Seizure outcome of pediatric magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy versus open surgery: A matched noninferiority cohort study

Impact of Previous Surgery on Success of Magnetic Resonance-guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (MRgLITT) to Treat Pediatric Epilepsy: An Institutional Experience

BACKGROUND

There is an emerging role for minimally invasive magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) in the treatment of pediatric epilepsy refractory to medication. To date, predictors of MRgLITT success have not been established in a sizeable singular experience. Correspondingly, the aim of this study was to elucidate if previous surgical history predicts MRgLITT success in this setting.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of our MRgLITT procedures for pediatric (patient age <19 years) epilepsy from 2011 to 2020 with documented seizure outcomes at 1 and 2 years after procedure. Categorical and continuous data were compared using χ2 and Student's t test, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 41 patients satisfied all criteria with 16 (39%) female and 25 (61%) male patients. Following MRgLITT, seizure-freedom at 1-year was achieved in 15 (37%) patients. In the cohort, there were 14 (34%) patients who had undergone previous open surgery for epilepsy at mean age of 9.4 ± 5.5 years. Patients with a previous open surgery history were found to statistically experience longer length of hospitalization after MRgLITT (P = 0.04) with a statistically lower proportion of seizure-freedom at 1-year after MRgLITT (14% vs. 48%, P = 0.03). However, there was no difference in the rate of seizure-freedom at 2 years (29% vs. 41%, P = 0.44), as well as no difference in subsequent surgical interventions for seizure management between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our institutional experience, patients with previous open surgery history may experience longer length of hospitalization after MRgLITT for pediatric epilepsy and lesser response in seizure-freedom within the first year but with non-inferior seizure freedom by the second year.

The changing landscape of palliative epilepsy surgery for Lennox Gastaut Syndrome

Lennox Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) is characterized by drug-resistant epilepsy that typically leads to decreased quality of life and deleterious neurodevelopmental comorbidities from medically refractory seizures. In recent years there has been a dramatic increase in the development and availability of novel treatment strategies for Lennox Gastaut Syndrome patient to improve seizure. Recent advances in neuromodulation and minimally invasive magnetic resonance guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) have paved the way for new treatments strategies including deep brain stimulation (DBS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and MRgLITT corpus callosum ablation. These new strategies offer hope for children with drug-resistant generalized epilepsies, but important questions remain about the safety and effectiveness of these new approaches. In this review, we describe the opportunities presented by these new strategies and how each treatment strategy is currently being employed. Next, we will critically assess available evidence for these new approaches compared to traditional palliative epilepsy surgery approaches, such as vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and open microsurgical corpus callosotomy (CC). Finally, we will describe future directions that would help define which of the available strategies should be employed and when.

Comparison of magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy corpus callosum ablation to open microsurgical corpus callosotomy: A single-center retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Corpus callosotomy (CC) is an important treatment for atonic seizures in patients with generalized or multifocal drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Traditionally, CC is performed via an open microsurgical approach, but more recently, MR-guided stereotactic laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) corpus callosum ablation (CCA) has been developed to leverage the safety and minimally invasive nature of LITT. Given the recent adoption of CCA at select centers, how CCA compares to CC is unknown. We aim to compare the clinical seizure outcomes of CCA and CC after extended follow-up.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study to compare the effectiveness and safety of CC to CCA from 1994 to 2022. The primary outcome was a 50% reduction in target seizure. Secondary outcome measures were postoperative length of stay, adverse events, and other effectiveness metrics. Comparative statistics were executed using Stata. Normality for continuous variables was assessed, and parametric statistics were utilized as needed. Frequency was compared with chi-squared or Fischer's exact tests, when applicable.

RESULTS

Data from 47 operations performed on 36 patients were included in this study, of which 13 (36%) patients underwent 17 CCA. Patients who received CCA had similar rates of meaningful reduction (>50%) of atonic seizures as their CC counterparts (55% vs 70% P = 0.15). Patients undergoing CCA had significantly shorter hospitalizations than those receiving CC (2.5 vs 6.0 days P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in rates of postoperative complications between the groups, although the magnitude of the complication rates was lower in the CCA cohort (12% vs 28%).

