSF (e.g. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor [NMDA-R] IgG) or serum (e.g. aquaporin-4 [AQP4] IgG) specimens may be preferred. Screening using 2 methods is recommended for most analytes, particularly paraneoplastic antibodies. We utilize murine tissue-based indirect immunofluorescence assay (TIFA) with subsequent confirmatory protein-specific testing. The cellular location of the target antigen informs choice of confirmatory diagnostic assay (e.g. blot for intracellular antigens such as Hu; cell-based assay for cell surface targets such as leucine-rich glioma inactivated 1 [LGI1]). Titers of positive results have limited diagnostic utility with the exception of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) 65 IgG autoimmunity, which is associated with neurological disease at higher values. While novel antibodies are typically discovered using established techniques such as TIFA and immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry, more recent high-throughput molecular technologies (such as protein microarray and phage-display immunoprecipitation sequencing) may expedite the process of antibody discovery. Individual neural antibodies inform the clinician regarding the clinical associations, oncological risk stratification and tumor histology, the likely prognosis, and immunotherapy choice. In the era of neural antibody biomarkers for autoimmune CNS disorders, access to appropriate laboratory assays for neural antibodies is of critical importance in the diagnosis and management of these disorders.

Canadian Consensus Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Autoimmune Encephalitis in Adults

Autoimmune encephalitis is increasingly recognized as a neurologic cause of acute mental status changes with similar prevalence to infectious encephalitis. Despite rising awareness, approaches to diagnosis remain inconsistent and evidence for optimal treatment is limited. The following Canadian guidelines represent a consensus and evidence (where available) based approach to both the diagnosis and treatment of adult patients with autoimmune encephalitis. The guidelines were developed using a modified RAND process and included input from specialists in autoimmune neurology, neuropsychiatry and infectious diseases. These guidelines are targeted at front line clinicians and were created to provide a pragmatic and practical approach to managing such patients in the acute setting.

Optimizing the diagnostic performance of neural antibody testing for paraneoplastic and autoimmune encephalitis in clinical practice

The detection of neural antibodies in patients with paraneoplastic and autoimmune encephalitis has majorly advanced the diagnosis and management of neural antibody-associated diseases. Although testing for these antibodies has historically been restricted to specialized centers, assay commercialization has made this testing available to clinical chemistry laboratories worldwide. This improved test accessibility has led to reduced turnaround time and expedited diagnosis, which are beneficial to patient care. However, as the utilization of these assays has increased, so too has the need to evaluate how they perform in the clinical setting. In this chapter, we discuss assays for neural antibody detection that are in routine use, draw attention to their limitations and provide strategies to help clinicians and laboratorians overcome them, all with the aim of optimizing neural antibody testing for paraneoplastic and autoimmune encephalitis in clinical practice.

Autoimmune encephalitis: recent clinical and biological advances

In 2015, we wrote a review in The Journal of Neurology summarizing the field of autoantibody-associated neurological diseases. Now, in 2023, we present an update of the subject which reflects the rapid expansion and refinement of associated clinical phenotypes, further autoantibody discoveries, and a more detailed understanding of immunological and neurobiological pathophysiological pathways which mediate these diseases. Increasing awareness around distinctive aspects of their clinical phenotypes has been a key driver in providing clinicians with a better understanding as to how these diseases are best recognized. In clinical practice, this recognition supports the administration of often effective immunotherapies, making these diseases 'not to miss' conditions. In parallel, there is a need to accurately assess patient responses to these drugs, another area of growing interest. Feeding into clinical care are the basic biological underpinnings of the diseases, which offer clear pathways to improved therapies toward enhanced patient outcomes. In this update, we aim to integrate the clinical diagnostic pathway with advances in patient management and biology to provide a cohesive view on how to care for these patients in 2023, and the future.

Clinical spectrum of contactin-associated protein 2 autoimmune encephalitis in children

Objective

Anti-contactin-associated protein 2 (CASPR2)-related autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is more common in adults than in children. Clinical understanding of anti-CASPR2-antibody (Ab)-related AE, diagnosis and treatment standards are lacking in children. Therefore, this retrospective study on clinical symptoms and treatment outcomes in children with anti-CASPR2-Ab-related AE was conducted, to improve the clinical understanding of the disease, its diagnosis and treatment.

Methods

This study retrospectively assessed children with anti-CASPR2-Ab-related AE from January 1, 2020, to June 30, 2022, in the Department of Neurology at Hunan Children's Hospital. Data regarding demographics, clinical symptoms, laboratory examinations, electroencephalography (EEG), imaging, and curative were collected.

