Statins as antiepileptogenic drugs: analysing the evidence and identifying the most promising statin

Enhancing the human health and lifespan: a targeted strategy emphasizing statins

There has been substantial research interest in finding activities/agents that slow the onset and reduce the severity of numerous age-related diseases/conditions. This assessment indicates that the most studied agent intended to promote health in human population investigations for a broad spectrum of diseases are the statins, with large-scale epidemiological studies addressing numerous health endpoints. The key findings are that statin treatment consistently reduces the occurrence and attenuates the course of numerous non-communicable and contagious pathologies and numerous types of cancer with high mortality rates by about 20-50%. That one agent could affect such a broad based and consistently positive trends in epidemiological studies is unexpected and impressive, along with consistent cell and animal model research. Underlying mechanisms have been proposed that significantly contribute to the spectrum of salutary effects of statins, especially the capacity to activate Nrf2 showing hormetic dose responses in multiple organs and cell types, due to its bioavailability and broad tissue distribution. The widespread use of statins, which has the capacity to enhance human health span, should be considered for experimental exploration as a novel public health strategy that includes practical approaches for reduction of the most common adverse effects of this class of drugs including myalgia/myopathy and transaminitis.

New epilepsy therapies in development

Epilepsy is a common brain disorder, characterized by spontaneous recurrent seizures, with associated neuropsychiatric and cognitive comorbidities and increased mortality. Although people at risk can often be identified, interventions to prevent the development of the disorder are not available. Moreover, in at least 30% of patients, epilepsy cannot be controlled by current antiseizure medications (ASMs). As a result of considerable progress in epilepsy genetics and the development of novel disease models, drug screening technologies and innovative therapeutic modalities over the past 10 years, more than 200 novel epilepsy therapies are currently in the preclinical or clinical pipeline, including many treatments that act by new mechanisms. Assisted by diagnostic and predictive biomarkers, the treatment of epilepsy is undergoing paradigm shifts from symptom-only ASMs to disease prevention, and from broad trial-and-error treatments for seizures in general to mechanism-based treatments for specific epilepsy syndromes. In this Review, we assess recent progress in ASM development and outline future directions for the development of new therapies for the treatment and prevention of epilepsy.

Krüppel-like factors: potential roles in blood-brain barrier dysfunction and epileptogenesis

Epilepsy is a chronic and debilitating neurological disorder, known for the occurrence of spontaneous and recurrent seizures. Despite the availability of antiseizure drugs, 30% of people with epilepsy experience uncontrolled seizures and drug resistance, evidencing that new therapeutic options are required. The process of epileptogenesis involves the development and expansion of tissue capable of generating spontaneous recurrent seizures, during which numerous events take place, namely blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction, and neuroinflammation. The consequent cerebrovascular dysfunction results in a lower seizure threshold, seizure recurrence, and chronic epilepsy. This suggests that improving cerebrovascular health may interrupt the pathological cycle responsible for disease development and progression. Krüppel-like factors (KLFs) are a family of zinc-finger transcription factors, encountered in brain endothelial cells, glial cells, and neurons. KLFs are known to regulate vascular function and changes in their expression are associated with neuroinflammation and human diseases, including epilepsy. Hence, KLFs have demonstrated various roles in cerebrovascular dysfunction and epileptogenesis. This review critically discusses the purpose of KLFs in epileptogenic mechanisms and BBB dysfunction, as well as the potential of their pharmacological modulation as therapeutic approach for epilepsy treatment.

Antiepileptogenic Effects of Anakinra, Lamotrigine and Their Combination in a Lithium-Pilocarpine Model of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy in Rats

Temporal lobe epilepsy is a common, chronic disorder with spontaneous seizures that is often refractory to drug therapy. A potential cause of temporal lobe epilepsy is primary brain injury, making prevention of epileptogenesis after the initial event an optimal method of treatment. Despite this, no preventive therapy for epilepsy is currently available. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of anakinra, lamotrigine, and their combination on epileptogenesis using the rat lithium-pilocarpine model of temporal lobe epilepsy. The study showed that there was no significant difference in the number and duration of seizures between treated and untreated animals. However, the severity of seizures was significantly reduced after treatment. Anakinra and lamotrigine, alone or in combination, significantly reduced neuronal loss in the CA1 hippocampus compared to the control group. However, the drugs administered alone were found to be more effective in preventing neuron loss in the hippocampal CA3 field compared to combination treatment. The treatment alleviated the impairments in activity level, exploratory behavior, and anxiety but had a relatively weak effect on TLE-induced impairments in social behavior and memory. The efficacy of the combination treatment did not differ from that of anakinra and lamotrigine monotherapy. These findings suggest that anakinra and lamotrigine, either alone or in combination, may be clinically useful in preventing the development of histopathological and behavioral abnormalities associated with epilepsy.

Traumatic brain injury, stroke, and epilepsy: A mediation study in a Danish nationwide cohort

OBJECTIVE

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke are well-known causes of acquired epilepsy. TBI is also a risk factor for stroke, and injury-induced stroke may indirectly convey a proportion of the epilepsy risk following TBI. We studied the extent to which the effect of TBI on epilepsy operated through intermediary stroke.

METHODS

We analyzed a nationwide, matched, register-based cohort of adults ≥ 40 years of age whose first TBI at Danish hospitals was recorded between 2004 and 2016. A matched reference population was sampled for comparison. During follow-up, we recorded all acute strokes. Cox proportional hazard models and the difference method were used to estimate the total and controlled direct effect hazard ratios (HRs) of TBI on epilepsy and the indirect effect HRs of TBI on epilepsy operating through stroke, and to calculate the proportion eliminated. Analyses were stratified by severity of, age at, and time since TBI.

