Characterizing the treatment gap in the United States among adult patients with a new diagnosis of epilepsy

Primary treatment gap among adults with epilepsy: A cross-sectional analysis

OBJECTIVE

Despite recommendations to initiate antiseizure medication treatment once the diagnosis of epilepsy is confirmed, a certain proportion of patients with epilepsy who should receive antiseizure medication treatment remain untreated. We aimed to evaluate the rate of and the reasons for the treatment gap in patients with epilepsy who were referred to their first visit in our epilepsy clinic.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the computerized database and the medical records of all the patients with epilepsy who had their first visit in our outpatient epilepsy clinic during a 10-year period (2012-2021).

RESULTS

Forty-nine (6.5%) of 746 patients with epilepsy were not treated with antiseizure medications: 27 (3.6%) were nonadherent to treatment, 12 (1.6%) patients were not definitively diagnosed with epilepsy prior to their first epilepsy clinic visit, and in 10 (1.3%) patients antiseizure medication treatment was not recommended. Untreated patients had shorter epilepsy duration compared to patients treated with antiseizure medications (p = .003). At last follow-up, 77% of the untreated patients at first visit were receiving antiseizure medications compared to 97% of the initially treated group, and fewer were receiving antiseizure medication polytherapy (p = .0001).

SIGNIFICANCE

Although the rate of treatment gap was relatively low, we believe that it should be further reduced. Efforts may focus on addressing individual causes of nonadherence to antiseizure medication treatment and on promoting knowledge of diagnosis and treatment of epilepsy among healthcare professionals.

Prevalence of and factors associated with the early prescription of antiseizure medications in adults newly diagnosed with epilepsy in Germany

BACKGROUND

There is little information on prescription patterns of antiseizure medications (ASMs) during the early management of patients with epilepsy in Germany. Therefore, this study investigated the prevalence of and the factors associated with ASM prescription in patients newly diagnosed with epilepsy in this country.

METHODS

Adults diagnosed for the first time with epilepsy in one of 128 neurology practices in Germany between 2005 and 2021 were included (Disease Analyzer database, IQVIA). The prescription of ASMs was assessed within 30 days, six months, and 12 months of the diagnosis. Covariates were demographic factors, epilepsy sub-diagnoses, and co-diagnoses frequently associated with epilepsy.

RESULTS

This study included 55,962 participants (mean [SD] age 52.5 [20.0] years; 50.5 % men). The prevalence of ASM prescription ranged from 45.0 % within 30 days to 66.0 % within 12 months of the diagnosis. Men were less likely to receive ASMs within six and 12 months of epilepsy diagnosis than women. In addition, epilepsy sub-diagnoses of symptomatic, complex, or generalized nature were associated with increased odds of ASM prescription compared with epilepsy of unspecified nature. Finally, there was an inverse and significant association between multiple co-diagnoses (e.g., diabetes, mental and behavioral disorders due to use of alcohol, and traumatic brain injury) and ASM prescribing.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial proportion of participants were prescribed ASMs in the year following epilepsy diagnosis, highlighting that the early prescription of ASMs was necessary for these patients. Further research is warranted to corroborate the present findings in other countries and settings.