Results

Thirteen patients were positive for serum anti-CASPR2-Ab (age at manifestation, 25 months to 13 years old; median, 8.1 years old; male-to-female ratio, 8/5). One patient (P1) had dual Abs, including anti-CASPR2 and anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor Abs; his symptoms were more severe than those of children with anti-CASPR2 Abs alone. The clinical symptoms of the 13 patients with anti-CASPR2 Ab were movement disorders (9/13), consciousness disorders (9/13), abnormal demeanor (8/13), seizures (7/13), language disorders (6/13), fever (6/13), pain (4/13), involuntary exercise (4/13), poor diet (4/13), vomiting (3/13), sleep disorders (3/13), mood disorders (3/13), eczema/itching/redness (2/13), sweating (P8), urinary disorders (P13), and cognitive disorders (P9). No tumors were found in any patient. Additionally, EEG results of six patients were abnormal and imaging findings such as abnormal signals were found in 10 patients. Moreover, all except one patient recovered well after treatment; P1 with overlapping syndrome underwent recovery for more than 2 years. None of the patients who recovered have had a relapse.

Discussion and conclusion

Anti-CASPR2-Ab-related AE has several clinical manifestations. Anti-CASPR2-Ab levels were higher in male patients than in female patients. Moreover, related tumors are relatively rare. Most patients benefit from immunotherapy and have a lower chance of recurrence in the short term. Furthermore, different from patients who had anti-CASPR2-Ab AE alone, those with overlapping syndrome had a severe and complex condition requiring lengthy treatment and rehabilitation. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the long-term prognosis of these patients.

New Insights on DR and DQ Human Leukocyte Antigens in Anti-LGI1 Encephalitis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To explore the clinical characteristics and HLA associations of patients with anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 encephalitis (LGI1E) from a large single center in Israel. Anti-LGI1E is the most commonly diagnosed antibody-associated encephalitic syndrome in adults. Recent studies of various populations reveal significant associations with specific HLA genes. We examined the clinical characteristics and HLA associations of a cohort of Israeli patients.

METHODS

Seventeen consecutive patients with anti-LGI1E diagnosed at Tel Aviv Medical Center between the years 2011 and 2018 were included. HLA typing was performed using next-generation sequencing at the tissue typing laboratory of Sheba Medical Center and compared with data from the Ezer Mizion Bone Marrow Donor Registry, containing over 1,000,000 samples.

RESULTS

Our cohort displayed a male predominance and median age at onset in the 7th decade, as previously reported. The most common presenting symptom was seizures. Notably, paroxysmal dizziness spells were significantly more common than previously reported (35%), whereas faciobrachial dystonic seizures were found only in 23%. HLA analysis revealed overrepresentation of DRB1*07:01 (OR: 3.18, CI: 20.9 p < 1.e-5) and DRB1*04:02 (OR: 3.8, CI: 20.1 p < 1.e-5), as well as of the DQ allele DQB1*02:02 (OR: 2.8, CI: 14.2 p < 0.0001) as previously reported. A novel overrepresentation observed among our patients was of the DQB1*03:02 allele (OR: 2.3, CI: 6.9 p < 0.008). In addition, we found DR-DQ associations, among patients with anti-LGI1E, that showed complete or near-complete linkage disequilibrium (LD). By applying LD analysis to an unprecedentedly large control cohort, we were able to show that although in the general population, DQB*03:02 is not fully associated with DRB1*04:02, in the patient population, both alleles are always coupled, suggesting the DRB1*04:02 association to be primary to disease predisposition. In silico predictions performed for the overrepresented DQ alleles reveal them to be strong binders of LGI1-derived peptides, similarly to overrepresented DR alleles. These predictions suggest a possible correlation between peptide binding sites of paired DR-DQ alleles.

DISCUSSION

Our cohort presents distinct immune characteristics with substantially higher overrepresentation of DRB1*04:02 and slightly lower overrepresentation of DQB1*07:01 compared with previous reports implying differences between different populations. DQ-DR interactions found in our cohort may shed additional light on the complex role of immunogenetics in the pathogenesis of anti-LGI1E, implying a possible relevance of certain DQ alleles and DR-DQ interactions.

Episodic Ataxias: Primary and Secondary Etiologies, Treatment, and Classification Approaches

Background

Episodic ataxia (EA), characterized by recurrent attacks of cerebellar dysfunction, is the manifestation of a group of rare autosomal dominant inherited disorders. EA1 and EA2 are most frequently encountered, caused by mutations in KCNA1 and CACNA1A. EA3-8 are reported in rare families. Advances in genetic testing have broadened the KCNA1 and CACNA1A phenotypes, and detected EA as an unusual presentation of several other genetic disorders. Additionally, there are various secondary causes of EA and mimicking disorders. Together, these can pose diagnostic challenges for neurologists.

