Seizure underreporting in LGI1 and CASPR2 antibody encephalitis

Risk of Seizure Recurrence Due to Autoimmune Encephalitis With NMDAR, LGI1, CASPR2, and GABABR Antibodies: Implications for Return to Driving

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients with ongoing seizures are usually not allowed to drive. The prognosis for seizure freedom is favorable in patients with autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) with antibodies against NMDA receptor (NMDAR), leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1), contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CASPR2), and the gamma-aminobutyric-acid B receptor (GABABR). We hypothesized that after a seizure-free period of 3 months, patients with AIE have a seizure recurrence risk of <20% during the subsequent 12 months. This would render them eligible for noncommercial driving according to driving regulations in several countries.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter cohort study analyzed follow-up data from patients aged 15 years or older with seizures resulting from NMDAR-, LGI1-, CASPR2-, or GABABR-AIE, who had been seizure-free for ≥3 months. We used Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates for the seizure recurrence risk at 12 months for each antibody group and tested for the effects of potential covariates with regression models.

RESULTS

We included 383 patients with NMDAR-, 440 with LGI1-, 114 with CASPR2-, and 44 with GABABR-AIE from 14 international centers. After being seizure-free for 3 months after an initial seizure period, we calculated the probability of remaining seizure-free for another 12 months (KM estimate) as 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-0.92) for NMDAR, 0.84 (CI 0.80-0.88) for LGI1, 0.82 (CI 0.75-0.90) for CASPR2, and 0.76 (CI 0.62-0.93) for GABABR.

DISCUSSION

Taking a <20% recurrence risk within 12 months as sufficient, patients with NMDAR-AIE and LGI1-AIE could be considered eligible for noncommercial driving after having been seizure-free for 3 months.

Autoimmune-associated seizure disorders

With the discovery of an expanding number of neural autoantibodies, autoimmune etiologies of seizures have been increasingly recognized. Clinical phenotypes have been identified in association with specific underlying antibodies, allowing an earlier diagnosis. These phenotypes include faciobrachial dystonic seizures with LGI1 encephalitis, neuropsychiatric presentations associated with movement disorders and seizures in NMDA-receptor encephalitis, and chronic temporal lobe epilepsy in GAD65 neurologic autoimmunity. Prompt recognition of these disorders is important, as some of them are highly responsive to immunotherapy. The response to immunotherapy is highest in patients with encephalitis secondary to antibodies targeting cell surface synaptic antigens. However, the response is less effective in conditions involving antibodies binding intracellular antigens or in Rasmussen syndrome, which are predominantly mediated by cytotoxic T-cell processes that are associated with irreversible cellular destruction. Autoimmune encephalitides also may have a paraneoplastic etiology, further emphasizing the importance of recognizing these disorders. Finally, autoimmune processes and responses to novel immunotherapies have been reported in new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) and febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES), warranting their inclusion in any current review of autoimmune-associated seizure disorders.

Anticonvulsive treatment in autoimmune encephalitis: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Epileptic seizures are a common manifestation of autoimmune encephalitis (AIE). Immunosuppression (IT) is an efficient therapeutic approach, particularly in AIE associated with antibodies against extracellular structures. The role of antiseizure medication (ASM) is less clear. However, it may be beneficial in disease refractory to IT or in chronic post-AIE epilepsy.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review assessing the PubMed and Cochrane databases to identify all reports on patients with epileptic seizures due to AIE in whom ASM was used and report it according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards. We included case series (minimum 3 eligible patients), retrospective and prospective observational studies, and randomized controlled trials. The main outcome assessed was therapeutic efficacy of ASM. Secondary outcomes comprise number, type, and adverse effects of ASM. Descriptive statistics were used. The level of evidence was assessed according to the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.

RESULTS

We screened a total of 3371 studies and included 30 (7 prospective, 23 retrospective). The reports cover a total of 708 patients, the majority (72.5%) suffering from AIE with antibodies against extracellular structures. Type of AIE, seizure frequency, and number and type of ASM used were heterogenous. While most patients profited from IT and/or ASM, the effect of ASM could rarely be isolated. Nine studies report on patients who received ASM monotherapy or were on ASM for a relevant length of time before IT initiation or after IT failure. One study reports a significant association between seizure freedom and use of sodium channel inhibitors. However, levels of evidence were generally low.

