Medical and surgical treatment of epilepsy in older adults: A national survey

Late-onset epilepsy clinic: From clinical diagnostics to biomarkers

The unique patho-clinical entity of late-onset epilepsy (LOE), distinguished by its distinct natural history, from its onset to the prognosis it portends, necessitates specialized care. We lack a universally accepted definition, but LOE is typically identified as epilepsy onset after the age of 60 or 65. Unlike epilepsy in younger individuals, LOE is almost by default focal in origin, secondary to acquired etiologies, and presents unique diagnostic and management challenges due to its atypical semiology, higher comorbidity burden, frailty, and increased risks of subsequent stroke and dementia. LOE clinics have been established to address these challenges, providing a multidisciplinary approach to optimize outcomes in patients with new-onset seizures beyond the fifth decade of life. LOE clinics are essential for comprehensive care, offering not only seizure management but also monitoring and addressing associated comorbidities. The care model involves collaboration among neurologists, primary care providers, cardiologists, mental health professionals, and social workers to manage LOE patients' complex needs effectively. The prevalence of cognitive dysfunction in LOE patients underscores the need for regular cognitive assessments and interventions. Biomarker research, particularly involving amyloid beta, offers promising avenues for early diagnosis and a better understanding of the interplay between LOE and Alzheimer's disease. Establishing LOE clinics in major referral centers can enhance provider expertise, improve patient outcomes, and facilitate research to advance diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In conclusion, LOE clinics play a critical role in addressing the multifaceted needs of older adults with epilepsy, tailored to local resources and challenges, thus enhancing epilepsy care in an aging global population.

Initiation of Antiseizure Medications by US Board-Certified Neurologists After a First Unprovoked Seizure Based on EEG Findings

Background and Objectives

To investigate neurologists' practice variability in antiseizure medication (ASM) initiation after a first unprovoked seizure based on reported EEG interpretations.

Methods

We developed a 15-question multiple-choice survey incorporating a standardized clinical case scenario of a patient with a first unprovoked seizure for whom different EEG reports were provided. The survey was distributed among board-certified neurologists practicing in the United States. Associations between categorical variables were evaluated using the Fisher Exact test. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression.

Results

A total of 106 neurologists responded to the survey. Most responders (75%-95%) would start ASM for definite epileptiform features on EEG, with similar rates between subgroups differing in years of practice, presence of subspecialty EEG training, and self-reported confidence in EEG interpretation. There was greater variability in practice for nonspecific EEG abnormalities, with sharply contoured activity, sharp transients, and focal delta slowing associated with the highest variability and uncertainty. Neurologists with >5 years of practice experience (21% vs 44%, OR 0.35 [95% CI 0.13-0.89], p = 0.021), subspecialty EEG training (15% vs 50%, OR = 0.17 [95% CI 0.06-0.48], p < 0.001), and greater confidence in EEG interpretation (21% vs 52%, OR 0.24 [95% CI 0.09-0.62], p = 0.001) were less likely to start ASM for ≥2 nonspecific EEG abnormalities and reported greater uncertainty. In multivariate analysis, seniority (p = 0.039) and subspecialty EEG training (p = 0.032) were associated with decreased ASM initiation for nonspecific EEG features.

Discussion

There was substantial variability in ASM initiation practices between board-certified neurologists after a first unprovoked seizure with nonspecific EEG abnormalities. These findings clarify specific areas where EEG reporting may be optimized and reinforces the importance of implementing evidence-based practice guidelines.

Start Low and Go Slow: The General Principle of Managing Older Adults With Epilepsy Finds Robust Support From Frailty

Association Between Frailty and Antiseizure Medication Tolerability in Older Adults With Epilepsy Vary-O’Neal A, Miranzadeh S, Husein N, Holroyd-Leduc J, Sajobi TT, Wiebe S, Deacon C, Tellez-Zenteno JF, Josephson CB, Keezer MR. Neurology . 2023;100(11):e1135-e1147. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000201701 . PMID: 36535780. Background and Objective: Frailty is an important aspect of biological aging, referring to the increased vulnerability of individuals with frailty to physical and psychological stressors. While older adults with epilepsy are an important and distinct clinical group, there are no data on frailty in this population. We hypothesize that frailty will correlate with the seizure frequency and especially the tolerability of anti-seizure medications (ASMs) in older adults with epilepsy. Methods: We recruited individuals aged 60 years or older with active epilepsy from 4 Canadian hospital centers. We reported the seizure frequency in the 3 months preceding the interview, while ASM tolerability was quantified using the Liverpool Adverse Events Profile (LAEP). We applied 3 measures of frailty: grip strength as a measure of physical frailty, 1 self-reported score (Edmonton frail score [EFS]), and 1 scale completed by a healthcare professional (clinical frailty scale [CFS]). We also administered standardized questionnaires measuring levels of anxiety, depression, functional disability, and quality of life and obtained relevant clinical and demographic data. Results: Forty-three women and 43 men aged 60-93 years were recruited, 87% of whom had focal epilepsy, with an average frequency of 3.4 seizures per month. Multiple linear regression and zero-inflated negative binomial regression models showed that EFS and CFS scores were associated with decreased ASM tolerability, each point increase leading to 1.83 (95% CI: 0.67-4.30) and 2.49 (95% CI: 1.27-2.39) point increases on the LAEP scale, respectively. Neither the EFS and CFS scores nor grip strength were significantly associated with seizure frequency. The EFS was moderately correlated with depression, anxiety, quality of life, and functional disability, demonstrating the best construct validity among the 3 tested measures of frailty. Discussion: The EFS was significantly, both statistically and clinically, associated with ASM tolerability. It also showed multiple advantages in performance while assessing for frailty in older adults with epilepsy, when compared with the 2 other measures of frailty that we tested. Future studies must focus on what role the EFS during epilepsy diagnosis may play in ASM selection among older adults with epilepsy.