Long-term epilepsy outcome dynamics revealed by natural language processing of clinic notes

Artificial intelligence in epilepsy - applications and pathways to the clinic

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming health care, and its applications in epilepsy have increased exponentially over the past decade. Integration of AI into epilepsy management promises to revolutionize the diagnosis and treatment of this complex disorder. However, translation of AI into neurology clinical practice has not yet been successful, emphasizing the need to consider progress to date and assess challenges and limitations of AI. In this Review, we provide an overview of AI applications that have been developed in epilepsy using a variety of data modalities: neuroimaging, electroencephalography, electronic health records, medical devices and multimodal data integration. For each, we consider potential applications, including seizure detection and prediction, seizure lateralization, localization of the seizure-onset zone and assessment for surgical or neurostimulation interventions, and review the performance of AI tools developed to date. We also discuss methodological considerations and challenges that must be addressed to successfully integrate AI into clinical practice. Our goal is to provide an overview of the current state of the field and provide guidance for leveraging AI in future to improve management of epilepsy.

Disparities in seizure outcomes revealed by large language models

OBJECTIVE

Large-language models (LLMs) can potentially revolutionize health care delivery and research, but risk propagating existing biases or introducing new ones. In epilepsy, social determinants of health are associated with disparities in care access, but their impact on seizure outcomes among those with access remains unclear. Here we (1) evaluated our validated, epilepsy-specific LLM for intrinsic bias, and (2) used LLM-extracted seizure outcomes to determine if different demographic groups have different seizure outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We tested our LLM for differences and equivalences in prediction accuracy and confidence across demographic groups defined by race, ethnicity, sex, income, and health insurance, using manually annotated notes. Next, we used LLM-classified seizure freedom at each office visit to test for demographic outcome disparities, using univariable and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

We analyzed 84 675 clinic visits from 25 612 unique patients seen at our epilepsy center. We found little evidence of bias in the prediction accuracy or confidence of outcome classifications across demographic groups. Multivariable analysis indicated worse seizure outcomes for female patients (OR 1.33, P ≤ .001), those with public insurance (OR 1.53, P ≤ .001), and those from lower-income zip codes (OR ≥1.22, P  ≤ .007). Black patients had worse outcomes than White patients in univariable but not multivariable analysis (OR 1.03, P = .66).

CONCLUSION

We found little evidence that our LLM was intrinsically biased against any demographic group. Seizure freedom extracted by LLM revealed disparities in seizure outcomes across several demographic groups. These findings quantify the critical need to reduce disparities in the care of people with epilepsy.

Potential merits and flaws of large language models in epilepsy care: A critical review

The current pace of development and applications of large language models (LLMs) is unprecedented and will impact future medical care significantly. In this critical review, we provide the background to better understand these novel artificial intelligence (AI) models and how LLMs can be of future use in the daily care of people with epilepsy. Considering the importance of clinical history taking in diagnosing and monitoring epilepsy-combined with the established use of electronic health records-a great potential exists to integrate LLMs in epilepsy care. We present the current available LLM studies in epilepsy. Furthermore, we highlight and compare the most commonly used LLMs and elaborate on how these models can be applied in epilepsy. We further discuss important drawbacks and risks of LLMs, and we provide recommendations for overcoming these limitations.

Natural history of rare diseases using natural language processing of narrative unstructured electronic health records: The example of Dravet syndrome

OBJECTIVE

The increasing implementation of electronic health records allows the use of advanced text-mining methods for establishing new patient phenotypes and stratification, and for revealing outcome correlations. In this study, we aimed to explore the electronic narrative clinical reports of a cohort of patients with Dravet syndrome (DS) longitudinally followed at our center, to identify the capacity of this methodology to retrace natural history of DS during the early years.