Methods

A systematic literature review was performed in October 2022 for 'episodic ataxia' and 'paroxysmal ataxia', restricted to publications in the last 10 years to focus on recent clinical advances. Clinical, genetic, and treatment characteristics were summarized.

Results

EA1 and EA2 phenotypes have further broadened. In particular, EA2 may be accompanied by other paroxysmal disorders of childhood with chronic neuropsychiatric features. New treatments for EA2 include dalfampridine and fampridine, in addition to 4-aminopyridine and acetazolamide. There are recent proposals for EA9-10. EA may also be caused by gene mutations associated with chronic ataxias (SCA-14, SCA-27, SCA-42, AOA2, CAPOS), epilepsy syndromes (KCNA2, SCN2A, PRRT2), GLUT-1, mitochondrial disorders (PDHA1, PDHX, ACO2), metabolic disorders (Maple syrup urine disease, Hartnup disease, type I citrullinemia, thiamine and biotin metabolism defects), and others. Secondary causes of EA are more commonly encountered than primary EA (vascular, inflammatory, toxic-metabolic). EA can be misdiagnosed as migraine, peripheral vestibular disorders, anxiety, and functional symptoms. Primary and secondary EA are frequently treatable which should prompt a search for the cause.

Discussion

EA may be overlooked or misdiagnosed for a variety of reasons, including phenotype-genotype variability and clinical overlap between primary and secondary causes. EA is highly treatable, so it is important to consider in the differential diagnosis of paroxysmal disorders. Classical EA1 and EA2 phenotypes prompt single gene test and treatment pathways. For atypical phenotypes, next generation genetic testing can aid diagnosis and guide treatment. Updated classification systems for EA are discussed which may assist diagnosis and management.

Use of anti-seizure medications in different types of autoimmune encephalitis: A narrative review

Seizures are the main manifestation of the acute phase of autoimmune encephalitis (AE). Anti-seizure medications (ASMs) play an important role in controlling seizures in AE patients, but there is currently a lack of consensus regarding the selection, application, and discontinuation of ASMs. This narrative review focuses on the use of ASMs in patients with AE driven by different antibodies. The PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE databases were searched up until 30 October 2022 using prespecified search terms. We identified 2,580 studies; 23 retrospective studies, 2 prospective studies and 9 case reports were evaluated based on our inclusion criteria. Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartic-acid-receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis is the type of AE that responds best to ASMs, and long-term or combined use of ASMs may be not required in most patients with seizures; these results apply to both adults and children. Sodium channel blockers may be the best option for seizures in anti-leucine-rich-glioma-inactivated-1 (anti-LGI1) encephalitis, but patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis are prone to side effects when using ASMs. Cell surface antibody-mediated AE patients are more likely to use ASMs for a long period than patients with intracellular antibody-mediated AE. Clinicians can score AE patients' clinical characteristics on a scale to identify those who may require long-or short-term use of ASMs in the early stage. This review provides some recommendations for the rational use of ASMs in encephalitis mediated by different antibodies with the aim of controlling seizures and avoiding overtreatment.

Acute symptomatic seizures secondary to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease

OBJECTIVE

To report the clinical presentations and outcomes of patients with seizure and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records for clinical and paraclinical features among patients with seizures and MOG-IgG (immunoglobulin G) seropositivity.

RESULTS

We identified 213 patients with MOG-IgG seropositivity who fulfilled criteria for MOGAD. Seizures attributed to central nervous system (CNS) autoimmunity were observed in 10% of patients (n = 23: 19 children, 4 adults). The majority (n = 19, 83%) had pediatric disease onset. Focal motor seizures were the most common seizure semiology (16/23; 70%). Focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures were present in 12 patients (53%), and 3 patients (13%) developed status epilepticus. All patients had features of encephalitis at onset of seizures. Cerebral cortical encephalitis (CCE) was the most common radiological finding (10 unilateral and 5 bilateral cases). Eight of 23 patients (35%) had only CCE, six of 23 patients (26%) had only acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), and seven of 23 patients (30%) had features of both. Fifteen patients (65%) had leptomeningeal enhancement. Three patients (13%) had coexistence of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) IgG. Only 3 of 23 patients (13%) developed drug- resistant epilepsy. Although the majority had MOGAD relapses (14/23, 60%) had only 5 of 23 patients had recurrence of episodes of encephalitis with associated seizures. Twenty-one of 23 patients (91%) had seizure freedom at last follow-up.