SIGNIFICANCE

This early experience suggests CCA has similar outcomes to traditional CC, albeit with a shorter hospital stay. However, future studies are necessary to investigate the noninferiority between these two approaches. Large multicenter studies are necessary to investigate differences in adverse events and whether these findings generalize across other centers.

A multi-center comparison of surgical techniques for corpus Callosotomy in pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

Corpus callosotomy (CC) is used to reduce seizures, primarily in patients with generalized drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). The invasive nature of the procedure contributes to underutilization despite its potential superiority to other palliative procedures. The goal of this study was to use a multi-institutional epilepsy surgery database to characterize the use of CC across participating centers.

METHODS

Data were acquired from the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium (PERC) Surgery Database, a prospective observational study collecting data on children 0-18 years referred for surgical evaluation of DRE across 22 U.S. pediatric epilepsy centers. Patient, epilepsy, and surgical characteristics were collected across multiple CC modalities. Outcomes and complications were recorded and analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients undergoing 85 CC procedures at 14 participating epilepsy centers met inclusion criteria. Mean age at seizure onset was 2.3 years (0-9.4); mean age for Phase I evaluation and surgical intervention were 9.45 (.1-20) and 10.46 (.2-20.6) years, respectively. Generalized seizure types were the most common (59%). Complete CC was performed in 88%. The majority of CC procedures (57%) were via open craniotomy, followed by laser interstitial thermal therapy (LiTT) (20%) and mini-craniotomy/endoscopic (mc/e) (22%). Mean operative times were significantly longer for LiTT, whereas mean estimated blood loss was greater in open cases. Complications occurred in 11 cases (13%) and differed significantly between surgical techniques (p < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in length of postoperative stay across approaches. Mean follow-up was 12.8 months (range 1-39). Favorable Engel outcomes were experienced by 37 (78.7%) of the patients who underwent craniotomy, 10 (58.8%) with LiTT, and 12 (63.2%) with mc/e; these differences were not statistically significant.

SIGNIFICANCE

CC is an effective surgical modality for children with DRE. Regardless of surgical modality, complication rates are acceptable and seizure outcomes generally favorable. Newer, less-invasive, surgical approaches may lead to increased adoption of this efficacious therapeutic option for pediatric DRE.

Outcomes after laser interstitial thermal ablation for temporal lobe epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Epilepsy is a common condition that affects approximately 1% of the world's population, with about one-third being refractory epilepsy. Temporal lobe epilepsy is the most common type of drug-resistant epilepsy, and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is an innovative treatment. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to summarize the current evidence on outcomes after LITT, including seizure freedom rate, complication rate, and neurocognitive outcome. PubMed and OVID Medline search engines were systematically searched for all indexed publications in the English language up to July15, 2023. The search was limited to human studies. Proportions and 95% confidence interval (CI) values were calculated for seizure, neurocognitive outcome, and complication rate. A total of 836 patients were included. Overall seizure outcomes, regardless of the pathology, included Engel I outcome in 56% (95% CI, 52.4-59.5%), Engel II outcome in 19.2% (95% CI, 15.4-23.6%), Engel III outcome in 17.3% (95% CI, 13.5-21.8%), and Engel IV outcome in 10.5% (95% CI 6.3-17%) of the patients. The overall decline in verbal and visual memory regardless of laterality was 24.2 (95% CI 8.6-52%) and 25.2% (8.3-55.8%). For naming, the decline was 13.4% (6.6-25.4%). The results of the pooled analysis in comparison with available data in the literature showed that seizure outcomes after LITT were slightly inferior to published data after temporal lobectomy. Data on cognitive outcomes after LITT are scarce and heterogeneous.