RESULTS

We followed 57 900 persons with TBI (48.6% males) from median age 61 years (interquartile range = 51-75), and 561 977 age- and sex-matched references. The total effect of TBI on epilepsy was higher for persons aged 40-59 years (HR = 5.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.65-5.72) than for persons aged ≥ 60 years (HR = 4.55, 95% CI = 4.19-4.95). In contrast, the indirect effect of TBI mediated by stroke was lower for persons aged 40-59 years (HR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.02-1.03) than for persons aged ≥ 60 years (HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.04-1.06). We estimated 2.3% and 5.6% of the risk of epilepsy after TBI to operate through stroke for these age groups, respectively.

SIGNIFICANCE

Less than 6% of the risk of epilepsy following TBI operated through intermediary stroke. However, this mechanism seems to play an increasing role with age and for late onset epilepsies. This warrants further investigation.

Repurposing of cholesterol-lowering agents in status epilepticus: A neuroprotective effect of simvastatin

The increase of cholesterol synthesis after a status epilepticus may lead to excitotoxic processes, neuronal loss and favor the appearance of spontaneous epileptic seizures. Lowering cholesterol content could be a neuroprotective strategy. Here, we evaluated the protective effect of simvastatin administrated daily for 14 days, after the induction of a status epilepticus by intrahippocampal injection of kainic acid in mice. The results were compared to those obtained from mice showing a kainic acid-induced status epilepticus, treated daily with a saline solution, and from mice injected with a control phosphate-buffered solution without any status epilepticus. We first assessed the antiseizure effects of simvastatin by performing video-electroencephalographic recordings during the first three hours after kainic acid injection and continuously between the fifteenth and the thirty-first days. Mice treated with simvastatin had significantly fewer generalized seizures during the first three hours without a significant effect on generalized seizures after two weeks. There was a trend for fewer hippocampal electrographic seizures after two weeks. Secondly, we evaluated the neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of simvastatin by measuring the fluorescence of neuronal and astrocyte markers on the thirtieth day after status onset. We found that simvastatin reduced CA1 reactive astrocytosis, demonstrated by a significant 37% decrease in GFAP-positive cells, and that simvastatin prevented the neuronal loss in CA1, demonstrated by a significant 42% increase in the NeuN-positive cells, as compared to the findings in mice with kainic acid-induced status epilepticus treated by a saline solution. Our study confirms the interest of cholesterol-lowering agents, and in particular simvastatin, in status epilepticus and paves the way for a clinical pilot study to prevent neurological sequelae after status epilepticus. This paper was presented at the 8th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures held in September 2022.

Emerging Molecular Targets for Anti-Epileptogenic and Epilepsy Modifying Drugs

The pharmacological treatment of epilepsy is purely symptomatic. Despite many decades of intensive research, causal treatment of this common neurologic disorder is still unavailable. Nevertheless, it is expected that advances in modern neuroscience and molecular biology tools, as well as improved animal models may accelerate designing antiepileptogenic and epilepsy-modifying drugs. Epileptogenesis triggers a vast array of genomic, epigenomic and transcriptomic changes, which ultimately lead to morphological and functional transformation of specific neuronal circuits resulting in the occurrence of spontaneous convulsive or nonconvulsive seizures. Recent decades unraveled molecular processes and biochemical signaling pathways involved in the proepileptic transformation of brain circuits including oxidative stress, apoptosis, neuroinflammatory and neurotrophic factors. The "omics" data derived from both human and animal epileptic tissues, as well as electrophysiological, imaging and neurochemical analysis identified a plethora of possible molecular targets for drugs, which could interfere with various stages of epileptogenetic cascade, including inflammatory processes and neuroplastic changes. In this narrative review, we briefly present contemporary views on the neurobiological background of epileptogenesis and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of some more promising molecular targets for antiepileptogenic pharmacotherapy.

Statins as an antiepileptogenic or disease-modifying treatment? A survey of what UK patients and significant others think about repurposing and trialing them for epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To identify the views of people with epilepsy (PWE), and their significant others, on the repurposing and trialing of statins as a potential antiepileptogenic or disease-modifying treatment for those who have had the first seizure.

METHODS

Online questionnaire. Participants needed to be aged ≥ 16 years, UK residents, and able to independently complete a questionnaire in English. User groups distributed study adverts. Embedded infographics explained repurposing, why anti-seizure treatment is not typically started after a first seizure and the nature of randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs). The questionnaire asked participants to reflect and rate their expected willingness to have started an unspecified treatment after their first seizure/s (or that of the person with epilepsy they knew). They also rated willingness if the treatment were a statin, views of statins, the importance of an RCT of statins to their community, the outcomes it should assess, and their willingness to have taken part in it. The estimated number needed for the survey was 324.

RESULTS

Responses from 213 persons were analyzed; 111 (52.1%) were PWE and 102 (47.9%) significant others. The median years diagnosed was 10 and PWE suffered from relatively severe epilepsy. One hundred and seventeen (54.9%) said they would have started an unspecified treatment after their first seizure/s (or supported the person with epilepsy they knew to have). A similar proportion (55.4%) said they would have started the treatment if it were a statin. Participants' main concern about statins, expressed by 79%, was their possible side effects. Repurposing was a concern for only 25%. Most (85.8%) rated an RCT of statins as of extreme or high importance; 54.4% said they would have participated.

CONCLUSION

The PWE and significant others (SOs) responding to our survey expressed views towards repurposing statins that were generally positive and indicate a trial in those who have had a first seizure might be feasible. Concerns regarding side effects are common. Our findings could help optimize a future trial's design and the case for funding. Limitations include that we did not survey persons who had experienced a first seizure and did not go on to develop epilepsy. Also, persons with uncontrolled epilepsy were overrepresented.