CONCLUSION

Few robust data exist on the particular efficacy of ASM in autoimmune epileptic seizures. While these patients generally seem to respond less well to ASM or surgical interventions, sodium channel blockers may have an additional benefit compared to other substances. However, levels of evidence are low and early IT remains the mainstay of AIE therapy. Future trials should address optimal ASM selection and dosing in AIE.

A hospital-based retrospective study: early recognition of neuronal surface antibodies by clinical manifestations and CSF inflammation indicators in patients with unexplained epilepsy

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of actual and comprehensive data on the detection rate of neuronal surface antibodies in patients with unexplained epilepsy in China. Thus, we attempted to analyze the differences in clinical manifestations, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) characteristics, seizure types and other aspects of antibody-positive and negative patients, to identify suspected antibody-positive epilepsy patients.

METHODS

In total, 137 inpatients with unexplained epilepsy were consecutively included, and neuronal surface antibodies (NSAbs) were detected by serological and/or CSF evaluations. The clinical features and seizure characteristics were analyzed between the NSAb-positive and negative patients. In addition, patients were divided into four groups based on CSF and blood antibody titers. CSF cell count and protein content were analyzed in relation to antibody titers.

RESULTS

There were 45 (32.8%) patients tested positive for antibodies. Multivariate analyses revealed that age, mental status changes or memory deterioration, CSF protein, CSF cell count, treatment, days of hospitalization, outcome, duration of symptoms before hospitalization, status epilepticus, and number of antiepileptic drugs were significantly associated with the NSAb-positive group and changes in inflammatory indicators in routine CSF analysis were associated with antibody titers.

CONCLUSIONS

A relatively high proportion of patients with unexplained epilepsy have positive NSAbs. Patients with the above clinical characteristics need to be highly suspected of NSAbs positivity and should be tested for antibodies in time to assist treatment. The decrease of CSF cell count and protein content has suggestive value for the decrease of antibody titer, which should be evaluated in the follow-up.

Is There a Continuum Between Acute Symptomatic Seizures Secondary to Autoimmune Encephalitis and Autoimmune-Associated Epilepsy?

Seizure Underreporting in LGI1 and CASPR2 Antibody Encephalitis Baumgartner T, Pitsch J, Olaciregui-Dague K, Hoppe C, Racz A, Rüber T, Becker A, von Wrede R, Surges R. Epilepsia . 2022;63(9): e100-e105. doi:10.1111/epi.17338 . PMID: 35735209 Patients with anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated1 protein (LGI1) or anti-contactin-associated protein 2 (CASPR2) antibody encephalitis typically present with frequent epileptic seizures. The seizures generally respond well to immunosuppressive therapy, and the long-term seizure outcome seems to be favorable. Consequentially, diagnosing acute symptomatic seizures secondary to autoimmune encephalitis instead of autoimmune epilepsy was proposed. However, published data on long-term seizure outcomes in CASPR2 and LGI1 antibody encephalitis are mostly based on patient reports, and seizure underreporting is a recognized issue. Clinical records from our tertiary epilepsy center were screened retrospectively for patients with LGI1 and CASPR2 antibody encephalitis who reported seizure freedom for at least 3 months and received video-electroencephalography (EEG) for >24 h at follow-up visits. Twenty (LGI1, n = 15; CASPR2, n = 5) of 32 patients with LGI1 (n = 24) and CASPR2 (n = 8) antibody encephalitis fulfilled these criteria. We recorded focal aware and impaired awareness seizures in four of these patients (20%) with reported seizure-free intervals ranging from 3 to 27 months. Our results question the favorable seizure outcome in patients with CASPR2 and LGI1 antibody encephalitis and suggest that the proportion of patients who have persistent seizures may be greater. Our findings underline the importance of prolonged video-EEG telemetry in this population.

Seizure characteristics and outcomes in patients with neurological conditions related to high-risk paraneoplastic antibodies

OBJECTIVE

Seizures are a common manifestation of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes. The objective of this study was to describe the seizure characteristics and outcomes in patients with high-risk paraneoplastic autoantibodies (>70% cancer association) and to determine factors associated with ongoing seizures.