METHODS

We used a document-based clinical data warehouse employing natural language processing to recognize the phenotype concepts in the narrative medical reports. We included patients with DS who have a medical report produced before the age of 2 years and a follow-up after the age of 3 years ("DS cohort," 56 individuals). We selected two control populations, a "general control cohort" (275 individuals) and a "neurological control cohort" (281 individuals), with similar characteristics in terms of gender, number of reports, and age at last report. To find concepts specifically associated with DS, we performed a phenome-wide association study using Cox regression, comparing the reports of the three cohorts. We then performed a qualitative analysis of the surviving concepts based on their median age at first appearance.

RESULTS

A total of 76 concepts were prevalent in the reports of children with DS. Concepts appearing during the first 2 years were mostly related with the epilepsy features at the onset of DS (convulsive and prolonged seizures triggered by fever, often requiring in-hospital care). Subsequently, concepts related to new types of seizures and to drug resistance appeared. A series of non-seizure-related concepts emerged after the age of 2-3 years, referring to the nonseizure comorbidities classically associated with DS.

SIGNIFICANCE

The extraction of clinical terms by narrative reports of children with DS allows outlining the known natural history of this rare disease in early childhood. This original model of "longitudinal phenotyping" could be applied to other rare and very rare conditions with poor natural history description.

Alcohol for seizure induction in the epilepsy monitoring unit

RATIONALE

Seizure induction techniques are used in the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) to increase diagnostic yield and reduce length of stay. There are insufficient data on the efficacy of alcohol as an induction technique.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study using six years of EMU data at our institution. We compared cases who received alcohol for seizure induction to matched controls who did not. The groups were matched on the following variables: age, reason for admission, length of stay, number of antiseizure medications (ASM) at admission, whether ASMs were tapered during admission, and presence of interictal epileptiform discharges. We used both propensity score and exact matching strategies. We compared the likelihood of epileptic seizures and nonepileptic events in cases versus controls using Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analysis, as well as odds ratios for these outcomes occurring at any time during the admission.

RESULTS

We analyzed 256 cases who received alcohol (median dose 2.5 standard drinks) and 256 propensity score-matched controls. Cases who received alcohol were no more likely than controls to have an epileptic seizure (X2(1) = 0.01, p = 0.93) or nonepileptic event (X2(1) = 2.1, p = 0.14) in the first 48 h after alcohol administration. For the admission overall, cases were no more likely to have an epileptic seizure (OR 0.89, 95 % CI 0.61-1.28, p = 0.58), nonepileptic event (OR 0.97, CI 0.62-1.53, p = 1.00), nor require rescue benzodiazepine (OR 0.63, CI 0.35-1.12, p = 0.15). Stratified analyses revealed no increased risk of epileptic seizure in any subgroups. Sensitivity analysis using exact matching showed that results were robust to matching strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

Alcohol was not an effective induction technique in the EMU. This finding has implications for counseling patients with epilepsy about the risks of drinking alcohol in moderation in their daily lives.

Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Applications to Epilepsy: a Review for the Practicing Epileptologist

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) are data-driven techniques to translate raw data into applicable and interpretable insights that can assist in clinical decision making. Some of these tools have extremely promising initial results, earning both great excitement and creating hype. This non-technical article reviews recent developments in ML/AI in epilepsy to assist the current practicing epileptologist in understanding both the benefits and limitations of integrating ML/AI tools into their clinical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

ML/AI tools have been developed to assist clinicians in almost every clinical decision including (1) predicting future epilepsy in people at risk, (2) detecting and monitoring for seizures, (3) differentiating epilepsy from mimics, (4) using data to improve neuroanatomic localization and lateralization, and (5) tracking and predicting response to medical and surgical treatments. We also discuss practical, ethical, and equity considerations in the development and application of ML/AI tools including chatbots based on Large Language Models (e.g., ChatGPT). ML/AI tools will change how clinical medicine is practiced, but, with rare exceptions, the transferability to other centers, effectiveness, and safety of these approaches have not yet been established rigorously. In the future, ML/AI will not replace epileptologists, but epileptologists with ML/AI will replace epileptologists without ML/AI.