SIGNIFICANCE

MOG-IgG evaluation should be considered in patients who present with encephalitis and focal motor and/or focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, especially pediatric patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain findings consistent with CCE, ADEM, or other MOGAD presentations. The majority of these seizures are self-limited and do not require maintenance/chronic antiseizure medications. Although seizure recurrence is uncommon, many patients have MOGAD relapses in the form of encephalitis and optic neuritis.

Early-Stage Contactin-Associated Protein-like 2 Limbic Encephalitis: Clues for Diagnosis

Background and Objectives

Previous studies suggested that autoimmune limbic encephalitis with antibodies against contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CASPR2-encephalitis) is clinically heterogeneous and progresses slowly, preventing its early recognition. We aimed to describe the onset and progression of CASPR2-encephalitis and to assess long-term outcomes.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of all patients whose CSF tested positive for anti-CASPR2 antibodies in our center between 2006 and 2020. Standardized telephone interviews of all available patients and relatives were conducted, assessing long-term functional independence using the Functional Activity Questionnaire (FAQ) and quality of life using the 36-Item Short-Form Survey (SF36).

Results

Forty-eight patients were included (98% males; median age 64 years), and 35 participated in telephone interviews (73%). At onset, 81% had at least 1 neurologic symptom among the following: limbic (54%), peripheral nerve hyperexcitability (PNH; 21%), and/or cerebellar symptoms (17%). Most of the patients (75%) had initially symptoms of only one of these categories. Limbic symptoms at onset included mostly seizures (33%), while memory disturbances were less frequent (10%). PNH signs were mostly neuropathic pain (9/10 patients). Other symptoms seen at onset included asthenia (33%), mood disorders (25%), and insomnia (21%); 19% of patients did not show any limbic, peripheral, or cerebellar symptom at onset but only asthenia (15%), mood disorders (6%), weight loss (8%), dysautonomia (4%), and/or insomnia (2%). The peak of the disease was attained in median 16.7 months after onset. Over the study period (median follow-up, 58.8 months, range 10.6–189.1), 77% of patients developed ≥3 core CASPR2 symptoms and 42% fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for autoimmune limbic encephalitis, although all patients ultimately developed limbic symptoms. At the last visit, most interviewed patients (28/35 patients, 80%; median, 5 years after onset) had recovered functional independence (FAQ <9) while only the vitality subscore of the SF36 was lower than normative data (mean 49.9 vs 58.0, p = 0.0369).

Discussion

CASPR2-encephalitis has a progressive course and is highly heterogeneous at the early stage. In men older than 50 years, otherwise unexplained seizures, cerebellar ataxia, and/or neuropathic pain are suggestive of early-stage CASPR2-encephalitis, especially if they coincide with recent asthenia, mood disorders, or insomnia.

"Obvious" indications for Neural antibody testing in Epilepsy or Seizures: The ONES checklist

OBJECTIVE

Numerous predictive scores have been developed to help determine which patients with epilepsy or seizures of unknown etiology should undergo neural antibody testing. However, their diagnostic advantage compared to only performing testing in patients with "obvious" indications (e.g. broader features of autoimmune encephalitis, characteristic seizure semiologies) requires further study. We aimed to develop a checklist that identifies patients who have "obvious" indications for neural antibody testing, and compare its diagnostic performance to predictive scores.

METHODS

We developed the "Obvious" indications for Neural antibody testing in Epilepsy or Seizures (ONES) checklist through literature review. We then retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent neural antibody testing for epilepsy or seizures at our center between March 2019 and January 2021, to determine and compare the sensitivity and specificity of the ONES checklist to the recently-proposed Antibody Prevalence in Epilepsy and Encephalopathy (APE2)/Antibodies Contributing to Focal Epilepsy Signs and Symptoms (ACES) reflex score.

RESULTS

One-hundred-seventy patients who underwent neural antibody testing for epilepsy or seizures were identified. Seventy-four of 170 (43.5%) with a known etiology were excluded from sensitivity/specificity analyses; none had a true-positive neural antibody. Of the 96 patients with an unknown etiology, fourteen (15%) had a true-positive neural antibody. The proportion of false-positives was significantly higher among patients with a known etiology (3/3, 100%) compared to an unknown etiology (2/16, 13%) (P = .01). There was no significant difference of the APE2/ACES reflex score compared to the ONES checklist with regard to sensitivity (93% for both, P > .99) or specificity (71% versus 78%, P = .18) for true-positive neural antibodies.

SIGNIFICANCE

Compared to only performing neural antibody testing in patients with epilepsy or seizures of unknown etiology who have "obvious" indications, predictive scores confer no clear diagnostic advantage. Pre-specified definitions of what constitutes a true-positive neural antibody is required in future studies to avoid false-positives that can confound results.