METHODS

Patients from 2000 to 2020 with seizures and high-risk paraneoplastic autoantibodies were retrospectively identified. Factors associated with ongoing seizures at last follow-up were evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were identified (34 males, median age at presentation = 52 years). ANNA1-IgG (Hu; n = 24, 39%), Ma2-IgG (n = 14, 23%), and CRMP5-IgG (CV2; n = 11, 18%) were the most common underlying antibodies. Seizures were the initial presenting symptom in 26 (43%), and malignancy was present in 38 (63%). Seizures persisted for >1 month in 83%, and 60% had ongoing seizures, with almost all patients (55/60, 92%) still being on antiseizure medications at last follow-up a median of 25 months after seizure onset. Ongoing seizures at last follow-up were associated with Ma2-IgG or ANNA1-IgG compared to other antibodies (p = .04), highest seizure frequency being at least daily (p = .0002), seizures on electroencephalogram (EEG; p = .03), and imaging evidence of limbic encephalitis (LE; p = .03). Death occurred in 48% throughout the course of follow-up, with a higher mortality in patients with LE than in those without LE (p = .04). Of 31 surviving patients at last follow-up, 55% continued to have intermittent seizures.

SIGNIFICANCE

Seizures in the setting of high-risk paraneoplastic antibodies are frequently resistant to treatment. Ongoing seizures are associated with ANNA1-IgG and Ma2-IgG, high seizure frequency, and EEG and imaging abnormalities. Although a subset of patients may respond to immunotherapy and achieve seizure freedom, poor outcomes are frequently encountered. Death was more common among patients with LE.

How autoimmunity changed our diagnostic practice in epileptology?

Since few years, a new etiology of epilepsy emerges with the labelling of new autoantibodies against the central nervous system. In 2017, the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) concluded that autoimmunity is one of six etiologies contributing to epilepsy and that autoimmune epilepsy is directly caused by immune disorders in which seizures constitute a core symptom. Epileptic disorders of immune origin are now distinguished in two different entities: acute symptomatic seizures secondary to autoimmune (ASS) and autoimmune-associated epilepsy (AAE) with different expected clinical outcome under immunotherapy. If acute encephalitis is usually related to ASS with a classic good control of the disease under immunotherapy, clinical phenotype characterized by isolated seizures (new onset seizures and chronic focal epilepsy patients) may be due to either ASS or to AAE. Decision of Abs testing and early immunotherapy initiation needs the development of clinical scores able to select patients with high risk of positive Abs testings. If this selection is now included in the usual medical care of encephalitic patients, specifically with NORSE, the actual bigger challenge is in patients with non or only mild encephalitic symptoms followed for new onset seizures or chronic focal epilepsy patients of unknown origin. The emergence of this new entity provides new therapeutic strategies with specific etiologic and probably anti epileptogenic medication rather than the usual and nonspecific ASM. In the world of the epileptology, this new autoimmune entity appears as a big challenge with an exciting chance to improve or even definitely cure patients of their epilepsy. However, the detection of these patients has to be done in the early phase of the disease to offer the best outcome.

Long-term-video monitoring EEG and 18F-FDG-PET are useful tools to detect residual disease activity in anti-LGI1-Abs encephalitis: A case report

Background

The use of CD20-depleting monoclonal antibodies has shown to improve the long-term outcome of patients with anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein 1 antibodies (anti-LGI1-Abs) encephalitis after first-line immunotherapy, but currently predictive markers of treatment response and disease activity are lacking.

Case presentation

A 75-year-old man presented cognitive impairment and faciobrachial dystonic seizures (FBDS), with mild abnormalities at electroencephalography (EEG), normal brain magnetic resonance and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis. Anti-LGI1-Abs were detected in serum and CSF, and corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulins were administered. Despite partial cognitive improvement, 18F-fluoridesoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) showed the persistence of temporo-mesial hypermetabolism, and FBDS were still detected by long-term monitoring video EEG (LTMV EEG). Rituximab was therefore administered with FBDS disappearance, further cognitive improvement, and resolution of 18F-FDG-PET temporo-mesial hypermetabolism.

Conclusions

Our experience supports the use of 18F-FDG-PET and LTMVEEG as useful tools to measure disease activity, evaluate treatment response and guide therapeutic decisions in the long-term management of anti-LGI1-antibody encephalitis.