Artificial intelligence in epilepsy phenotyping

Artificial intelligence (AI) allows data analysis and integration at an unprecedented granularity and scale. Here we review the technological advances, challenges, and future perspectives of using AI for electro-clinical phenotyping of animal models and patients with epilepsy. In translational research, AI models accurately identify behavioral states in animal models of epilepsy, allowing identification of correlations between neural activity and interictal and ictal behavior. Clinical applications of AI-based automated and semi-automated analysis of audio and video recordings of people with epilepsy, allow significant data reduction and reliable detection and classification of major motor seizures. AI models can accurately identify electrographic biomarkers of epilepsy, such as spikes, high-frequency oscillations, and seizure patterns. Integrating AI analysis of electroencephalographic, clinical, and behavioral data will contribute to optimizing therapy for patients with epilepsy.

Generalization of finetuned transformer language models to new clinical contexts

Objective

We have previously developed a natural language processing pipeline using clinical notes written by epilepsy specialists to extract seizure freedom, seizure frequency text, and date of last seizure text for patients with epilepsy. It is important to understand how our methods generalize to new care contexts.

Materials and methods

We evaluated our pipeline on unseen notes from nonepilepsy-specialist neurologists and non-neurologists without any additional algorithm training. We tested the pipeline out-of-institution using epilepsy specialist notes from an outside medical center with only minor preprocessing adaptations. We examined reasons for discrepancies in performance in new contexts by measuring physical and semantic similarities between documents.

Results

Our ability to classify patient seizure freedom decreased by at least 0.12 agreement when moving from epilepsy specialists to nonspecialists or other institutions. On notes from our institution, textual overlap between the extracted outcomes and the gold standard annotations attained from manual chart review decreased by at least 0.11 F1 when an answer existed but did not change when no answer existed; here our models generalized on notes from the outside institution, losing at most 0.02 agreement. We analyzed textual differences and found that syntactic and semantic differences in both clinically relevant sentences and surrounding contexts significantly influenced model performance.

Discussion and conclusion

Model generalization performance decreased on notes from nonspecialists; out-of-institution generalization on epilepsy specialist notes required small changes to preprocessing but was especially good for seizure frequency text and date of last seizure text, opening opportunities for multicenter collaborations using these outcomes.

Disparities in seizure outcomes revealed by large language models

Objective

Large-language models (LLMs) in healthcare have the potential to propagate existing biases or introduce new ones. For people with epilepsy, social determinants of health are associated with disparities in access to care, but their impact on seizure outcomes among those with access to specialty care remains unclear. Here we (1) evaluated our validated, epilepsy-specific LLM for intrinsic bias, and (2) used LLM-extracted seizure outcomes to test the hypothesis that different demographic groups have different seizure outcomes.

Methods

First, we tested our LLM for intrinsic bias in the form of differential performance in demographic groups by race, ethnicity, sex, income, and health insurance in manually annotated notes. Next, we used LLM-classified seizure freedom at each office visit to test for outcome disparities in the same demographic groups, using univariable and multivariable analyses.

Results

We analyzed 84,675 clinic visits from 25,612 patients seen at our epilepsy center 2005-2022. We found no differences in the accuracy, or positive or negative class balance of outcome classifications across demographic groups. Multivariable analysis indicated worse seizure outcomes for female patients (OR 1.33, p = 3×10-8), those with public insurance (OR 1.53, p = 2×10-13), and those from lower-income zip codes (OR ≥ 1.22, p ≤ 6.6×10-3). Black patients had worse outcomes than White patients in univariable but not multivariable analysis (OR 1.03, p = 0.66).

Significance

We found no evidence that our LLM was intrinsically biased against any demographic group. Seizure freedom extracted by LLM revealed disparities in seizure outcomes across several demographic groups. These findings highlight the critical need to reduce disparities in the care of people with epilepsy.